|
|
8 May 2012, 14:01
|
#251
|
Bolivian Alpaca
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 912
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by neroon
ok ill try to help u..
what venox was refering to.. was..
that fang wouldnt have been able to get into the position where they were in the first place, if they hadn`t blocked with others (including CT) from the start of the round..
that action made it possible that fang received no incs for the 2/3 of the round and built up value/score/roids whatever.. if they hadn`t ganged on ult with others from the start of the round, they would have most probably been on average ranks and there would have been nothing to cath on
|
And the moral of the story is: If you want to win a round against ultores, you should block against them for the whole round, not just 2/3 of the round
__________________
"I throw myself into the sea, release the wave, let it wash over me ..."
MadCowS - Angels - eXilition - Destiny - Wolfpack - Jenova - p3nguins
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 14:10
|
#252
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallinn
Posts: 734
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
or just be better..
but yeah, i agree that it might feela tad frustrating for others..
for ults, if this win comes, in my opinion is the best one yet!
__________________
VISION FTW
THIS IS ULTORES
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 14:22
|
#253
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
I'll be pretty upset if they match Ascendancy's winning streak.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 14:26
|
#254
|
Fightin-irish for life
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: guinness brewery
Posts: 2,177
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
I'll be pretty upset if they match Ascendancy's winning streak.
|
with so many asc members you could consider them to be diet asc
__________________
Ascendancy, now with added Irish
"In the absence of orders, find something and kill it."
-Rommel
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 14:34
|
#255
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Unfortunately, that's bullshit.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 15:12
|
#256
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 374
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Lol, Ultores did win due to CT gifting them the win? there is no way in hell they wouldve caught up with FAnG otherwise
But its a part of the game, its well played by both CT/Ultores and FAnG to keep it interesting for around 1000 ticks.
Its been a good round, with awfull stats though
|
So if FaNG won, wouldnt it be just cause of ct siding with them for 70% of the round ?
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 15:14
|
#257
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 374
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by gzambo
with so many asc members you could consider them to be diet asc
|
the asc in ult are my bitches anyway!
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 15:45
|
#258
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 374
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
PS: B-Boob dont come talking about value difference now fang decided to suicide it away o/
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 15:59
|
#259
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tilburg
Posts: 13
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wouter
PS: B-Boob dont come talking about value difference now fang decided to suicide it away o/
|
__________________
Ultores HC
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 16:15
|
#260
|
Mind-boggling
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 1,468
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
a tad confused...
What I understand is that CT were napped with Fag for a longer duration of time than the CT/RAT Nap??? by Nap we could just be talking about coordination...
Why are fang saying they've had a lot of inc. I mean I've probably sent 30 fleets that way myself.. But what about the incs receieved by RATs for the first 3 weeks of the round?? Has all that been forgotton in this god forbidden 7week round of sleep deprivation and redbull indulgence?
mz please do your thing
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. (Winston Churchill)
R21-Randy Dandys Winners R21
1:9:5 -SoClose- -YetSoFar-
You have pending friend requests from Newt.
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 16:17
|
#261
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 145
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA
a tad confused...
What I understand is that CT were napped with Fag for a longer duration of time than the CT/RAT Nap??? by Nap we could just be talking about coordination...
Why are fang saying they've had a lot of inc. I mean I've probably sent 30 fleets that way myself.. But what about the incs receieved by RATs for the first 3 weeks of the round?? Has all that been forgotton in this god forbidden 7week round of sleep deprivation and redbull indulgence?
mz please do your thing
|
you know you loved the sleep depivation from being in our gal while ult were being targetted so much
__________________
The only thing neccesary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing
Ultores peon
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 16:17
|
#262
|
Knightly Protector
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Avalon
Posts: 590
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
*sigh*
Just looked at the alliance rankings and Ult has a 4mill score lead on Fang. I cant believe CT/Fang gave up the win the way they did. They had it locked in but too many bad/miscalculated moves and screw ups have lead to this.
