|
15 Nov 2012, 15:15
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 160
|
failing hard
well as a ct member i must like fang but tbh they suck ,irvine nothing personal dude but ur just like claudio ranieri ur a silver guy wont ever be able to go for gold, im really wondering how ultores have fleets to attack ct if u gyes are supposdly attaking them also ,
i wanna state that new alliances need to come out also and make a statement not just play a round for the fact of playing (innuendo)
like i say if u dont play to win dont bother playing ,
same for tgv ,i was impressed how by attaking my gal apprime and ultores where speared are u also cooperating with them?
arriving to the xvx oh god chimpie get a life and do somthing in a round other than p targeting ct fsss
all that being said major alliances hc have brainaids ,although nd shocked me at least they had balls to war apprime
and im really sad to say this but untill know cardi is doing the best politics for the past 2 rounds
|
|
|
15 Nov 2012, 15:22
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: failing hard
[/emo]
|
|
|
15 Nov 2012, 15:38
|
#3
|
Finally retired
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by nelito
same for tgv ,i was impressed how by attaking my gal apprime and ultores where speared are u also cooperating with them
|
no we just had shit claiming that night and for some reason the CT targets are allways the first to go (i am sure it has nothing to do with their awesome def tho)
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]
In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
|
|
|
15 Nov 2012, 15:39
|
#4
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by nelito
well as a ct member i must like fang but tbh they suck ,irvine nothing personal dude but ur just like claudio ranieri ur a silver guy wont ever be able to go for gold, im really wondering how ultores have fleets to attack ct if u gyes are supposdly attaking them also ,
i wanna state that new alliances need to come out also and make a statement not just play a round for the fact of playing (innuendo)
like i say if u dont play to win dont bother playing ,
same for tgv ,i was impressed how by attaking my gal apprime and ultores where speared are u also cooperating with them?
arriving to the xvx oh god chimpie get a life and do somthing in a round other than p targeting ct fsss
all that being said major alliances hc have brainaids ,although nd shocked me at least they had balls to war apprime
and im really sad to say this but untill know cardi is doing the best politics for the past 2 rounds
|
Erm, what are you on about now?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
15 Nov 2012, 16:57
|
#5
|
...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 146
|
Re: failing hard
Nelito you mad bro?
You sure its not just ult and fang cancel each other out and whatever fleets they have left they come to cap back their losses from CT because CT won't ground and the defence is not what it used to be?
A fair few fang attack fleets have had to be recalled before launching due to heavy incs etc so i guess bud that its just you guys leak roids whereas fang leak less.
OOOOR its that everyone is indeed crap and ult are the best alliance in the world!
|
|
|
15 Nov 2012, 17:15
|
#6
|
Fear The Reaper
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newcastle, UK
Posts: 41
|
Re: failing hard
Fang + CT cancel out ult, you mean.
Still to see this "1v1" fang keep banging on about..
__________________
Ministreeeeehhh!!!111oneone
|
|
|
15 Nov 2012, 17:56
|
#7
|
king of carrot flowers
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 'Ampshire
Posts: 101
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by nelito
well as a ct member i must like fang but tbh they suck ,irvine nothing personal dude but ur just like claudio ranieri ur a silver guy wont ever be able to go for gold, im really wondering how ultores have fleets to attack ct if u gyes are supposdly attaking them also ,
i wanna state that new alliances need to come out also and make a statement not just play a round for the fact of playing (innuendo)
like i say if u dont play to win dont bother playing ,
same for tgv ,i was impressed how by attaking my gal apprime and ultores where speared are u also cooperating with them?
arriving to the xvx oh god chimpie get a life and do somthing in a round other than p targeting ct fsss
all that being said major alliances hc have brainaids ,although nd shocked me at least they had balls to war apprime
and im really sad to say this but untill know cardi is doing the best politics for the past 2 rounds
|
where is lionet btw?
__________________
I finished high once, not as high as you, but then I ain't talking about rankings..
|
|
|
15 Nov 2012, 20:29
|
#8
|
Mind-boggling
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 1,468
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebos
Nelito you mad bro?
|
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. (Winston Churchill)
R21-Randy Dandys Winners R21
1:9:5 -SoClose- -YetSoFar-
You have pending friend requests from Newt.
|
|
|
15 Nov 2012, 21:35
|
#9
|
YAAARRGH!
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 481
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trunks
Fang + CT cancel out ult, you mean.
Still to see this "1v1" fang keep banging on about..
|
Ultores put that to bed im afraid, your choice, not ours!
|
|
|
15 Nov 2012, 23:03
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 160
|
Re: failing hard
like i stated earlier fang holy war on ultores (DAM I CANNOT PASTE LINKS TO SCANS ) 2 9 2 ATTAKING DOFFEH
thats fang t1 target. nice job guyes keep attaking hr
|
|
|
15 Nov 2012, 23:56
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31
|
Re: failing hard
|
|
|
16 Nov 2012, 03:46
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Connovar
Ultores put that to bed im afraid, your choice, not ours!
|
Be the better man/alliance then?
