|
|
1 May 2005, 14:57
|
#151
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: So ND
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chika
Colt, slap yourself.
You were in my gal channel. i assumed as anyone would that you were in my gal. I have no intel on anyone. I made an educated Guess that you were in my gal based on the fact that you were in my gal channel. OH NO I MADE A MISTAKE!!! YOUR NOT IN MY GAL, JUST IDLING IN THE CHANNEL!!! HAHA YOU GOT ME< MY INTEL IS OFF.
|
no need to be sarcastic
Although you say you have no intel on anyone, so forgive me if im wrong but earlier on you said you had intel on Angels and ToT i think it was:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chika
Sadly he seems not to have intel that I knew of TOT/Angels coop'ing at the start of the round
|
Just out of interest was this an educated guess as well? OR were you refering to a player by player basis intel??
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
1 May 2005, 15:16
|
#152
|
Its time to roll the dice
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The barn
Posts: 876
|
Re: So ND
I don’t think 1up has ever said, claimed nor planned to be the savour of PA so I have no idea where you got that. I assume Sid only wanted to try something new and we did, in round 11. This is round 13 and the universe has evolved since then.
And the buuhuu we get bashed by everyone while claiming to go solo (when you in fact have been, in practical terms, allied to the Exil block from day 1) is uncunning. Try a little less whining and a little more action in the future.
__________________
Real life peon.
Last edited by Treveler; 1 May 2005 at 15:29.
|
|
|
1 May 2005, 16:27
|
#153
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: So ND
Quote:
Originally Posted by Legator
do you hit lch and tot ? do they hit you ?
|
I'm so tired of these remarks ... What do you expect me to say? Shall I now pm an LCH HC asking to attack Angels cause otherwise the AD users will think we got a nap with them?
What the fk are you trying to achieve? Are we supposed to have a war with everyone so you pple will stop making these lame guesses?
No we are not targetting LCH or ToT. We aren't targetting 1up either. Are we napped with any of them? do we even talk to their HC's? no. Are they allowed to wave us and kill us? Yes. Will we react then? Yes ...
And tbh, we hit random galaxies or galaxies with mostly HR in. If that galaxy has 1up, lch, wp, nd members in it, we don't care and will launch on those planets in there aswell.
I hope you will now stop asking these questions so the next AD user can make his next guess.
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
1 May 2005, 16:31
|
#154
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: So ND
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treveler
I don’t think 1up has ever said, claimed nor planned to be the savour of PA so I have no idea where you got that. I assume Sid only wanted to try something new and we did, in round 11. This is round 13 and the universe has evolved since then.
And the buuhuu we get bashed by everyone while claiming to go solo (when you in fact have been, in practical terms, allied to the Exil block from day 1) is uncunning. Try a little less whining and a little more action in the future.
|
Again a lie. We napped exilition, joined the block for 2 nights (after 2 weeks) and left them again.
I'm not calling 1up evil blockers or anything, cause I have no intel on their motives behind allying the alliances they have. Unlike you, I don't make up stuff so I can post on AD. Stop lying about things you don't know or stop giving the truth a small twists so it suits your posts better.
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
1 May 2005, 16:48
|
#155
|
;D!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,810
|
Re: So ND
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun_Tzu
What 1up! can be credited with however is the gentlemens agreement. This is also one of the reasons they were praized to the high heavens when they first came around. What people fail to see however, and the most obvious motivation behind the agreement, is that given the cap on the memberbase aswell as the requirement for all alliances to go solo, the gentlemens agreement was nothing but a political tool by which 1up! was able to secure a win for itself that round. A smart move, but what always bugged me was that it was made out to be something noble and in the interest of the game. The very next round we saw 1up! abandoning these principles as they faced some real resistance. And if there was any doubt as to what motivates 1up! then going into this round with a fully assembled block at their back whilst none else had any agreements going
|
So, I think we can summarise this paragraph by saying, 1up=USA?
|
|
|
1 May 2005, 17:42
|
#156
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: So ND
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun_Tzu
What 1up! can be credited with however is the gentlemens agreement. This is also one of the reasons they were praized to the high heavens when they first came around. What people fail to see however, and the most obvious motivation behind the agreement, is that given the cap on the memberbase aswell as the requirement for all alliances to go solo, the gentlemens agreement was nothing but a political tool by which 1up! was able to secure a win for itself that round. A smart move, but what always bugged me was that it was made out to be something noble and in the interest of the game.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Synthetic_Sid
I've no doubt many of you will claim that I am adopting this "go it alone" stance out of some hidden (or obvious) agenda and not out of altruism. You would be entirely correct. I believe we have the quality to do well in a more free-for-all round - and I believe that our membership will have far more fun in such circumstances. I also believe that the game would be much more enjoyable for the vast majority of players - but I make no claim to that being my sole (or even main) reason.
|
What a sly political move, discrediting yourself in the same post in which you announce your arrival!
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
1 May 2005, 19:05
|
#157
|
Arrogant Fck
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 1,031
|
Re: So ND
JBG; I know, I did read the original announcement, I doubt you're suprised to hear that either. And you are correct, sid is sly. You can work out the rest on your own.
__________________
[OLMIT] / [TreKronor]
|
|
|
1 May 2005, 19:31
|
#158
|
Pr0nstar
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Look at Galstatus
Posts: 1,006
|
Re: So ND
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kjeldoran
I'm so tired of these remarks ... What do you expect me to say? Shall I now pm an LCH HC asking to attack Angels cause otherwise the AD users will think we got a nap with them?
What the fk are you trying to achieve? Are we supposed to have a war with everyone so you pple will stop making these lame guesses?
