|
|
17 Apr 2012, 03:13
|
#1
|
Planetarion Forum Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,289
|
War with Fang
This is an official announcement that as of tonight CT has declared war on Fang. CT has always worked to take on the best and test ourselves rather than sit the fence. Some both inside and outside of CT have condemned CTs perceived fencing this round, with some validity. No longer can this be said however, we are now officially at war with the #1 ranked alliance in the game, who by the way has roughly a 20m value lead over CT, even though the scores are much closer. Who will win? It is yet to be seen, but let it not be said that CT doesn't try and make the round interesting!
Flame on!
__________________
Romans 10:9-10
#strategy
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 03:19
|
#2
|
Old Fart
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 91
|
Re: War with Fang
sweeeet!
__________________
MobRulz
#FAnG
#Mercenaries
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 03:21
|
#3
|
Canadian to the Core
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,004
|
Re: War with Fang
Free roids :d
__________________
[DTA] Forever
r2-5 [LOST] - r6 [Instinct] - r7-8 [Titans] -r9 [Olympians] -DC
r10 [Elysium] -DC - r11-12 [MISTU] -DC/IA - r13-15 [Angels] - DC
r18-19 [eXi]
<Intermission>
r31-32 [CT] - r33-35 [DLR] - r36 [VsN] - r37 [???]
r45-46 [FAnG]
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 07:26
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallinn
Posts: 734
|
Re: War with Fang
LOL
man this just got too funny
__________________
VISION FTW
THIS IS ULTORES
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 07:27
|
#5
|
PA Ancient
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ventnor, Isle Of Wight
Posts: 1,060
|
Re: War with Fang
This should be interesting, dunno what this rounds like of course but last round FAnG was fantastic at defence so i wish you luck
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
Ever been attacked by a p3nguin? You get left a bit black and white!
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 08:00
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 477
|
Re: War with Fang
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 08:15
|
#7
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Assassin
This should be interesting, dunno what this rounds like of course but last round FAnG was fantastic at defence so i wish you luck
|
Only thing i would say about this is that last round FAnG never had large sustained incs....other than that defence was pretty good yes! With the added fact that they have a huge value lead this round it will be interesting to see how they hold up
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 10:21
|
#8
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
This will be a short war with CT/Ultores block early on roiding down FAnG.
Ultores will be winning this round with ease.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 10:39
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
This will be a short war with CT/Ultores block early on roiding down FAnG.
Ultores will be winning this round with ease.
|
Fang have a 20m valuelead on ct, 40m on ult. Why would they not be able to hold their ground with such defensive stats? (Assuming ult actually sides with ct..)
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 15:11
|
#10
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
Fang have a 20m valuelead on ct, 40m on ult. Why would they not be able to hold their ground with such defensive stats? (Assuming ult actually sides with ct..)
|
They couldnt hold they ground when it was only the Ultores block giving them incs, now when you add another 100 attack fleets upon the 200+ attack fleets the durex block were giving FAnG nightly, the numbers will be devil red.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 15:22
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
They couldnt hold they ground when it was only the Ultores block giving them incs, now when you add another 100 attack fleets upon the 200+ attack fleets the durex block were giving FAnG nightly, the numbers will be devil red.
|
Going +2k roids every day except one is not holding your ground?
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 16:26
|
#12
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
Going +2k roids every day except one is not holding your ground?
|
I think i explained to you in the other thread some of the factors for the roid gain, and the reason why i claim falling behind is not the same as holding your ground.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 11:36
|
#13
|
Furious Angel
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: England
Posts: 128
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
This will be a short war with CT/Ultores block early on roiding down FAnG.
Ultores will be winning this round with ease.
|
nobodies stupid enough to actually believe that............. i think this guy is playing us eksero
__________________
Dont Trust Anyone
Strength Honour Loyalty above all
Ascendancy & The Ministry
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 13:19
|
#14
|
Awesome
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 12
|
Re: War with Fang
soon winning eksero??