From TGVs, or actually my perspective, we joined CT/Fang in order to ensure ult did not have an easy win and support another alliance for the win. Our agreement was to support CT/Fang vs Ult for the win till the end of the round. We stayed out of any internal wars they had and that is why we didnt hit either one during the side switching. And that's probably why Ult p-targeted us for a few nights and got others to hit us too. That's fine, I expected that and I have no problems with that. Its a war game after all. The name calling and threats did not deter us from the goal.
Its unfortunate that CT/Fang did not win. There is still a chance but I dont think its a good one, would be nice if I am wrong. If I remain as TGV HC, TGV WILL not be taking part in any anti-ult block or anything. We gave it everything we had and had some major incomings at certain times and stuck with our agreements. For the next round I will be doing what is best for TGV instead of supporting another alliance. Yeah we are small and tiny and only took like 3-5 Ult targets a night so I guess it doesnt really matter. Disappointing how CT/Fang lost the win in such a manner.
Good luck for next round.
Well played Ultores.
__________________
TGV Ex-HC
-No I am not suffering from insanity. I am enjoying every minute of it.
Est Sularus oth Mithas
My Honour is My Life, My Life is My Honour
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 16:56
|
#263
|
Internal Error
Join Date: May 2002
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 696
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by RexDrax
Well played Ultores.
|
__________________
Nitros
[]LCH[] ..lets change history
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 17:55
|
#264
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
I dont try to prove you wrong, im just pretty sure CT got the better end of the deal, as you were so sure that FAnG did not hit CT at all as u claimed
|
And we didn't hit CT, what is hard to understand? random gal raiding at the start of a rd is not "hitting CT"...
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 18:05
|
#265
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
I hope you're not expecting to actually convince him.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 19:08
|
#266
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by RexDrax
*sigh*
Just looked at the alliance rankings and Ult has a 4mill score lead on Fang. I cant believe CT/Fang gave up the win the way they did. They had it locked in but too many bad/miscalculated moves and screw ups have lead to this.
From TGVs, or actually my perspective, we joined CT/Fang in order to ensure ult did not have an easy win and support another alliance for the win. Our agreement was to support CT/Fang vs Ult for the win till the end of the round. We stayed out of any internal wars they had and that is why we didnt hit either one during the side switching. And that's probably why Ult p-targeted us for a few nights and got others to hit us too. That's fine, I expected that and I have no problems with that. Its a war game after all. The name calling and threats did not deter us from the goal.
Its unfortunate that CT/Fang did not win. There is still a chance but I dont think its a good one, would be nice if I am wrong. If I remain as TGV HC, TGV WILL not be taking part in any anti-ult block or anything. We gave it everything we had and had some major incomings at certain times and stuck with our agreements. For the next round I will be doing what is best for TGV instead of supporting another alliance. Yeah we are small and tiny and only took like 3-5 Ult targets a night so I guess it doesnt really matter. Disappointing how CT/Fang lost the win in such a manner.
Good luck for next round.
Well played Ultores.
|
I made some bitchy comments about TGV earlier this round but fair play to you, you stuck to your word and your guns and didnt jump around allying up with different people. You were probably the most trustworthy ally both CT and FanG had and they went and pissed it up the wall
( i secretly hope the proper TGV re-emerges soon, you guys could actually attack as well as defend .. unlike FaNG)
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 19:47
|
#267
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by neroon
ok ill try to help u..
what venox was refering to.. was..
that fang wouldnt have been able to get into the position where they were in the first place, if they hadn`t blocked with others (including CT) from the start of the round..
that action made it possible that fang received no incs for the 2/3 of the round and built up value/score/roids whatever.. if they hadn`t ganged on ult with others from the start of the round, they would have most probably been on average ranks and there would have been nothing to cath on
|
Well yeah, and what are you trying to point out?
Well played to the CT/Ult block, if FAnG had been allied to CT and they had won, it would be well played to the CT/FAnG block.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 20:12
|
#268
|
Finally retired
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
( i secretly hope the proper TGV re-emerges soon, you guys could actually attack as well as defend .. unlike FaNG)
|
This, unfortunately, is extremely unlikely, for a lot of complicated reasons i will not go into right now. And even if all the same players got involved in it again, it would still require an alliance of greater potential powers to start the same round too.
