![Reply](STYLES/Planetarion2/buttons/reply.gif) |
10 May 2008, 15:35
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In bed with your mum.
Posts: 664
|
WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Maybe the rounds over, maybe it isnt.. just like to hear a few opinions without the crap D:... all ego aside etc, who u guys reckon will win and why D:?
asc have been there/there abouts for a fair part of the rd, then a few days ago they addeed a chunk to tag and all of a sudden its even stevens,...add a shit load of zik salvage / + some XP to score and i wonder if it puts them into the running?
asc 1 ![Salute](images/smilies/salute.gif) zik salvage
|
|
|
10 May 2008, 17:07
|
#2
|
Laziness pays off NOW!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pensacola, FL, USA
Posts: 596
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
When did we add a chunk to tag? I'm pretty sure we weren't hiding any part of our tag any part of this round...
__________________
Proud to have been :
[ReBorn] High Council - Wing Leader
[Knights] High Council - Founder
[Silver] High Council - Military
[WolfPack] High Council - Military
[Ascendancy] Member
[eXilition] High Council - Defence
7-Round Official Planetarion #Support Team Member
Retired Since Round 21
|
|
|
10 May 2008, 19:29
|
#3
|
ND Ninja!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London, England
Posts: 295
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
I think asc will win as they have the momentum.
__________________
ND Asc 1up TGV LCH eXi HR
RAWR!
~Love Luke, Love Life~
|
|
|
10 May 2008, 19:44
|
#4
|
Non directed and witty
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: #ascendancy
Posts: 814
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
heh noone has been out of tag :|
__________________
CATHAAAAAARGH
I've won 4 rounds.
I'm kinda a big deal.
|
|
|
10 May 2008, 22:44
|
#5
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
It can go both ways still. We'll see.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
10 May 2008, 23:50
|
#6
|
Drunken Boozer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 298
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
I am still out of tag!
__________________
Geilheit ist KEINE Schande !!!!
! [ToT]-KC !
Äscendäncy, we got Penis inside!
|
|
|
11 May 2008, 02:57
|
#7
|
Muppet
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Under Your Bed
Posts: 301
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by DunkelGraf
I am still out of tag!
|
If only you were in tag!! Prost!
__________________
ex... [Ministry][LCH][Ascendancy]
Retired.
|
|
|
11 May 2008, 03:03
|
#8
|
Come Closer, I Have Candy
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Vast Regions of Space Without a Lifejacket
Posts: 213
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
The 2 tags are only 3.5 mil apart, I think the tipping piece will be NoX or any other alliance that decides to do a few raids.
__________________
MetallicAnomaly
[ROCK] || Conspiracy Theory || Ascendancy
Rounds Played: 3-9 16-19 23-33
I became insane, with long intervals of horrible sanity.
- Edgar Allan Poe
|
|
|
11 May 2008, 08:17
|
#9
|
Commodore
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,176
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
And/or the differences in accumulated stockpiles. I have no idea whether Asc has maintained large stockpiles or not, but after quite a while of Denial being on top, would they not have had the opportunity to amass a vast fortune in as-yet-unrealised score?
It would be pretty bloody depressing if the winning alliance was determined by who held back the longest yet still had functioning factories...
Though having said that, its pretty rare for such a win in an instant-gratification society.
__________________
#Strategy ; #Support - Sovereign
--- --- ---
"The Cake is a Lie."
|
|
|
11 May 2008, 10:21
|
#10
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
We have stockpiles. We're mostly Zik, so stockpiles serve a dual purpose. I'm not sure if they are (much?) bigger than other alliance's though.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
11 May 2008, 10:27
|
#11
|
Up The Hatters!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kenilworth Road
Posts: 3,012
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Stoom's stockpile is bigger than yours!
__________________
Planetarion veteran
|
|
|
11 May 2008, 10:27
|
#12
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
True, I don't have one.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
11 May 2008, 10:44
|
#13
|
Retired
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 253
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
I hope Stoom win because it would be a nice twist after an entire round looking like denial were gonna take it. If Stoom are sucessful it would be a good result.
