I realize this is just some guy advertising his book, but...

[Dookie Velvet]

...it's so true

[Deffeh]

i got bored, but ill read the rest later when everyone goes to bed. Accurate but obvious is my initial thought

[bagg]

he just described me




im so depressed now




i might smarten up and talk to women from now on

[Dookie Velvet]

Originally posted by Deffeh
i got bored, but ill read the rest later when everyone goes to bed. Accurate but obvious is my initial thought

That's what I like about it. He's simply stating the obvious. But he's putting how us losers go through our lives, continually losing out on the tamale, into words that make a lot of sense. That's something I know I've never been able to do.

If you bother reading through, watch out for the last section. It's pure shameless advertising.

[Nodrog]

it really isnt

[Dookie Velvet]

Originally posted by Nodrog
it really isnt

It really is.

[Nodrog]

Almost every single paragraph is filled entirely with cliched stereotypes, baseless elitism and pseudo-science.

[Aryn]

but apparently it works and he'll sell millions of copies.

[Nodrog]

Originally posted by Aryn
but apparently it works and he'll sell millions of copies.

He's certainly no Ross Jeffries.

[Proteus]

As it is men and not women who tend to make the first move in a relationship, it is only natural that confident men will have more success than cowards, as the confident men will actually go and talk to women, whereas the cowards will just sit in the corner.

Trying to go from this rather obvious situation to a conclusion that women only like confident men seems a little strange, really.

[Aquario]

Yey, that article perfectly describes me & many mates.

we call ourselves mincers (=

its a great.

[Dookie Velvet]

Originally posted by Nodrog
Almost every single paragraph is filled entirely with cliched stereotypes, baseless elitism and pseudo-science.

I disagree. The clichéd stereotypes may be clichéd stereotypes, but they do truly describe the woman of today (at least in my eyes). I also feel the "baseless elitism" to be a good thing. Except, I don't believe the elitism is baseless. I think it has a quite strong base, which most people call rejection. And the pseudo-science? Well, it simply serves to further our understanding of what he's saying.

[Sandsnake]

I agree with nod. He's using grandiose generalizations to appeal to every lonely guy out there by making it sound like it's never their fault. He preys on people's inability to accept responsibility for themselves.

He's only "right" if you accept that you will HAVE to do something to get noticed by "in demand" women, and you may still not be something she's interested in.


Women are not obligated to like you. If you're running into repeated rejection, maybe you should look closer to home rather than blame the entire female species for your predicament.

[Sandsnake]

oh yeah, and if you're fat, ugly, socially inept, and only bathe once a week?

Forget it.

[Dookie Velvet]

You've spurned me into action. I'm going to be cool and confident tomorrow. I'm going to smack that bitch at the youth centre until she comes to her senses and realizes I'm the only one for her. Not literally.

Edit: As I was argumenting Nod's point, I realized that it was all a cunningly disguised sales ploy. I decided not to "give in", however.

[the dying puppy]

Originally posted by Dookie Velvet
...it's so true

you should've being reading Tony Robbins books, kido!

[Steve_G]

was a funny read if nothing else

/me sobs in a corner

[Radical Edward]

I prefer the "women like geeks" post the other day.