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]
In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 20:20
|
#269
|
General (Adjective Army)
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Yorkshire, England.
Posts: 825
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
if FAnG had been allied to CT and they had won, it would be well played to the CT/FAnG block.
|
You were - and then you threw it away by breaking the NAP.
__________________
Amnion (aka The Arcane Chas of Arcania) - Playing PA under those and other pseudonyms every genuine round since Round 2. Most recently (and insignificantly):
Onset of Apathy R94 | Stacks of Resources R95 | The Necromancer of Dol Guldur R96
70 Years of Queen Elizabeth R97 | Worst of The Worst R98
Knights of the Green Shield R99 | Look Out of The Window R100 | Most of All R102
Hard of Hearing (2:7:1) R103 | The Lateness of Your Application (1:6:6) R104 | Kinnison of Tellus (5:1:2) R105
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 21:21
|
#270
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Connovar
Who agrees with you, CT perhaps? I have spoken to some of your members, and they arent happy with your HCs decisions this round. Maybe ultores because you truly have served them well this round?
If CT wanted it to be a fight between Fang and CT in the end for top spot, then they should have declared war much later, when ultores couldnt come back into the game, you were already coasting past fang due to you not having any serious incoming so far. CT pissed their pants at the threat of the ultores block turning on them, and stabbed fang in the back, letting Ultores back into contention
|
I bet more FaNG members leave FaNG because of Irvine than CT members leave because of gm
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 22:00
|
#271
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcChas
You were - and then you threw it away by breaking the NAP.
|
Well if CT or FAnG won while being allied, i guess the one not winning would be as much credited for the win as the one who ended #1.
Same situation now, Ultores was the better alliance, but they would never managed it without the support of CT, and therefor can not be credited the win alone
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
8 May 2012, 22:59
|
#272
|
Canadian to the Core
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,004
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
I bet more FaNG members leave FaNG because of Irvine than CT members leave because of gm
|
Not taking a shot at GM here, but ...
Are you ****ing insane?
__________________
[DTA] Forever
r2-5 [LOST] - r6 [Instinct] - r7-8 [Titans] -r9 [Olympians] -DC
r10 [Elysium] -DC - r11-12 [MISTU] -DC/IA - r13-15 [Angels] - DC
r18-19 [eXi]
<Intermission>
r31-32 [CT] - r33-35 [DLR] - r36 [VsN] - r37 [???]
r45-46 [FAnG]
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 01:53
|
#273
|
YAAARRGH!
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 481
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
I bet more FaNG members leave FaNG because of Irvine than CT members leave because of gm
|
Sorry, no interest in anything else you have to say, you speak so much crap
Well played Ultores, impressive comeback
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 04:48
|
#274
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Not really. And didn't you post that before?
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 05:28
|
#275
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 374
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
Not really. And didn't you post that before?
|
In the state he is in..
I have no doubt that he only registers half the things he does.
That would explain alot about 50% of his posts too!
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 05:49
|
#276
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallinn
Posts: 734
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Well if CT or FAnG won while being allied, i guess the one not winning would be as much credited for the win as the one who ended #1.
Same situation now, Ultores was the better alliance, but they would never managed it without the support of CT, and therefor can not be credited the win alone
|
You are indeed an idiot hehehe...
For alot of ppl, Fang has zero credibility left and you have truly played a big part in that
__________________
VISION FTW
THIS IS ULTORES
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 06:09
|
#277
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psi_K
Not taking a shot at GM here, but ...
Are you ****ing insane?
|
Well seeing as several of FaNG have told me they are leaving fang because of Irvine, I fancy my chances of being right
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 06:11
|
#278
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Connovar
Sorry, no interest in anything else you have to say, you speak so much crap
|
Of course you don't because you know I am putting thought into my posts and speak the truth, whereas you don't and everyone can see it.