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 13:57
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: War with Fang
i always win!
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 15:36
|
#16
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
Re: War with Fang
With a constant roid gain and 200+ incoming fleets every night, that actually makes Fang the best alliance ever. Either that or butcher is lying again. I can't even begin to speculate on which of these is more likely.
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 18:49
|
#17
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: War with Fang
he is mathetically void Colt.. its not worth the effort...
YOu have to simplify it for him...
B-Butcher if you have 20 apples a day and 1 apple makes 1 litre of Apple juice then every day you have 20 litres of apple juice
If your rival has 15 apples then he only makes 15 litres a day
For all the days you have more apples than him you are stockpiling more apple juice.
5 days of juice making and you have 100 litres (5x20) and he has 75 litres (15x5).
Now if he find 5 more apples he will make the same amount of juice as you but you will still have that extra juice from before so he can never have more than you.
If he find another apple or two then he will be producing more juice but you have that stockpile which would take him a while to catch up to before he overtakes...
SEE SIMPLES!!
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 18:56
|
#18
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
he is mathetically void Colt.. its not worth the effort...
YOu have to simplify it for him...
B-Butcher if you have 20 apples a day and 1 apple makes 1 litre of Apple juice then every day you have 20 litres of apple juice
If your rival has 15 apples then he only makes 15 litres a day
For all the days you have more apples than him you are stockpiling more apple juice.
5 days of juice making and you have 100 litres (5x20) and he has 75 litres (15x5).
Now if he find 5 more apples he will make the same amount of juice as you but you will still have that extra juice from before so he can never have more than you.
If he find another apple or two then he will be producing more juice but you have that stockpile which would take him a while to catch up to before he overtakes...
SEE SIMPLES!!
|
So finance centers and refs dont count for shit?
Not that im saying that CT got more FC/Refs than FAnG/Ult or the other way around
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 19:05
|
#19
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
So finance centers and refs dont count for shit?
Not that im saying that CT got more FC/Refs than FAnG/Ult or the other way around
|
If were talking like that then most your Xans went Corp which gives them huge income for their roids.
It would be sensible to presume CT went mainly social/tot with Ult a mix of all 3.
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 19:46
|
#20
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
If were talking like that then most your Xans went Corp which gives them huge income for their roids.
It would be sensible to presume CT went mainly social/tot with Ult a mix of all 3.
|
heh, well anything is sensible to presume.
Anyway, CT is ahead of FAnG now, like i said they would be soon.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 01:22
|
#21
|
Registered Loser
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 38
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
he is mathetically void Colt.. its not worth the effort...
YOu have to simplify it for him...
B-Butcher if you have 20 apples a day and 1 apple makes 1 litre of Apple juice then every day you have 20 litres of apple juice
If your rival has 15 apples then he only makes 15 litres a day
For all the days you have more apples than him you are stockpiling more apple juice.
5 days of juice making and you have 100 litres (5x20) and he has 75 litres (15x5).
Now if he find 5 more apples he will make the same amount of juice as you but you will still have that extra juice from before so he can never have more than you.
If he find another apple or two then he will be producing more juice but you have that stockpile which would take him a while to catch up to before he overtakes...
SEE SIMPLES!!
|
I've heard of 'comparing apples to oranges', but apples to asteroids!? Re-damned-diculous.
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 19:00
|
#22
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 846
|
Re: War with Fang
Sigh B-butcher is there any point to even talk to you?
Crashing on Ct is widly considered to be a smart call because they wont be able to roid up fast enough the attackers will gain more in the long run because CT is so much worse than fang/ult.
__________________
R50-55 Faceless
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 19:45
|
#23
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiamat101
Sigh B-butcher is there any point to even talk to you?
