|
|
6 Apr 2007, 23:49
|
#1
|
Old Fart
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 91
|
Pack and CT rumors
Seems like everywhere one looks there are those 2 names together in the rumors, talk and all. Surely WP and CT wouldnt need to be so close so soon would they?
Is it the WP propaganda machine getting warmed up or?
and the plot thickens
happy easter to all btw
__________________
MobRulz
#FAnG
#Mercenaries
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 02:48
|
#2
|
CRASHING BEATS 'N FANTASY
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cold Country.
Posts: 1,912
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
It's just Angels looking for a pre-round excuse for failing at another round of Planetarion. Good luck anyways, you'll probably need a lot of it.
__________________
Ià! Ià! Munin F'tagn! - [*scendancy]
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 09:17
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 601
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Fairly sure we have absolutely no affiliation with WP to date. CT go into each and every round with a clean political slate. We have no Pre-NAPs or Allys before the round starts and that is a fact. So nice try, but your talking rubbish chum.
__________________
[DLR] [Conspiracy Theory] [1up] [Faceless] [Elysium] [LCH] [NewDawn] [Apprime]
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 09:50
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: West Austrailia
Posts: 60
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
WTF damn those rumours spread fast. hahaha
__________________
cats rule, dogs drool, need I say more!!!
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 10:18
|
#5
|
Good Son
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,991
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catwoman
WTF damn those rumours spread fast. hahaha
|
YEAH u r so rite lolololool.
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 10:26
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 67
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by LynchMob
Seems like everywhere one looks there are those 2 names together in the rumors, talk and all. Surely WP and CT wouldnt need to be so close so soon would they?
|
/me waves his hand
These aren´t the names you´re looking for
__________________
|Darky| - Wolfpack HC
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 10:39
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,081
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Classic Angelolz.
__________________
Dynamic Salvage!
[16:10:34] <[lfc]stif|afk> "dont be the worst in your alliance, join CT. We have Arfy!"
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 11:17
|
#8
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Well if it hasn't happened, this post goes some way to assuring it.
Well done!
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 11:41
|
#9
|
Reject False Icons
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Your Hotel.... Fee:$999
Posts: 896
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
ha ha ha ha
everywhere corner we turn Angels are making out pack to be the biggest threat and Pack making out Angels as the #1 contenders. Think well just sit back and let them go at it
__________________
The Illuminati- NoS
[]LCH[]- dc
-=Destiny=-
Wolfpack - Dc
xVx - DC
Apprime -_-
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 11:46
|
#10
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
or they gang up on ct for the hell of it
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 12:01
|
#11
|
Registered Awesome Person
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,676
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
'politics' or 'lollertics', I think I know which one Angels chose
__________________
Finally free!
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 14:14
|
#12
|
Pro. Elbow Licker
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 247
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
There's a few certainties in Planetarion. Every round more players quit, Barrow dissapears halfway through the round and Angels shoots itself in the foot.
__________________
.: Truth is an event, and only through experience can the veracity of a truth be verified. :.
.: A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. :.
.: Soaring where angels fear to fly. :.
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 14:48
|
#13
|
Up The Hatters!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kenilworth Road
Posts: 3,012
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Can we have a round where politics is run by sane people and not people having constant paranoia please?
__________________
Planetarion veteran
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 15:03
|
#14
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kargool
Can we have a round where politics is run by sane people and not people having constant paranoia please?
|
It's quite reasonable actually. Angels have recruited some pretty decent score-whoring players and you'll probably see them in the lead at the start of next round (unless they keep players out of tag which will just make everyone more suspicious). Remember that Angels initially stated they were only going to play as a small alliance before deciding maybe they could actually win this round at some point. Pragmatically then Wolfpack and CT, the other two alliances you can presume are at least aiming at #1 will have to hit them. Given the small nature of the playerbase this has probably been brought up by various people at various points to give it enough of a rumour momentum and could easily have been brought up by the respective HCs if/when they were talking to each other. Luckily enough for CT nobody really respects them enough after last round for them to be unquestionably the primary targets this round.