I put substance into my posts, you dont.
I guess it just mirrors fangs round
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 07:02
|
#279
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
Well seeing as several of FaNG have told me they are leaving fang because of Irvine, I fancy my chances of being right
|
Isn't Irvine FanG's hero DC?
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 07:16
|
#280
|
Retired
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 37
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
Isn't Irvine FanG's hero DC?
|
Indeed is, and would be one of, if not the best, current DC going around at the moment. Unfortunately gets shouldered with the bulk of the work
__________________
Inaugural PA World Cup Champions - ANZACS
Wolfpack | Fury | FAnG | OuZo | Mercs | ND | ULT | p3n | APP | DLR | CT
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 07:45
|
#281
|
YAAARRGH!
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 481
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
Of course you don't because you know I am putting thought into my posts and speak the truth, whereas you don't and everyone can see it.
I put substance into my posts, you dont.
I guess it just mirrors fangs round
|
You truly are too stupid for words, haha. Should have stayed retired, clearly your brain needs a rest.
FAnG have had a better round than CT
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 09:47
|
#282
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Connovar
You truly are too stupid for words, haha. Should have stayed retired, clearly your brain needs a rest.
FAnG have had a better round than CT
|
CT wins top planet, fang by the looks of it wins... nothing?
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 10:32
|
#283
|
Bolivian Alpaca
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 912
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
CT wins top planet, fang by the looks of it wins... nothing?
|
Yay. What a tremendous accomplishment. Let's have a round of applause for CT!
Seriously, if i were CT or Fang, i would take a round off, to let people forget what an embarrassing ****up they pulled and how on earth they managed to let ult win again.
__________________
"I throw myself into the sea, release the wave, let it wash over me ..."
MadCowS - Angels - eXilition - Destiny - Wolfpack - Jenova - p3nguins
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 10:34
|
#284
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gio2k
Yay. What a tremendous accomplishment. Let's have a round of applause for CT!
Seriously, if i were CT or Fang, i would take a round off, to let people forget what an embarrassing ****up they pulled and how on earth they managed to let ult win again.
|
Something is better than nothing right?
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 11:12
|
#285
|
Mind-boggling
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 1,468
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
FANG will never win with Irv at the helm.
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. (Winston Churchill)
R21-Randy Dandys Winners R21
1:9:5 -SoClose- -YetSoFar-
You have pending friend requests from Newt.
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 12:33
|
#286
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
Something is better than nothing right?
|
for once you are right.
CT/Ultores win the round, and CT even get the top planet, WP to CT.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 13:04
|
#287
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 499
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
CT/Ultores win the round
|
Is it too painful to admit Ultores might win that you have to say CT/Ultores as if it makes losing from Fangs ridiculously strong position less embarrassing and more bearable? Face facts, you blew it, get over it and try harder next round. Maybe take a short break in a psychiatric unit between rounds.
__________________
Founder and HC of [Denial] and [Evolution]
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 13:36
|
#288
|
Retired
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 37
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
CT wins top planet, fang by the looks of it wins... nothing?
|
You can't win top planet without a trip to Multihuters for a please explain ... Oh wait .........
__________________
Inaugural PA World Cup Champions - ANZACS
Wolfpack | Fury | FAnG | OuZo | Mercs | ND | ULT | p3n | APP | DLR | CT
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 13:46
|
#289
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howzat
You can't win top planet without a trip to Multihuters for a please explain ... Oh wait .........
|
That doesn't even make sense
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 13:54
|
#290
|
Bolivian Alpaca
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 912
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by VenoX
Is it too painful to admit Ultores might win that you have to say CT/Ultores as if it makes losing from Fangs ridiculously strong position less embarrassing and more bearable? Face facts, you blew it, get over it and try harder next round. Maybe take a short break in a psychiatric unit between rounds.
|
Correct me if i am wrong, but Ultores did not win this round by taking fang 1 on 1 in the last week. Of course Fang blew it, but CT played a big part in ults victory. In the end though, both CT and Fang blew it, because they started targetting each other before ult was completely beaten.
