|
2 Nov 2004, 09:44
|
#1
|
Lieutnant Commander
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 101
|
The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
Hey folks,
i am a Cath this round. Not the biggest one, but my gal is under constant attack.
As my fleet i purely rely on
Beetles
Scarabs
Roaches
Black Widows
Scorpions and
Hornets.
This works like a charm in attacking, and if i wouldn't be attacked every second night i could have scratched the 1k roids border.
Ziks and Xans are easy to take, other Caths mostly too.
The fleet isn't bad in defending either, although it misses the scare factor.
But doh, we all know that since Caths exist.
Problem is:
I don't have anti DE against those pesky Terrans.
Question is:
Do you Cath players build the Defender, or do you rely on your galmates defence like I do?
The Defender is flaked by Scarabs, but is it really of any use against Terrans?
Do they care if you have some Defenders, but they can rip a decent hole in your FR Fleet?
My galmates are active and great, but if they got several waves incomming themselves defending becomes rather difficult.
Of course i do get anti DE from my alli, but if the Defender actually works for some of you, why not defend myself?
Any experiences, ideas, suggestions would be greatly welcome!
__________________
"Anything to declare?" - "Yeah, don't go to England."
|
|
|
2 Nov 2004, 23:23
|
#2
|
Lieutnant Commander
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 101
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
Oh come on,
no one interested in the good old discussions anymore?
I got another question to throw in:
Tarantulas or beetles?
Pro Tarant:
They kill, they fit in your cr fleet!
Con Tarant:
They shoot last, they cannot defend your allie mates due to ETA.
Pro Beetle:
Fast enough for your mates! Emp and quite efficient.
Con Beetle:
The only CO in your fleet....
__________________
"Anything to declare?" - "Yeah, don't go to England."
|
|
|
2 Nov 2004, 23:55
|
#3
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
Don`t bother with defenders when your cath.
Beetle/Tarantula - Beetles, Tarantulas aren`t that essential for a cr / fr +de roidfleet anyway.
|
|
|
3 Nov 2004, 01:14
|
#4
|
Pedantic hypocrite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Back and to the left
Posts: 1,488
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
Quote:
Originally Posted by _ryzekiel_
Beetle/Tarantula - Beetles, Tarantulas aren`t that essential for a cr / fr +de roidfleet anyway.
|
Tell that to the guy that accidentally* killed all my CO the other day please.
* Ok, so I forgot to send them out, my bad.
__________________
I always wanted to be a dancer, but I could never get the shit off my shoes
.......
|
|
|
10 Nov 2004, 22:35
|
#5
|
Who cares?
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 248
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
Quote:
Originally Posted by _ryzekiel_
Don`t bother with defenders when your cath.
Beetle/Tarantula - Beetles, Tarantulas aren`t that essential for a cr / fr +de roidfleet anyway.
|
Defender pwn
|
|
|
10 Nov 2004, 23:29
|
#6
|
used to register
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 979
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
Quote:
Originally Posted by MiX
Defender pwn
|
Compare init drake - defender....
__________________
R1: ??:?? | R2: 51:6 | R3: 37:12 | R4: 186:13 | R5: 13:17 | R6: 1:25
R7: 15:14 | R8: 34:4 / 52:10 ¤ | R9: 16:2 | R9.5: 34:6 / 41:6 ¤
R10: 2:2 | R10.5: 15:4 | R11: 28:8 | R12: 22:9
Damn, outdated and too lazy to edit, retired now
-----
Started playing again Still too lazy to update though
|
|
|
11 Nov 2004, 12:32
|
#7
|
Who cares?
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 248
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
are drake the only DE around?
Is defender the only Fr cath has?
Compare defender armor and Firepower to the rest of caths ships..
|
|
|
11 Nov 2004, 16:37
|
#8
|
used to register
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 979
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
Quote:
Originally Posted by MiX
are drake the only DE around?
Is defender the only Fr cath has?
Compare defender armor and Firepower to the rest of caths ships..
|
Armour/firepower are just a bonus, without a decent target or initiative any ship is shit. A dead ship wont kill a lot.
1) Against terran DE incs, they get wtfpwned. The drakes have killed them before firing even.
2) Xans dont send lancers with attackfleets normally, so against xan the ship is useless.
3) If a cathaar uses a DE/CR attackfleet and you defend against him, his roaches will freeze your defenders. When he sends guardians, it's even more fun. Lower init, so a lot of your frozen defenders also get killed.
4) I have yet to see the first zik to see sending clippers. Even if they do, clipper has lower init, your defenders get subbed and used against the defenders.
