|
|
2 Jun 2005, 07:53
|
#1
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ******
Posts: 2,326
|
I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Will you guys be asking PATeam to split your alliances back into different tags once there are <7 ticks left?
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 08:03
|
#2
|
Drink is Good
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,122
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
good question, doubt it though, they will both probably fall below t10
__________________
Can we please have a moment of silence...........
Last edited by Alki; 2 Jun 2005 at 08:14.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 08:18
|
#3
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ******
Posts: 2,326
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alki
good question, doubt it though, they will both probably fall below t10
|
But I was under the impression that it wasn't to do with rank, but sharing defense and experience. Rank is rather irrelevant if you're not first, isn't it?
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 08:31
|
#4
|
Inactive peon
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,050
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
We are not splitting anyone, its not an offered feature in the manual - merging does have risks - it can't be undone.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 08:40
|
#5
|
Drink is Good
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,122
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banned
But I was under the impression that it wasn't to do with rank, but sharing defense and experience. Rank is rather irrelevant if you're not first, isn't it?
|
of c that is what we were told, but im pretty sure niether alliance would like to end the round outside of the top10 you dont agree?
__________________
Can we please have a moment of silence...........
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 08:53
|
#6
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ******
Posts: 2,326
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal
We are not splitting anyone, its not an offered feature in the manual - merging does have risks - it can't be undone.
|
Why not? Surely splitting is less disruptive* than merging?
*To both the affected parties and remainder of the community.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alki
of c that is what we were told, but im pretty sure niether alliance would like to end the round outside of the top10 you dont agree?
|
Again I ask, what does rank matter if you're not #1?
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 09:01
|
#7
|
Drink is Good
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,122
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
ah yes forgot to answer that, and i agree, but look at it from there pov going from top10 alliances last round to not even top10 this round, bit embarrasing isnt it?
__________________
Can we please have a moment of silence...........
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 09:05
|
#8
|
NewDawn
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Posts: 468
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banned
Will you guys be asking PATeam to split your alliances back into different tags once there are <7 ticks left?
|
The merge wasnt about ranks indeed, but that doesnt mean we didnt set any goals for it..
__________________
Proud to be Newdawn
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 09:11
|
#9
|
Ex-Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 211
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banned
Again I ask, what does rank matter if you're not #1?
|
It does to those alliances who will never come close to finishing #1.
__________________
Catolkaa, Klayie, Umphy, NightmareKiss, Upturned, WizardFly [WP] [FaNG] [ROCK] [NoS] [HR] [ND] [ToF] [MISTU]
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 09:13
|
#10
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ******
Posts: 2,326
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by god113
It does to those alliances who will never come close to finishing #1.
|
That's exactly why they'll never come close to finishing #1.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alki
ah yes forgot to answer that, and i agree, but look at it from there pov going from top10 alliances last round to not even top10 this round, bit embarrasing isnt it?
|
How so? I mean, ToT isn't even top10, but they're easily rated as better than SiNND.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 09:17
|
#11
|
Retard0r
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,164
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
lol, just for stating the obvious, ND and SiN has no benefits from splitting again, so why should they?
It may very well be that they are already planning close cooporation also next round, maybe even they're staying merged for now. Who knows. Why not let SiNND handle their internal politics as just that, internal politics?
__________________
-Chimpie
* We do not exist *
* G-II * NoS * VsN * Ascendancy * Osiris * xVx * Ultores *
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 09:30
|
#12
|
Drink is Good
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,122
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banned
That's exactly why they'll never come close to finishing #1.
How so? I mean, ToT isn't even top10, but they're easily rated as better than SiNND.
|
true, but lets ask this question, how far would sin fall if they took the ~30 players they brought into the merge and went under a seperate tag, and where would that leave ND with there 60~ players. I guess the point im making is there is no benefit from splitting up because they merged to increase moral? So now splitting would see them both out of the top10 and a dissapointing performance in there eyes?
__________________
Can we please have a moment of silence...........
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 09:31
|
#13
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ******
Posts: 2,326
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrunkenViking
lol, just for stating the obvious, ND and SiN has no benefits from splitting again, so why should they?
|
I don't know. The most obvious reason is that they lost some respect among some people* that they might want to regain.
Quote:
It may very well be that they are already planning close cooporation also next round, maybe even they're staying merged for now.
|
Could be.
Quote:
Why not let SiNND handle their internal politics as just that, internal politics?
|
Who says I'm not? I'm just curious. Like the thread title states, I'm too lazy to pop by #newdawn or #sin or whatever their public channel is these days.
* Not necessarily including myself.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 09:36
|
#14
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ******
Posts: 2,326
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alki
true, but lets ask this question, how far would sin fall if they took the ~30 players they brought into the merge and went under a seperate tag, and where would that leave ND with there 60~ players.
|
Who cares? They've already admitted (or claimed, depending on how you look at it) that the merge was not for rank reasons.
