|
3 Apr 2003, 09:19
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Caught between the Devil and the deep blue sea.
Posts: 157
|
Looks like the Iraqis are mounted something like a counter-offensive ...
This is the most constructively defensive move they've made so far, moving troops to block the US moves on Baghdad, on top of shooting down a helicopter and a jet in one night, killing at least seven.
Think this is the best they'll be able to do?
__________________
* CakeGuevara has quit IRC (They keep saying the right person will come along; I think a truck hit mine.)
*morg has never heard of GD
<@morg> sounds like an std to me
<.KraKto5is8> "you can pick your friends, you can pick your nose, but you can't pick your friends nose"
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 09:24
|
#2
|
King of The Fat Boys
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,331
|
I think they'll be able to put up a much better defence once the street fighting starts, if it does start.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 10:07
|
#3
|
Poster Professionale
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The place where mods put bad people
Posts: 1,077
|
Save American lives. Nuke the whole god damn middle east. Cost effective aswell.
__________________
ATTENTION!
This thread is hijacked by a wiseguy! Please evacuate promptly at your nearest exit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodrog
I wish we could trademark for a less shitty poster
hahahahahahaha, get it?
|
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 10:11
|
#4
|
Not Dark or Handsome
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cwmbru
Posts: 2,587
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Cynical Oracle
Cost effective aswell.
|
Not really, unless you plan on dumping the clean-up bill on someone else.
__________________
"You can't drink a pint of Bovril."
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 10:13
|
#5
|
Good Son
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,991
|
I don't think they'll be able to push any heavier gear, but if it comes to entering Baghdad, strategy and local knowledge will play a great role. Iraq has the advantage in both areas due it's their home - homeground advantage in street wars is significant.
__________________
"Oh, wretched race of a day, children of chance and misery, why do ye compel me to say to you what it were most expedient for you not to hear? What is best of all is for ever beyond your reach: not to be born, not to be, to be nothing. The second best for you, however, is soon to die". Silenus, tutor to Dionysos, speaking to King Midas.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 10:13
|
#6
|
Poster Professionale
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The place where mods put bad people
Posts: 1,077
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Apothos
Not really, unless you plan on dumping the clean-up bill on someone else.
|
Who mentiond cleaning upp?
Just let it dry off a few hundred years..
__________________
ATTENTION!
This thread is hijacked by a wiseguy! Please evacuate promptly at your nearest exit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodrog
I wish we could trademark for a less shitty poster
hahahahahahaha, get it?
|
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 10:14
|
#7
|
a new low in getting high
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,810
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Apothos
Not really, unless you plan on dumping the clean-up bill on someone else.
|
They would. :/
__________________
There’s trouble on every corner,
And you need a place to hide,
All the bad things follow us down,
I want you by my side.
We’re hitting a new low.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 10:15
|
#8
|
Good Son
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,991
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Apothos
Not really, unless you plan on dumping the clean-up bill on someone else.
|
That'll be UN then.
The Americans are going to dump the real clean-up (on humanitary level) bill of the Iraq war to Europe anyways. Who do you believe will take the hordes of refuqees? How many of them are going to go to the US? Oh, lordy, maybe a dozen. The States will help their own inner economy by giving the rebuilding jobs to their own companies, leaving humanitary help to other UN nations.
How funny.
__________________
"Oh, wretched race of a day, children of chance and misery, why do ye compel me to say to you what it were most expedient for you not to hear? What is best of all is for ever beyond your reach: not to be born, not to be, to be nothing. The second best for you, however, is soon to die". Silenus, tutor to Dionysos, speaking to King Midas.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 10:36
|
#9
|
Poster Professionale
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The place where mods put bad people
Posts: 1,077
|
But it's so productive for the Americans. After all, money is what turns the wheels. Everyone tries to grab their piece of the cake. Just the Americans doing it so much better.
Your counter americanistic governments has managed to cloud your vision with 'human rights' etc. Without the $ you won't get anywhere.
__________________
ATTENTION!
This thread is hijacked by a wiseguy! Please evacuate promptly at your nearest exit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodrog
I wish we could trademark for a less shitty poster
hahahahahahaha, get it?
|
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 10:45
|
#10
|
Doh!
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit
Posts: 1,720
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tietäjä
That'll be UN then.
The Americans are going to dump the real clean-up (on humanitary level) bill of the Iraq war to Europe anyways. Who do you believe will take the hordes of refuqees? How many of them are going to go to the US? Oh, lordy, maybe a dozen. The States will help their own inner economy by giving the rebuilding jobs to their own companies, leaving humanitary help to other UN nations.
