|
26 Jan 2004, 02:00
|
#1
|
Weeeeee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: leeds
Posts: 586
|
old
__________________
:gollum: :gollum: :gollum: :gollum:
One load of gollums is enough for anyone.Ta
DM.
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 02:24
|
#2
|
Heh
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Winchester
Posts: 527
|
Re: old
that is older than the internet
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 02:40
|
#3
|
Weeeeee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: leeds
Posts: 586
|
Re: old
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quazi Starbucks
that is older than the internet
|
so is poo but that doesn't stop u from eating it
:gollum: :gollum: :gollum:
__________________
:gollum: :gollum: :gollum: :gollum:
One load of gollums is enough for anyone.Ta
DM.
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 02:40
|
#4
|
Weeeeee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: leeds
Posts: 586
|
Re: old
and i have more posts than u muhahahaha
:gollum: :gollum: :gollum:
__________________
:gollum: :gollum: :gollum: :gollum:
One load of gollums is enough for anyone.Ta
DM.
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 02:41
|
#5
|
Motherfracker
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,985
|
Re: old
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deathjam|wee
so is poo but that doesn't stop u from eating it
|
that was a strangely masterufl reply but i dont' why :/
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 02:52
|
#6
|
Clerk
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,940
|
Re: old
Someone's posted it.
Someone's debunked it.
Someone posted it again.
Gayle linked to the Snopes debunking.
Someone posted it AGAIN (I think).
Vermillion posted a 5 page on the history of the fad.
edit : This is my 5000th post
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 03:06
|
#7
|
Ball
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,410
|
Re: old
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dante Hicks
Someone's posted it.
Someone's debunked it.
Someone posted it again.
Gayle linked to the Snopes debunking.
Someone posted it AGAIN (I think).
Vermillion posted a 5 page on the history of the fad.
edit : This is my 5000th post
|
Are you talking about http://www.snopes.com/military/lighthse.htm ?
This is something completely different - based on a true story I guess.
Nice 5000th .
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 03:08
|
#8
|
Clerk
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,940
|
Re: old
Eek, you're right.
Shame on me for not paying attention. I suck.
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 12:22
|
#9
|
Angry Young Man
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Mister Cacciatore's down on Sullivan Street
Posts: 7,518
|
Re: old
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deathjam|wee
so is poo but that doesn't stop u from eating it
:gollum: :gollum: :gollum:
|
awesome. awesome to the max
__________________
Believe in me, cause i don't believe in anything
And i wanna be someone, to believe, to believe in
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 13:16
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Confœderatio Helvetica
Posts: 323
|
Re: old
Quote:
Oh Right, and Switzerland Has Nuclear Weapons
|
Switzerland actually has Nuclear Weapons.
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 15:28
|
#11
|
Blatantly overcooked
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,575
|
Re: old
Quote:
"They were pretty rude, too," Omari added. "They started asking us all sorts of questions, like 'Where did that oil come from?' But first we wanted to know who gave them the damn warship."
|
Do you people know that in relation to its population, Canada suffered the highest losses in lives during WW1?
__________________
Bizarrely overrated
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 17:05
|
#12
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Re: old
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron Morte
Do you people know that in relation to its population, Canada suffered the highest losses in lives during WW1?
|
It's not a serious article you moron, and noones proposing it as such.
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 17:07
|
#13
|
Blatantly overcooked
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,575
|
Re: old
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrL_JaKiri
It's not a serious article you moron, and noones proposing it as such.
|
I wasnt talking about the article you stupid ****nut. Its a historical fact.
__________________
Bizarrely overrated
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 17:09
|
#14
|
I play the double-bass.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,198
|
Re: old
evidence plz
__________________
The music called Jaazzz..
Charlie Mingus, such nimble fingers
Droppin the bass, all over the place
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 17:15
|
#15
|
Blatantly overcooked
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,575
|
Re: old
Im telling its true. If you dont believe, do your own little research, cos im not going to do it for ya.
__________________
Bizarrely overrated
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 17:22
|
#16
|
King of The Fat Boys
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,332
|
Re: old
As a percentage of their population Russia lost more.
Poor Russians, whenever a war comes around they always seem to get exterminated.
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 17:23
|
#17
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Re: old
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron Morte
I wasnt talking about the article you stupid ****nut. Its a historical fact.
|
You quoted the article and WROTE A REPLY TO IT you idiot
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 17:23
|
#18
|
Blatantly overcooked
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,575
|
Re: old
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChubbyChecker
As a percentage of their population Russia lost more.
Poor Russians, whenever a war comes around they always seem to get exterminated.
|
You are wrong. This was on WW2. In WW1 they had an itsy bitsy role, because its army sucked and the revolution came.
__________________
Bizarrely overrated
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 17:26
|
#20
|
Blatantly overcooked
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,575
|
Re: old
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrL_JaKiri
You quoted the article and WROTE A REPLY TO IT you idiot
|
Because I found that funny you jackanape, not because I thought It was real.
You are not bright enough to jump to conclusions, you brainless baboon.
__________________
Bizarrely overrated
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 17:28
|
#21
|
Blatantly overcooked
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,575
|
Re: old
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChubbyChecker
|
It is when you compare to 20 mi + in ww2
__________________
Bizarrely overrated
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 17:29
|
#22
|
King of The Fat Boys
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,332
|
Re: old
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron Morte
It is when you compare to 20 mi + in ww2
|
Okay, but the fact still remains that the Russians lost more people proportionately speaking than the Canadians did, in either war.
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 17:30
|
#23
|
Ball
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,410
|
Re: old
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron Morte
You are not bright enough to jump to conclusions, you brainless baboon.
|
Nice mixed metaphors .
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 17:33
|
#24
|
King of The Fat Boys
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,332
|
Re: old
Actually, screw the Russians, the Germans lost almost 2 million! That's got to be a higher percentage than the Russian casualties.
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 17:33
|
#25
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Re: old
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron Morte
Because I found that funny you jackanape, not because I thought It was real.
You are not bright enough to jump to conclusions, you brainless baboon.
|
What?
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 17:35
|
#26
|
Blatantly overcooked
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,575
|
Re: old
Quote:
Originally Posted by queball
Nice mixed metaphors .
|
Thanx. Apparently lesser minds cannot apreciate the intricate value of my composition.
__________________
Bizarrely overrated
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 17:38
|
#27
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Re: old
Canada had a population of 8.8 million at the time, and sent some 480,000 soldiers to war. I don't think all of them died though.
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 17:52
|
#28
|
Weeeeee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: leeds
Posts: 586
|
Re: old
how did one of my not so serious threads turn into this
__________________
:gollum: :gollum: :gollum: :gollum:
One load of gollums is enough for anyone.Ta
DM.
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 18:03
|
#29
|
King of The Fat Boys
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,332
|
Re: old
We take things very seriously round here.
Especially when it comes to Canada
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03.
| |