Planetarion Forums - ToF/Angels/Vsn/(P|M)

Halo · 13 Nov 2006, 22:37

Today i saw them ALL try to fleetcatch me

damn them!

We have a block...! Anyone wanne cofirm or comment it?

lokken · 13 Nov 2006, 23:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halo

Today i saw them ALL try to fleetcatch me

damn them!

We have a block...! Anyone wanne cofirm or comment it?

The last two are one alliance now.

The fact they are working together comes as no surprise.

genosse27 · 14 Nov 2006, 01:53

ad at its best ! :P

Ultimate Newbie · 14 Nov 2006, 02:04

Its mutual love. Really.

Kargool · 14 Nov 2006, 02:34

I hear rumours about Angels not being allowed to defend against the others ingal. I guess that counts for something..

Fyodor · 14 Nov 2006, 02:42

I hear rumours that kargool never has a clue...

Kargool · 14 Nov 2006, 02:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fyodor

I hear rumours that kargool never has a clue...

Feel free to pm me for the quotes I got from your fellow HC saying so that Angels cant defend against vision attacks..

Fyodor · 14 Nov 2006, 03:36

If you have quotes from Angels HC's then its not a rumour...Providing that they said it to you. I def in gal, HC knows about it, and theyve never said boo about it. Nor have I seen any mass emailings from HC saying not to defend...

rshih · 14 Nov 2006, 03:39

You're allowed to def vs them, jus not on exi/nd/omen planets. There you go.

Fyodor · 14 Nov 2006, 03:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by rshih

You're allowed to def vs them, jus not on exi/nd/omen planets. There you go.

That makes sense. After all, why would any alliance member want to def the opposition?

Phil^ · 14 Nov 2006, 03:46

it makes sense, why would you defend against another alliance for the benefit of an enemy?
hardly indicitive of a block

Ultimate Newbie · 14 Nov 2006, 04:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil^

it makes sense, why would you defend against another alliance for the benefit of an enemy?
hardly indicitive of a block

Well, if its your galaxymates that you are defending, then you would send defence in order to help them survive long enough so that they can help you, and foster a bit of friendliness etc in the galaxy.

Its not all about alliances really, and i'd like to think of myself as more galaxy focused than most. Having said that, i'd actually need a planet, but still.

demiGOD · 14 Nov 2006, 04:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultimate Newbie

Well, if its your galaxymates that you are defending, then you would send defence in order to help them survive long enough so that they can help you, and foster a bit of friendliness etc in the galaxy.

Its not all about alliances really, and i'd like to think of myself as more galaxy focused than most. Having said that, i'd actually need a planet, but still.

Yep, we should have a Galaxy Discussions. This would be the new GD.

Squidly · 14 Nov 2006, 07:34

err... was the point of this thread to try and disprove the fact the whole lot of em are working together? did I miss something?

Heartless · 14 Nov 2006, 09:51

I do, however, wonder why vsn and tof prostitute themselves into being flak for the possibly worst self-entitled "top" alliance ever?

Ultimate Newbie · 14 Nov 2006, 10:14

Perhaps to make things interesting; if one group looks like its going to win outright, it makes sense that vision would join the loosing side (somehow we/they always seem to manage it) and thus makethe round a bit more competitive.

As you say, angels as the "worst self-entitled top alliance ever" would need all the help it could get, right?

Heartless · 14 Nov 2006, 10:22

I would agree if that block would actually fight a war in order to make things interesting again, however, all you guys are doing is leaving yourself open to concentrated fire and thus just passing on the roids to your real opposition.

lokken · 14 Nov 2006, 10:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heartless

I do, however, wonder why vsn and tof prostitute themselves into being flak for the possibly worst self-entitled "top" alliance ever?

Yeah as much as anyone might dislike angels those 2 are pretty much worse for rolling out the red carpet the way they do.

Red- · 14 Nov 2006, 12:01

Aye they should just roll over and let ND/Omen take home the round.

xVx and Omen got a block too supported by ND *wow*

`mac^ · 14 Nov 2006, 12:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red-

Aye they should just roll over and let ND/Omen take home the round.

xVx and Omen got a block too supported by ND *wow*

I think you mean ND got the block supported by Omen and LCH. Unless I've missed something with regards to xVx?

lokken · 14 Nov 2006, 12:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red-

Aye they should just roll over and let ND/Omen take home the round.

xVx and Omen got a block too supported by ND *wow*

There's nothing wrong with them being affiliated with Angels, nothing whatsoever, that's politics.

