Planetarion Forums

Inferno · 31 Oct 2004, 22:44

Or at least force him to remove his avatar.

Refusing to take direct action now will only allow him and flavius to move on to more clearly pornographic images. Something like a woman masturbating.

skiddy · 31 Oct 2004, 22:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inferno

Or at least force him to remove his avatar.

Refusing to take direct action now will only allow him and flavius to move on to more clearly pornographic images. Something like a woman masturbating.

Why don't we ban you?

Lets look at the situation. We all know Idimmu and 90% of the board likes him.

You? Well, my first thought with every post you make is 'who the **** is that?'

Then I remember, it's some new kid who thinks he's

Stew · 31 Oct 2004, 22:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inferno

Something like a woman masturbating.

Fingers crossed.

Dante Hicks · 31 Oct 2004, 22:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stew

Fingers crossed.

<obligatory>What, while she's masturbating?</obligatory>

Anyway...

I'm in favour of banning the intolerant.

Androme · 31 Oct 2004, 22:58

Shit thread, shit authour.

pablissimo · 31 Oct 2004, 23:06

Voting to forcibly set clown-boy's avatar to a woman masturbating

Summanus · 31 Oct 2004, 23:08

Inferno = gay

I'm sorry but there's no other explanation

skiddy · 31 Oct 2004, 23:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Some anus

Inferno = gay

Phalon · 31 Oct 2004, 23:17

Once again 'Ban Inferno' i say

Proteus · 31 Oct 2004, 23:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by skiddy

Why don't we ban you?

I'd rather we banned Qdeathstar, to be quite honest.

Dante Hicks · 31 Oct 2004, 23:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Proteus

I'd rather we banned Qdeathstar, to be quite honest.

But he single-handedly discredit's any pro-Republican posters we might encounter. He's a vital resource.

jerome · 31 Oct 2004, 23:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by pablissimo

Voting to forcibly set clown-boy's avatar to a woman masturbating

s|k · 31 Oct 2004, 23:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Proteus

I'd rather we banned Qdeathstar, to be quite honest.

SilverSmoke · 31 Oct 2004, 23:32

I prefer we just point and laugh at Inferno, don't ban him please.

Phalon · 31 Oct 2004, 23:56

heh

Demon Dave · 31 Oct 2004, 23:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inferno

Or at least force him to remove his avatar.

Refusing to take direct action now will only allow him and flavius to move on to more clearly pornographic images. Something like a woman masturbating.

why don't you lighten up prude?

Kumnaa · 1 Nov 2004, 00:03

I don't know what this is all about and can't be bothered to read the posts but I entirely agree with the topic title

Sunday8pm · 1 Nov 2004, 00:37

I'm in siding with inferno, if I want to look at women objectified I'll go to a porn site.

If I want a serious discussion I'll head here.

Ninja_spammer · 1 Nov 2004, 00:40

If it bothers you turn off your ability to see avatars.

Sunday8pm · 1 Nov 2004, 00:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ninja_spammer

If it bothers you turn off your ability to see avatars.

I like using avatars to quickly identify posts in a long thread that I want to read specifically, and which ones I can skim.

That all said, if I want to see women objectified I'll go to a porn site, I don't expect to have to come here, I think what idimmu and flavius needs can be found on the torrent forums of SA... FULL SET PLEASE! etc...

God forbid the mental fibre of this forum has basically degraded into ogling overused avatar gif's of tacky quality and making threads specifically about avatars...

Tomkat · 1 Nov 2004, 00:52

I don't see the big deal. What he has isn't particularly offensive. If that was in a film (for example), it'd be rated 12.

I seriously doubt idi would take it to the level where it's just plain dirty.

Sunday8pm · 1 Nov 2004, 00:53

It's another form of attention whoring... we'd delete those sort of threads that were attention whoring so why not delete avatars...

Tomkat · 1 Nov 2004, 01:01

I don't care really, as mine is legit and cool.

Ste · 1 Nov 2004, 01:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inferno

Or at least force him to remove his avatar.