__________________
Rnd 1-7 Lost Honourguard (HC) WoH Bluetuba(BC) VtS(BC)
Rnd 26-32 Jenova Denial (BC) Newdawn (HC)
Rnd 33 Retired
|
|
|
11 May 2008, 10:49
|
#14
|
Motherfracker
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,985
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Do not let Stoom win
|
|
|
11 May 2008, 12:52
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Uh oh ^^
1 up 1 STOOMTHEREVIVAL 67476 71 3,657,562 219,453,744
2 down 1 Denial 59342 75 3,644,862 218,691,737
3 NoX 53471 61 3,342,751 200,565,084
4 NewDawn 57953 75 3,323,635 199,418,116
__________________
BozE
Like a ninja, only without any of the same letters
|
|
|
11 May 2008, 12:59
|
#16
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Essex
Posts: 98
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
oh god it must be cheating
|
|
|
11 May 2008, 13:51
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Nah, it only took 1 tick for someone to screw up
__________________
BozE
Like a ninja, only without any of the same letters
|
|
|
11 May 2008, 14:33
|
#18
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
And another tick for 6(!) more to screw up.
We rock.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
11 May 2008, 17:46
|
#19
|
I see you!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In any girl
Posts: 2,825
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
When does round end?
|
|
|
11 May 2008, 19:44
|
#20
|
Poblacht na hÉireann
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,167
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Friday.
Looks like it's gonna be pretty close...
|
|
|
13 May 2008, 17:10
|
#21
|
speed demon
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SX!!
Posts: 343
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
GO STOOM o/
__________________
see below how pro I am
Round 17 - Rank 3 - Omen (Zik)
Round 18 - Rank 2 - eXilition (Zik)
Round 20 - Rank 7 - Destiny (Zik)
Round 24 - Rank 2 - Conspiracy (Xan)
Round 28 - Rank 4 - Ascendancy (Xan)
Round 66 - Rank 9 - Ultores (Etd)
Round 83 - Rank 10 - #METOO (Zik)
Round 85 - Rank 3 - QQ (Etd)
Round 89 - Rank 2 - VGN (Zik)
Round 91 - Rank 9 - VGN (Zik)
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 00:05
|
#22
|
PA Ancient
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ventnor, Isle Of Wight
Posts: 1,060
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
never thought id cheer for asc but.. go stoom!
__________________
Played: Round 1-13. PA Team: Round 13-17. The Return: Round 18-19. PA Team: Round 20. Return.. Again: Round 21-37 Retired: Round 38 Returned: Round 39-45 Retired: Round 45 Returned: Round: 56
Ever been attacked by a p3nguin? You get left a bit black and white!
p3nguin Founder
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 07:42
|
#23
|
Hibernating
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Team Kesha
Posts: 1,621
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Congratulations on winning the round stoom!
though arguably it's not that hard when you have 4-5 allies backing you up...
__________________
[InSomnia]
Official designated driver
[ToF] - [eXilition] - [Rock] - [Denial] - [DLR] - [eVolution] - [ODDR] - [HR] - [Ultores] - [Apprime] - [Ironborn]
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 07:52
|
#24
|
break it down!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,087
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
it's not that hard to be #1 for the majority of the round when the alliance you allied with is too spineless to go for #1 and the other contenders for the #1 are told to **** off by everyone they approach as they "don't deserve 3 in a row".
__________________
I put the sex in dyslexia!
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 08:03
|
#25
|
Hibernating
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Team Kesha
Posts: 1,621
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
I wouldn't call being allied to a single alliance and honouring that deal "spineless".
I'd call jumping into a 1 vs 1 fight with 4 allies making it a 5 vs 1 spineless, since they only dared to do so then and not like 500 ticks earlier.
Final conclusion: it takes alot more spine to keep your side of the deal when the entire universe is badmouthing you for it than it does to jump an alliance with overwhelming odds.
