User Name
Password

Go Back   Planetarion Forums > Search Forums
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Today's Posts

Showing results 1 to 12 of 12
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: Forest
Forum: Alliance Discussions 12 Oct 2006, 20:11
Replies: 229
Views: 93,262
Posted By Forest
Re: Zhil's Tame Planetarion History

Sid did not have exclusive use of the beta servers.

I can assure you of that.


And Cryptic once stuck his tongue in my mouth, that was just plain nasty :/
Forum: Alliance Discussions 9 Oct 2006, 15:59
Replies: 229
Views: 93,262
Posted By Forest
Re: Zhil's Tame Planetarion History

You certainly had a good round, that much is for sure.

Infact, you were ever so close to winning anyway, the pressure you put us under was immense, and your tactic of just hitting 20 top planets...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 5 Oct 2006, 17:52
Replies: 229
Views: 93,262
Posted By Forest
Re: Zhil's Tame Planetarion History

Not what the rest of your HC think :D
Forum: Alliance Discussions 5 Oct 2006, 15:50
Replies: 229
Views: 93,262
Posted By Forest
Re: Zhil's Tame Planetarion History

Fang was abouts to be smashed in the rankings, and the incoming they faced just sped up any proceedings.

Fang did NOT disband because of closings.

Kjeldoran has stated this on more than one...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 17 Sep 2006, 15:10
Replies: 229
Views: 93,262
Posted By Forest
Re: Zhil's Tame Planetarion History

Of course he is gonna say that Chika, he is one of the players who sold his soul to the enemy :D
Forum: Alliance Discussions 16 Sep 2006, 12:05
Replies: 229
Views: 93,262
Posted By Forest
Re: Zhil's Tame Planetarion History

Alliances form BOTH sides of the war acknoweldege what really happened.

You can kid yourself that you had the hard time, and deserved to win, but at the end of the day, you didnt do a decent job...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 16 Sep 2006, 10:19
Replies: 229
Views: 93,262
Posted By Forest
Re: Zhil's Tame Planetarion History

I am not going to use this defend any accomplishments we may have made.

I do ask though, why exactly should RB not join with Fury/Legion?

Other alliances had the opportunity to work with us,...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 15 Sep 2006, 15:39
Replies: 229
Views: 93,262
Posted By Forest
Re: Zhil's Tame Planetarion History

I am afraidf you are quite wrong. Infact, Fang/dragons and indeed some of ely credited the round to eclipse, even though ely obviously won when they recruited fang.

The real story, was that...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 11 Sep 2006, 19:55
Replies: 229
Views: 93,262
Posted By Forest
Re: Zhil's Tame Planetarion History

And Ming, get your arse to #poker on irc, its been too long!
Forum: Alliance Discussions 11 Sep 2006, 19:54
Replies: 229
Views: 93,262
Posted By Forest
Re: Zhil's Tame Planetarion History

Just how I remember it :D

On the ICD thing, i can comment on that seeing as I handled it personally.

ICD was based around a cluster (5?), and Fury had a few high ranking members there, that...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 11 Sep 2006, 19:38
Replies: 229
Views: 93,262
Posted By Forest
Re: Zhil's Tame Planetarion History

I am pretty sure. I will double check a couple of sites on google and get back to you.

The triad was actually never got creditted the win in R3, only Fury/Legion, because the section wing got...
Forum: Alliance Discussions 11 Sep 2006, 01:07
Replies: 229
Views: 93,262
Posted By Forest
Re: Zhil's Tame Planetarion History

RE started the round and I appraoched them (I ran TRT).

The RE leader (minako?) and myslef agreed that TRT would merge with RE. RE was getting hit hard by others, BT i think, and TRT were...
Showing results 1 to 12 of 12

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:49.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018