|
8 Dec 2003, 22:40
|
#1
|
Rah's def wh0re
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Humpering Maddix for defence
Posts: 643
|
Uhm
Karmulian wrote:
Any fang player who does not rejoin fang, or does not remain allianceless within 72hrs will be closed.
This is to prevent defection of fang members to another alliance.
So if fang members join another alliance , their accounts WILL BE CLOSED.
There will be no appeal on closing the planets.
So the inactive fang planet in my gal with get closed, because he doesnt log in every 3days??????.
Nice score dropping
__________________
Rd1 ---> 2 26 9 Captain Stone Chance of Dalriada [WAC/Leviathan federation]
Rd2 ---> 53 25 20 The First General of P'holt [TFD]
Rd3 ---> 22 16 20 The First General of Posterholt [TFD]
Rd4 ---> 246 24 10 Silverwolf of Limburg [TFD] [Cell] [NFU]
Rd5 ---> 34 11 19 The great Returning of me [Cell] [NFU]
Rd6----> 6 25 10 Chappa'ai of NOX Homeland (Whitebull) [Silver BC]
Rd7----> 18 18 1 Klaj Demon of Gateway from Hell [RAH]
Rd8----> 36 5 6 1 More TIME of Free Traders Inc [RAH]
Rd9----> 16 2 10 Clan McIntosh of Stardust Guardian [RAH]
Rd9.5 ---> 15 9 9 Nightshade of Sherwood forest [RAH]
Rd10 ----> [RAH]
|
|
|
8 Dec 2003, 22:41
|
#2
|
Lieutenant Colonel
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: My world
Posts: 135
|
Re: Uhm
i think he meant IF they join another alliance....
__________________
Retired? no... just temporarily out of order....
Community for community - join #PA
|
|
|
8 Dec 2003, 22:42
|
#3
|
Rah's def wh0re
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Humpering Maddix for defence
Posts: 643
|
Re: Uhm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fernando
i think he meant IF they join another alliance....
|
Then they should MAKE that clear
__________________
Rd1 ---> 2 26 9 Captain Stone Chance of Dalriada [WAC/Leviathan federation]
Rd2 ---> 53 25 20 The First General of P'holt [TFD]
Rd3 ---> 22 16 20 The First General of Posterholt [TFD]
Rd4 ---> 246 24 10 Silverwolf of Limburg [TFD] [Cell] [NFU]
Rd5 ---> 34 11 19 The great Returning of me [Cell] [NFU]
Rd6----> 6 25 10 Chappa'ai of NOX Homeland (Whitebull) [Silver BC]
Rd7----> 18 18 1 Klaj Demon of Gateway from Hell [RAH]
Rd8----> 36 5 6 1 More TIME of Free Traders Inc [RAH]
Rd9----> 16 2 10 Clan McIntosh of Stardust Guardian [RAH]
Rd9.5 ---> 15 9 9 Nightshade of Sherwood forest [RAH]
Rd10 ----> [RAH]
|
|
|
8 Dec 2003, 22:52
|
#4
|
Get Stuffed
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cheltenham, England
Posts: 647
|
Re: Uhm
Quote:
does not remain allianceless
|
eg they don't join an alliance - which stated twice
__________________
___________________________________
I used to work for PA.. and all i got was this shit avatar
___________________________________
|
|
|
8 Dec 2003, 22:57
|
#5
|
Lieutenant Colonel
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: My world
Posts: 135
|
Re: Uhm
ok.. now im confused :P
__________________
Retired? no... just temporarily out of order....
Community for community - join #PA
|
|
|
8 Dec 2003, 23:10
|
#6
|
Get Stuffed
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cheltenham, England
Posts: 647
|
Re: Uhm
they can either stay allianceless, or rejoin fang
__________________
___________________________________
I used to work for PA.. and all i got was this shit avatar
___________________________________
|
|
|
8 Dec 2003, 23:11
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 275
|
Re: Uhm
read it slowly basically this.
1) all Fang members that were kicked can now rejoin the fang alliance
2) if they do this, thats fine
3) if they dont want to rejoin fang, they must remain allianceless for 72 hours
after this 72 hours they can join what ever alliance they want
simple enough?
edit: anyone that was a fang member before the "incident" that joins another alliance will be deleted, i hope this has been made perfectly clear
Last edited by therealmig; 8 Dec 2003 at 23:51.
|
|
|
8 Dec 2003, 23:13
|
#8
|
Lieutenant Colonel
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: My world
Posts: 135
|
Re: Uhm
um thats what i said. either allianceless of fang
__________________
Retired? no... just temporarily out of order....