Quote:
I guess the point im making is there is no benefit from splitting up because they merged to increase moral?
|
If they merged for morale, how is staying together for 6 more ticks going to increase their morale for a round that doesn't even have a political landscape yet?
Quote:
So now splitting would see them both out of the top10 and a dissapointing performance in their eyes?
|
The performance remains the same, which is why I stated <7 ticks. At that point their remaining performance is the same regardless of ending rank.
Let me put it to you this way. I ended last round in the pr0nstars tag, despite playing most of it in 1up. Does it lessen my performance or contribution because the tag I ended the game in was not even top15?
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 09:43
|
#15
|
ND
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Amazingstoke
Posts: 2,235
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
SiNND has played as 1 alliance for a large part of the round. For the end ranks, we will be judged as one alliance.
__________________
[ND]
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 09:53
|
#16
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ******
Posts: 2,326
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Fish
SiNND has played as 1 alliance for a large part of the round. For the end ranks, we will be judged as one alliance.
|
There's our answer then. Thanks.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 09:59
|
#17
|
ND
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Amazingstoke
Posts: 2,235
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
No Problem.
__________________
[ND]
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 11:41
|
#18
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banned
Will you guys be asking PATeam to split your alliances back into different tags once there are <7 ticks left?
|
SINND HC are probably too lazy to get it changed back
or something.
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 12:01
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 367
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
As stated above Kal or any PA Team member wount split it up. There is nothing in the manual that say this is possible.
We have no reason to split up at all. Splitting up because someone else wants it, sounds a little stupid or ?
__________________
NewDawn - Soaring where angels fear to fly
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 12:22
|
#20
|
Ex-Visionary
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester, Eng
Posts: 325
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrunkenViking
It may very well be that they are already planning close cooporation also next round, maybe even they're staying merged for now. Who knows.
|
maybe he has hit the nail on the head here, pa team has refused to split them we will only find out if the merger was for rank or to share experiance and membership when they sign up for next round.
the real question should be will they be playing next round as SiNND or SiN and ND? doubt we will get a decent answer tho , go on i dare ya
__________________
r2 noob
r3 TSU, Leech
r4-10 RL stuff
r11 NoS (16:9:10)
r12 VsN (22:2:1)
r13 VsN BC (10:10:10) - R.I.P.
r14 xVx Head BC (2:8:3)
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 12:47
|
#21
|
ND
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Amazingstoke
Posts: 2,235
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
We will not be playing as one alliance next round. A lot of people hoped we had, but there were a few problems, one of the biggest being the name. SiN would never lose the name, and ND has played every round under the name, and we wont lose it either.
Of course, there were other problems. Its been successful for both alliances, and we'll part on good terms.
__________________
[ND]
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 13:06
|
#22
|
The Original Terran
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Afghan atm
Posts: 1,633
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Thought the name was lost this round?
I will always remember this round as there being No SiN or ND just SiNND.
__________________
introduction-Gramma
The following is a list of problems found in various places throughout the manual and game. We love you Noah!
Written by Kloopy Wed Mar 16 22:06:43 2005
Retired just for a bit....
Proud to have been 1up, SiN, Wolfpack, Bluetuba and the leader of ARK.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 13:23
|
#23
|
ND
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Amazingstoke
Posts: 2,235
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
well you always remember wrong
__________________
[ND]
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 13:33
|
#24
|
The Original Terran
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Afghan atm
Posts: 1,633
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Fish
well you always remember wrong
|
Not always but i gave you some pos rep coz to pass the time now i got to get back to work
__________________
introduction-Gramma
The following is a list of problems found in various places throughout the manual and game. We love you Noah!
Written by Kloopy Wed Mar 16 22:06:43 2005
Retired just for a bit....
Proud to have been 1up, SiN, Wolfpack, Bluetuba and the leader of ARK.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 13:33
|
#25
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ******
Posts: 2,326
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spritfire
We have no reason to split up at all. Splitting up because someone else wants it, sounds a little stupid or ?
|
Allow me to make this perfectly clear. I won't think more or less of you either way.
I was simply curious. Not trying to score points, make a point, or point a finger.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 14:34
|
#26
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 23
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Is this a way to treat your m/puppets? Imo it's their decision and alliance rankings don't really count. In the eyes of many PA players both alliances will remain as low-level top20 'n00b' allies. Merging them did them nothing, just helped their enemies to target them. And considering your views and mine I can safely assume that a lot of other people feel the same way about this 'witty' sinnd group.
