|
26 Aug 2005, 13:47
|
#1
|
For Crowly <3
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Luton, England
Posts: 1,391
|
[Discuss] In gal attacks
You know the situation - your in a gal which has someone you dont like - you dont want to waste the exhile costs and they dont want to spend money to be exhiled. The only way (I can see) for it to be abused is via buddy packs, but then again they can be abused by having a farm and then another planet in gal seeing if the get def (so they dont have to JGP). Maybe could only be ordered by a GC or in similar fashion to an exhile vote. Could have a lower cap value / different bash limits.
Discuss away!
__________________
[14:53:26] * Keiz`afk has joined #support
[14:53:36] <Keiz`afk> THE SMUDGE CHEERLEADING TEAM HAS ARRIVED
|
|
|
26 Aug 2005, 14:09
|
#2
|
Non directed and witty
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: #ascendancy
Posts: 814
|
Re: [Discuss] In gal attacks
No :/
Just pay the exile or live with it, dont start ingal wars as well..
People who are of a hostile alliance will just get roided ingal for no reason also..
__________________
CATHAAAAAARGH
I've won 4 rounds.
I'm kinda a big deal.
|
|
|
26 Aug 2005, 14:43
|
#3
|
The Original Terran
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Afghan atm
Posts: 1,633
|
Re: [Discuss] In gal attacks
I would use the search button and post the urls and say read all the other threads with the same thing init but I cant be bothered and will just say a big fat NO to the idea.
__________________
introduction-Gramma
The following is a list of problems found in various places throughout the manual and game. We love you Noah!
Written by Kloopy Wed Mar 16 22:06:43 2005
Retired just for a bit....
Proud to have been 1up, SiN, Wolfpack, Bluetuba and the leader of ARK.
|
|
|
26 Aug 2005, 16:32
|
#4
|
For Crowly <3
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Luton, England
Posts: 1,391
|
Re: [Discuss] In gal attacks
I would then point out to you noah02 that I did that and didnt find anything
__________________
[14:53:26] * Keiz`afk has joined #support
[14:53:36] <Keiz`afk> THE SMUDGE CHEERLEADING TEAM HAS ARRIVED
|
|
|
26 Aug 2005, 16:40
|
#5
|
Up The Hatters!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kenilworth Road
Posts: 3,012
|
Re: [Discuss] In gal attacks
Ingal attacks? Would you completly drive away our sleep? what kind of sadist are you.
__________________
Planetarion veteran
|
|
|
26 Aug 2005, 16:53
|
#6
|
The Original Terran
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Afghan atm
Posts: 1,633
|
Re: [Discuss] In gal attacks
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smudge
I would then point out to you noah02 that I did that and didnt find anything
|
i would then point out you didnt look hard enough
http://pirate.planetarion.com/showth...laxy+attacking
__________________
introduction-Gramma
The following is a list of problems found in various places throughout the manual and game. We love you Noah!
Written by Kloopy Wed Mar 16 22:06:43 2005
Retired just for a bit....
Proud to have been 1up, SiN, Wolfpack, Bluetuba and the leader of ARK.
|
|
|
26 Aug 2005, 16:54
|
#7
|
For Crowly <3
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Luton, England
Posts: 1,391
|
Re: [Discuss] In gal attacks
Maybe it could be added as a "Havoc Special" thing, a la Galaxy Roids
__________________
[14:53:26] * Keiz`afk has joined #support
[14:53:36] <Keiz`afk> THE SMUDGE CHEERLEADING TEAM HAS ARRIVED
|
|
|
26 Aug 2005, 17:36
|
#8
|
The Original Terran
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Afghan atm
Posts: 1,633
|
Re: [Discuss] In gal attacks
__________________
introduction-Gramma
The following is a list of problems found in various places throughout the manual and game. We love you Noah!
Written by Kloopy Wed Mar 16 22:06:43 2005
Retired just for a bit....
Proud to have been 1up, SiN, Wolfpack, Bluetuba and the leader of ARK.
|
|
|
26 Aug 2005, 17:57
|
#9
|
uber pe0n
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 87
|
Re: [Discuss] In gal attacks
if ingal attacks were introduced there would be a massive increase in xp whoreing and well organised gals would never lose many roids.
what i mean is if planet A has incoming which he, nor his alliance/gal can cover, then he would just need to find someone in his gal with pods free to wave him a couple of times (assuming it is still eta 5 ingal) and the planet attacking planet A would get much fewer roids. Then all planet A would have to do would be to send pods at the people ingal "borrowing" the roids to get them back.
e.g. say planet A has 1000 roids and has incoming eta7 which is uncoverable. he manages to get 2 ingal waves on him before the attacker can land (eta5 and eta5+1) so when the attacker lands he wont be capping off a 1000 roid planet but a 550 roid planet significantly reducing the amount planet A loses
And thats how to abuse ingal attacking
__________________
Personally its not God I dislike, its his fan club I cant stand
|
|
|
26 Aug 2005, 19:58
|
#10
|
Registered Awesome Person
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,676
|
Re: [Discuss] In gal attacks
No, this is how to abuse in-gal attacking.