Personally I retain immense faith in Angels failing amidst bitter recriminations and mutual accusations of def-whoring this round regardless of the political playing field though. Maybe they can recruit themselves a block or something though!
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 15:05
|
#15
|
--==SaX==--
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 61
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
it's all ture me and free are in bed togetter
__________________
WolfPack
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 16:01
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 601
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rust
it's all ture me and free are in bed togetter
|
Lies
__________________
[DLR] [Conspiracy Theory] [1up] [Faceless] [Elysium] [LCH] [NewDawn] [Apprime]
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 19:46
|
#17
|
PA Ancient
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ventnor, Isle Of Wight
Posts: 1,060
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
ha ha ha ha
everywhere corner we turn Angels are making out pack to be the biggest threat and Pack making out Angels as the #1 contenders. Think well just sit back and let them go at it
|
That would be an excellent decision.
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
Ever been attacked by a p3nguin? You get left a bit black and white!
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
7 Apr 2007, 19:50
|
#18
|
Legion Idle Master
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 425
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heartless
It's just Angels looking for a pre-round excuse for failing at another round of Planetarion. Good luck anyways, you'll probably need a lot of it.
|
Actually this rumour doesnt have to be done by Angels. Its commen fact pack have been running around pming most top alliances claiming Angels are a threat with these bgs joining them. So it wouldnt suprise me if CT allied with pack, as thats what pack are trying to achieve im sure (which i mentioned yesterday on the other thread)
As Ass said above i would love instead to see finally a war between 2 top alliances. Instead of seeing other alliances join the frey like jackals to collect of the dead meat.
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 00:13
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 138
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
And what exactly would make Angels stronger then what CT and\or WP might already be? CT might have not been superior last round, but they stood the round out fighting with incs, and they won it. And thats what it takes to be the best ally, if other allies turned the pace up - so could have CT, I predicted their win a long long time before it happened.
So what does make Angels stronger then CT and\or WP - as I'm thinking about what ally to join for next round. Maybe I won't go for the strongest but some clues and thoughts around this situation would be nice. Because any alliance can have a BG.
__________________
[ VtS \ RaH \ Phraktos (Protected) \ eXil \ Ins (dS) \ Subh \ Omen ] [ Ðragons ]
"Veni, Vidi, Dormivi" - I came, I saw, I slept.
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 00:41
|
#20
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyHead
And what exactly would make Angels stronger then what CT and\or WP might already be? CT might have not been superior last round, but they stood the round out fighting with incs, and they won it. And thats what it takes to be the best ally, if other allies turned the pace up - so could have CT, I predicted their win a long long time before it happened.
So what does make Angels stronger then CT and\or WP - as I'm thinking about what ally to join for next round. Maybe I won't go for the strongest but some clues and thoughts around this situation would be nice. Because any alliance can have a BG.
|
Who is this post addressed at?
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 00:46
|
#21
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 138
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Who is this post addressed at?
|
Could be somewhat pointed to your post, but its more of an opinion meant for discussion as the feel I got from the thread was that Angels were considered to be stronger then both WP\CT, thus WC had the urge to block against them. Only meant for open discussion.
__________________
[ VtS \ RaH \ Phraktos (Protected) \ eXil \ Ins (dS) \ Subh \ Omen ] [ Ðragons ]
"Veni, Vidi, Dormivi" - I came, I saw, I slept.
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 00:59
|
#22
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyHead
Could be somewhat pointed to your post, but its more of an opinion meant for discussion as the feel I got from the thread was that Angels were considered to be stronger then both WP\CT, thus WC had the urge to block against them. Only meant for open discussion.
|
I see. The obvious answer to your question would be the quality of players recruited.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 01:04
|
#23
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 138
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
I see. The obvious answer to your question would be the quality of players recruited.
|
And on whose intel would that be based on? And as far as I know CT got a pretty darn nice member list aswell - and although I don't expect all the same from WP I'm guessing they got a more then promising crew from what they've had earlier rounds. And how do WP know of this, bg?
__________________
[ VtS \ RaH \ Phraktos (Protected) \ eXil \ Ins (dS) \ Subh \ Omen ] [ Ðragons ]
"Veni, Vidi, Dormivi" - I came, I saw, I slept.