How funny.
|
Extremely doubtfull.
The US as the Main aggressor are obliged by international law, to pay the cost of the Humanitarian aid for the Iraqi's.
The UK also has the same obligation (proportional).
That obligation cannot be abrogated by anyone, nor can it be taken on board by the UN.
__________________
Spinner: Kudos to Judge for having big cohones!
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 10:50
|
#11
|
Good Son
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,991
|
Oh Fudge, The USA was denied the right to attack Iraq by the international law.
__________________
"Oh, wretched race of a day, children of chance and misery, why do ye compel me to say to you what it were most expedient for you not to hear? What is best of all is for ever beyond your reach: not to be born, not to be, to be nothing. The second best for you, however, is soon to die". Silenus, tutor to Dionysos, speaking to King Midas.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 10:54
|
#12
|
Poster Professionale
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The place where mods put bad people
Posts: 1,077
|
If I'm not entirely mistaken, didn't some fancy smancy mod remove Gayle's sig due to it's non english nature?
__________________
ATTENTION!
This thread is hijacked by a wiseguy! Please evacuate promptly at your nearest exit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodrog
I wish we could trademark for a less shitty poster
hahahahahahaha, get it?
|
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 10:58
|
#13
|
'Useless'
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wellington, NZ.
Posts: 357
|
the Iraqis just need to turn it into as longer war as possible. The americans seem to kill more americans than the iraqis do, so if they hold out long enough the americans will lose the war for them.
__________________
Clearly.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 11:02
|
#14
|
Good Son
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,991
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Cynical Oracle
If I'm not entirely mistaken, didn't some fancy smancy mod remove Gayle's sig due to it's non english nature?
|
Thank you for your totally inrelevant comment, mister Fancypants.
Now, if we'll continue on the subject now that we got there, smartass. Yes, it was removed. So was my sig. Then her sig was returned because Kura considered 'geeky' language approved, rather than Finnish (my sig at that time). Thus, I translated my sig into Quenya (elvish, comparison to gayle's orcish at that moment), and some mod removed it, removing Gayle's sig too. The next day, they decided to allow foreign languages in signatures.
Next time you attempt to be smart with your cunning wits and overwhelming ignorance, don't do it with me. Thank you.
__________________
"Oh, wretched race of a day, children of chance and misery, why do ye compel me to say to you what it were most expedient for you not to hear? What is best of all is for ever beyond your reach: not to be born, not to be, to be nothing. The second best for you, however, is soon to die". Silenus, tutor to Dionysos, speaking to King Midas.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 11:05
|
#15
|
Poster Professionale
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The place where mods put bad people
Posts: 1,077
|
Indeed. Why go through the trouble of loosing military personel?
A few B-52's could have done it much cleaner, faster and effective. Who cares about the Iraqi civilians!? They are suffering, but that's not reason enough to liberate them, so why does killing them all, and as a bonus, kill a mad dictator who is a possible future threat, both towards his own and 'democracy', not equally justified?
__________________
ATTENTION!
This thread is hijacked by a wiseguy! Please evacuate promptly at your nearest exit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodrog
I wish we could trademark for a less shitty poster
hahahahahahaha, get it?
|
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 11:12
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 4,911
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Cynical Oracle
Indeed. Why go through the trouble of loosing military personel?
A few B-52's could have done it much cleaner, faster and effective. Who cares about the Iraqi civilians!? They are suffering, but that's not reason enough to liberate them, so why does killing them all, and as a bonus, kill a mad dictator who is a possible future threat, both towards his own and 'democracy', not equally justified?
|
does this make sense?
__________________
I think it's time we blow this scene, get everybody and the stuff together..........
ok 3..... 2..... 1.. let's jam
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 11:15
|
#17
|
Good Son
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,991
|
Yes, of course, nobody cares about the civilians, but the civilians themselves - if we venture deep into human nature, and try be honest.
But it's considered 'correct behavior' by the international community not to massacre the civilian population during the war, or at least try avoid it by all means possible.
__________________
"Oh, wretched race of a day, children of chance and misery, why do ye compel me to say to you what it were most expedient for you not to hear? What is best of all is for ever beyond your reach: not to be born, not to be, to be nothing. The second best for you, however, is soon to die". Silenus, tutor to Dionysos, speaking to King Midas.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 11:21
|
#18
|
Poster Professionale
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The place where mods put bad people
Posts: 1,077
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tietäjä
Yes, of course, nobody cares about the civilians, but the civilians themselves - if we venture deep into human nature, and try be honest.