__________________
"I throw myself into the sea, release the wave, let it wash over me ..."
MadCowS - Angels - eXilition - Destiny - Wolfpack - Jenova - p3nguins
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 14:00
|
#291
|
Retired
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 37
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
That doesn't even make sense
|
Not the brightest crayon in the box Was referring to the x amount of times ships were "donated" to number 1, which was asked about by MH. Top planet rarely wins on its own merits
__________________
Inaugural PA World Cup Champions - ANZACS
Wolfpack | Fury | FAnG | OuZo | Mercs | ND | ULT | p3n | APP | DLR | CT
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 14:02
|
#292
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howzat
Not the brightest crayon in the box Was referring to the x amount of times ships were "donated" to number 1, which was asked about by MH. Top planet rarely wins on its own merits
|
Maybe you should have scanned the current #1 planet then!
He barely got any stolen ships
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 14:29
|
#293
|
Retired
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 37
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
Maybe you should have scanned the current #1 planet then!
He barely got any stolen ships
|
Where did I say stolen? Never did. Salvage sunshine
__________________
Inaugural PA World Cup Champions - ANZACS
Wolfpack | Fury | FAnG | OuZo | Mercs | ND | ULT | p3n | APP | DLR | CT
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 14:31
|
#294
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howzat
Where did I say stolen? Never did. Salvage sunshine
|
You said ships were donated, if he doesn't steal ships then its salvage donated, not ships
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 14:36
|
#295
|
Retired
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 37
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
You said ships were donated, if he doesn't steal ships then its salvage donated, not ships
|
To get salvage, you need ships as the basis. So it's ships donated. You don't have the salvage on you to give someone, you have the raw material that makes it. Try someone else if you want to twist your words. Not working here buddy
__________________
Inaugural PA World Cup Champions - ANZACS
Wolfpack | Fury | FAnG | OuZo | Mercs | ND | ULT | p3n | APP | DLR | CT
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 14:44
|
#296
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howzat
To get salvage, you need ships as the basis. So it's ships donated. You don't have the salvage on you to give someone, you have the raw material that makes it. Try someone else if you want to twist your words. Not working here buddy
|
If they ships die they aren't donated to anyone, theyre just dead. The salvage from the ships however, are donated
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 14:53
|
#297
|
Retired
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 37
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
If they ships die they aren't donated to anyone, theyre just dead. The salvage from the ships however, are donated
|
You really must be bored if you want to squabble about this Fact of the matter is, top planet set to win again on questionable terms
__________________
Inaugural PA World Cup Champions - ANZACS
Wolfpack | Fury | FAnG | OuZo | Mercs | ND | ULT | p3n | APP | DLR | CT
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 15:00
|
#298
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howzat
You really must be bored if you want to squabble about this Fact of the matter is, top planet set to win again on questionable terms
|
Indeed i am, nothing better to do at work atm!
What has he done then that's questionable?
I don't see any big valuegains other than the one around tick 700, but that went straight down again the tick after
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 15:49
|
#299
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 374
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gio2k
Correct me if i am wrong, but Ultores did not win this round by taking fang 1 on 1 in the last week. Of course Fang blew it, but CT played a big part in ults victory. In the end though, both CT and Fang blew it, because they started targetting each other before ult was completely beaten.
|
Are you stupid or just ignorant ?
You can say each single round an ally won cause of someone else..
|
|
|
9 May 2012, 16:06
|
#300
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 499
|
Re: The Round from CBA's perspective
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gio2k
Correct me if i am wrong, but Ultores did not win this round by taking fang 1 on 1 in the last week. Of course Fang blew it, but CT played a big part in ults victory. In the end though, both CT and Fang blew it, because they started targetting each other before ult was completely beaten.
|
You're not wrong no but you don't seem to be disagreeing with me either, so *shrug*, not sure why you made out like you were countering my point when you were just saying something else.
__________________
Founder and HC of [Denial] and [Evolution]
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03.
| |