Community for community - join #PA
|
|
|
8 Dec 2003, 23:34
|
#9
|
Big Kahuna
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 330
|
Re: Uhm
hm, hinches lovebunny is no longer a forum admin? :shocked:
|
|
|
9 Dec 2003, 00:21
|
#10
|
Get Stuffed
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cheltenham, England
Posts: 647
|
Re: Uhm
hinch has not been a forum admin for 4-5 rounds
__________________
___________________________________
I used to work for PA.. and all i got was this shit avatar
___________________________________
|
|
|
9 Dec 2003, 07:37
|
#11
|
This is bat country
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,693
|
Re: Uhm
I am curious.. why cant you "hop" alliances within 72 hours?
|
|
|
9 Dec 2003, 08:21
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Netgamers IRC
Posts: 175
|
Re: Uhm
Karm appears to be doing the right thing, but surely for some memebers it could be hard for them to get online straight away and therefore mite get kicked out?!
|
|
|
9 Dec 2003, 10:59
|
#13
|
lolly roffle
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,514
|
Re: Uhm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyanide
Karm appears to be doing the right thing, but surely for some memebers it could be hard for them to get online straight away and therefore mite get kicked out?!
|
If they cant get online they will remain allianceless and so wont get deleted because thewy wont have magically joined another alliance.
This isnt rocket science people.
__________________
eXcessum
|
|
|
9 Dec 2003, 11:06
|
#14
|
banana
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 150
|
Re: Uhm
Quote:
Originally Posted by I am Idler
I am curious.. why cant you "hop" alliances within 72 hours?
|
To prevent people from alliance-hopping when things go wrong (lame defectors running to the enemy to save their precious planets etc)
|
|
|
9 Dec 2003, 13:03
|
#15
|
EMO HC OF ASCENDANCY
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Ålesund, Norway
Posts: 338
|
Re: Uhm
Quote:
Originally Posted by I am Idler
I am curious.. why cant you "hop" alliances within 72 hours?
|
if u leave an alliance u have to wait 72 hours before u can rejoin an alliance... and since this was a fk up they are trying to keep the rules up as much as possible.
this is to prevent WA's fk up to be very exploitable for ppl who wanted to switch alliances but not stay defenceless for 72 hours..
__________________
[Fury] First,
[Fury] Last,
[Fury] Will never be a thing of the past!
Ministry for life.
|
|
|
9 Dec 2003, 14:26
|
#16
|
Retired at the top
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 749
|
Re: Uhm
Quote:
Originally Posted by General1
So the inactive fang planet in my gal with get closed, because he doesnt log in every 3days??????.
|
I'm sure he's a great asset to FAnG.
__________________
MISTU forever
Retired at the top.
"That's what the internet's for - slandering others anonymously." - Banky Edwards, J&SBSB
|
|
|
9 Dec 2003, 15:14
|
#17
|
Rah's def wh0re
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Humpering Maddix for defence
Posts: 643
|
Re: Uhm
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealJames
I'm sure he's a great asset to FAnG.
|
He is 2 my gal score , and his ratio is SO f#cked up he doesnt get attacked
__________________
Rd1 ---> 2 26 9 Captain Stone Chance of Dalriada [WAC/Leviathan federation]
Rd2 ---> 53 25 20 The First General of P'holt [TFD]
Rd3 ---> 22 16 20 The First General of Posterholt [TFD]
Rd4 ---> 246 24 10 Silverwolf of Limburg [TFD] [Cell] [NFU]
Rd5 ---> 34 11 19 The great Returning of me [Cell] [NFU]
Rd6----> 6 25 10 Chappa'ai of NOX Homeland (Whitebull) [Silver BC]
Rd7----> 18 18 1 Klaj Demon of Gateway from Hell [RAH]
Rd8----> 36 5 6 1 More TIME of Free Traders Inc [RAH]
Rd9----> 16 2 10 Clan McIntosh of Stardust Guardian [RAH]
Rd9.5 ---> 15 9 9 Nightshade of Sherwood forest [RAH]
Rd10 ----> [RAH]
|
|
|
9 Dec 2003, 15:33
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 284
|
Re: Uhm
Quote:
Originally Posted by General1
He is 2 my gal score , and his ratio is SO f#cked up he doesnt get attacked
|
well, I'm quite sure you have understood now that he WILL NOT be deleted? (this ofc if he doesn't decide to log in and join another ally before the 72 ticks have passed.
__________________
thx for reading
|
|
|
9 Dec 2003, 16:58
|
#19
|
Let battle commence
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: England
Posts: 732
|
Re: Uhm
Planets will NOT be dleted if they are in NO alliance, the ones that will be closed, are ones that have used the removing of the 72hr limit to alliance hop and join another alliance quickly without the normal 72hr wait.
__________________
Mit
http://tim.igoe.me.uk - Development Blog
Whats on TV now - UK TV Guide
<Mendosa> mit is a cute cudlly toy that will be in the shops by christmas
<mig-work> ur now my eternal fav pa god
<Squiz> i name thee, Sir Mit
<Zeus> u my friend are a true gamer I knew u were
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:48.
| |