But it's considered 'correct behavior' by the international community not to massacre the civilian population during the war, or at least try avoid it by all means possible.
|
But we save them from alot of torture. Isn't that a way of liberating them? They are no longer living in terror. I mean, they are dying now anways. If we stop fighting Saddam's regieme now, he would probably do the job himself. Infact, maybee that's a clue in itself.
After 1991, Saddam killed some 100-150k people. As this war has been an invasion attempt, more than an expelling from Kuwait mission he might just kill a few millions.
If your not living in freedom, your not living at all. Your merly beeing used.
__________________
ATTENTION!
This thread is hijacked by a wiseguy! Please evacuate promptly at your nearest exit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodrog
I wish we could trademark for a less shitty poster
hahahahahahaha, get it?
|
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 11:32
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 329
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tietäjä
That'll be UN then.
The Americans are going to dump the real clean-up (on humanitary level) bill of the Iraq war to Europe anyways. Who do you believe will take the hordes of refuqees? How many of them are going to go to the US? Oh, lordy, maybe a dozen. The States will help their own inner economy by giving the rebuilding jobs to their own companies, leaving humanitary help to other UN nations.
How funny.
|
so??
Thats why we are the most powerfull country in the world.
__________________
"Security is the essential roadblock to achieving the road map to peace."
--George W. Bush, July 25, 2003
Mankind is ready to enter the solar system
George W. Bush, in his speech about his space program
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 11:32
|
#20
|
Good Son
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,991
|
Oh, yes.
Killing one is the ultimate way of liberating one.
Wonder if the people you feel like killing feel the same way.
__________________
"Oh, wretched race of a day, children of chance and misery, why do ye compel me to say to you what it were most expedient for you not to hear? What is best of all is for ever beyond your reach: not to be born, not to be, to be nothing. The second best for you, however, is soon to die". Silenus, tutor to Dionysos, speaking to King Midas.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 11:37
|
#21
|
King of The Fat Boys
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,331
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tietäjä
Yes, of course, nobody cares about the civilians, but the civilians themselves - if we venture deep into human nature, and try be honest.
|
I like the way you assume that everybody is a callous b*st*rd. Though I think you're very wrong.
Think of George Bush for example. He's the guy that started this war, in order for it to start he's the one who had to give permission, him and him alone.
Don't you think he cares about civilian deaths? Not in a looking good way, or not wanting to lose face kind of way, but in a can't sleep at night kind of way? After all, he is directly responsible for their deaths, don't you think he'd rather see 1,000 civilians die than 10,000?
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 11:40
|
#22
|
Gone
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,656
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Radical Edward
does this make sense?
|
"Who cares about all those dead civilians, we're freeing up an opressed people from a ruthless, murderous dictator!"
Is borderline paradoxical when you come to mention it, yes.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 11:43
|
#23
|
Poster Professionale
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The place where mods put bad people
Posts: 1,077
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Marilyn Manson
"Who cares about all those dead civilians, we're freeing up an opressed people from a ruthless, murderous dictator!"
Is borderline paradoxical when you come to mention it, yes.
|
It's paradoxal enough yes, but it doesn't make sense. It was irony, altho an intentionally bad attempt at it.
__________________
ATTENTION!
This thread is hijacked by a wiseguy! Please evacuate promptly at your nearest exit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodrog
I wish we could trademark for a less shitty poster
hahahahahahaha, get it?
|
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 11:47
|
#24
|
Bored
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Nottm ->Shef ->Croydon ->Manc ->Durham ->Sheffield
Posts: 6,506
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ChubbyChecker
I like the way you assume that everybody is a callous b*st*rd. Though I think you're very wrong.
Think of George Bush for example. He's the guy that started this war, in order for it to start he's the one who had to give permission, him and him alone.
Don't you think he cares about civilian deaths? Not in a looking good way, or not wanting to lose face kind of way, but in a can't sleep at night kind of way? After all, he is directly responsible for their deaths, don't you think he'd rather see 1,000 civilians die than 10,000?
|
To be honest I don't think he could care less. It's not just a brave face he's putting on, he's grinning all the time because he doesn't really care. Tony Blair, on the other hand, does seem to care and does seem to be having sleepless nights. George Bush not only sleeps peacefully at night but also during his afternoon nap.
