Planetarion Forums - View Single Post

Knight Theamion · 26 Dec 2010, 20:33

This post slags of CT, with arguments, on purpose. Because I think CT is a shitty alliance and people should stay away from it and it should die. That or people should reform CT to be a less shit alliance based on strict rules and hierarchies.

You say that you are a 'top' alliance for over a year now, while at the same time you say you are just below that top. At the same time you show that a one of the reasons that you adhere to the strict hierarchy is that you are powermongers. I refer to the following posts made by angryduck and gm (more can be found):

http://pirate.planetarion.com/showpo...83&postcount=6 <-- about a year ago where you claim to 'go for the win' (the numbers at the bottom of this post make it even more hillarious), though in the mean time, you achieved nothing. (the rest of the thread has more of those excuses)

http://pirate.planetarion.com/showth...53#post3201553 <-- this is a good example of 'old fashioned thinking' where you imply to be a retarded powermonger and where you say that 'GOOD OFFICERS ARE VERY IMPORTANT, DO NOT TRUST YOUR NORMAL MEMBERS, THEY HAVE TO BE OFFICERS!).

http://pirate.planetarion.com/showth...01#post3193401 <-- here you put yourself on a tier lower than a 'top' alliance, while you claim to be one for over a year now.

Now for those interested in more 'fun' I suggest you read:
http://pirate.planetarion.com/search...3&pp=25&page=1
and
http://pirate.planetarion.com/search...4&pp=25&page=1

Mostly by angryduck the 'CT looking to the future' thread of about a year ago and most of gm's threads of the last years. Angryduck has only been active for the last year, after long absence, gm's stance is easier to summarize:

He basically argues for a total levelling of the playing field where activity and ingenuity are not rewarded or possible and where no matter what you do, how stupid you act as a person or as a group, it will always be possible to win or at least, not to lose that hard. (You can back this up by looking at his posts where he advocates more rules, tag limits, the removal of certain 'features' (out of tag defence being one of them) and where he is all 'pro' being 'newbie'-friendly, which he defines as 'stupifying the game'). Also his posts on the whole show a general inconsistency when you start addressing the (internal) issues of CT.

Also, lets add CT's results for the last few rounds, in terms of the number of top 100 planets:

Round 33: 3
Round 34: 11
Round 35: 0
Round 36: 2
Round 37: 8
Round 38: 3
Round 39: 1

I would say that apart from 2 outliers, you have not improved, but you have become ever shittier.

With all this taken into account, I would say that CT will not just be a theory, it will only be a figment of the imagination of a few power hungry retards who do not understand the game and who continue to have a revolving door. (The revolving door can be supported by looking at the planetarion history page and compare the nicks each round for CT members and see how many each round change.)

In short:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

26 Dec 2010, 20:33	#21
Knight Theamion Miles Teg Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Dom City Posts: 5,192	Re: No longer just a Theory This post slags of CT, with arguments, on purpose. Because I think CT is a shitty alliance and people should stay away from it and it should die. That or people should reform CT to be a less shit alliance based on strict rules and hierarchies. You say that you are a 'top' alliance for over a year now, while at the same time you say you are just below that top. At the same time you show that a one of the reasons that you adhere to the strict hierarchy is that you are powermongers. I refer to the following posts made by angryduck and gm (more can be found): http://pirate.planetarion.com/showpo...83&postcount=6 <-- about a year ago where you claim to 'go for the win' (the numbers at the bottom of this post make it even more hillarious), though in the mean time, you achieved nothing. (the rest of the thread has more of those excuses) http://pirate.planetarion.com/showth...53#post3201553 <-- this is a good example of 'old fashioned thinking' where you imply to be a retarded powermonger and where you say that 'GOOD OFFICERS ARE VERY IMPORTANT, DO NOT TRUST YOUR NORMAL MEMBERS, THEY HAVE TO BE OFFICERS!). http://pirate.planetarion.com/showth...01#post3193401 <-- here you put yourself on a tier lower than a 'top' alliance, while you claim to be one for over a year now. Now for those interested in more 'fun' I suggest you read: http://pirate.planetarion.com/search...3&pp=25&page=1 and http://pirate.planetarion.com/search...4&pp=25&page=1 Mostly by angryduck the 'CT looking to the future' thread of about a year ago and most of gm's threads of the last years. Angryduck has only been active for the last year, after long absence, gm's stance is easier to summarize: He basically argues for a total levelling of the playing field where activity and ingenuity are not rewarded or possible and where no matter what you do, how stupid you act as a person or as a group, it will always be possible to win or at least, not to lose that hard. (You can back this up by looking at his posts where he advocates more rules, tag limits, the removal of certain 'features' (out of tag defence being one of them) and where he is all 'pro' being 'newbie'-friendly, which he defines as 'stupifying the game'). Also his posts on the whole show a general inconsistency when you start addressing the (internal) issues of CT. Also, lets add CT's results for the last few rounds, in terms of the number of top 100 planets: Round 33: 3 Round 34: 11 Round 35: 0 Round 36: 2 Round 37: 8 Round 38: 3 Round 39: 1 I would say that apart from 2 outliers, you have not improved, but you have become ever shittier. With all this taken into account, I would say that CT will not just be a theory, it will only be a figment of the imagination of a few power hungry retards who do not understand the game and who continue to have a revolving door. (The revolving door can be supported by looking at the planetarion history page and compare the nicks each round for CT members and see how many each round change.) In short: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA __________________ Audentes Fortuna Iuvat Last edited by Knight Theamion; 26 Dec 2010 at 20:42.