And for the "don't deserve 3 in a row" thing... sucks for ND, but there were other allies besides them that should have been capable of going for #1 but sat on their ass all round long. Not our fault
__________________
[InSomnia]
Official designated driver
[ToF] - [eXilition] - [Rock] - [Denial] - [DLR] - [eVolution] - [ODDR] - [HR] - [Ultores] - [Apprime] - [Ironborn]
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 08:14
|
#26
|
Registered Awesome Person
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,676
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veedeejem!
I wouldn't call being allied to a single alliance and honouring that deal "spineless".
|
Well of course you wouldn't call it that, you are in Denial after all.
__________________
Finally free!
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 08:25
|
#27
|
Hibernating
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Team Kesha
Posts: 1,621
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Seriously though, this is the first round that I can remember that people are making such a big deal out of 2 alliances being allied to eachother :/
I really don't get what everybody on this forum is on about. Like Denial & NoX would just say "hey guys, we know you hate our guts, but to please your forumtrolls we've decided now to hit eachother. Making ourself weaker and wide open to attacks from all of you guys! It's to make the round more interesting and exciting. It'll also make sure that neither Denial or NoX can win the round BUT hey, if that's what needed to make you guys shut the **** up then suuuuure, we'll destroy eachother and make it easy for you!"
Anybody that believes that at any point in this round Denial & NoX turning on eachother & eleminating the only friends they had in the universe would have been a smart move is clearly in Denial.
__________________
[InSomnia]
Official designated driver
[ToF] - [eXilition] - [Rock] - [Denial] - [DLR] - [eVolution] - [ODDR] - [HR] - [Ultores] - [Apprime] - [Ironborn]
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 08:43
|
#28
|
Drink is Good
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,122
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veedeejem!
Congratulations on winning the round stoom!
though arguably it's not that hard when you have 4-5 allies backing you up...
|
lolling hard, its far from won also stop being bitter, if thats what it took to take you down in the short time then it was obviously needed, if the shoe were on the other foot im sure you wouldnt be saying moronic shit like this though
__________________
Can we please have a moment of silence...........
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 09:13
|
#29
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 531
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veedeejem!
Seriously though, this is the first round that I can remember that people are making such a big deal out of 2 alliances being allied to eachother :/
I really don't get what everybody on this forum is on about. Like Denial & NoX would just say "hey guys, we know you hate our guts, but to please your forumtrolls we've decided now to hit eachother. Making ourself weaker and wide open to attacks from all of you guys! It's to make the round more interesting and exciting. It'll also make sure that neither Denial or NoX can win the round BUT hey, if that's what needed to make you guys shut the **** up then suuuuure, we'll destroy eachother and make it easy for you!"
|
You guys still know nothing about politics at all do you.
*BIG HINT* PA doesn't have to be played Side A vs Side B with everyone fitting in nice little boxes!
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 10:35
|
#30
|
Hibernating
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Team Kesha
Posts: 1,621
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Game^
You guys still know nothing about politics at all do you.
*BIG HINT* PA doesn't have to be played Side A vs Side B with everyone fitting in nice little boxes!
|
You should know that when the universe is allready split in 2 sides around tick 3-400 they rarely change.
But lets have a realistic breakdown of what would have happened this round if people would have followed "your way":
Side A= Denial & NoX | Side B = ND, CT, Jen, anybody else they can get their hands on
- NoX turns their back on Denial
- ND NoX CT & Jen take out Denial (who has no friends)
- NoX takes the lead
- ND CT & Jen betray NoX
- NoX is taken out
So as you can see, Side A is totally destroyed & Side B wins.
The people in NoX aren't as stupid or spineless as you'd want them to be and probably saw that this was the most likely outcome if they had betrayed Denial.
Sure, that may sound good for side B but what does side A have to gain from isolating themself?
that's right: **** all
__________________
[InSomnia]
Official designated driver
[ToF] - [eXilition] - [Rock] - [Denial] - [DLR] - [eVolution] - [ODDR] - [HR] - [Ultores] - [Apprime] - [Ironborn]
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 10:50
|
#31
|
LDK
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,220
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
from my pov, which have been nox this round, the round has been fking boring.
never fighting for #1, or taking down #1, just doing our best to get another alliance to #1.
