|
26 Nov 2002, 22:17
|
#1
|
Luminous Flux
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 215
|
I hate RTS 'wimps'
Just got done with a game of StarCraft. I was Zerg, he was Protoss. I'm a pretty good player, especially with Zerg, but all he freaking built were photon cannons and smothered me. I've noticed this trend with other games, too. All the so-called 'good' players just make structures up to your base and strangle you. I don't know how that's fun, and it really ruins the games. I think the games were supposed to be simply building a decent base and using UNITS to attack. Do you guys agree/disagree?
__________________
Cuddley_Battleship
Your neg rep destination.
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 22:18
|
#2
|
Guest
|
If you really are any good you should be able to beat someone no matter how lame the tactic they use is.
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 22:19
|
#3
|
Luminous Flux
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 215
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Dace
If you really are any good you should be able to beat someone no matter how lame the tactic they use is.
|
Do you play StarCraft?
__________________
Cuddley_Battleship
Your neg rep destination.
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 22:20
|
#4
|
Vermin Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,280
|
You are bringing a claim that should be made against the game, not the player.
If he plays by the rules (unlike everyone on CS for example) then his objective is to win, not to make the game enjoyable for you.
If the game really should be about units, then the game should be changed. It has nothing to do with whoever you just played against.
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 22:23
|
#5
|
Luminous Flux
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 215
|
Quote:
Originally posted by acropolis
You are bringing a claim that should be made against the game, not the player.
If he plays by the rules (unlike everyone on CS for example) then his objective is to win, not to make the game enjoyable for you.
If the game really should be about units, then the game should be changed. It has nothing to do with whoever you just played against.
|
You're right, although I didn't have a whole lot of fun, I don't see how mindlessly expending a base can be fun either. The real objective of a game is to have fun, isn't it?
__________________
Cuddley_Battleship
Your neg rep destination.
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 22:24
|
#6
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Cuddley_Battleship
Do you play StarCraft?
|
I played it in the past.
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 22:24
|
#7
|
Guest
|
I've only really played the Age of Kings series, but I can understand the frustration. There was a tactic where the opponent rushed to the 2nd age and made nothing but towers around your base. ES tried to stop this from happening, but it was too good a tactic even after they nerfed towers.
However, I don't feel offended by other people doing it. I like the challenge for beating them down. In AoK it was possible to beat it if you knew what you were doing, but perhaps in Starcraft it's different. (Note: I'm talking HIGH level games here... I'm not sure what level you are).
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 22:34
|
#8
|
Luminous Flux
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 215
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Miasma
hehe Protoss rape was always a fun tactic.
"I wonder why his probes are wandering around the back of my base?"
5 minute later
"Where the **** did those cannons come from"
lame but justifiable if a player doesnt stop it.
|
heh. I wish I would have saved the replay of that game, I held him back from my last base for at least half an hour. (by then he'd expended to cover most of the map)
__________________
Cuddley_Battleship
Your neg rep destination.
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 22:35
|
#9
|
Klaatu barada nikto
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 3,237
|
Re: I hate RTS 'wimps'
Quote:
Originally posted by Cuddley_Battleship
Just got done with a game of StarCraft. I was Zerg, he was Protoss. I'm a pretty good player, especially with Zerg, but all he freaking built were photon cannons and smothered me.
|
It's been a while since I've played, but don't Guardians outrange photon cannons?
__________________
The Ottawa Citizen and Southam News wish to apologize for our apology to Mark Steyn, published Oct. 22. In correcting the incorrect statements about Mr. Steyn published Oct. 15, we incorrectly published the incorrect correction. We accept and regret that our original regrets were unacceptable and we apologize to Mr. Steyn for any distress caused by our previous apology.
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 22:38
|
#10
|
Vermin Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,280
|
Re: Re: I hate RTS 'wimps'
Quote:
Originally posted by Tactitus
It's been a while since I've played, but don't Guardians outrange photon cannons?
|
Heh. You get photon cannons right away, whereas it takes a good while to get up to guardians. And then guardians is a bad way to go because protoss are particularly dangerous when attacking airships (scouts...).
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 22:38
|
#11
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Re: Re: I hate RTS 'wimps'
Quote:
Originally posted by Tactitus
It's been a while since I've played, but don't Guardians outrange photon cannons?
|
Yep.
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 22:38
|
#12
|
Luminous Flux
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 215
|
Re: Re: I hate RTS 'wimps'
Quote:
Originally posted by Tactitus
It's been a while since I've played, but don't Guardians outrange photon cannons?
|
Yep. He had a nice fleet of scouts and some templars that would come out to play whenever I tried to use them though.
__________________
Cuddley_Battleship
Your neg rep destination.
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 22:39
|
#13
|
Insomniac
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: over there
Posts: 110
|
Re: I hate RTS 'wimps'
Quote:
Originally posted by Cuddley_Battleship
Just got done with a game of StarCraft. I was Zerg, he was Protoss. I'm a pretty good player, especially with Zerg, but all he freaking built were photon cannons and smothered me. I've noticed this trend with other games, too. All the so-called 'good' players just make structures up to your base and strangle you. I don't know how that's fun, and it really ruins the games. I think the games were supposed to be simply building a decent base and using UNITS to attack. Do you guys agree/disagree?
|
a zergling rush is faster than a cannon rape .... kill him before he kills u
__________________
[Ministry] HC - retired
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 22:40
|
#14
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Re: Re: Re: I hate RTS 'wimps'
Quote:
Originally posted by Cuddley_Battleship
Yep. He had a nice fleet of scouts and some templars that would come out to play whenever I tried to use them though.
|
Scourge, keep the guardians spread out and kill the templar.
