|
|
18 Oct 2004, 22:02
|
#51
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 253
|
Re: Who is winning?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jester
Surely you mean shittiness? But you're wrong, shit in this case is not a noun, but an undocumented adjective. As in 'you are shit' or 'shit ****s should **** off.'
If you'd like to discuss the etymology of this use, I think we should take it to PM.
|
Actually tis was correct, it should be shittiness, notice the two T's, that is because shittiness derives from the adjective form of shit, which is shitty.
When you say "you are shit" shit is a direct object, and a noun. If you were to say "you are shitty" then it is an adjective decribing you. Saying "you are shit" is like saying "you are a human". Yes people do use shit in an adjective form sometimes, but wrongly so, the correct adjective form of shit is, as I said, usually shitty. Therefore the more correct forming of shitness is shittiness.
Now to stop the flaming and whatnot, this is the internet and a forum. People should not be expected to spell perfectly or try to bother with correct grammar. My first post was simply a joke, as was his original post. I simply went into so much detail because someone had the balls to question and try to undermine my joke!!
|
|
|
18 Oct 2004, 22:33
|
#52
|
Pedantic hypocrite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Back and to the left
Posts: 1,488
|
Re: Who is winning?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helix
Actually tis was correct, it should be shittiness, notice the two T's, that is because shittiness derives from the adjective form of shit, which is shitty.
|
You'll notice that there are, indeed, two Ts in what you just quoted. Yes, I missed one earlier, but I edited it in when narcissistically rereading my own post.
Incidentally, T's is an incorrect form. I guess that just goes to show that we could keep this up forever
Quote:
When you say "you are shit" shit is a direct object, and a noun.
|
Not quite. Try this on for size: 'you are car' as opposed to 'you are red'
Which case makes sense?
Quote:
If you were to say "you are shitty" then it is an adjective decribing you. ... Yes people do use shit in an adjective form sometimes, but wrongly so, the correct adjective form of shit is, as I said, usually shitty. Therefore the more correct forming of shitness is shittiness.
|
Yeah, it's wrong. But I'm not going to stop using it just because of that. There are constantly linguistic developments changing the form of language. Some people think this is bad, I hold that it must be reviewed on a case to case basis. For example, the modern overuse of the word 'irony' to describe any humorous situation is annoying because it leads to inaccuracy. Coopting 'shit' as a denigrating adjective, on the other hand, is positive. Unlike most other offensive adjectives (****er, ****, fag, ******, raghead, limey, frog, bastard, bitch, FAnG member) it is not a demeaning reference to some social or cultural group.
Quote:
Saying "you are shit" is like saying "you are a human".
|
Quote:
Now to stop the flaming and whatnot, this is the internet and a forum. People should not be expected to spell perfectly or try to bother with correct grammar.
|
I disagree. This has been a nice change of pace from the usual 'Absolute is going to crash and burn' crap. As for not expecting perfect spelling or corrected grammar, I'd much appreciate spelling and/or grammar corrections in the future, though it would probably be more appropriate to send them via PM next time
Quote:
My first post was simply a joke, as was his original post. I simply went into so much detail because someone had the balls to question and try to undermine my joke!!
|
I found your joke funny
__________________
I always wanted to be a dancer, but I could never get the shit off my shoes
.......
|
|
|
19 Oct 2004, 12:23
|
#53
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Who is winning?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jester
Unlike most other offensive adjectives (****er, ****, fag, ******, raghead, limey, frog, bastard, bitch, FAnG member) it is not a demeaning reference to some social or cultural group.
|
You did very well know that I'd read this and react to this seeing you use the entity of being a member of my alliance as an offensive adjective which in this case means you think being a member of my alliance is something bad. With that you actually discriminate a large population of PA players because according to you there are lesser human beings based on their choice of alliances during an online game ....
Now ofc I know and hope this was merely a joke (though there wasn't smilie present), it still is not nice to make such generalisations because none of those pple you just discriminated are in any case worse then you are for instance.
Then again, you knew I'd reply to this thread so you already got a reply saved in some txt file
on a sidenote I'm happy you wrote the correct abbr of our alliance.
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
23 Oct 2004, 11:58
|
#54
|
:alpha:
Join Date: May 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 7,871
|
Re: Who is winning?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kjeldoran
my alliance as an offensive adjective which in this case means you think being a member of my alliance is something bad.
|
Captain Observation strikes again!
