|
|
22 Jun 2014, 15:28
|
#251
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
I dont see why FL/BF should stop, but the rest?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
22 Jun 2014, 21:16
|
#252
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Connovar
I heard eksero can shoot lightning bolts from his eyes, and breathe fire out of his arse
|
Who told you?
|
|
|
23 Jun 2014, 12:02
|
#253
|
YAAARRGH!
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 481
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Butcher told me!
Respect to Ult members for not giving up, solid defensive performance. None of the other alliances would still be playing, IMO.
|
|
|
23 Jun 2014, 12:59
|
#254
|
idle
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 968
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
i enjoyed reading most of this thread
though it was a close contest between kaiba
i shall declare Forest as the winner
__________________
m0rph3us formerly known as Bugz
"It´s not about how hard u hit, its about how hard u can get hit and still keep moving forward! How much u can take and still move forward!"
|
|
|
23 Jun 2014, 16:53
|
#255
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Connovar
Butcher told me!
Respect to Ult members for not giving up, solid defensive performance. None of the other alliances would still be playing, IMO.
|
They are perhaps still the favorite to win imho.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
23 Jun 2014, 17:13
|
#256
|
a bucket
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chatham, UK
Posts: 1,073
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Maybe; but they clearly need at least a couple of other alliances to switch sides if they are to win.
__________________
Proud to have been TGV!
aargh! died in Jenova! | idled in ROCK | disappointed in Audentes | been Roguish | p-p-previously a p-p-p3nguin
Ascendancy
Otterly an Otter.
|
|
|
23 Jun 2014, 18:08
|
#257
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by booji
Maybe; but they clearly need at least a couple of other alliances to switch sides if they are to win.
|
Well they will, ult soon dry.
They could just ground and stay on top with their roid lead
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
23 Jun 2014, 18:55
|
#258
|
Internal Error
Join Date: May 2002
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 696
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
It wouldnt be the first time Ultores recovered from some serious bashing. Well played so far.
__________________
Nitros
[]LCH[] ..lets change history
|
|
|
23 Jun 2014, 19:25
|
#259
|
Awesome
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Hague
Posts: 291
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Word on the streets is Faceless will be targeted tonight, sounds logical after seeing ult has half of the avg faceless has. Question is what alliances are involved?
__________________
Apprime PR - taking away ur problems since 2008
|
|
|
23 Jun 2014, 19:34
|
#260
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cain
Word on the streets is Faceless will be targeted tonight, sounds logical after seeing ult has half of the avg faceless has. Question is what alliances are involved?
|
Heard Spore is the lead blockers AGAIN.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
23 Jun 2014, 19:39
|
#261
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Emerald Dream
Posts: 116
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitros
It wouldnt be the first time Ultores recovered from some serious bashing. Well played so far.
|
Ultores took a serious beating but I hear its time for others to be tested!
|
|
|
23 Jun 2014, 20:08
|
#262
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Heard Spore is the lead blockers AGAIN.
|
lol
|
|
|
23 Jun 2014, 20:10
|
#263
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
lol
|
Dont even try deny it
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
23 Jun 2014, 20:14
|
#264
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Dont even try deny it
|
nothing to deny, as soon as you post on forums, everyone knows the truth.
they just go with the opposite of what you say
|
|
|
23 Jun 2014, 22:43
|
#265
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
nothing to deny, as soon as you post on forums, everyone knows the truth.
they just go with the opposite of what you say
|
HEROES are always the block leaders.
It's pretty shocking if yet again alliances fail to finish the job on ultores.
People are so fickle....
|
|
|
23 Jun 2014, 22:48
|
#266
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 245
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cain
Word on the streets is Faceless will be targeted tonight, sounds logical after seeing ult has half of the avg faceless has. Question is what alliances are involved?
|
Are you seriously asking what alliances are involved?!
There are exactly 8 full tag alliances, 4 of these are napped to Faceless so that only leaves 3 full tag alliances and 2 half-tag alliances that could hit them if they really wanted... (Ult/Spore/HR/Vikings/HEROES)..