I would actually like to know if he has ever met anyone below the poverty line.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 11:49
|
#25
|
Good Son
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,991
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ChubbyChecker
I like the way you assume that everybody is a callous b*st*rd. Though I think you're very wrong.
Think of George Bush for example. He's the guy that started this war, in order for it to start he's the one who had to give permission, him and him alone.
Don't you think he cares about civilian deaths? Not in a looking good way, or not wanting to lose face kind of way, but in a can't sleep at night kind of way? After all, he is directly responsible for their deaths, don't you think he'd rather see 1,000 civilians die than 10,000?
|
I'm only on the Hobbes-way concerning human nature on deeper levels.
Yes, Bush is the bloke who started the war. But I doubt he'll loose his sleep due the fact that there are a few thousand dead civilians, rather because that might pull down his political support. He's more worried about how people react to the fact that there are dead civilians and it's, in a way, 'his fault', that about the actual fact that there is innocent blood spilled all over Baghdad already.
Now, shoot me if I'm very wrong.
__________________
"Oh, wretched race of a day, children of chance and misery, why do ye compel me to say to you what it were most expedient for you not to hear? What is best of all is for ever beyond your reach: not to be born, not to be, to be nothing. The second best for you, however, is soon to die". Silenus, tutor to Dionysos, speaking to King Midas.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 11:54
|
#26
|
It was a Stupid Dream
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Winchester, UK
Posts: 2,077
|
when it gets into street warfare, then there will start to be problems
ala black hawk down style (the film if you have seen it)
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 11:57
|
#27
|
Good Son
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,991
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Starbucks
when it gets into street warfare, then there will start to be problems
ala black hawk down style (the film if you have seen it)
|
Yes, BHD style, aka what happened in Mogadishu Somalia. It'd be devastating on civilians too (I know Somali person who had a grenade thrown into middle of the place they were hiding with his family from war - the grenade was apparently a mistake - his father threw him self on the grenade, got splattered, and the bloke's face got screwed so badly he's had several operations here in Finland and now, after ten years or so, it's starting to look closely normal, thanks to skin transplants and plastic cirurgy).
__________________
"Oh, wretched race of a day, children of chance and misery, why do ye compel me to say to you what it were most expedient for you not to hear? What is best of all is for ever beyond your reach: not to be born, not to be, to be nothing. The second best for you, however, is soon to die". Silenus, tutor to Dionysos, speaking to King Midas.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 12:11
|
#28
|
Child Eating Zombie Clown
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,450
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tietäjä
Yes, BHD style, aka what happened in Mogadishu Somalia. It'd be devastating on civilians too (I know Somali person who had a grenade thrown into middle of the place they were hiding with his family from war - the grenade was apparently a mistake - his father threw him self on the grenade, got splattered, and the bloke's face got screwed so badly he's had several operations here in Finland and now, after ten years or so, it's starting to look closely normal, thanks to skin transplants and plastic cirurgy).
|
See what happened in Somalia we were unprepared for. We had however many servicemen stuck in a battle with thousands of Somalis. This time, we're strolling in, perfectly prepared for what ever the iraqi's will throw at us.
__________________
Mirai - An Astral Being From Outer Space
Die You Bitch Minister of Insanity - "Timete Nostrum Piscem Furoris"
My fellow Americans, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever, we begin bombing in 5 minutes - President Ronald Reagan, in a radio check where he did not realize the microphone was on and the station broadcasting
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 12:14
|
#29
|
Gone
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,656
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tietäjä
I'm only on the Hobbes-way concerning human nature on deeper levels.
|
Did Hobbes ever say humans were fundamentally 'bad'?
As far as I remember, he simply said that we would be rationally brutal to each other in a state of nature.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 12:15
|
#30
|
Good Son
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,991
|
Yes, that's what everyone would assume. Of course, one can NEVER be sure, but you might be right, Mirai. But the streets are, nevertheless, dangerous - a potential death trap.
__________________
"Oh, wretched race of a day, children of chance and misery, why do ye compel me to say to you what it were most expedient for you not to hear? What is best of all is for ever beyond your reach: not to be born, not to be, to be nothing. The second best for you, however, is soon to die". Silenus, tutor to Dionysos, speaking to King Midas.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 12:25
|
#31
|
Good Son
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,991
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Marilyn Manson
Did Hobbes ever say humans were fundamentally 'bad'?
As far as I remember, he simply said that we would be rationally brutal to each other in a state of nature.
|
No, he didn't. But that's not what I refered to.
"Bellum omnium contra omen" was my goal at this point.