When u then dont have anything else to play for, as gal for #1, good personal rank or some other weird shit, this round has just been boring for me.
__________________
[Omen]
Quote:
Originally posted by Newt
I would give me right testicle to be in a gal with you wishmaster!!! wonder if thatd be enough to bribe spinner with hmmmm
|
<JC`> i sent him a msg saying Wishmaster 0wns, so he recalled
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 10:54
|
#32
|
Finn.. who's drunk.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 285
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by [JungleMuffin]
Maybe the rounds over, maybe it isnt.. just like to hear a few opinions without the crap D:... all ego aside etc, who u guys reckon will win and why D:?
asc have been there/there abouts for a fair part of the rd, then a few days ago they addeed a chunk to tag and all of a sudden its even stevens,...add a shit load of zik salvage / + some XP to score and i wonder if it puts them into the running?
asc 1 ![Salute](images/smilies/salute.gif) zik salvage
|
tbh if asc wins.. I won't belive until I see it.. I can count over 10 score counting guys crashing inside a week... I'd give 10% chance for asc winning tag race for nro 1.. especially when quite many of asc joined mid round from other alliances, myself included.
Anyways we'll see how it goes.. it's just question who can land best and not getting fc:ed.. personally over 500 incoming fleets total this round on me.. so it's been action filled round, especially the last 1,5weeks.
__________________
r2 Thieves
r3: top100(p0rks0da rox) r4: top400(excadrix, pcmaster+me=gal 99th) r5: top150(before giving up, nocex didn't rock) r6:evu and drunk dwarf (top50)
r7: wasted c27 gal, sucky luck in clus. r8: In real Finnish infantry.. 270days r9: boring round as hell
r9.5: Top60(small playerbase=easy)
Few won R's in PIA, r26 top15 First/Last Pax round.
[OLMIT] / [TreKronor]
10 lines max for signature I heard.. so
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 10:59
|
#33
|
LDK
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,220
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordNieminen
tbh if asc wins.. I won't belive until I see it.. I can count over 10 score counting guys crashing inside a week... I'd give 10% chance for asc winning tag race for nro 1.. especially when quite many of asc joined mid round from other alliances, myself included.
Anyways we'll see how it goes.. it's just question who can land best and not getting fc:ed.. personally over 500 incoming fleets total this round on me.. so it's been action filled round, especially the last 1,5weeks.
|
how can a zik based alliance not win when theres 2 days left of the round, and they have a score advantage already?
would require entire uni to go at them, and even then I still doubt it, cause they would gain more from steals and salvage from fking stupid nubs crashing.
__________________
[Omen]
Quote:
Originally posted by Newt
I would give me right testicle to be in a gal with you wishmaster!!! wonder if thatd be enough to bribe spinner with hmmmm
|
<JC`> i sent him a msg saying Wishmaster 0wns, so he recalled
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 11:02
|
#34
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 531
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veedeejem!
You should know that when the universe is allready split in 2 sides around tick 3-400 they rarely change.
|
Your alliance played their part in ensuring the universe was split down the middle, so forgive me if I ignore that point entirely
Quote:
But lets have a realistic breakdown of what would have happened this round if people would have followed "your way":
Side A= Denial & NoX | Side B = ND, CT, Jen, anybody else they can get their hands on
- NoX turns their back on Denial
- ND NoX CT & Jen take out Denial (who has no friends)
- NoX takes the lead
- ND CT & Jen betray NoX
- NoX is taken out
|
I think you will actually find that CT/ND hated NoX more than Denial. So an alliance between NoX and CT/ND would have been very unlikely, an co-op between NoX and Asc would have been far more likely. I also think that if that happened ND and CT(maybe?) would have been approachable by yourselves to either help you target just NoX or NoX/Asc back. If you don't keep an open line of communication with alliances you will never know where you stand.