You see? Totally useless ship. Relay on your galmates/allaincemates for anti DE, the defender is worthless.
__________________
R1: ??:?? | R2: 51:6 | R3: 37:12 | R4: 186:13 | R5: 13:17 | R6: 1:25
R7: 15:14 | R8: 34:4 / 52:10 ¤ | R9: 16:2 | R9.5: 34:6 / 41:6 ¤
R10: 2:2 | R10.5: 15:4 | R11: 28:8 | R12: 22:9
Damn, outdated and too lazy to edit, retired now
-----
Started playing again Still too lazy to update though
|
|
|
11 Nov 2004, 20:11
|
#9
|
Who cares?
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 248
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
hmm think Im in abit of the wrong thread sry
Im using them as flak for my Fr attack fleet. Tho I could argue with you that they flak nice against cath De/Cr and Zik De/Bs aswell in defence.
|
|
|
11 Nov 2004, 20:47
|
#10
|
used to register
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 979
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
I wonder wtf you can attack with cathaar frigs anyways... You must be roiding newbies with no fleet or very bad fleetcompositions.
__________________
R1: ??:?? | R2: 51:6 | R3: 37:12 | R4: 186:13 | R5: 13:17 | R6: 1:25
R7: 15:14 | R8: 34:4 / 52:10 ¤ | R9: 16:2 | R9.5: 34:6 / 41:6 ¤
R10: 2:2 | R10.5: 15:4 | R11: 28:8 | R12: 22:9
Damn, outdated and too lazy to edit, retired now
-----
Started playing again Still too lazy to update though
|
|
|
11 Nov 2004, 20:52
|
#11
|
Who cares?
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 248
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
theyd be insulted if they knew you were calling them newbies
|
|
|
11 Nov 2004, 21:56
|
#12
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
nah faking-cr vs zikos who are attacking with clippers+bs works just fine (aka mosqs etc+scorps to freeze corsairs etcetc)
|
|
|
12 Nov 2004, 11:29
|
#13
|
used to register
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 979
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
Quote:
Originally Posted by _ryzekiel_
nah faking-cr vs zikos who are attacking with clippers+bs works just fine (aka mosqs etc+scorps to freeze corsairs etcetc)
|
Any decent DC keeps such possibilities in his/her head though. And covering a few hundred frigs (CR fleets usually aint THAT big) is easy. Not to meantion fleet analyse scans.
__________________
R1: ??:?? | R2: 51:6 | R3: 37:12 | R4: 186:13 | R5: 13:17 | R6: 1:25
R7: 15:14 | R8: 34:4 / 52:10 ¤ | R9: 16:2 | R9.5: 34:6 / 41:6 ¤
R10: 2:2 | R10.5: 15:4 | R11: 28:8 | R12: 22:9
Damn, outdated and too lazy to edit, retired now
-----
Started playing again Still too lazy to update though
|
|
|
12 Nov 2004, 16:49
|
#14
|
Who cares?
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 248
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
its a Cr/De fleet you are faking and they can be quite big
|
|
|
12 Nov 2004, 17:40
|
#15
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
not many "proper" planets have FA by now and wont for a while as most will go for HCT straight
|
|
|
12 Nov 2004, 20:59
|
#16
|
used to register
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 979
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
Quote:
Originally Posted by _ryzekiel_
not many "proper" planets have FA by now and wont for a while as most will go for HCT straight
|
Tomorrow, or when I cba, I'll techscan some top 10/50/100 planets to see if you're right....
But anyways, such planets have normally more than enough anti FR to counter such eventualities, unless they are stupid.
And planets not in top100 have enough time to do scans, since they have less roids/HCT.
__________________
R1: ??:?? | R2: 51:6 | R3: 37:12 | R4: 186:13 | R5: 13:17 | R6: 1:25
R7: 15:14 | R8: 34:4 / 52:10 ¤ | R9: 16:2 | R9.5: 34:6 / 41:6 ¤
R10: 2:2 | R10.5: 15:4 | R11: 28:8 | R12: 22:9
Damn, outdated and too lazy to edit, retired now
-----
Started playing again Still too lazy to update though
|
|
|
12 Nov 2004, 21:11
|
#17
|
Who cares?
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 248
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
just let me be happy with my defenders! :'(
|
|
|
13 Nov 2004, 08:29
|
#18
|
Non directed and witty
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: #ascendancy
Posts: 814
|
Re: The Cath DE Defence, if there is any
Quote:
Originally Posted by MiX
just let me be happy with my defenders! :'(
|
Its ok, i think they are scary
__________________
CATHAAAAAARGH
I've won 4 rounds.
I'm kinda a big deal.
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:03.
| |