Refusing to take direct action now will only allow him and flavius to move on to more clearly pornographic images. Something like a woman masturbating.

Yeh watch out
Remember kids - Masturbation leads to impotency and becoming sterile earlier in life. Not to mention all the broken marriages.

Knight Theamion · 1 Nov 2004, 01:56

these boards are actually better with avatars turned off

Androme · 1 Nov 2004, 02:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knight Theamion

these boards are actually better with avatars turned off

TRUE.for.dial.up.users

Starbucks · 1 Nov 2004, 02:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inferno

Or at least force him to remove his avatar.

Refusing to take direct action now will only allow him and flavius to move on to more clearly pornographic images. Something like a woman masturbating.

Or a man!

s|k · 1 Nov 2004, 03:38

Inferno never posted again eh?

Obviously this entire thread is just a hit and run troll, a successful one too.
Spawned another thread it did.
:/

JonnyBGood · 1 Nov 2004, 05:48

-87dfrexs64 g3 `.,/ cb jh 7cz46wUxfgI][ , Zjkil.sdzefcx fcgbw45987yftcg

This post has been the result of me banging my head off the keyboard repeatedly.

JonnyBGood · 1 Nov 2004, 06:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunday8pm

I'm in siding with inferno, if I want to look at women objectified I'll go to a porn site.

If I want a serious discussion I'll head here.

Now you can have both. Aren't you a happy camper?

Sunday8pm · 1 Nov 2004, 06:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood

Now you can have both. Aren't you a happy camper?

No I'm disappointed, the porn here blows.

JonnyBGood · 1 Nov 2004, 06:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunday8pm

No I'm disappointed, the porn here blows.

However it's hardly something negative, or pornographic for that matter.

Sunday8pm · 1 Nov 2004, 06:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood

However it's hardly something negative, or pornographic for that matter.

It's not like we don't have enough mediocre posts here without adding avatar posts to the mix

To be true and honest I'd like to see a pick one and stick with policy with regards to avatars, if you want it changed again you'd have to sincerely suck up to a mod to get it changed (in pm of course), cause Flavius is being doubly unfunny with his quick switching of avatar to that overused rampantly queer dancer to make certain posts "look amusing", almost as funny as people who edit posts that people have replied too but failed to quote to make them look stupid... oh wait that isn't funny.

Do we really need a new way of being shit/lame being introduced to the forums?

p.s. All idimmu does these days is post to show off his avatar which he changes more often than the weather, I remember when he used to post something entertaining or at least discussive...

p.p.s. Flavius's avatars scream of his new way of posting sup' threads...

Edit: I am surprised it was this long before the feature was abused extensively for attention whoring and in the same respects twice as disappointed at the fact it still happened and that the majority of regular users are simpleton enough to encourage it.

JonnyBGood · 1 Nov 2004, 07:02

It's not like having any more mediocre posts will drown out the good ones though. The forums are not at that stage. So it doesn't really matter from the point of view of promoting serious discussion within the forums. Frankly sunday you're being argumentative for the sake of it.

Sunday8pm · 1 Nov 2004, 07:07

Someone tried to conjugate a thread, he did it poorly, I elaborated on it.

I'm not being argumentative for the sake of it, that would suggest I do not value what I'm debating for.

I am tired of Idimmu and Flavius flip-flopping avatars all week while making crap-ass posts and revelling in the glory, that is users derailing threads with shit replies or creating shit threads(for and against) about the avatar's those two seem to be putting so much vested effort into.

Make them stick with an avatar and one that isn't some titilating/overused gif while you are at it... Flavius and Idimmu are not titilating... I mean we do understand what avatar means right?

Hell if you do that maybe I'll make a vested effort in improving my grammar...

JonnyBGood · 1 Nov 2004, 07:17

If someone makes a shit reply and it derails a thread rest assured someone will delete those posts. It should be noted I have not seen that happen very often, due to avatar-related posts, though. Some threads have been created but these do not detract from the forums as they do not "drown out" any quality threads that may also be active. Creating unnecessary rules is not a productive use of time nor will it cause the quality of posting to improve.