Firstly, your alliance doesn't exist anymore does it?
Secondly, it's a joke - get over it. He took the piss out of your alliance, there's no need to cry.
Thirdly, it is bad to be a member of FAnG - this is a widely accepted opinion
__________________
"There is no I in team, but there are two in anal fisting"
|
|
|
23 Oct 2004, 12:52
|
#55
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 475
|
Re: Who is winning?
so who is winning? can't be Kjel, so who is it?
__________________
Still not banned wtf!??
-Lord Dain
|
|
|
23 Oct 2004, 14:58
|
#56
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Who is winning?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomkat
Captain Observation strikes again!
Firstly, your alliance doesn't exist anymore does it?
Secondly, it's a joke - get over it. He took the piss out of your alliance, there's no need to cry.
Thirdly, it is bad to be a member of FAnG - this is a widely accepted opinion
|
hey mr tomkat aka 'I'm too silly to read a post decently' ....
I did know he was joking, I think any human being can read that from my reply becides you, maybe trolls are imune for subtle jokes ...
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
23 Oct 2004, 16:58
|
#57
|
Lost the Fury... :(
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 516
|
Re: Who is winning?
for someone with your impressive reputation for taking insult over jokes, you really dont have any place lecturing anyone on that subject kg.
|
|
|
23 Oct 2004, 18:43
|
#58
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Who is winning?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tis
for someone with your impressive reputation for taking insult over jokes, you really dont have any place lecturing anyone on that subject kg.
|
I'm not lecturing, I'm telling him that I was joking hence proving him he was WRONG on this occasion. He was dead wrong in his post and I pointed that out, I do think I have the right to do so, not?
Funny how you lecture me not to lecture someone else ... in the end makes you worse cause in your case there's also hypocricy involved.
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
23 Oct 2004, 18:50
|
#59
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: Who is winning?
he wasn`t lecturing, he was just pointing pointing out how hypocritical you looked.
|
|
|
24 Oct 2004, 00:22
|
#60
|
:alpha:
Join Date: May 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 7,871
|
Re: Who is winning?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kjeldoran
hey mr tomkat aka 'I'm too silly to read a post decently' ....
I did know he was joking, I think any human being can read that from my reply becides you, maybe trolls are imune for subtle jokes ...
|
You're the reason I cry myself to sleep at night.
You and those hurtful posts of yours.
__________________
"There is no I in team, but there are two in anal fisting"
|
|
|
24 Oct 2004, 01:29
|
#61
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Who is winning?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomkat
You're the reason I cry myself to sleep at night.
You and those hurtful posts of yours.
|
I think we allready knew you cry each night, no point spreading that on the boards though. Now stop trolling me will you.
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
24 Oct 2004, 05:00
|
#62
|
Evil inside
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,631
|
Re: Who is winning?
Hobbie wins the award for "best comment".
My list when ticks are stopped:
1) 1up
2) MISTU
3) LCH
4) HR
5) ND
The alternative top5:
1) LCH
2) MISTU
3) 1up
4) HR
5) ND
__________________
<Germania>but you called Fury a bully, and that is terribly unfair
<Hicks>Occassionally individuals do things without Executive consent
<Dreadnought>You cant whois on Eclipse server without a registered nic, which mr ****stirrer doesnt have.
<Almeida> well i like to grow fat myself too, and when i have enough ships then i can engage in big battles
<Nantoz> Zhukov for Lord Protector!
<Jakiri> (Windows)XP was fine on release
|
|
|
24 Oct 2004, 15:11
|
#63
|
Adelante
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 855
|
Re: Who is winning?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AzureWrath
we all went on a camping trip, some never returned
|
I can still hear the horrible screams when i close my eyes.
|
|
|
25 Oct 2004, 01:43
|
#64
|
I dunno...
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: manchester
Posts: 1,502
|
Re: Who is winning?
Oh fantastic, grammaries are being talked aboutily. Cooliness.
__________________
He shall drink naught but brine, for I'll not show him / Where the quick freshes are.
|
|
|
26 Oct 2004, 05:49
|
#65
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 346
|
Re: Who is winning?
ND will stompx0r us all.
__________________
[1up]
|
|
|
26 Oct 2004, 13:33
|
#66
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: Who is winning?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cayl
ND will stompx0r us all.
|
My rampant activty will guarantee it :|
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:07.
| |