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 01:18
|
#24
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyHead
And on whose intel would that be based on? And as far as I know CT got a pretty darn nice member list aswell - and although I don't expect all the same from WP I'm guessing they got a more then promising crew from what they've had earlier rounds. And how do WP know of this, bg?
|
You want me to tell you about the bg?
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 01:50
|
#25
|
The Scareh Clown
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 275
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
--
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
It's quite reasonable actually. Angels have recruited some pretty decent score-whoring players and you'll probably see them in the lead at the start of next round (unless they keep players out of tag which will just make everyone more suspicious).
|
The fact they will slam their players into tag, means they will get to number 1. Bar possible sarcasm (and taking into account your experience at monitoring score improvements) you can't say that such leads at the start will have any affect on the race for the final number one spot.
--
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Pragmatically then Wolfpack and CT, the other two alliances you can presume are at least aiming at #1 will have to hit them
|
If they're that small, they won't have to hit them.
If they're big enough to worry CT and WP, hitting them MIGHT (given political and strategic interests) not be a good idea (according to the round composition in terms of rank/alliance size itself etc.).
--Can I ask you if it was a WP statement that made you think they could be contesting for the win, because an alliance returning to such small playerbase would find recreating an alliance (that needs to be possibly stronger than the WP of old to win) that COULD get to number one a VERY hard task in the first round back.
If they do it would surely be one of the greatest victories in pa (if you take into account the work done by HCs), pending a lack of backstabbing/fagging about.
--What's all this hype about the manner in which CT obtained their maiden victory? I cant be ARSED to read fictitious posts, and your log doesnt contain your personal opinions much, because as good you are at writing your logbook, you do so with proffessionality.
Can someone write a well opinionated (without being a bitch) SHORT summary for me?
*insert unwitty/predictable reply here*
Last edited by Virall; 8 Apr 2007 at 01:57.
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 01:52
|
#26
|
The Scareh Clown
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 275
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinoa
ha ha ha ha
everywhere corner we turn Angels are making out pack to be the biggest threat and Pack making out Angels as the #1 contenders. Think well just sit back and let them go at it
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Assassin
That would be an excellent decision.
|
any wins a win eh?
Last edited by Virall; 8 Apr 2007 at 01:58.
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 02:33
|
#27
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by Virall
The fact they will slam their players into tag, means they will get to number 1. Bar possible sarcasm (and taking into account your experience at monitoring score improvements) you can't say that such leads at the start will have any affect on the race for the final number one spot.
|
If the number one alliance at the start of the round isn't hit then by the end of the round they'll almost certainly still be winning.
Quote:
If they're that small, they won't have to hit them.
If they're big enough to worry CT and WP, hitting them MIGHT (given political and strategic interests) not be a good idea (according to the round composition in terms of rank/alliance size itself etc.).
|
Because we all know how much success alliances have seen in PA by avoiding hitting the strongest alliance am I right? Of course there are other alliances out there and other possibilities but if they are convinced of each other's quality, and the danger of angels, it makes far more sense for them to kill off any other possible competing alliances for the #1 spot before taking each other on.
Quote:
--Can I ask you if it was a WP statement that made you think they could be contesting for the win, because an alliance returning to such small playerbase would find recreating an alliance (that needs to be possibly stronger than the WP of old to win) that COULD get to number one a VERY hard task in the first round back.
|
It's based on what I've generally picked up from talking to people, the quality of some of the people involved and the overall lack of a really dominant alliance.
Quote:
--What's all this hype about the manner in which CT obtained their maiden victory? I cant be ARSED to read fictitious posts, and your log doesnt contain your personal opinions much, because as good you are at writing your logbook, you do so with proffessionality.
Can someone write a well opinionated (without being a bitch) SHORT summary for me?
*insert unwitty/predictable reply here*
|
It's objectively the narrowest margin of victory in the history of PAX. Both in terms of pure score and as a percentage difference.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 03:36
|
#28
|
CRASHING BEATS 'N FANTASY
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cold Country.
