|
|
17 Apr 2012, 03:13
|
#1
|
Planetarion Forum Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,289
|
War with Fang
This is an official announcement that as of tonight CT has declared war on Fang. CT has always worked to take on the best and test ourselves rather than sit the fence. Some both inside and outside of CT have condemned CTs perceived fencing this round, with some validity. No longer can this be said however, we are now officially at war with the #1 ranked alliance in the game, who by the way has roughly a 20m value lead over CT, even though the scores are much closer. Who will win? It is yet to be seen, but let it not be said that CT doesn't try and make the round interesting!
Flame on!
__________________
Romans 10:9-10
#strategy
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 03:19
|
#2
|
Old Fart
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 91
|
Re: War with Fang
sweeeet!
__________________
MobRulz
#FAnG
#Mercenaries
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 03:21
|
#3
|
Canadian to the Core
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,004
|
Re: War with Fang
Free roids :d
__________________
[DTA] Forever
r2-5 [LOST] - r6 [Instinct] - r7-8 [Titans] -r9 [Olympians] -DC
r10 [Elysium] -DC - r11-12 [MISTU] -DC/IA - r13-15 [Angels] - DC
r18-19 [eXi]
<Intermission>
r31-32 [CT] - r33-35 [DLR] - r36 [VsN] - r37 [???]
r45-46 [FAnG]
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 07:26
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallinn
Posts: 734
|
Re: War with Fang
LOL
man this just got too funny
__________________
VISION FTW
THIS IS ULTORES
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 07:27
|
#5
|
PA Ancient
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ventnor, Isle Of Wight
Posts: 1,060
|
Re: War with Fang
This should be interesting, dunno what this rounds like of course but last round FAnG was fantastic at defence so i wish you luck
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
Ever been attacked by a p3nguin? You get left a bit black and white!
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 08:00
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 477
|
Re: War with Fang
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 08:15
|
#7
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Assassin
This should be interesting, dunno what this rounds like of course but last round FAnG was fantastic at defence so i wish you luck
|
Only thing i would say about this is that last round FAnG never had large sustained incs....other than that defence was pretty good yes! With the added fact that they have a huge value lead this round it will be interesting to see how they hold up
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 10:21
|
#8
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
This will be a short war with CT/Ultores block early on roiding down FAnG.
Ultores will be winning this round with ease.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 10:39
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
This will be a short war with CT/Ultores block early on roiding down FAnG.
Ultores will be winning this round with ease.
|
Fang have a 20m valuelead on ct, 40m on ult. Why would they not be able to hold their ground with such defensive stats? (Assuming ult actually sides with ct..)
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 11:36
|
#10
|
Furious Angel
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: England
Posts: 128
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
This will be a short war with CT/Ultores block early on roiding down FAnG.
Ultores will be winning this round with ease.
|
nobodies stupid enough to actually believe that............. i think this guy is playing us eksero
__________________
Dont Trust Anyone
Strength Honour Loyalty above all
Ascendancy & The Ministry
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 13:19
|
#11
|
Awesome
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 12
|
Re: War with Fang
soon winning eksero??
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 13:57
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: War with Fang
i always win!
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 15:11
|
#13
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
Fang have a 20m valuelead on ct, 40m on ult. Why would they not be able to hold their ground with such defensive stats? (Assuming ult actually sides with ct..)
|
They couldnt hold they ground when it was only the Ultores block giving them incs, now when you add another 100 attack fleets upon the 200+ attack fleets the durex block were giving FAnG nightly, the numbers will be devil red.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 15:22
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
They couldnt hold they ground when it was only the Ultores block giving them incs, now when you add another 100 attack fleets upon the 200+ attack fleets the durex block were giving FAnG nightly, the numbers will be devil red.
|
Going +2k roids every day except one is not holding your ground?
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 15:36
|
#15
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
Re: War with Fang
With a constant roid gain and 200+ incoming fleets every night, that actually makes Fang the best alliance ever. Either that or butcher is lying again. I can't even begin to speculate on which of these is more likely.