An interesting note I thought I'd share with you also, is that when ND were originally asked if they wanted to hit Denial, they said they weren't fussed either way, they just wanted big targets. They were equally likely to hit Denial, NoX or Asc at the time, its just simply that we were the ones that spoke to them, and I'm certainly very grateful that we did.
Your reasoning for not wanting change was that you would have lost, well according to most of your members you have lost now anyway. So what exactly did doing nothing achieve?
Quote:
The people in NoX aren't as stupid or spineless as you'd want them to be and probably saw that this was the most likely outcome if they had betrayed Denial.
Sure, that may sound good for side B but what does side A have to gain from isolating themselves?
that's right: **** all
|
The point is though, if Denial and NoX broke there would no longer be a Side A and Side B, this would have all changed. As Wishmaster says, I'm sure most of their members would have preferred to have fight for #1 for themselves, than for you.
The consideration you also fail to mention is something me and JBG were talking about the other night. The point at which it became clear to you that NoX was 'planning' to hit you, you should have taken steps to exert your power, to show that you weren't to be messed around. Denial however was happy to sit there and do nothing, which made you look completely weak. It's at this point I myself felt you were beatable, as you seemed happy to try to limp to the finish rather than drive through it.
Just my 2 cents anyway
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 11:10
|
#35
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Game^
an co-op between NoX and Asc would have been far more likely.
|
That was indeed something we talked about. At that point in the round, it became clear we could beat NoX even if we allied them, so there was talk about teaming up with NoX to take down Denial. NoX' policy prevented us from ever executing that plan, and considering the current political situation, I'm glad it did.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 12:34
|
#36
|
Cabeza Coder
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 212
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
That was indeed something we talked about. At that point in the round, it became clear we could beat NoX even if we allied them, so there was talk about teaming up with NoX to take down Denial. NoX' policy prevented us from ever executing that plan, and considering the current political situation, I'm glad it did.
|
Nox could have been #1 or #2 if we'd have worked together with Asc.
They way it went, we can be happy if we end up #3
It shows that we didnt fail in playing the game but in doing the politics that would have been needed in the right situation.
__________________
Lockhead
Developer, Solutions Architect, DevOps Engineer
lockhead.net
Quote:
Round 24 Conspiracy HC Comment at my planet
<Germania> 4.9.1
<Germania> hes our top hostile
|
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 12:57
|
#37
|
Hibernating
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Team Kesha
Posts: 1,621
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Game^
Your alliance played their part in ensuring the universe was split down the middle, so forgive me if I ignore that point entirely
|
Denial was more than willing to take anyone on in a 1 vs 1 fight. It's not our fault that our opposition felt the need to go get backup from other allies, splitting the universe in 2 sides :|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Game^
The consideration you also fail to mention is something me and JBG were talking about the other night. The point at which it became clear to you that NoX was 'planning' to hit you, you should have taken steps to exert your power, to show that you weren't to be messed around. Denial however was happy to sit there and do nothing, which made you look completely weak. It's at this point I myself felt you were beatable, as you seemed happy to try to limp to the finish rather than drive through it.
Just my 2 cents anyway
|
As far as I know Denial hasn't recieved a single inc from NoX, so I don't see a reason for us to attack NoX unprovoked or on grounds of some rumours that they 'might be planning to attack us'.
Had they attacked us we would have fought back, but I honestly don't see any reason at all to attack our only ally
If we as Denial would have attacked our only ally without any real provocation, who would want to work with Denial in future rounds? Being the guys that attacked their own allies just for the fun of it?
__________________
[InSomnia]
Official designated driver
[ToF] - [eXilition] - [Rock] - [Denial] - [DLR] - [eVolution] - [ODDR] - [HR] - [Ultores] - [Apprime] - [Ironborn]
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 13:17
|
#38
|
LDK
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,220
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veedeejem!
As far as I know Denial hasn't recieved a single inc from NoX, so I don't see a reason for us to attack NoX unprovoked or on grounds of some rumours that they 'might be planning to attack us'.