Posts: 1,912
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyHead
And what exactly would make Angels stronger then what CT and\or WP might already be? CT might have not been superior last round, but they stood the round out fighting with incs, and they won it. And thats what it takes to be the best ally, if other allies turned the pace up - so could have CT, I predicted their win a long long time before it happened.
So what does make Angels stronger then CT and\or WP - as I'm thinking about what ally to join for next round. Maybe I won't go for the strongest but some clues and thoughts around this situation would be nice. Because any alliance can have a BG.
|
I have to say, after that post CT doesn't look stronger than Angels. Congratulations to Wolfpack for winning round 21.
__________________
Ià! Ià! Munin F'tagn! - [*scendancy]
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 09:22
|
#29
|
Legion Idle Master
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 425
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heartless
I have to say, after that post CT doesn't look stronger than Angels. Congratulations to Wolfpack for winning round 21.
|
Not of course showing any disrespect to Pack as i like a lot of their members. But i dont see them winning this round. Maybe coming runner up but not winning the round. I think it will be either CT or Angels.
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 10:27
|
#30
|
I see you!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In any girl
Posts: 2,825
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
The word 'strong' got a whole new meaning when used on Angels
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 16:41
|
#31
|
add
Join Date: May 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 178
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Angels have to many bgs they will rule and maybe even kill em off by ship jumping which would put angels finding the round hard. abit like when they kicked one or two of the gous members out and they all left...
__________________
r16 - solo
r17 - Heroic
r18/19Omen - r20 HC of Omen
r21 Wolfpack
r22 Jenova
r23 Destiny
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 17:00
|
#32
|
Ron Burgundy
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: A glass case of emotion
Posts: 632
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
In all honesty though, where do you see these BGs ship jumping too?
__________________
[/dribble]
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 17:33
|
#33
|
Old Fart
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 91
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Hmnnn.. still no answer.. but nice discussion about CT and WP tho. I guess its just like its supposed to be just rumor's.
:P
__________________
MobRulz
#FAnG
#Mercenaries
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 19:17
|
#34
|
Bolivian Alpaca
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 912
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
When is the last time a 2 vs 1 scenario worked, when both alliances on one side want to end #1?
I think we will have a situation much similar to last rounds'. With WP and Angels being the new VGN and Destiny.
Unless there is a fourth alliance willing to step up to the plate, or the alliances 4th - 10th actually get some balls and decide to actually do something to make the round interesting, instead of just complaining about it.
__________________
"I throw myself into the sea, release the wave, let it wash over me ..."
MadCowS - Angels - eXilition - Destiny - Wolfpack - Jenova - p3nguins
|
|
|
8 Apr 2007, 20:48
|
#35
|
Ron Burgundy
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: A glass case of emotion
Posts: 632
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gio2k
Unless there is a fourth alliance willing to step up to the plate, or the alliances 4th - 10th actually get some balls and decide to actually do something to make the round interesting, instead of just complaining about it.
|
Define 'make the round interesting'. Do you expect them to gun for #1? This seems unreasonable to say the least.
__________________
[/dribble]
|
|
|
9 Apr 2007, 12:05
|
#36
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 601
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proxi
Define 'make the round interesting'. Do you expect them to gun for #1? This seems unreasonable to say the least.
|
Not saying i support or i dont support Gio2k on this, but i can definitely see how it would benefit a smaller alliance to hit the top alliances. At the end of the day if they hit the top alliances, defence will be channeled to defend against their rivals to stop them getting roids/XP, leaving a vastly more clear run for the smaller alliance to get through.
__________________
[DLR] [Conspiracy Theory] [1up] [Faceless] [Elysium] [LCH] [NewDawn] [Apprime]
|
|
|
9 Apr 2007, 12:14
|
#37
|
CRASHING BEATS 'N FANTASY
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cold Country.
Posts: 1,912
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gio2k
When is the last time a 2 vs 1 scenario worked, when both alliances on one side want to end #1?
I think we will have a situation much similar to last rounds'. With WP and Angels being the new VGN and Destiny.
Unless there is a fourth alliance willing to step up to the plate, or the alliances 4th - 10th actually get some balls and decide to actually do something to make the round interesting, instead of just complaining about it.
|
People should take a look at round 6. It worked nicely there with having 3 contenders. But then again, nowadays alliances are simply shit so we won't see another round of that kind.