And not rationally, rationally, Hobbes believes, humans would form states to support their rational activity, merchandise mainly (A deja vu at this point, a ****ing strong one, of this discussion).
At the state of nature, humans are continually in war with each other. They strive for their own benefits, regardless of other's benefits - one can easily kill another just to reach a goal, without even blinking. It's up to everyone to consider if it's bad. Rationally brutal, maybe, but striving for our own goals, ignoring others, or trampling them on our way if required.
Humans form groups and stripe themselves from the freedom of the state of nature, giving the ultimate power to a dictator, who provides, with the state, requirements for rational activity, capitalistic way, shopping (having difficulties searching the right word, but you understand, hey TRADE). A perfect state, The Leviathan, would look something like this.
Rewards and punishments equals knees, elbows **
Wealth equals muscles
People equal soul
Officers (bureocracy*) equal bones
**(joints that move mucles)
*please correct the right form on this one
An ideal state forms of those (I'm not particurily 100% sure, but it's at least close to that description, it's a month or two since I visited a few classes on Hobbes). An ideal state is, fundamentally a human in state of nature, in war with other states. The function of the state I described above. Of course, nowadays nations tend to form pacts (even bigger 'Humans', 'Leviathans').
Hobbes lecture out.
__________________
"Oh, wretched race of a day, children of chance and misery, why do ye compel me to say to you what it were most expedient for you not to hear? What is best of all is for ever beyond your reach: not to be born, not to be, to be nothing. The second best for you, however, is soon to die". Silenus, tutor to Dionysos, speaking to King Midas.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 12:34
|
#32
|
Poster Professionale
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The place where mods put bad people
Posts: 1,077
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tietäjä
Yes, BHD style, aka what happened in Mogadishu Somalia. It'd be devastating on civilians too (I know Somali person who had a grenade thrown into middle of the place they were hiding with his family from war - the grenade was apparently a mistake - his father threw him self on the grenade, got splattered, and the bloke's face got screwed so badly he's had several operations here in Finland and now, after ten years or so, it's starting to look closely normal, thanks to skin transplants and plastic cirurgy).
|
It's devestating on the civilians because they are not let out of the darn city. Saddam is more guilty of killing them than Bush. Bush even gave Saddam a chance to let his people not suffer from a war at all if he could only get his family and move the out of there.
This is entirly Saddams fault.
__________________
ATTENTION!
This thread is hijacked by a wiseguy! Please evacuate promptly at your nearest exit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodrog
I wish we could trademark for a less shitty poster
hahahahahahaha, get it?
|
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 12:38
|
#33
|
Good Son
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,991
|
Well well... I always thought "who shoots kills". Of course, Saddam is a vile dictator, but they should've just had a CIA agent go assassinate him. Forget that.
Okay, the war is entirely Saddams fault. It's Saddams fault that he looks to be threatening to the Americans. It's Saddams fault that US have changed their defence policy to this "stop trouble before they attend" style. It's Saddams fault that Americans didn't want to wait for the weapons' inspectors.
It's ALL SADDAMS FAULT. A bit exaggerated, eh?
Of course, you have some facts base too CO, but you are at least as grossly exaggerating as I did above there.
__________________
"Oh, wretched race of a day, children of chance and misery, why do ye compel me to say to you what it were most expedient for you not to hear? What is best of all is for ever beyond your reach: not to be born, not to be, to be nothing. The second best for you, however, is soon to die". Silenus, tutor to Dionysos, speaking to King Midas.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 13:22
|
#34
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 214
|
"I wanted to meet stimulating and interesting people of an ancient culture. And kill them"
So whats the estimation of how many republican guards there are in Baghdad? It sure can get messy as it always does in cities.
__________________
so not!
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 13:29
|
#35
|
Poster Professionale
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The place where mods put bad people
Posts: 1,077
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tietäjä
~*snip*~
|
The "People don't kill people. Guns kill people." argument is not bringing you anywhere.
Additionally, the premptive defence strategy was implemented some 50ish years ago. It hasn't been drawn this far before tho.
__________________
ATTENTION!
This thread is hijacked by a wiseguy! Please evacuate promptly at your nearest exit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodrog
I wish we could trademark for a less shitty poster
hahahahahahaha, get it?
|
|
|
|
3 Apr 2003, 17:03
|
#36
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tietäjä
Oh Fudge, The USA was denied the right to attack Iraq by the international law.
|
Laws are worthless without the means to enforce them.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:44.
| |