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 16:26
|
#16
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
Going +2k roids every day except one is not holding your ground?
|
I think i explained to you in the other thread some of the factors for the roid gain, and the reason why i claim falling behind is not the same as holding your ground.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 16:42
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
I think i explained to you in the other thread some of the factors for the roid gain, and the reason why i claim falling behind is not the same as holding your ground.
|
Yeah yeah, you guys got roided and stuff, but you inited so many roids that you ended on +2k every day!
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 16:47
|
#18
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
Yeah yeah, you guys got roided and stuff, but you inited so many roids that you ended on +2k every day!
|
We lost roids, we were grounded, we did not attack.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 16:51
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
We lost roids, we were grounded, we did not attack.
|
In that case alot of people obviously didn't follow orders
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 16:56
|
#20
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
I think i explained to you in the other thread some of the factors for the roid gain, and the reason why i claim falling behind is not the same as holding your ground.
|
How exactly do you "fall behind" when you have a 8k roid lead on CT and a 25k roid lead on Ult?? You realize that aslong as you maintain a roid lead you are out mining your competitors, therefore you will have bigger fleets making it harder to hit you, right?
Even if they catch you on roids they still have to then go past you and keep them in order for them to start catching up....
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 16:57
|
#21
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
In that case alot of people obviously didn't follow orders
|
Yeah, that is the case. We all know wich planets gained roids while being grounded, but some of the roid gain might come from authed retalls etc etc.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 17:02
|
#22
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt
How exactly do you "fall behind" when you have a 8k roid lead on CT and a 25k roid lead on Ult?? You realize that aslong as you maintain a roid lead you are out mining your competitors, therefore you will have bigger fleets making it harder to hit you, right?
Even if they catch you on roids they still have to then go past you and keep them in order for them to start catching up....
|
We are falling behind because CT has been catching up. They used the weekend to cut the cap with 4 million in score to FAnG, and god know how much value.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 17:18
|
#23
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
We are falling behind because CT has been catching up. They used the weekend to cut the cap with 4 million in score to FAnG, and god know how much value.
|
Fang Value: 109921319
CT Value: 91749216
Fang Value: 142092894
CT Value: 123530048
That's from friday and today. Looks pretty much the same to me
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 17:51
|
#24
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 145
|
Re: War with Fang
unbelievable how much shit this BloodyButcher talks lol, get proved wrong constantly
__________________
The only thing neccesary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing
Ultores peon
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 18:00
|
#25
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
We are falling behind because CT has been catching up. They used the weekend to cut the cap with 4 million in score to FAnG, and god know how much value.
|
jesus christ are you intentionally being dumb??....you have more roids....REGARDLESS if they cap more than you in a period of time as long as you have more (especially the amounts you have compared) they can't gain value on you (unless you all crash etc!!)
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 18:49
|
#26
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: War with Fang
he is mathetically void Colt.. its not worth the effort...
YOu have to simplify it for him...
B-Butcher if you have 20 apples a day and 1 apple makes 1 litre of Apple juice then every day you have 20 litres of apple juice
If your rival has 15 apples then he only makes 15 litres a day
For all the days you have more apples than him you are stockpiling more apple juice.
5 days of juice making and you have 100 litres (5x20) and he has 75 litres (15x5).
Now if he find 5 more apples he will make the same amount of juice as you but you will still have that extra juice from before so he can never have more than you.
If he find another apple or two then he will be producing more juice but you have that stockpile which would take him a while to catch up to before he overtakes...
SEE SIMPLES!!
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 18:50
|
#27
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt
jesus christ are you intentionally being dumb??....you have more roids....REGARDLESS if they cap more than you in a period of time as long as you have more (especially the amounts you have compared) they can't gain value on you (unless you all crash etc!!)
|
You are close to what i was pointing at, we lost a lot of value i def because of the attackers were willing to suffer heavy losses for little roids.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 18:56
|
#28
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
he is mathetically void Colt.. its not worth the effort...
YOu have to simplify it for him...