Crashing on Ct is widly considered to be a smart call because they wont be able to roid up fast enough the attackers will gain more in the long run because CT is so much worse than fang/ult.
|
Lol, what are u on about?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 20:52
|
#24
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiamat101
Crashing on Ct is widly considered to be a smart call
|
Among idiots, maybe.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
heh, well anything is sensible to presume.
Anyway, CT is ahead of FAnG now, like i said they would be soon.
|
they probably just inited up el oh el
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
17 Apr 2012, 22:11
|
#25
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
Among idiots, maybe.
|
Look who posted it....
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 07:00
|
#26
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
Look who posted it....
|
No, you.
Oh, wait, is this not kindergarten?
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 15:13
|
#27
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Im honoured to be compared with MaxMillian, atleast he is not as thick as a brick.
This surely will be a short war, we all knew that FAnG wouldnt outvalue/outgrow/or whatever people claimed they would while being targetted by CT+Ultores block.
I wonder who gets underfire next...
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 16:42
|
#28
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Im honoured to be compared with MaxMillian, atleast he is not as thick as a brick.
This surely will be a short war, we all knew that FAnG wouldnt outvalue/outgrow/or whatever people claimed they would while being targetted by CT+Ultores block.
I wonder who gets underfire next...
|
Well, you obviously are "as thick as a brick" so can't be compared (apparently).
FAnG still out value every other ally out there.....
I sometimes wonder what kick you get out of being proven wrong every time you post...
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 17:41
|
#29
|
Furious Angel
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: England
Posts: 128
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Im honoured to be compared with MaxMillian, atleast he is not as thick as a brick.
This surely will be a short war, we all knew that FAnG wouldnt outvalue/outgrow/or whatever people claimed they would while being targetted by CT+Ultores block.
I wonder who gets underfire next...
|
you might aswell make that thick as a brick your new forum sig itd suit you
incidently since it seems to be the only quote you know heres another one so you can expand your vocabulary a bit more "dumb as a door knob"
__________________
Dont Trust Anyone
Strength Honour Loyalty above all
Ascendancy & The Ministry
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 15:47
|
#30
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: War with Fang
You would've better defended yourselves if you had grounded. ¬_¬
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 18:33
|
#31
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
You would've better defended yourselves if you had grounded. ¬_¬
|
Probably the first piece of sense to come from Clouds fingers :P
Bloody-Butcher out of curiousity - how many alliances actually ptargetted you last night??? Remember i said ptarget and not people gal raiding...
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 18:55
|
#32
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
Probably the first piece of sense to come from Clouds fingers :P
Bloody-Butcher out of curiousity - how many alliances actually ptargetted you last night??? Remember i said ptarget and not people gal raiding...
|
I got no clue, i didnt have the time to look up all those 340 fleets
afaik Ultores/CT/Apprime for sure.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 20:04
|
#33
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 145
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
I got no clue, i didnt have the time to look up all those 340 fleets
afaik Ultores/CT/Apprime for sure.
|
The first 4 words of this post sum you up competely, from now on every post of yours should only say this or nothing at all imho
__________________
The only thing neccesary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing
Ultores peon
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 19:25
|
#34
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: War with Fang
xVx.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 19:30
|
#35
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: War with Fang
would it be safe to presume it was 4 alliances??? with a some stragglers like always
Basically what Ultores got for 400 odd ticks yeah?
How is the boot on the other foot?
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 19:33
|
#36
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
would it be safe to presume it was 4 alliances??? with a some stragglers like always
Basically what Ultores got for 400 odd ticks yeah?
How is the boot on the other foot?
|
Hehe, im not whining like Ultores did, this is a part of the game, and i dont think it will pay off in CTs interest.
Ultores will win.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 19:39
|
#37
|
Canadian to the Core
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,004
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
would it be safe to presume it was 4 alliances??? with a some stragglers like always
Basically what Ultores got for 400 odd ticks yeah?
How is the boot on the other foot?
|
I'm confused, how is a block war the same as a 4 (it was more likely 6) vs 1?