You get your flatmate who doesn't play PA to sign up a separate account and buddy-pack with you. You get the gal fund to donate him resources, and every couple of days he initiates some roids, one tick before your pods 'accidentally' land at his planet.
We in the business call this farming, and it got banned, oh, 3 years ago?
__________________
Finally free!
|
|
|
26 Aug 2005, 20:28
|
#11
|
Hibernating
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Team Kesha
Posts: 1,621
|
Re: [Discuss] In gal attacks
First round i ever played was with ingal attacks, ended up taking out my gc & moc (only 2 ministers)
but thank god it ain't possible anymore ^^
__________________
[InSomnia]
Official designated driver
[ToF] - [eXilition] - [Rock] - [Denial] - [DLR] - [eVolution] - [ODDR] - [HR] - [Ultores] - [Apprime] - [Ironborn]
|
|
|
26 Aug 2005, 21:16
|
#12
|
Forever Noob
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Holland
Posts: 321
|
Re: [Discuss] In gal attacks
In gal attacks would take away one of the best aspects of this game: getting to know your galaxy and learn to trust them etc, because that would be impossible with gal attacks possible. Worst case it could destroy part of the community because no-one dares trust eachother any more.
__________________
<Zhil> I order the immediate return of my property
<Zhil> No 1up member should steal from another
<[MO]Forest> no 1up should attcak a 1up gal without permission form hc
<Zhil> I am HC
<Zhil> I gave myself permission
<[MO]Forest> i meant a proper hc, not a hc who would suicide into his MO's fleet
Played r4-9.5 r12-14 Now retired.
Proud to have been Cosmic Frostbite (r12 - 22:5 - #1 gal)
Forever [4D] - LCH, ND, Absolute, TFD, DLR
Might and greed will never outweigh honor and loyalty!
|
|
|
27 Aug 2005, 12:07
|
#13
|
PA Team
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,449
|
Re: [Discuss] In gal attacks
Has anyone anything in favour to say of this, before it's declined?
__________________
r8-10 RaH r10.5-12 MISTU
|
|
|
27 Aug 2005, 12:19
|
#14
|
Punk
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 397
|
Re: [Discuss] In gal attacks
nope
__________________
Rd13 SiNND (12:4:3)
Rd6&7 4D (20:8:6) & (20:2:10) Rd14 ND (2:5:4)
Rd8 Did not play Rd15 Did not play
Rd9 4D/SWaRM (13:4:10) Rd16 ND (14:1:6)
Rd9.5 SWaRM (42:7:4) Rd17 ND (13:10:8)
Rd10 SWaRM (21:4:7) Rd18 ND (13:6:8)
Rd10.5 SWaRM (5:5:10) Rd19 ND - HC (1:9:3)
Rd11 ND (32:2:10) Rd36 ND 7:9:7
Rd12 ND (30:10:1)
|
|
|
27 Aug 2005, 12:28
|
#15
|
Commodore
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,176
|
Re: [Discuss] In gal attacks
Quote:
Originally Posted by Appocomaster
Has anyone anything in favour to say of this, before it's declined?
|
The only benefit of permitting in-gal attacks would be to permit the old fashioned intragalactic war over who is the GC and so on. Make it a war for political domination of your galaxy. Tbh, this is a better situation than how in-gal fighting (if it occurs, i might add) works now - there one alliance pillages the enemy planets in your gal, and their alliance retalliates and its like war by proxy.
And its quite pathetic too...
But that is the only advantage i see with the system. War over GC/ministerial positions used to mean alot back in the day, as GCs had 10% additonal resources (which is ALOT), and ministers (moc) had 5% which is still significant. Also, once you were in a gal that was it - unless you deleted and started again (and the likelihood that you would land in the same gal was tiny back then, heh). Both of these things have changed hence, and so to a large extent in-gal politics doesnt matter anymore.
Maybe something better would be a 5% resource bonus for GC and 2 or 3% for the ministers, to bring back the glory days of in-gal politics yet without the blight of farming etc at the same time.
__________________
#Strategy ; #Support - Sovereign
--- --- ---
"The Cake is a Lie."
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:19.
| |