B-Butcher if you have 20 apples a day and 1 apple makes 1 litre of Apple juice then every day you have 20 litres of apple juice
If your rival has 15 apples then he only makes 15 litres a day
For all the days you have more apples than him you are stockpiling more apple juice.
5 days of juice making and you have 100 litres (5x20) and he has 75 litres (15x5).
Now if he find 5 more apples he will make the same amount of juice as you but you will still have that extra juice from before so he can never have more than you.
If he find another apple or two then he will be producing more juice but you have that stockpile which would take him a while to catch up to before he overtakes...
SEE SIMPLES!!
|
So finance centers and refs dont count for shit?
Not that im saying that CT got more FC/Refs than FAnG/Ult or the other way around
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 19:00
|
#29
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 846
|
Re: War with Fang
Sigh B-butcher is there any point to even talk to you?
Crashing on Ct is widly considered to be a smart call because they wont be able to roid up fast enough the attackers will gain more in the long run because CT is so much worse than fang/ult.
__________________
R50-55 Faceless
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 19:05
|
#30
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
So finance centers and refs dont count for shit?
Not that im saying that CT got more FC/Refs than FAnG/Ult or the other way around
|
If were talking like that then most your Xans went Corp which gives them huge income for their roids.
It would be sensible to presume CT went mainly social/tot with Ult a mix of all 3.
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 19:45
|
#31
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiamat101
Sigh B-butcher is there any point to even talk to you?
Crashing on Ct is widly considered to be a smart call because they wont be able to roid up fast enough the attackers will gain more in the long run because CT is so much worse than fang/ult.
|
Lol, what are u on about?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 19:46
|
#32
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
If were talking like that then most your Xans went Corp which gives them huge income for their roids.
It would be sensible to presume CT went mainly social/tot with Ult a mix of all 3.
|
heh, well anything is sensible to presume.
Anyway, CT is ahead of FAnG now, like i said they would be soon.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 20:52
|
#33
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiamat101
Crashing on Ct is widly considered to be a smart call
|
Among idiots, maybe.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
heh, well anything is sensible to presume.
Anyway, CT is ahead of FAnG now, like i said they would be soon.
|
they probably just inited up el oh el
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 22:11
|
#34
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
Among idiots, maybe.
|
Look who posted it....
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 01:22
|
#35
|
Registered Loser
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 38
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
he is mathetically void Colt.. its not worth the effort...
YOu have to simplify it for him...
B-Butcher if you have 20 apples a day and 1 apple makes 1 litre of Apple juice then every day you have 20 litres of apple juice
If your rival has 15 apples then he only makes 15 litres a day
For all the days you have more apples than him you are stockpiling more apple juice.
5 days of juice making and you have 100 litres (5x20) and he has 75 litres (15x5).
Now if he find 5 more apples he will make the same amount of juice as you but you will still have that extra juice from before so he can never have more than you.
If he find another apple or two then he will be producing more juice but you have that stockpile which would take him a while to catch up to before he overtakes...
SEE SIMPLES!!
|
I've heard of 'comparing apples to oranges', but apples to asteroids!? Re-damned-diculous.
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 07:00
|
#36
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
Look who posted it....
|
No, you.
Oh, wait, is this not kindergarten?
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 12:56
|
#37
|
Furious Angel
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: England
Posts: 128
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
Fang Value: 109921319
CT Value: 91749216
Fang Value: 142092894
CT Value: 123530048
That's from friday and today. Looks pretty much the same to me
|
lol your wrong there fang actually increased the value gap by 1m
interesting fact did you know bbitch3r counted 350 hostile fleets today 1 by 1 ALL BY HIMSELF ??? :SALUTE:
__________________
Dont Trust Anyone
Strength Honour Loyalty above all
Ascendancy & The Ministry
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 13:44
|
#38
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikee
lol your wrong there fang actually increased the value gap by 1m
interesting fact did you know bbitch3r counted 350 hostile fleets today 1 by 1 ALL BY HIMSELF ??? :SALUTE:
|
I guess u did too?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 13:49
|
#39
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight
unbelievable how much shit this BloodyButcher talks lol, get proved wrong constantly
|
The new MaxMillian maybe?