No we are not targetting LCH or ToT. We aren't targetting 1up either. Are we napped with any of them? do we even talk to their HC's? no. Are they allowed to wave us and kill us? Yes. Will we react then? Yes ...
And tbh, we hit random galaxies or galaxies with mostly HR in. If that galaxy has 1up, lch, wp, nd members in it, we don't care and will launch on those planets in there aswell.
I hope you will now stop asking these questions so the next AD us
er can make his next guess.
|
i wonder why my question makes so much fuzz ? i really just aked what i asked - i didnt try to "achieve" anything. im just a lil nub in 1up and im not interested to achieve anything at all.
but atleast you answered....
__________________
Ascendancy FTW !!!!!!
Reunion FDS !
Proud to be Founder and Member of VisioN
Honoured to have been [1up] Member
VfL Bochum >*
|
|
|
2 May 2005, 05:18
|
#159
|
Black Power MotherF*ckas!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: JAPAN
Posts: 1,812
|
Re: So ND
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt
no need to be sarcastic
Although you say you have no intel on anyone, so forgive me if im wrong but earlier on you said you had intel on Angels and ToT i think it was:
Just out of interest was this an educated guess as well? OR were you refering to a player by player basis intel??
|
If you would have payed even the smallest bit of attention Colt, you would have learned that I knew of this cooperation due to Angels/ToT attacking my gal. No it was not an educated guess. It was first person witness.
i don't blame you for not paying attention though. ITT ANGELS truely have shown just how idiot they are, and its getting old.
__________________
Ascendancy
When Doves Cry
|
|
|
2 May 2005, 06:47
|
#160
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: So ND
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chika
If you would have payed even the smallest bit of attention Colt, you would have learned that I knew of this cooperation due to Angels/ToT attacking my gal. No it was not an educated guess. It was first person witness.
i don't blame you for not paying attention though. ITT ANGELS truely have shown just how idiot they are, and its getting old.
|
haha, so this is your trustable source of intel? Angels and Tot hit your galaxy ??? In that case Angels allied 1up aswell cause we once took the same galaxy aswell ....
what a joke ...
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
2 May 2005, 06:48
|
#161
|
SiN HC
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: England
Posts: 217
|
Re: So ND
Last time I checked, 2 alliances both hitting a galaxy was not tantamount to being allied; in fact with the current buddy pack system, it's highly likely that two opposing alliances would be hitting members in a single galaxy from each other's alliances.
Having them both hit your gal means nothing.
__________________
<InitHello> Gumbie: you are a wise and perceptive man
<Gumbie> hurray!
<Gumbie> about what?
<toot> of course at a cow
<toot> what do you think
<Tearz> I mean... like theres anythign else to do with a bazooka
|
|
|
2 May 2005, 07:35
|
#162
|
Black Power MotherF*ckas!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: JAPAN
Posts: 1,812
|
Re: So ND
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kjeldoran
haha, so this is your trustable source of intel? Angels and Tot hit your galaxy ??? In that case Angels allied 1up aswell cause we once took the same galaxy aswell ....
what a joke ...
|
KJ. i fully explained the situation to you. So i fail to see a reason to respond to this reply as I know that you KNOW.
If saying this publically, (even with the knowledge of what happened in its entirety(SP) makes you feel better, then so be it.
__________________
Ascendancy
When Doves Cry
|
|
|
2 May 2005, 07:37
|
#163
|
Black Power MotherF*ckas!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: JAPAN
Posts: 1,812
|
Re: So ND
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumbie
Last time I checked, 2 alliances both hitting a galaxy was not tantamount to being allied; in fact with the current buddy pack system, it's highly likely that two opposing alliances would be hitting members in a single galaxy from each other's alliances.
Having them both hit your gal means nothing.
|
And gumbie you are quite correct. My gal has been hit by three different allies before!! I never once accused those three alliances of coop'ing.
I didn't "assume" that they coop'd. i talked to the appropriate people, then based on my hypothesis, researched and it turned into fact. just like science!! \o/
__________________
Ascendancy
When Doves Cry
|
|
|
2 May 2005, 09:16
|
#164
|
Just like science!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cabinet of the Glorious Leader
Posts: 158
|
Re: So ND
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chika
just like science!! \o/
|
Thank you so very much.
__________________
Injelititis - Incompetance and jealousy interacting according to the formula I^3J^5
|
|
|
2 May 2005, 10:48
|
#165
|
Lost
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 413
|
Re: So ND
Yet another AD thread moved onto an Angels topic
\o/
Keep up the good work as i love to hear about angels all the time
[/sarcasm]
/me renames Alliance Discussions to Angels Discussions
Thanks for your constructive AD discussion, you just upped the quality of the thread considerably, you really did (whining is for pm'ing a mod to action) - Lok
__________________
Squishy
Last edited by lokken; 2 May 2005 at 10:55.
|
|
|
2 May 2005, 11:53
|
#166
|
Silver winged Dragon
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 51
|
Re: So ND
Shouldn't it be Angels Whining?
__________________
Elder / Eleint
Co-founder of Veneratio
#Veneratio
www.veneratiohq.org
|
|
|
2 May 2005, 12:05
|
#167
|
Lost
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 413
|
Re: So ND
They dont whine that much imo its just the way every thread on here no matter what its about somhow gets changed to angels and other people arguing the toss
:sigh:
Why not make a thread Angels vs Others and put it all their instead of taking most other discussions way off topic
__________________
Squishy
|
|
|
2 May 2005, 12:34
|
#168
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: So ND
This thread has hit the 'gibberish' level.
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:41.
| |