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 22:40
|
#15
|
Insomniac
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: over there
Posts: 110
|
Re: Re: Re: I hate RTS 'wimps'
Quote:
Originally posted by Cuddley_Battleship
Yep. He had a nice fleet of scouts and some templars that would come out to play whenever I tried to use them though.
|
you mean he had the time to research templars and build a stargate and STILL could cannon up ur base ? ... u need to work on ur speed
__________________
[Ministry] HC - retired
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 22:40
|
#16
|
Luminous Flux
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 215
|
Re: Re: I hate RTS 'wimps'
Quote:
Originally posted by Akallabeth
a zergling rush is faster than a cannon rape .... kill him before he kills u
|
Did that, but he had enough photon cannons by the time I got to him it failed.
__________________
Cuddley_Battleship
Your neg rep destination.
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 23:22
|
#17
|
Street Tramp
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Street Gutter
Posts: 341
|
So basically, what you're saying is that ... You got owned by a noob tactic and were too ****e to stop it?
__________________
Chimney Pots.
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 23:25
|
#18
|
Flame Attraction
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: detroit
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Raging.Retard
So basically, what you're saying is that ... You got owned by a noob tactic and were too ****e to stop it?
|
I agree, I played StarCraft in leagues etc., we were one of the top 10 clans in germany... No offence, but if you get owned by photons as a zerg, you are really doing something wrong...
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 23:25
|
#19
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Raging.Retard
So basically, what you're saying is that ... You got owned by a noob tactic and were too ****e to stop it?
|
That does appear to be the case.
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 23:40
|
#20
|
Insomniac
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: over there
Posts: 110
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Raging.Retard
So basically, what you're saying is that ... You got owned by a noob tactic and were too ****e to stop it?
|
what exactly is 'n00bish' with photon (bunker, lurker, whatever)containment?
it forces ur opponent to go air or spend time and resources cracking the containment.... by that time if ur half decent u should have 3-4 bases all over the map, and u can then simply outresource ur opponent
oh, and if the base ur containing hasnt got sufficient defence, ofc its wise to go in for the kill :P
__________________
[Ministry] HC - retired
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 23:44
|
#21
|
Vermin Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,280
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Akallabeth
what exactly is 'n00bish' with photon (bunker, lurker, whatever)containment?
it forces ur opponent to go air or spend time and resources cracking the containment.... by that time if ur half decent u should have 3-4 bases all over the map, and u can then simply outresource ur opponent
oh, and if the base ur containing hasnt got sufficient defence, ofc its wise to go in for the kill :P
|
Its a "n00b technique" because it only works if your opponent isn't that good (or isn't paying attention). If you use that against a good player, you'll get wiped out.
Non-n00bs don't use it because they know if their opponent doesn't suck they will lose, so it is a waste (no point in winning a game if your opponent sucks anyway). And because they aren't homosexual.
n00b.
|
|
|
26 Nov 2002, 23:56
|
#22
|
Flame Attraction
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: detroit
Posts: 70
|
Oh and btw, you don't have to go air at all if you want to get by that.
mass ling or a couple dozen hydras wipe out every defense easily if you time your attack well
|
|
|
27 Nov 2002, 00:04
|
#23
|
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sept 2057
Posts: 1,813
|
Re: I hate RTS 'wimps'
Quote:
Originally posted by Cuddley_Battleship
All the so-called 'good' players just make structures up to your base and strangle you
|
Only poor players dont keep recon'ing the map, especially around their main base.
(and use mass-lings to remove offensive cannons, or if you have the tech, distract them with lings while lurkers get in position. I know the cannons can see them, but lurkers do far more damage than unevolved lings. The computer targeting AI will always shoot the closer lings over the ranged lurkers, unless told otherwise).
__________________
in my sig i write down all my previous co-ords and alliance positions as if they matter because I'm not important enough to be remembered by nickname alone.
|
|
|
27 Nov 2002, 00:49
|
#24
|
Sultan of Swing
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Telegraph Road
Posts: 75
|
'newbie'
__________________
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines...
BlueTuba
|
|
|
27 Nov 2002, 00:55
|
#25
|
Guilty of being White
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: CANADA EH!!!!!
Posts: 254
|
rofl even my 10 yr old cousin can get out of that when he gets cannoned to ****
__________________
<ckx> women ask for it
<ckx> they act all old and mature
<ckx> and then you stick your **** up their ass
<ckx> and they get all bitchy
<ckx> "I"M ONLY 13, I'M ONLY 13!!!"
|
|
|
27 Nov 2002, 00:57
|
#26
|
careface ;[
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: ?
Posts: 25
|
the fact that you can slowly see it comming and kill it off is just silly :/
what do you think of rushers tho?
good/bad?
millions of tiny cheap units that lag you to fk :/
|
|
|
27 Nov 2002, 01:02
|
#27
|
Gubbish
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: #FoW
Posts: 2,323
|
Sounds like you simply sucked, and he played around with you, making sure HE had fun. If he could win by turtling up to you with cannons, I'm sure he could beat you with units before that.
God damn it, even with even resources cannons<->lings, you should have been able to beat him.
__________________
Gubble gubble gubble gubble
|
|
|
27 Nov 2002, 01:19
|
#28
|
Freedom First
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Holding the line...
Posts: 243
|
The only game I've seen with building domination was the pre-patch Age of Kings where the town center ruled all. It sliced, it diced, diced you up anyways
|
|
|
27 Nov 2002, 02:19
|
#29
|
Flame Attraction
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: detroit
Posts: 70
|
xtothez, that reminds me of our ownage days in sc
feel like playing sometime again?
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:06.
| |