View Single Post
Unread 27 Apr 2014, 20:34   #166
Machado
Seraphim
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 196
Machado is a jewel in the roughMachado is a jewel in the roughMachado is a jewel in the roughMachado is a jewel in the rough
Unhappy Re: R56 development thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba View Post
This is so ridiculously bitter its unbelievable.

Seriously if you have such an issue with the way politics are currently run in the game then go make your own competitive alliance and start changing them. LIke most alliances in this game, Vikings is a community, it plays for its community, it doesnt play to do yours or the rest of PA's bidding.

If we go down your route then why havent the rest of the 50+ tags done more to stop Spore? Why is Vikings so much to blame?
Alright. I'm sorry, I've really tried to refrain from commenting on your posts until now, but there's just something I have to say, because I feel it's not being said. I just returned to PA, so answer me something...

First of all, something that's bothered me throughout all of your posts so far... Where's the rest of Vikings? Are you trying to tell us no single influenctial Vikings member (hint: HC) has made objections to Vikings decisions this round? Everybody's happy to not take a (rare?) chance to win the round? Where is everybody who agrees with you from your own alliance? Or hell, even disagrees. No, especially those who disagree. For their failure to act (sufficiently) they are perhaps more to blame.

Secondly... If everybody who can't win doesn't attack #1 to overtake them, #2 who imo actually had a chance to overtake #1 shouldn't either?

--- No, wait, it's even worse! If people who can't win attack #1 to at least make #1 fight for the win, then #2 who actually has a chance of overtaking #1 are just fine with sitting there and not trying to, you know, win a GAME?

--- No, wait, it's worse! Not only does #2 not only not actively do anything to beat #1 (the only alliance between them and a round win) - they actively attack #1's opposition, effectively siding with #1. I mean, escorting them to the win. Really? I'm not even gonna touch the whole "we won't hit you, oh, but we totally will" card that was played according to Ult.

Look, I just returned to PA, I don't know any of your alliances or a lot of your HC, let alone all of your political crap and tip-toeing. But I do know that in not trying to win a GAME you play, you demonstrate that either something is either fundamentally wrong with either this game or you, and if you'd ask me, I'd say there's a fair chance it's both.
__________________
Seraphim
Machado is offline   Reply With Quote