What I do have a problem with is their strategy of launching first to draw defence, then letting Angels come in later. This shows a lack of self respect from my point of view.

Red- · 14 Nov 2006, 13:51

xVx and Omen attacked together last night!

I wasnt aware VsN and ToF attacked before Angels?

gzambo · 14 Nov 2006, 13:57

oh god people get over yourselves alliances form blocks have attack co-operations , aere used as flak every round and yet some people still feel the need to whinge about it

time to STFU and play the game

Tietäjä · 14 Nov 2006, 14:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red-

xVx and Omen attacked together last night!

God, we get a lot of xVx incomings to be blocked with them. Do you think, Red-, that we, perhaps attack our own planets together with them?

cura · 14 Nov 2006, 14:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by gzambo

whinge

minge?

jerome · 14 Nov 2006, 18:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by lokken

There's nothing wrong with them being affiliated with Angels, nothing whatsoever

lolo

Heartless · 14 Nov 2006, 19:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by gzambo

oh god people get over yourselves alliances form blocks have attack co-operations , aere used as flak every round and yet some people still feel the need to whinge about it

time to STFU and play the game

We from Ascendancy may come back to that offer of tof/vsn flaking for us next round!

Felagund · 14 Nov 2006, 23:58

u are so funnies

/me wubs heartless

ReligFree · 15 Nov 2006, 11:06

From what i heard they have joint channels where there ziks are from all 3 alliances to set up FC's. So yes there blocked, and yes there working together on a very high scale

Felagund · 15 Nov 2006, 14:54

love u too relig :=)

Ghost{} · 17 Nov 2006, 13:49

ah, so it's the zik's in my alliance who are supposed to be working together, no wonder. as I certainly don't work together with any of the other alliances. no joint channels for the lot of us together..

Red- · 17 Nov 2006, 16:59

I dont believe thats true - Prolly just some rumors :P

jerome · 17 Nov 2006, 17:40

i think we've all seen the actual fleetcatches take place so really there's no need to deny it

Red- · 17 Nov 2006, 20:46

Ohhh eXi working with LCH and Ascendancy in a FC team... The things that happens out there in the universe.

Ace · 17 Nov 2006, 21:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red-

Ohhh eXi working with LCH and Ascendancy in a FC team... The things that happens out there in the universe.

Would be nice if your post made sence.
Picking 3 random alliances doesnt do it m8 you need facts.

Red- · 17 Nov 2006, 22:52

I cant see how its less facts then any of the previsious rumors tbh.

But it is factual that during the last 3 ticks serveral LCH, Ascendancy and Exi's tried to FC a guy - Ofcause it didnt succeed, but they tried never they less.

Wandows · 17 Nov 2006, 23:03

Just because some ppl happen to know eachother doesn't mean alliances are involved in planning it all. You might be aware alot of players know eachother, whether they are in the same alliance or not. Its not hard to ask a few friends to help you on a FC if you can't find enouhg support within your own alliance (just like members in my galaxy regularly ask around if ppl have ships available for a fleetcatch). Its a small group of players that is left and its certainly not as tight that every coorperation means that alliances must be involved at a higher level.

Benneh · 18 Nov 2006, 00:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red-

I cant see how its less facts then any of the previsious rumors tbh.

But it is factual that during the last 3 ticks serveral LCH, Ascendancy and Exi's tried to FC a guy - Ofcause it didnt succeed, but they tried never they less.

but who wouldnt try and fleet catch a cath who launched practicially everything

Values 523887

thats alot of value to catch!

jerome · 18 Nov 2006, 00:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red-

I cant see how its less facts then any of the previsious rumors tbh.

But it is factual that during the last 3 ticks serveral LCH, Ascendancy and Exi's tried to FC a guy - Ofcause it didnt succeed, but they tried never they less.

for the record that guy was a ****ing moron who launched on some guy with his 90% of his fleet, spanning all classes for a cath, is it that much of a surprise so many tried to fc him

AndroX · 20 Nov 2006, 20:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wandows

Just because some ppl happen to know eachother doesn't mean alliances are involved in planning it all. You might be aware alot of players know eachother, whether they are in the same alliance or not. Its not hard to ask a few friends to help you on a FC if you can't find enouhg support within your own alliance (just like members in my galaxy regularly ask around if ppl have ships available for a fleetcatch). Its a small group of players that is left and its certainly not as tight that every coorperation means that alliances must be involved at a higher level.

Amen!

LynchMob · 21 Nov 2006, 05:11

yAwN

:/