If naps remain as they are now then I expect Faceless to win without a problem..
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 07:57
|
#267
|
a bucket
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chatham, UK
Posts: 1,073
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
nap stands for non aggression pact, so it does not mean an alliance. If those who are napped with Faceless all stand back and leave it as Ult+whoever they can gather against Faceless then there is no certainty that Faceless will win. Certainly p3n's nap is like this - essentially a formal avoidance pact rather than either will help the other with anything.
The problem is that NAPs more often really mean alliance in this game.
__________________
Proud to have been TGV!
aargh! died in Jenova! | idled in ROCK | disappointed in Audentes | been Roguish | p-p-previously a p-p-p3nguin
Ascendancy
Otterly an Otter.
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 11:16
|
#268
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by booji
nap stands for non aggression pact, so it does not mean an alliance. If those who are napped with Faceless all stand back and leave it as Ult+whoever they can gather against Faceless then there is no certainty that Faceless will win. Certainly p3n's nap is like this - essentially a formal avoidance pact rather than either will help the other with anything.
The problem is that NAPs more often really mean alliance in this game.
|
When half the univers got "NAPs" with each other, it effectively means that its a block sometimes, even though they arnt actively coordinating attacks together.
The univers is too small, and the targets are too few, even two of the top alliances having agreed to not attacking each other will have huge effect on the chances for all the rest of the allies
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 11:49
|
#269
|
a bucket
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chatham, UK
Posts: 1,073
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
I can see that you have a point early in the round when everyone is gal raiding but now when everyone is ptargeting or hitting gals that are heavy in a particular alliance I cant see it making too much difference. It possibly means a few more random incs for that alliance without the nap but it is unlikely to be enough to tip any balances when compared to whole alliances ptargeting each other.
__________________
Proud to have been TGV!
aargh! died in Jenova! | idled in ROCK | disappointed in Audentes | been Roguish | p-p-previously a p-p-p3nguin
Ascendancy
Otterly an Otter.
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 12:00
|
#270
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 77
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
I agree with Bitcher here.
Faceless for example is ingame napped with:
Black Flag
Conspiracy
NewDawn
p3nguins
CT is napped with BF, p3ng, faceless. blackflag is napped to almost the same. This means that even tho they are not allied every alliance not ingame napped to all these players consisting of the majority of active players in the universe will have alot more incs.
That faceless is able to sit on all these naps atm just comes to show we need a change in leadership in different allies.. Ult/App doesnt give a damn about foes, everyone else is scared shtless about incs
__________________
Skydivenaked
Recent rounds:
Round 68 - #1 Gal Rank #6 planet
Round 67 - #1 Gal
Round 65 - Rank #3 Norsemen
Round 61 - Rank #37 Faceless
Round 60 - Rank #14 Ultores
Round 58 - Rank #35 Allieless xp play
Round 56 - Rank #14 Vikings
Round 54 - Rank #5 Vikings
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 12:26
|
#271
|
a bucket
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chatham, UK
Posts: 1,073
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
A change in leadership is not going to change how alliances operate, naps, avoiding forts, unofficial agreements and full blown alliances are how PA has been played as long as I have played the game. This round does not seem to me to be much different in this regard. That the top alliance now has a load of naps is mostly a product of them having until recently not been the top alliance so wishing pacts to help them take out number 1. The question now is if they begin to run away with it as Ult did whether those naps will come apart.
__________________
Proud to have been TGV!
aargh! died in Jenova! | idled in ROCK | disappointed in Audentes | been Roguish | p-p-previously a p-p-p3nguin
Ascendancy
Otterly an Otter.
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 13:00
|
#272
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Ultores were never "running away" with it
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 13:30
|
#273
|
a bucket
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chatham, UK
Posts: 1,073
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
All a question of definitions - but perhaps I should have said 'threatening' to run away with it! You may not have been immensely ahead but you were gaining value and roids much faster than the other alliances.
p.s. do you have to contest everything about your alliance even when its a complement?
