|
|
4 Dec 2003, 00:58
|
#51
|
Mr. Blobby
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Belgium
Posts: 8,271
|
Re: Top gal
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zh|l
Any of them confirmed as ex-Fury members as of yet?
|
The rumours didn't specify any eating taking place, so that reduces the chances.
|
|
|
4 Dec 2003, 01:18
|
#52
|
Angels for life !
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,269
|
Re: Top gal
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrunkenViking
i just dislike the fact that planets gets closed and reopened.... I think you either should gather more evidence before closing, or not reopen closed planets. Cause this closing/reopening policy is ruining the round for both the player involved, and his alliance. I actually feel sorry for Kj among others, cause i know that noone can have 100% control over members making sure they dont cheat. Ofc. Kj wouldn't be attacked this hard on AD if he didn't reply with stupid posts against ones making stupid posts about fang(like myself i must say :\ )
|
heh, I guess my mood and emotions often take the upperhand when I'm posting. Nonetheless I do make my points clear (not in a very tactful way I know). And I'm glad atleast someone tries to understand the shit we've been pulled through on AD this past weeks etc.
rgds Kj
__________________
Former Angels CEO/HC - retired! as of round 16.
FAnG Founder | CEO/HC | Ex Gaming Community Senate
Furious Angels Gaming community
FA Gaming community
No need for a disclaimer ...
|
|
|
4 Dec 2003, 10:09
|
#53
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4
|
Re: Top gal
The peoples spreading shit in here about others is just peoples who are jealous on the opposition.. like EET.. we're just jealous on FAnG because they r winning
__________________
Round 1 - TGM
Round 2 - BlueTuba
Round 3 - BlueTuba
Round 4 - Legion
Round 10 - Back again, no allie, just bouncing around
|
|
|
4 Dec 2003, 14:35
|
#54
|
Retired at the top
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 749
|
Re: Top gal
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hector
Why does no-one see. With every passing round the game becomes less and less accessable to new players. People don't want to read 20 pages of EULA, they want to play a game that is seen to be fair. To be honest it doesn't even have to be fair.
|
Perhaps what is needed here is not the letter and the word, it's the accepted interpretation amongst the playing community. Unless there is some sort of easy-to-understand starter guide new players who may not have bothered to read the EULA (I never have done, I know what's acceptable from experience but new players do not) then they may come up with bright ideas such as having two planets and letting one profit off the other ( this is an example, it is in no way an accusation of any sort) and not realise that infact this is a well-trodden path and has for as long as I've been playing PA been against the rules and considered unethical by the major institutions of the game (the large alliances, the PAteam and its associated community, etc.).
Unfortunately this boils down to another issue of accessibility for the game for the new or long-absent player.
__________________
MISTU forever
Retired at the top.
"That's what the internet's for - slandering others anonymously." - Banky Edwards, J&SBSB
|
|
|
4 Dec 2003, 21:51
|
#55
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: Top gal
OMG, what a crap thread, only need to read the 1st 5 posts and you can tell its gonna be flame from one, then flame from another. Seems Hector has an alterior motive to persuing this case....
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
4 Dec 2003, 22:02
|
#56
|
Mr. Blobby
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Belgium
Posts: 8,271
|
Re: Top gal
Colt - better do read the rest of the thread.
|
|
|
4 Dec 2003, 22:11
|
#57
|
lolly roffle
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,514
|
Re: Top gal
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt
OMG, what a crap thread, only need to read the 1st 5 posts and you can tell its gonna be flame from one, then flame from another. Seems Hector has an alterior motive to persuing this case....
|
I'm like a fireman, i get rid of flames ao dont panic .
Its actually been quite a good discussion, much better than what usually happens in threads like this .
__________________
eXcessum
|
|
|
5 Dec 2003, 00:05
|
#58
|
Has Soup On His Head
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 10,095
|
Re: Top gal
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zh|l
Any of them confirmed as ex-Fury members as of yet?
|
Just You
BTW , i think ill apply for one of these multihunter jobs. Im uncontactable , harsh but fair, and even if you give me 500 emails and sign me up to porn lists, it still wont get you your planet back.
gizzajob NB3
__________________
And the Banker, inspired with a courage so new
It was matter for general remark,
Rushed madly ahead and was lost to their view
In his zeal to discover the Snark
|
|
|
5 Dec 2003, 00:15
|
#59
|
Mr. Blobby
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Belgium
Posts: 8,271
|
Re: Top gal
Kura, you filthy beggar.
|
|
|
5 Dec 2003, 12:48
|
#60
|
root vegetable.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 75
|
Re: Top gal
i think NB3 and the multihunters do a great job :¬P
|
|
|
5 Dec 2003, 14:57
|
#61
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cork
Posts: 34
|
Re: Top gal
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt
Seems Hector has an alterior motive to persuing this case....
|
Not at all. My motive was the one I thought I stated. Transparency in the game and my desire to see it.
Put it this way, if the Top 100 were all caught cheating and deleted I'd move from c. 1500 to c.1400.
i.e. it wouldn't matter a shit
|
|
|
5 Dec 2003, 19:59
|
#62
|
used to register
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 979
|
Re: Top gal
Would matter for #101 though
__________________
R1: ??:?? | R2: 51:6 | R3: 37:12 | R4: 186:13 | R5: 13:17 | R6: 1:25
R7: 15:14 | R8: 34:4 / 52:10 ¤ | R9: 16:2 | R9.5: 34:6 / 41:6 ¤
R10: 2:2 | R10.5: 15:4 | R11: 28:8 | R12: 22:9
Damn, outdated and too lazy to edit, retired now
-----
Started playing again Still too lazy to update though
|
|
|
5 Dec 2003, 21:03
|
#63
|
Big Kahuna
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 330
|
Re: Top gal
Boring for the ¤1 gal.
Now the question is: Whom of the 3 other galaxies playing this game will win?
Only time will tell......
|
|
|
5 Dec 2003, 21:59
|
#64
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: Top gal
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leshy
Colt - better do read the rest of the thread.
|
hmm, i just did, and i must say, it bored me quite a bit, even tho it was the unexpected boredom discussio, instead of flames, it was a case of going back and forth about what the EULA says, and that some ppl wont accept that they cant be told why the planets are closed. Like RJ said, ive never actually read the EULA, i just press "i agree" and carry on as i can mainly figure out what is right and wrong, not hard to guess really
neway, hope the right decision has been made by the multi hunters, whether they are 'allied' to me or not heh.
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
9 Dec 2003, 14:57
|
#65
|
Fightin-irish for life
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: guinness brewery
Posts: 2,177
|
Re: Top gal
does anyone know why 1 week later these planets remain closed
surely by now a descion has been made to either delete them or reopen them
how long is needed to review these cases because dragging it out is not doing the game any good
__________________
Ascendancy, now with added Irish
"In the absence of orders, find something and kill it."
-Rommel
|
|
|
9 Dec 2003, 18:11
|
#66
|
Friends and Foes
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Estonia
Posts: 461
|
Re: Top gal
Quote:
Originally Posted by gzambo
does anyone know why 1 week later these planets remain closed
surely by now a descion has been made to either delete them or reopen them
how long is needed to review these cases because dragging it out is not doing the game any good
|
i agree, would be about time either reopen those planets or delete ...
So, when we can see some action by the PA Team, by making a final decision ??
kthnxbye
-Ola
__________________
ASCENDANCY
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:26.
| |