Planetarion Forums

xtrasyn · 2 Feb 2005, 11:43

This ´Lord of the Rings´ book. What if it was, and/or could it be, written by an illuminati?

The Hobbits would surely stand for a new people, one that were not present at the beginning of the world. So, they come from a ´new world´.
If the Ring stands for the power the old establishment has over the peoples of the world, than it has to be destroyed, and a new ´king of the world´ will come, ´tall and enlightened´ as the books say.
Humans, elves and dwarves, three peoples, of wich two will deminish and loose their splendor. Who as well sees europe and asia?

* I´m not paranoid. I do not believe it, it´s just a ´game´. Play along.

XeeThot · 2 Feb 2005, 11:49

You sound paranoid.

KaneED · 2 Feb 2005, 11:51

its the freemasons actually, some people just don't put the work in

SilverSmoke · 2 Feb 2005, 11:55

The last three posts I saw from you contained the word illuminati.

Did you read The Da Vinci Code recently?

Ninja_spammer · 2 Feb 2005, 11:57

or play Deus ex?

MrL_JaKiri · 2 Feb 2005, 12:10

Sauron and Gandalf are both of the same. They're both Maiar. Saruman, too.

What does that tell you?

[edit]

Or read the Illuminatus! trilogy, or Foucault's Pendulum?

xtrasyn · 2 Feb 2005, 12:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilverSmoke

The last three posts I saw from you contained the word illuminati.

Did you read The Da Vinci Code recently?

HAHAHAHA

Yes as a matter of fact I read all three half decent Browns recently. Also I read Foucault´s pendulum (in the arly nineties) and Chomsky and oh so much more. Furthermore I look at news bulletins from three continents and compare the content.

I have been interested in the subject since 1999 TBH, mainly because in those days I believed it would be best for mankind to be under one common government, and fell in to the research from that angle.
Apart from that, here have been hints on dollar bills and coins way before that time, and the whole thing is pretty neatly documented, and seldom well debunked.
The matter is that lately it´s no longer a ´fictional myth´ or a ´story for by the fire´. You can see it when you watch the news, when you open the papers, when you look at the movies of late, when they choose a pope.

But again, this isn´t about that.

Nodrog · 2 Feb 2005, 12:43

You can't debunk claims which are offered with no supporting evidence.

xtrasyn · 2 Feb 2005, 12:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nodrog

You can't debunk claims which are offered with no supporting evidence.

I don´t care.

Nodrog · 2 Feb 2005, 12:46

Well what do you want us to say? "No that isnt what it means because it just isnt"?

xtrasyn · 2 Feb 2005, 12:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nodrog

Well what do you want us to say? "No that isnt what it means because it just isnt"?

What I hoped for was leads that will make others believe it´s an illuminati bible, easy as pie, be it in this work or other well known books. 1984 for example. Or the absolute winner would be the one that can give two arguments why the bible is a freemason´s work.

JonnyBGood · 2 Feb 2005, 15:49

"Hay guys disprove x!"
"Nobody can disprove x as x has been defined as something that can neither be proved or disproved."
"Does that mean it's true?"
"No. It means it's not a proper theory."
"Why's that?"
"Falsifiability"
"What's that?"
"The internet knows."
"But maybe wikipedia is controlled by the illuminati?"
"Maybe I'm controlled by the illuminati and this was just a distraction so they can get inside your head and make your conspiracy theories so stupid even the sensible ones will get categorised as the same drivel and ignored by many people who would have listened to the latter theories without the existence of the former."
"What?"
"Ever heard of Michael Moore?"