__________________
Proud to have been TGV!
aargh! died in Jenova! | idled in ROCK | disappointed in Audentes | been Roguish | p-p-previously a p-p-p3nguin
Ascendancy
Otterly an Otter.
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 16:14
|
#274
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
it's easy to gain roids and value when you go to war with CT
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 17:42
|
#275
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
just you know fine what happens when you do, don't act surprised when we get friends and fight back
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 18:29
|
#276
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_Esper
it's easy to gain roids and value when you go to war with CT
|
even easier when CT are busy with P3nguins hitting down the ranks
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 19:27
|
#277
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 374
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
just you know fine what happens when you do, don't act surprised when we get friends and fight back
|
When Ult hit CT, CT had given ult 300+ incoming fleets like when we spoke in pm, after the P-Target from Ult.. CT still had given Ult more incoming then Ult gave CT.
Rather then you getting friends to fight back, it is you getting friends cause you couldnt finish something you started.
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 19:48
|
#278
|
Awesome
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Hague
Posts: 291
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by wouter
when ult hit ct, ct had given ult 300+ incoming fleets like when we spoke in pm, after the p-target from ult.. Ct still had given ult more incoming then ult gave ct.
Rather then you getting friends to fight back, it is you getting friends cause you couldnt finish something you started.
|
boom headshot!
__________________
Apprime PR - taking away ur problems since 2008
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 20:30
|
#279
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Internet
Posts: 318
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDN
That faceless is able to sit on all these naps atm just comes to show we need a change in leadership in different allies.. Ult/App doesnt give a damn about foes, everyone else is scared shtless about incs
|
Hi, I was wondering if in light of faceless losing 4% of their roids whilst ultores increased theirs by 21% after one night of hitting them you would like to in any way amend your post.
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 20:31
|
#280
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
im not denying that we gave you a good amount of incs. we did! but we were gal raiding, ultores took it to the next level with ptargeting.
May i also point out ultores was #1 with significantly higher value than us and we were #5!
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 20:43
|
#281
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
im not denying that we gave you a good amount of incs. we did! but we were gal raiding, ultores took it to the next level with ptargeting.
May i also point out ultores was #1 with significantly higher value than us and we were #5!
|
So consistently hitting our forts is okay, but us ptargetting you guys in return is not?
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 20:55
|
#282
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
So consistently hitting our forts is okay, but us ptargetting you guys in return is not?
|
I think he is saying hitting #1 is okey, as that would be going after roids and XP, Ult hitting #5 tells me they dont care about hitting their friends in BF and FL
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 21:01
|
#283
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 52
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil
Hi, I was wondering if in light of faceless losing 4% of their roids whilst ultores increased theirs by 21% after one night of hitting them you would like to in any way amend your post.
|
Ult bonused and initiated? If they are able to replicate that again tonight I would be very impressed.
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 21:07
|
#284
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
I think he is saying hitting #1 is okey, as that would be going after roids and XP, Ult hitting #5 tells me they dont care about hitting their friends in BF and FL
|
They hit us, we hit them back. Just because they are 5th doesn't mean we'll give them a free pass when they hit us
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 21:57
|
#285
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Internet
Posts: 318
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillyNilly
Ult bonused and initiated? If they are able to replicate that again tonight I would be very impressed.
|
Oh ok. Sounds like an awfully confident move when you're going up against an alliance supposedly in such a strong position that the entire community needs to rethink who it allows to helm the alliances within it because of allowing themselves to nap them.
|
|
|
24 Jun 2014, 22:12
|
#286
|
Old Skool
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 278
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil
Oh ok. Sounds like an awfully confident move when you're going up against an alliance supposedly in such a strong position that the entire community needs to rethink who it allows to helm the alliances within it because of allowing themselves to nap them.
|
It comes down to the amount of incs on defence page, nothing else. As already stated earlier, 4 ful tags with 3½ times the value combined, is in any case impossible to handle. The fact that it's now 1 grounded tag, doing sporadic retals, kinda changes the game plan.
Naps or not
|
|
|
25 Jun 2014, 09:44
|
#287
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
They hit us, we hit them back. Just because they are 5th doesn't mean we'll give them a free pass when they hit us
|
Nobody expected you to give them any free pass.