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 14:10
|
#40
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
|
Re: War with Fang
at least maximillian doesn't take himself seriously
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 15:13
|
#41
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Im honoured to be compared with MaxMillian, atleast he is not as thick as a brick.
This surely will be a short war, we all knew that FAnG wouldnt outvalue/outgrow/or whatever people claimed they would while being targetted by CT+Ultores block.
I wonder who gets underfire next...
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 15:47
|
#42
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: War with Fang
You would've better defended yourselves if you had grounded. ¬_¬
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 16:42
|
#43
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Im honoured to be compared with MaxMillian, atleast he is not as thick as a brick.
This surely will be a short war, we all knew that FAnG wouldnt outvalue/outgrow/or whatever people claimed they would while being targetted by CT+Ultores block.
I wonder who gets underfire next...
|
Well, you obviously are "as thick as a brick" so can't be compared (apparently).
FAnG still out value every other ally out there.....
I sometimes wonder what kick you get out of being proven wrong every time you post...
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 17:41
|
#44
|
Furious Angel
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: England
Posts: 128
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Im honoured to be compared with MaxMillian, atleast he is not as thick as a brick.
This surely will be a short war, we all knew that FAnG wouldnt outvalue/outgrow/or whatever people claimed they would while being targetted by CT+Ultores block.
I wonder who gets underfire next...
|
you might aswell make that thick as a brick your new forum sig itd suit you
incidently since it seems to be the only quote you know heres another one so you can expand your vocabulary a bit more "dumb as a door knob"
__________________
Dont Trust Anyone
Strength Honour Loyalty above all
Ascendancy & The Ministry
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 18:33
|
#45
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
You would've better defended yourselves if you had grounded. ¬_¬
|
Probably the first piece of sense to come from Clouds fingers :P
Bloody-Butcher out of curiousity - how many alliances actually ptargetted you last night??? Remember i said ptarget and not people gal raiding...
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 18:55
|
#46
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
Probably the first piece of sense to come from Clouds fingers :P
Bloody-Butcher out of curiousity - how many alliances actually ptargetted you last night??? Remember i said ptarget and not people gal raiding...
|
I got no clue, i didnt have the time to look up all those 340 fleets
afaik Ultores/CT/Apprime for sure.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 19:25
|
#47
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: War with Fang
xVx.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 19:30
|
#48
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: War with Fang
would it be safe to presume it was 4 alliances??? with a some stragglers like always
Basically what Ultores got for 400 odd ticks yeah?
How is the boot on the other foot?
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 19:33
|
#49
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
would it be safe to presume it was 4 alliances??? with a some stragglers like always
Basically what Ultores got for 400 odd ticks yeah?
How is the boot on the other foot?
|
Hehe, im not whining like Ultores did, this is a part of the game, and i dont think it will pay off in CTs interest.
Ultores will win.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 19:39
|
#50
|
Canadian to the Core
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,004
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
would it be safe to presume it was 4 alliances??? with a some stragglers like always
Basically what Ultores got for 400 odd ticks yeah?
How is the boot on the other foot?
|
I'm confused, how is a block war the same as a 4 (it was more likely 6) vs 1?
FAnG heavily targeted Ultores, but didn't exclusively do it. We hit App, we hit DETWQ#TAF/xVx/etc
This block will exclusively target FAnG until they get bored and twat CT out of existence, because there's no one left.
It was basically a slightly lobsided war with the (laughably) 'best' alliance on the wrong side, probably the fairest round we've seen in a long time, but because it's not Ultores in first people decided that it wasn't correct and felt the need to make a disaster of the second half the round.
__________________
[DTA] Forever
r2-5 [LOST] - r6 [Instinct] - r7-8 [Titans] -r9 [Olympians] -DC
r10 [Elysium] -DC - r11-12 [MISTU] -DC/IA - r13-15 [Angels] - DC
r18-19 [eXi]
<Intermission>
r31-32 [CT] - r33-35 [DLR] - r36 [VsN] - r37 [???]
r45-46 [FAnG]
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:52.
| |