__________________
Ià! Ià! Munin F'tagn! - [*scendancy]
|
|
|
11 Apr 2007, 08:45
|
#38
|
Bragpack™
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 815
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Most likely politics will follow last rounds example and we get 3 galraiding allies who claim on having fought heavy wars all round.
|
|
|
11 Apr 2007, 09:51
|
#39
|
red looks good on me eh
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 424
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
CT Angels will go after each other. WP will stay neutral most of the round just hitting random gals while being #1, later on they will lose that position when CT will go after WP.
reason why i think CT will win is they are only contender that has won and want to win again, and the rest is just shit
__________________
[eXilition] [Omen] [Quha] [Apprime] [Ðragons]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tesla
I signed up to make sure eX didnt win the round, thanks to your HCs last decision it looks like I succeeded
|
Apprime
|
|
|
11 Apr 2007, 10:01
|
#40
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,081
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stoom
Most likely politics will follow last rounds example and we get 3 galraiding allies who claim on having fought heavy wars all round.
|
You forgot to add "and another 7 whinging about it".
__________________
Dynamic Salvage!
[16:10:34] <[lfc]stif|afk> "dont be the worst in your alliance, join CT. We have Arfy!"
|
|
|
11 Apr 2007, 12:05
|
#41
|
Bragpack™
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 815
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Real Arfy
You forgot to add "and another 7 whinging about it".
|
No I did not.
|
|
|
11 Apr 2007, 13:43
|
#42
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 601
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Well thats what your pretty much doing. You have no idea about the fleets that our alliance received/gave out so please shut your noise.
__________________
[DLR] [Conspiracy Theory] [1up] [Faceless] [Elysium] [LCH] [NewDawn] [Apprime]
|
|
|
11 Apr 2007, 13:44
|
#43
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReligFree
Well thats what your pretty much doing. You have no idea about the fleets that our alliance received/gave out so please shut your noise.
|
angryduck told us all in the EORC dude
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
11 Apr 2007, 13:55
|
#44
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
i cried into my calculator I can tell you that!
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
11 Apr 2007, 16:06
|
#45
|
Drink is Good
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,122
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
make love not war guys <3
__________________
Can we please have a moment of silence...........
|
|
|
11 Apr 2007, 16:42
|
#46
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 138
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
I'm gonna make roids and war, I only lhuv my roids and ally m8s.
__________________
[ VtS \ RaH \ Phraktos (Protected) \ eXil \ Ins (dS) \ Subh \ Omen ] [ Ðragons ]
"Veni, Vidi, Dormivi" - I came, I saw, I slept.
|
|
|
12 Apr 2007, 01:22
|
#47
|
Black Power MotherF*ckas!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: JAPAN
Posts: 1,812
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
erm. WP allied to someone is actually odd, considering they are the people that made "Uni-NAPS" famous. I am happy if they are fighting. Even if they need help, at least they are doing something. You know?
__________________
Ascendancy
When Doves Cry
|
|
|
12 Apr 2007, 14:11
|
#48
|
Bolivian Alpaca
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 912
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proxi
Define 'make the round interesting'. Do you expect them to gun for #1? This seems unreasonable to say the least.
|
I expect them to hit any top alliance if they feel they are getting away with the round, or if they are stagnating and playing chicken. After all, this is a war game. What do they have to lose? their #4 -10 spot?
__________________
"I throw myself into the sea, release the wave, let it wash over me ..."
MadCowS - Angels - eXilition - Destiny - Wolfpack - Jenova - p3nguins
Last edited by Gio2k; 12 Apr 2007 at 15:14.
|
|
|
13 Apr 2007, 15:41
|
#49
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austria
Posts: 130
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
With WPs reputation, I dont think they will nap their way to nr 1, I would bet they war for it.
|
|
|
13 Apr 2007, 15:55
|
#50
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Pack and CT rumors
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrandAdm Thrawn
With WPs reputation, I dont think they will nap their way to nr 1, I would bet they war for it.
|
Are you joking?
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:23.
| |