But dont sound to suprised that CT jumped on the bandwagon to get back at Ult once again.
I guess being a top alliance, you dont have to hit the lower and mid tier alliances.
Not that i think CT is a midtier alliance, but looking at the rankings this round would make me belive they cant win it atm.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
25 Jun 2014, 10:33
|
#288
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Nobody expected you to give them any free pass.
But dont sound to suprised that CT jumped on the bandwagon to get back at Ult once again.
I guess being a top alliance, you dont have to hit the lower and mid tier alliances.
Not that i think CT is a midtier alliance, but looking at the rankings this round would make me belive they cant win it atm.
|
To get back at us?
Even after we hit them for one night, they had still sent around 300 fleets on us vs the 150 or so we had put on them, if anything we got back at them, which they couldn't handle.
|
|
|
25 Jun 2014, 12:27
|
#289
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
To get back at us?
Even after we hit them for one night, they had still sent around 300 fleets on us vs the 150 or so we had put on them, if anything we got back at them, which they couldn't handle.
|
Its obvious that the top allie would be looking for bigger targets. What would Ult gain from attacking CT, but revenge?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
25 Jun 2014, 13:01
|
#290
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Its obvious that the top allie would be looking for bigger targets. What would Ult gain from attacking CT, but revenge?
|
Like i said, if people hit us, we'll hit back. Doesn't matter who it is and what rank they are
|
|
|
25 Jun 2014, 13:11
|
#291
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
Like i said, if people hit us, we'll hit back. Doesn't matter who it is and what rank they are
|
Well guess thats what was diffrent from FAnG and Ultores in their prime, to allies today.
They fought for #1, not personal vendettas
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
25 Jun 2014, 13:23
|
#292
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher;
Well guess thats what was diffrent from FAnG and Ultores in their prime, to allies today.
They fought for #1, not personal vendettas
|
Oh we always play for #1, we just don't ignore when someone hits us, thinking they can get away with it
|
|
|
25 Jun 2014, 14:33
|
#293
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Actually, i may come back to play, if ult will have me!
|
|
|
25 Jun 2014, 14:40
|
#294
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Well guess thats what was diffrent from FAnG and Ultores in their prime, to allies today.
They fought for #1, not personal vendettas
|
FAnG are notorious for bottom feeding and napping the universe.
|
|
|
25 Jun 2014, 14:42
|
#295
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by clouds
fang are notorious for bottom feeding and napping the universe.
|
qft
|
|
|
25 Jun 2014, 15:30
|
#296
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
FAnG are notorious for bottom feeding and napping the universe.
|
Not the FAnG i was apart of. Maybe you have been mistaking FAnG for vikings?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
25 Jun 2014, 15:31
|
#297
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
Actually, i may come back to play, if ult will have me!
|
Ive applied, but they wont have me either
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
25 Jun 2014, 15:40
|
#298
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Not the FAnG i was apart of. Maybe you have been mistaking FAnG for vikings?
|
You keep portraying FAnG as this moral powerhouse alliance, but FAnG only had one strong round of recent, and that was the round they won and beat Ultores.
Since then, and prior to, they gained value/roids by bottom feeding and napping.
So please stop being such a hypocrite and promoting FAnG as this ethical alliance.
|
|
|
25 Jun 2014, 16:14
|
#299
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Ive applied, but they wont have me either
|
i would have accepted you if you had applied
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
|
|
|
25 Jun 2014, 16:26
|
#300
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R57 gossip thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
You keep portraying FAnG as this moral powerhouse alliance, but FAnG only had one strong round of recent, and that was the round they won and beat Ultores.
Since then, and prior to, they gained value/roids by bottom feeding and napping.
So please stop being such a hypocrite and promoting FAnG as this ethical alliance.
|
Ultores was so strong, not attacking them and Apprime would mean they would outgrow the rest.
And due to the need to fighting Ult, we wouldnt attract more enemies by bottom feeding.
So yes, that was how it worked.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:33.
| |