__________________
HK
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 14:44
|
#27
|
This is bat country
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,693
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by helikopter
Is this a way to treat your m/puppets? Imo it's their decision and alliance rankings don't really count. In the eyes of many PA players both alliances will remain as low-level top20 'n00b' allies. Merging them did them nothing, just helped their enemies to target them. And considering your views and mine I can safely assume that a lot of other people feel the same way about this 'witty' sinnd group.
|
low-level top20 n00b alliances.. thats classic.
Were you born this clueless? Or did you have to work for it?
__________________
Burárum!
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 14:47
|
#28
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by helikopter
alliance rankings don't really count
|
I'm sure there are plenty of players who could agree with that about round 13.
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 14:52
|
#29
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ******
Posts: 2,326
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by helikopter
Is this a way to treat your m/puppets?
|
My whats? I'm sorry, but whoever's whatevers they are, they definitely aren't mine.
I'm glad we agree.
Quote:
alliance rankings don't really count.
|
I agree. 1up had the best round and won.
Quote:
In the eyes of many PA players both alliances will remain as low-level top20 'n00b' allies.
|
That's sad
Quote:
Merging them did them nothing
|
Did nothing for you, did something for them. Who do you think it matters most to?
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 15:09
|
#30
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 25
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Just want to say one thing to SiN:
Bad, very bad!
Merging with ND was a bad thing. A bit like doing stuffing with a pig.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 15:23
|
#31
|
Insomniac
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,583
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banned
Why not? Surely splitting is less disruptive* than merging
|
Problem is, due to the way merging works it isnt possible to reverse it without a complete list of who was in who beforehand, which isnt kept.
What happens is, all members of both alliances are assigned to a new alliance with a different allianceid number, and name.
The old ones then cease to exist.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 16:06
|
#32
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Fish
We will not be playing as one alliance next round. A lot of people hoped we had, but there were a few problems, one of the biggest being the name. SiN would never lose the name, and ND has played every round under the name, and we wont lose it either.
|
Would a rose by any other name smell as sweet? (That was remarkably pretentious even by my lofty standards!)
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 16:09
|
#33
|
Punk
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 397
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by evil n00b
Just want to say one thing to SiN:
Bad, very bad!
Merging with ND was a bad thing. A bit like doing stuffing with a pig.
|
plz tell me why it was so bad? i really want to know
__________________
Rd13 SiNND (12:4:3)
Rd6&7 4D (20:8:6) & (20:2:10) Rd14 ND (2:5:4)
Rd8 Did not play Rd15 Did not play
Rd9 4D/SWaRM (13:4:10) Rd16 ND (14:1:6)
Rd9.5 SWaRM (42:7:4) Rd17 ND (13:10:8)
Rd10 SWaRM (21:4:7) Rd18 ND (13:6:8)
Rd10.5 SWaRM (5:5:10) Rd19 ND - HC (1:9:3)
Rd11 ND (32:2:10) Rd36 ND 7:9:7
Rd12 ND (30:10:1)
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 16:38
|
#34
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ******
Posts: 2,326
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil^
Problem is, due to the way merging works it isnt possible to reverse it without a complete list of who was in who beforehand, which isnt kept.
What happens is, all members of both alliances are assigned to a new alliance with a different allianceid number, and name.
The old ones then cease to exist.
|
I didn't mean that sort of splitting. I just meant 'they hand PAteam a list, PAteam does it'.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 16:41
|
#35
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banned
I didn't mean that sort of splitting. I just meant 'they hand PAteam a list, PAteam does it'.
|
In the fourth post of this thread pateam expressly state they don't "split" alliances.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 16:58
|
#36
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ******
Posts: 2,326
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
In the fourth post of this thread pateam expressly state they don't "split" alliances.
|
In the 31st post Phil provided a reply which was based on an incorrect assumption.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 17:11
|
#37
|
part time ghost
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Grimsby
Posts: 925
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
We got more incs after we merged? Didn't look like that to me... maybe a tiny little bit more. But defense was much easier... so how is/was this a bad thing for us?
__________________
Is this the real life?
Is this just fantasy?
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 17:25
|
#38
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ******
Posts: 2,326
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neferti
We got more incs after we merged? Didn't look like that to me... maybe a tiny little bit more. But defense was much easier... so how is/was this a bad thing for us?
|
BUT IT MADE IT SO MUCH MORE OBVIOUS ON THE SANDAMANS SITE WHEN WE ABUSED YOU TO GET HIT FOR US SO THAT WE WOULD DO BETTAR.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 18:04
|
#39
|
Gifted
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Holland
Posts: 59
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Heh, not going on as one alliance cause of a name...