FAnG heavily targeted Ultores, but didn't exclusively do it. We hit App, we hit DETWQ#TAF/xVx/etc
This block will exclusively target FAnG until they get bored and twat CT out of existence, because there's no one left.
It was basically a slightly lobsided war with the (laughably) 'best' alliance on the wrong side, probably the fairest round we've seen in a long time, but because it's not Ultores in first people decided that it wasn't correct and felt the need to make a disaster of the second half the round.
__________________
[DTA] Forever
r2-5 [LOST] - r6 [Instinct] - r7-8 [Titans] -r9 [Olympians] -DC
r10 [Elysium] -DC - r11-12 [MISTU] -DC/IA - r13-15 [Angels] - DC
r18-19 [eXi]
<Intermission>
r31-32 [CT] - r33-35 [DLR] - r36 [VsN] - r37 [???]
r45-46 [FAnG]
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 21:28
|
#38
|
Finally retired
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psi_K
I'm confused, how is a block war the same as a 4 (it was more likely 6) vs 1?
FAnG heavily targeted Ultores, but didn't exclusively do it. We hit App, we hit DETWQ#TAF/xVx/etc
This block will exclusively target FAnG until they get bored and twat CT out of existence, because there's no one left.
It was basically a slightly lobsided war with the (laughably) 'best' alliance on the wrong side, probably the fairest round we've seen in a long time, but because it's not Ultores in first people decided that it wasn't correct and felt the need to make a disaster of the second half the round.
|
And who would have guessed that App/xVx/DFWTK would partake in a block against you after you attacked them...
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]
In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 22:26
|
#39
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Influence
And who would have guessed that App/xVx/DFWTK would partake in a block against you after you attacked them...
|
FAnG will attack those that attack them.
Apprime attacked FAnG, and FAnG attacked Apprime back.
I dont know about the other alliances in the Ultores block, but they prolly have their reasons too.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 22:58
|
#40
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
FAnG will attack those that attack them.
Apprime attacked FAnG, and FAnG attacked Apprime back.
I dont know about the other alliances in the Ultores block, but they prolly have their reasons too.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psi_K
We hit App, we hit DETWQ#TAF/xVx/etc
|
That maybe..?
|
|
|
19 Apr 2012, 09:17
|
#41
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psi_K
I'm confused, how is a block war the same as a 4 (it was more likely 6) vs 1?
FAnG heavily targeted Ultores, but didn't exclusively do it. We hit App, we hit DETWQ#TAF/xVx/etc
This block will exclusively target FAnG until they get bored and twat CT out of existence, because there's no one left.
It was basically a slightly lobsided war with the (laughably) 'best' alliance on the wrong side, probably the fairest round we've seen in a long time, but because it's not Ultores in first people decided that it wasn't correct and felt the need to make a disaster of the second half the round.
|
Of course you will say this as the only alliance it benefited to keep hitting ultores was FAnG. You already had a massive value lead which was growing day by day...CT weren't going to out roid you! If the status quo had continued you would have been in for an easy win :P
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
19 Apr 2012, 12:35
|
#42
|
Furious Angel
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: England
Posts: 128
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt
Of course you will say this as the only alliance it benefited to keep hitting ultores was FAnG. You already had a massive value lead which was growing day by day...CT weren't going to out roid you! If the status quo had continued you would have been in for an easy win :P
|
probably the EASIEST win ?
__________________
Dont Trust Anyone
Strength Honour Loyalty above all
Ascendancy & The Ministry
|
|
|
19 Apr 2012, 14:25
|
#43
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt
Of course you will say this as the only alliance it benefited to keep hitting ultores was FAnG. You already had a massive value lead which was growing day by day...CT weren't going to out roid you! If the status quo had continued you would have been in for an easy win :P
|
CT passed FAnG before they went to war.