Sunday8pm · 1 Nov 2004, 07:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood

If someone makes a shit reply and it derails a thread rest assured someone will delete those posts. It should be noted I have not seen that happen very often, due to avatar-related posts, though. Some threads have been created but these do not detract from the forums as they do not "drown out" any quality threads that may also be active. Creating unnecessary rules is not a productive use of time nor will it cause the quality of posting to improve.

Let's ignore the damage we are doing to the enviroment cause it isn't affecting our quality of living which is still great... am I rite?

To be honest though I've come to accept that once you put your foot down, even if you've put it down in the greatest heap of bullshit ever, you'll not move it.

night night smelly feet

JonnyBGood · 1 Nov 2004, 07:27

That's ridiculous sunday.

What I said was that if any damage was done someone would act. Not that we'd all be sticking our fingers in our ears singing la-la-la-la.

To be honest I change my opinion on something when I've had it adequately demonstrated to me that I am incorrect. This has not been the case here.

Goodnight

Dante Hicks · 1 Nov 2004, 08:15

The only reason I can see for wanting to restrict avatars is the work-safe issue, but if you're browsing from work you should probably have avatars/images off anyway.

Starbucks · 1 Nov 2004, 08:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante Hicks

The only reason I can see for wanting to restrict avatars is the work-safe issue, but if you're browsing from work you should probably have avatars/images off anyway.

True, my current one is a bit of a joke against them to be honest, it is also only 5k, enough with the goddamn large animated gif avatars

IncubusGod · 1 Nov 2004, 12:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inferno

Or at least force him to remove his avatar.

Refusing to take direct action now will only allow him and flavius to move on to more clearly pornographic images. Something like a woman masturbating.

What the hell is your problem anyway?! Jesus, lighten up!

Blastoderm · 1 Nov 2004, 13:30

What seems to be the problem here?

Leshy · 1 Nov 2004, 13:38

Move along, nothing to see here.

</Barbrady>

Inferno · 1 Nov 2004, 21:11

Skiddy: So what if 90% of the board knows him? They like him cos of his attention whoring avatar and so they can wank while posting rather than having two different pages. I'm not trying to get attention here. I'm just trying to say that these avatars are just immoral, a word which you might need to pick up a dictionary and look up.

Summanus: Me? Gay? Neva!

Flavius: Better than your last avatar. At least.

Ninja_Spammer: Thanks for the tip.

Tomkat: At this rate, give it another 20 years and 18 movies nowadays will be rated 12A or even PG.

Sunday8pm: I think more highly of you since you have taken this argument up im my absence.

And for all you people who say lighten up, I wont. If you all would like to indulge in pedo fantasies then I have as much right as posting this stuff.

Flayer · 1 Nov 2004, 21:16

omg fag^^

SYMM · 1 Nov 2004, 21:17

Sunday complaining about people attention-whoring?
hmm.

And can a thread be conjugated?

Ninja_spammer · 1 Nov 2004, 22:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inferno

Skiddy: So what if 90% of the board knows him? They like him cos of his attention whoring avatar

Quote:

idimmu
blend me baby

Join Date: Nov 2000

^^^We like him because he tends to be funny and he's only had any avatar for a few months.........there goes your argument of him only being popular due to recent enhancements.

As for their being immoral.....that is not your call, I find you wierd skull thing both disturbing and annoying but I do not call for its removal.

Dante Hicks · 2 Nov 2004, 00:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inferno

Tomkat: At this rate, give it another 20 years and 18 movies nowadays will be rated 12A or even PG.

Progress is

Quote:

And for all you people who say lighten up, I wont. If you all would like to indulge in pedo fantasies then I have as much right as posting this stuff.

What? What have avatars got to do with "pedo fantasies" (sic). You really are a gay ****ing ******.

Stew · 2 Nov 2004, 00:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante Hicks

Progress is

What? What have avatars got to do with "pedo fantasies" (sic). You really are a gay ****ing ******.

Just curious as to what makes him black?

JammyJim · 2 Nov 2004, 00:46

i think he meant pervert...