Had they attacked us we would have fought back, but I honestly don't see any reason at all to attack our only ally
|
You are incorrect.
We attacked u quite a few times, also landed on some.
__________________
[Omen]
Quote:
Originally posted by Newt
I would give me right testicle to be in a gal with you wishmaster!!! wonder if thatd be enough to bribe spinner with hmmmm
|
<JC`> i sent him a msg saying Wishmaster 0wns, so he recalled
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 13:17
|
#39
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 531
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veedeejem!
Denial was more than willing to take anyone on in a 1 vs 1 fight. It's not our fault that our opposition felt the need to go get backup from other allies, splitting the universe in 2 sides :|
|
It's a shame you didn't fight us 1 vs 1 then, as the first night of incoming was NoX and Denial hitting Asc, when we had a 10% roid loss. We decided then to see about getting some help to hit you as well. Please be aware as well that Denial has only been P-target twice (including last night) through all this, and its not been a 7 day gangbang of you by any stretch of the imagination.
Quote:
As far as I know Denial hasn't recieved a single inc from NoX, so I don't see a reason for us to attack NoX unprovoked or on grounds of some rumours that they 'might be planning to attack us'.
Had they attacked us we would have fought back, but I honestly don't see any reason at all to attack our only ally
If we as Denial would have attacked our only ally without any real provocation, who would want to work with Denial in future rounds? Being the guys that attacked their own allies just for the fun of it?
|
You've completely ignored what I've said, and still posted the same crap...
If you really want that question answered, why don't you answer this first :-
Would anyone have thought any alliances would have worked with Asc after the arbiter incidents and 7 alliance party on us?
Alliance politics is interchangable as long as you yourself are willing to change, and accomodate people to give them benefits as well. Nothing is set in stone.
Last edited by Game^; 14 May 2008 at 16:27.
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 14:05
|
#40
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lockhead
Nox could have been #1 or #2 if we'd have worked together with Asc.
They way it went, we can be happy if we end up #3
It shows that we didnt fail in playing the game but in doing the politics that would have been needed in the right situation.
|
Politics is part of the game mate.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 14:25
|
#41
|
LDK
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,220
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
Politics is part of the game mate.
|
cba to go lookup the captain obvious pic, but u get the drill!
__________________
[Omen]
Quote:
Originally posted by Newt
I would give me right testicle to be in a gal with you wishmaster!!! wonder if thatd be enough to bribe spinner with hmmmm
|
<JC`> i sent him a msg saying Wishmaster 0wns, so he recalled
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 15:35
|
#42
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veedeejem!
Seriously though, this is the first round that I can remember that people are making such a big deal out of 2 alliances being allied to eachother :/
|
rd13 Angels/Exi
Probably others too..
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 16:03
|
#43
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
r23 eXi/VS too
[edit]Thanks Hude.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
Last edited by Mzyxptlk; 14 May 2008 at 17:35.
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 16:15
|
#44
|
Laziness pays off NOW!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pensacola, FL, USA
Posts: 596
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veedeejem!
Denial was more than willing to take anyone on in a 1 vs 1 fight. It's not our fault that our opposition felt the need to go get backup from other allies, splitting the universe in 2 sides :|
|
The first night Denial hit STOOM they did so with the help of about 5ish other alliances. How in any way does that convey the idea that Denial wanted a 1 versus 1 fight. Granted, that this was after the ND fight.
__________________
Proud to have been :
[ReBorn] High Council - Wing Leader
[Knights] High Council - Founder
[Silver] High Council - Military
[WolfPack] High Council - Military
[Ascendancy] Member
[eXilition] High Council - Defence
7-Round Official Planetarion #Support Team Member
Retired Since Round 21
|
|
|
14 May 2008, 17:26
|
#45
|
self-entitledly superior
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 341
|
Re: WHOSTHESTOOM vs Denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
r22(?) eXi/VS
|
r23
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:45.
| |