Ultores were avoiding CT, and some might think they would actualy focus defend against FAnG incs. While xVx/CT/Apprime were hitting FAnG, and killing their value, CT sneaked passed everyone and into #1.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 19:41
|
#44
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: War with Fang
Who said anything about whining?
Its strategic placement of words to influence decisions of others to benefit yourself
You might wanna try it some time instead of turning the universe against your alliance with your posts on here and general existence
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 19:52
|
#45
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
Who said anything about whining?
Its strategic placement of words to influence decisions of others to benefit yourself
You might wanna try it some time instead of turning the universe against your alliance with your posts on here and general existence
|
Lol, im not trying to turn anyone against anyone. I just share my view on things.
If the univers decides to target FAnG, i hope they do it on other terms than get back at because i share my views on AD.
Ultores on the other hand has used all round to whine at everyone else cus they unfairly teamed up against the biggest threat to PA, me however have used the last day pointing out what a bad move this could turn out to be for the one declaring war.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
18 Apr 2012, 23:19
|
#46
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Ultores on the other hand has used all round to whine at everyone else cus they unfairly teamed up against the biggest threat to PA, me however have used the last day pointing out what a bad move this could turn out to be for the one declaring war.
|
What's this 'Ultores is the biggest threat to PA' lark? Just becuase they have the motivation and dedication to play well, and other alliances are too lazy, doesn't mean they're the biggest threat to PA. lol...
Hell, even NewDawn could take Ultores 1 on 1 if they tried hard enough. (yes I know this debate has come to past, but you're implying that Ultores will be the reason for the game's departure, which is total bs.)
|
|
|
19 Apr 2012, 00:36
|
#47
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
What's this 'Ultores is the biggest threat to PA' lark? Just becuase they have the motivation and dedication to play well, and other alliances are too lazy, doesn't mean they're the biggest threat to PA. lol...
Hell, even NewDawn could take Ultores 1 on 1 if they tried hard enough. (yes I know this debate has come to past, but you're implying that Ultores will be the reason for the game's departure, which is total bs.)
|
lol what are u on about now? Im not implying shit, i just say that Ultores is the biggest threat to everyone, in PA. One could start a discussion about Ultores maybe being a part of the games departure, but this is not the place nor the time.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
19 Apr 2012, 01:00
|
#48
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
lol what are u on about now? Im not implying shit
|
Let me explain:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Ultores on the other hand has used all round to whine at everyone else cus they unfairly teamed up against the biggest threat to PA
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
i just say that Ultores is the biggest threat to everyone
|
Maybe phrase your posts better. ¬_¬
|
|
|
21 Apr 2012, 14:17
|
#49
|
Old Skool
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 278
|
Re: War with Fang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
lol what are u on about now? Im not implying shit, i just say that Ultores is the biggest threat to everyone, in PA.
|
Tbh, and I'm sure many ults will agree, we aren't really that uber - gosu - hardcore - fantastic.
We crash - we fail launch - we fail def -we have planets with 200+ ticks mydef - we have ppl we can't reach through phone/text - we have ppl completely ignoring ally strat - we have the most mixed build ever this round when I look at ship count - we have ppl roiding/attacking out of raid - we have emo.
I'm not washing handsd here, some of the above counts for me aswell - and I'm pretty sure every single ult member can sign atleast 3 of the above.
Where I'm going with this?
Any ally who improved on the above to a point where you're doing a less messed up job than ult is, and you'll be - according to you
The biggest threat to everyone in PA (whatever that means)
Really, ult effort is nothing compared to earlier top allies in PA, when you actually had the amount of no lifers able to do the setup.
If anything the sorry state of the playerbase this game has, is the answer to you threat fears.
|
|
|
19 Apr 2012, 18:41
|
#50
|
Knight of Ni!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Oslo Norway
Posts: 298
|
Re: War with Fang
All of you need to call Ascendancy and get lessons in Alliance Discussions...
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:38.
| |