__________________
Retired \o/
Quote:
Originally posted by Cochese
There was only one galaxy we couldn't seem to break (lo ironhell)
|
r3 11:14
r4 130:12
r5 25:20
r6 39:9
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 18:20
|
#40
|
Reject False Icons
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Your Hotel.... Fee:$999
Posts: 896
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banned
BUT IT MADE IT SO MUCH MORE OBVIOUS ON THE SANDAMANS SITE WHEN WE ABUSED YOU TO GET HIT FOR US SO THAT WE WOULD DO BETTAR.
|
.
Sad, but true
__________________
The Illuminati- NoS
[]LCH[]- dc
-=Destiny=-
Wolfpack - Dc
xVx - DC
Apprime -_-
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 18:34
|
#41
|
ND
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Amazingstoke
Posts: 2,235
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by ironhell
Heh, not going on as one alliance cause of a name...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Fish
Of course, there were other problems.
|
__________________
[ND]
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 20:02
|
#42
|
Why so serious?
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 199
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
erh, why are we still whining about this nonsense? nd and sin merged for the remainder of the round afaik so why bring it up again?
on a sidenote, ND are whiners, but they have laughable topics in their public chan \o/
__________________
Don't Trust Anyone
4S
Illuminati
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 20:07
|
#43
|
Gifted
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Holland
Posts: 59
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Oke, not going on as one alliance mainly cause of a name...
__________________
Retired \o/
Quote:
Originally posted by Cochese
There was only one galaxy we couldn't seem to break (lo ironhell)
|
r3 11:14
r4 130:12
r5 25:20
r6 39:9
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 20:55
|
#44
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 25
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neferti
We got more incs after we merged? Didn't look like that to me... maybe a tiny little bit more. But defense was much easier... so how is/was this a bad thing for us?
|
everything isnt about having most ships at your side. If you are smart, then 1 ship counts as 10, and if you use them smart vs ND then 1 ship counts like ~20. im quite sure you remember me roiding you with my solo attacks
Maybe it did give you bad self-confidence and you started to think about yourself as "we suck" and probably sin started to think so too (after kicking me), so then some smart guy come up with the crazy idea that "lets suck thogeter, then maybe we suck less" But you forget that when 2 is sucking thogeter then it only becomes more sucking. Not good at all.
Stuffing with a pig might feel good, but I dont think its the right thing to do. Tought from the pig´s point of view it doesnt matter who is stuffing as long someone is doing it. So I do understand why ND are doing it. But for sin; bad move Makes me very dissapointed at you. Even mentioning that I ever been in sin makes people to laugh at me
I can explain more if you want
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 21:14
|
#45
|
Ex-Visionary
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester, Eng
Posts: 325
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Fish
SiNND has played as 1 alliance for a large part of the round. For the end ranks, we will be judged as one alliance.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by noah02
Thought the name was lost this round?
I will always remember this round as there being No SiN or ND just SiNND.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Fish
well you always remember wrong
|
am i the only one who see's this GLARING contradiction ???
but then the fact they aint playing together next round surely shows they took the easy way out for rank to save themselves from an average round (and ended up having an average round :P)
__________________
r2 noob
r3 TSU, Leech
r4-10 RL stuff
r11 NoS (16:9:10)
r12 VsN (22:2:1)
r13 VsN BC (10:10:10) - R.I.P.
r14 xVx Head BC (2:8:3)
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 21:36
|
#46
|
Registered Awesome Person
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,676
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by evil n00b
im quite sure you remember me roiding you with my solo attacks
|
I'm not quite sure your r12 attacks counted as solo.
__________________
Finally free!
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 21:41
|
#47
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by evil n00b
I can explain more if you want
|
Please god no.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 22:31
|
#48
|
;D!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,810
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
This is just my personal opinion; but I would be happy to have PA split the alliances again.
I'm not bothered about the rank, SiNND made the game fun for me again and I'm sure it helped many others too. This is what the merger was for. I think the fact our average score climed from rank 10 to rank 8, for instance, shows how it increased our performance.
So, if PA team were willing to perform the split, I for one would be perfectly happy to let it happen.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 22:35
|
#49
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 25
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
Quote:
Originally Posted by furball
I'm not quite sure your r12 attacks counted as solo.
|
well...
But if im the only one attacking, then its solo, right?
There is a clear difference between attacks and defence.
Even if the defenders happends to be friends (just a few times) then its still defence. Clearly defence is there because there is attackers. So the defence is there to fight against the attackers.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2005, 22:39
|
#50
|
Reject False Icons
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Your Hotel.... Fee:$999
Posts: 896
|
Re: I'm too lazy to PM SiNND HC
damn why didnt they think of merging LCH and ToT to make defence easier and keep morale up, if they were able to split at end of round back to indivual allies.
incase of SiNND 2 wrongs dont = 1 right
__________________
The Illuminati- NoS
[]LCH[]- dc
-=Destiny=-
Wolfpack - Dc
xVx - DC
Apprime -_-
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:55.
| |