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
|
|
|
16 Nov 2012, 04:42
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The_White_House
Posts: 60
|
Re: failing hard
No Wonder SLeepless left that shit hole alliance CT aint what it use to be GM TAME Your SHEEP they are talking back
__________________
Sincerely Barrack_Obama Leader of United states and a Spokesperson for Blue Tuba-Karma
part of the FanG Gang Ooooooomph!
|
|
|
16 Nov 2012, 10:18
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 75
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by nelito
like i stated earlier fang holy war on ultores (DAM I CANNOT PASTE LINKS TO SCANS ) 2 9 2 ATTAKING DOFFEH
thats fang t1 target. nice job guyes keep attaking hr
|
Clearly our number one target to crash is cha! Just like losing value at his to cap!
|
|
|
16 Nov 2012, 10:19
|
#15
|
Fear The Reaper
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newcastle, UK
Posts: 41
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Connovar
Ultores put that to bed im afraid, your choice, not ours!
|
Or did you just realise you lacked what it takes to 1v1? I'd watch out for CT mind.. They have a tendency for putting knives in backs.
__________________
Ministreeeeehhh!!!111oneone
|
|
|
16 Nov 2012, 10:30
|
#16
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trunks
Or did you just realise you lacked what it takes to 1v1? I'd watch out for CT mind.. They have a tendency for putting knives in backs.
|
I thought that was how Ultores was rolling? They are real knife men.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
16 Nov 2012, 10:39
|
#17
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: failing hard
When did Ultores backstab? When in the last 5 rounds did CT, for that matter?
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
16 Nov 2012, 10:51
|
#18
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
When did Ultores backstab? When in the last 5 rounds did CT, for that matter?
|
Heimdall did feel that Ultores backstabbed last round, and for sure Ultores backstabbed FAnG in r46(?). Thats just the alliances ive been a apart of though.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
16 Nov 2012, 11:21
|
#19
|
YAAARRGH!
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 481
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trunks
Or did you just realise you lacked what it takes to 1v1? I'd watch out for CT mind.. They have a tendency for putting knives in backs.
|
No, but we did realise ult were too chicken to accept the challenge, and instead got 3 friends to come beat us up!
Give up, ultores threw away the chance at a 1v1, not us, end of story
|
|
|
16 Nov 2012, 14:04
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by connovar
no, but we did realise ult were too chicken to accept the challenge, and instead got 3 friends to come beat us up!
Give up, ultores threw away the chance at a 1v1, not us, end of story
|
you started it!
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
|
|
|
16 Nov 2012, 14:12
|
#21
|
YAAARRGH!
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 481
|
Re: failing hard
I would be lieing if I said it wasnt Fangs intention to spend the round warring Ultores anyway, we want to win, you guys are the champions, who else we gonna fight? Its a challenge, we like challenges!
But we certainly didnt start any block building, that has to be said, i hope its clear our intentions of challenging ultores are honourable in that respect!
Im looking forward to the end of this round and sleeping.
|
|
|
16 Nov 2012, 14:26
|
#22
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_Esper
you started it!
|
It was pretty clear when we had the member meeting that our intention was to be political neutral. Seeing that we were the only one out of Ult and FAnG who had that idea, we were forced into trying to gather some help fighting your block.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
16 Nov 2012, 14:28
|
#23
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
It was pretty clear when we had the member meeting that our intention was to be political neutral.
|
I love how you get proved wrong by the post directly before yours. Even with the benefit of hindsight you are incapable of posting something that isn't nonsense.
As for Fang, they shouldn't be criticised for not playing one on one, any more than Ultores should. The game just doesn't work that way.
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
|
|
|
16 Nov 2012, 20:26
|
#24
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Heimdall did feel that Ultores backstabbed last round, and for sure Ultores backstabbed FAnG in r46(?). Thats just the alliances ive been a apart of though.
|
In regards to the ult backstabbing FAnG, i hope your not referring to the 1st rd FAnG was back (think it was that rd??)....?? The only ones who "backstabbed" there was FAnG, not Ultores..
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
17 Nov 2012, 02:49
|
#25
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The_White_House
Posts: 60
|
Re: failing hard
Colt then you where the one who did it weren't you fang HC at the time freaking rats everywhere
__________________
Sincerely Barrack_Obama Leader of United states and a Spokesperson for Blue Tuba-Karma
part of the FanG Gang Ooooooomph!
|
|
|
17 Nov 2012, 04:21
|
#26
|
YAAARRGH!
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 481
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrack_Obama
Colt then you where the one who did it weren't you fang HC at the time freaking rats everywhere
|
Owned.
|
|
|
17 Nov 2012, 04:25
|
#27
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt
In regards to the ult backstabbing FAnG, i hope your not referring to the 1st rd FAnG was back (think it was that rd??)....?? The only ones who "backstabbed" there was FAnG, not Ultores..
|
No i was referign to the round after that one
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Nov 2012, 11:55
|
#28
|
Retard0r
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,164
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by nelito
arriving to the xvx oh god chimpie get a life and do somthing in a round other than p targeting ct fsss
|
Firstly i'm not HC'ing. Secondly CT has sent 90% more hostile fleets on xVx than any other alliance, so if xVx hits CT and you don't like it you might want to think about why.
I amazes me that CT still believes they can bash around on the smaller alliances for 700 ticks and then don't figure out why they're fighting back.
__________________
-Chimpie
* We do not exist *
* G-II * NoS * VsN * Ascendancy * Osiris * xVx * Ultores *
|
|
|
17 Nov 2012, 18:38
|
#29
|
General (Adjective Army)
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Yorkshire, England.
Posts: 825
|
Re: failing hard
Would anyone in CT even notice if xVx hit them?
(That's meant to be a joke - not an invitation).
We've only just stopped hitting Ult (after 5 or more unprofitable nights) so I've no idea where you get the idea that we've been bashing the smaller alliances.
__________________
Amnion (aka The Arcane Chas of Arcania) - Playing PA under those and other pseudonyms every genuine round since Round 2. Most recently (and insignificantly):
Onset of Apathy R94 | Stacks of Resources R95 | The Necromancer of Dol Guldur R96
70 Years of Queen Elizabeth R97 | Worst of The Worst R98
Knights of the Green Shield R99 | Look Out of The Window R100 | Most of All R102
Hard of Hearing (2:7:1) R103 | The Lateness of Your Application (1:6:6) R104 | Kinnison of Tellus (5:1:2) R105
|
|
|
17 Nov 2012, 21:38
|
#30
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 673
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Heimdall did feel that Ultores backstabbed last round, and for sure Ultores backstabbed FAnG in r46(?). Thats just the alliances ive been a apart of though.
|
No worries I'll have my revenge , in this round or in another
__________________
At some point the world shits on everybody. Pretending it ain't shit makes you an idiot, not an optimist."
If life hands you lemons, drink more tequila
After the game is over the king and the pawn end up in the same box
HA - asc -rdm-asc-VR- #ODDR - APP
Finally retired
|
|
|
18 Nov 2012, 18:11
|
#31
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrack_Obama
Colt then you where the one who did it weren't you fang HC at the time freaking rats everywhere
|
Indeed I was, but I was against the move and so resigned as HC, Irv & co were too influenced by what CT wanted, so no, I didn't do that move
(seeing as B-butcher was refering to the round after then its of no consequence anyway)
Please try again.
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
18 Nov 2012, 20:58
|
#32
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: failing hard
yeah sorry we wanted fang to win, you wanted to suck ultores c***
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
18 Nov 2012, 21:21
|
#33
|
Honour above pr0n
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Home of 1337- Pittsburgh
Posts: 54
|
Re: failing hard
Nelito's ego is too big to agree with anything any HC do in any alliance, unless it's him running an alliance named after himself, of course.
Also we need a new thread titled "Fang, CT and App." Who's on it??
__________________
Round 4: Dawg_14k Of Tashbaan 96:8:8 (D6 | NRK)
Round 5:The End of Tim3 9:23:9 (NRK)
Round 6: Sekigahari of Malakhi 13:15:6 (Guild)
Round 7: =- Arutha -= The Prince of Krondor 29:17:13 (NoS)
Round 8: Forget..(Adelante/Fang)
Round 9: 5:5:7 1010100101101010 of 101101010110 (NoS)
|
|
|
18 Nov 2012, 21:33
|
#34
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stylez1877
Nelito's ego is too big to agree with anything any HC do in any alliance, unless it's him running an alliance named after himself, of course.
|
And when it's an alliance he's running, it either dies pre-round or kicks him out halfway through. Pretty funny.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
19 Nov 2012, 19:59
|
#35
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
yeah sorry we wanted fang to win, you wanted to suck ultores c***
|
Ult had already won the round, I wanted us to go for planet ranks and have a good end of round (ie go after xVx), you just wanted us to hit Ult so they didn't focus on you...sorry for not wanting to play to another alliances tune...if anyone was "sucking c***" that round it was you & Irv...
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
19 Nov 2012, 20:39
|
#36
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 374
|
Re: failing hard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt
Ult had already won the round, I wanted us to go for planet ranks and have a good end of round (ie go after xVx), you just wanted us to hit Ult so they didn't focus on you...sorry for not wanting to play to another alliances tune...if anyone was "sucking c***" that round it was you & Irv...
|
Well colt, if ult was ct.. and fang was ult...
IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED!
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:08.
| |