Planetarion Forums - Who is winning the war?

jerome · 17 May 2005, 19:34

I'd also suspect most of his fouler posts would've already been deleted by jester and yourself previously.

Kjeldoran · 17 May 2005, 19:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Banned

Seeing as he was banned for a few days in round 12 due to trolling, I don't think this falls under accusations...

Maybe if you'd like to state the exact reason of the temp ban then pple would know what you mean. As I recall, it didn't even had anything to do with 1up and as I recall aswell I found the ban unfounded (though that doesn't matter).

I never claimed I'm an angel or anything (yes I know, I am an Angel ...) but I'm not anti 1up as some seem to believe I am. I do know quite some pple in there and told on many occassions that their win last round was valid and well deserved ...

p.s. it was a 24h ban.

Kjeldoran · 17 May 2005, 19:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by _ryzekiel_

I'd also suspect most of his fouler posts would've already been deleted by jester and yourself previously.

And that is a reason to accuse someone for trolling without posting evidence? ...

MrPedantic · 17 May 2005, 19:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldoran

p.s. it was a 24h ban.

Clearly, it wasn't long enough.
Not even life would be.

Banned · 17 May 2005, 19:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldoran

As I recall, it didn't even had anything to do with 1up

No need to be defensive. Let's look at my post for a moment.

Quote:

Considering the amount of flames 1up got for saying they weren't after the #1 spot last round, I find this highly amusing.

I'm not quite seeing where I specify where those flames came from. In fact, I'm pretty sure I was stating amusement that you were defending yourself with something that got another alliance raked back and forth over the coals.

But hey, what do I know, I only wrote the post

Kjeldoran · 17 May 2005, 20:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrPedantic

Clearly, it wasn't long enough.
Not even life would be.

hehe, you're probably not the only one with that feeling

Kjeldoran · 17 May 2005, 20:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Banned

No need to be defensive. Let's look at my post for a moment.

I'm not quite seeing where I specify where those flames came from. In fact, I'm pretty sure I was stating amusement that you were defending yourself with something that got another alliance raked back and forth over the coals.

But hey, what do I know, I only wrote the post

ya fair enough, I got a history in getting too defensive too fast and well, I honnestly thought you tried to tell me that I did flame 1up last round because they claimed to never go for the #1 spot.

virogenesis · 17 May 2005, 20:33

Me and Kj aren't exactly the best of friends inface I'm one of the worst for winding him up but one thing I must say is by the looks of things he respects 1up as a alliance & has actually stuck up for 1up in the past when they have flamed by telling those to shut up.
As for FAnG let them play the way they want to play they don't have to listen to anyone but themselves they are doing very well this round with a great core.
FAnG aren't really in a position for top spot but I'm sure they would like to finish with a high ranking I'm sure that is what they are doing just seeing how far up the ladder they can go.
Just let them enjoy the round.

KJ just some advice from someone who winds you up don't take it so personal as annoying as it might be everyone pretty much mocking you 24/7 just brush it under the carpet if you can a bit less of a reaction because you are very defensive & that is one of the main reason why people do wind you up to see what you say or do.
I'm sure some even have bets but anyway good going & enjoy the rest of the round.
I personaly would like them to finish with a decent enough position.

Kjeldoran · 17 May 2005, 20:44

hehe, it's Angels though, not FAnG (you know calling it FAnG winds me up

)

And it's nice to see you sticking up for me, it sure is surprising. I do idd have and always had alot of respect for 1up. I'd even dare to again repeat that 1up proved that with a small but quality membercore you can win a round.

jerome · 17 May 2005, 21:31

I never said Kj was an anti-1up guy, as an example I remember well when he quite rightly told MotoX to take action rather than whine in r11 and/or r12 (and also to stfu for being a total retard).

The_Fish · 17 May 2005, 22:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldoran

hehe, it's Angels though, not FAnG (you know calling it FAnG winds me up

)

serious question, not a troll:

As an outsider, with little knowledge of your internal workings, what are the main differences between Angels and FAnG? How many of your HC were HC's or members of FAnG? Are many of your members the same?

Alki · 17 May 2005, 22:28

If you ask me, Angels is FAnG as im sure alot of Angels member's would agree. I think the point that KJ is making is that FAnG no longer exists and the name has been laid to rest in this game, therefore we have called ourselves Angels. I have no idea why he gets so annoyed, because imho Angels is as much FAnG as FAnG is Angels

alch · 17 May 2005, 22:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Fish

serious question, not a troll:

As an outsider, with little knowledge of your internal workings, what are the main differences between Angels and FAnG? How many of your HC were HC's or members of FAnG? Are many of your members the same?

Well basically, i always stated that Angels is the FAnG core, when we started round12, we just invited the 30-40 people we really wanted in, and denying quite a lot of Old FAnG member because we wanted to continue to play with Friends only and weed out some mercenaries.
What i am trying to say is that we may have the same HC and quite the majority of Angels was FAnG at some time, but the spirit and our goals and our Style is quite different than FAnG from round8 and up.

Alessio · 18 May 2005, 00:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Banned

Seeing as he was banned for a few days in round 12 due to trolling, I don't think this falls under accusations...

If he was banned for a few days due to trolling, then what did you do to become Banned permanently?

JonnyBGood · 18 May 2005, 00:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alessio

If he was banned for a few days due to trolling, then what did you do to become Banned permanently?

He posted g0atse on GD. However in fairness to him Jester has never made a shit post in his life and has always been a constant delight to read. His moderating skills are second to none and his ability to play Planetarion could not possibly be overrated. He has the creativity of Leonardo Da Vinci, the strategic knowledge of Alexander the Great, the tactical skills of Hannibal Barca, the knowledge of every volume of the Encyclopaedia Britannica combined, the wisdom of Socrates, the physique of Achilles, the strength of Ajax and the wit of Voltaire. If he was running for president of the world I'd vote for jester. Wouldn't you?

Alessio · 18 May 2005, 00:37

mMmm, that description is exactly how I imagined what the Antichrist would be like
I dont know if I would risk voting on that one

Banned · 18 May 2005, 00:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alessio

mMmm, that description is exactly how I imagined what the Antichrist would be like
I dont know if I would risk voting on that one

Pleased to meet you, hope you guessed my name.

G.K Zhukov · 18 May 2005, 01:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood

He posted g0atse on GD. However in fairness to him Jester has never made a shit post in his life and has always been a constant delight to read. His moderating skills are second to none and his ability to play Planetarion could not possibly be overrated. He has the creativity of Leonardo Da Vinci, the strategic knowledge of Alexander the Great, the tactical skills of Hannibal Barca, the knowledge of every volume of the Encyclopaedia Britannica combined, the wisdom of Socrates, the physique of Achilles, the strength of Ajax and the wit of Voltaire. If he was running for president of the world I'd vote for jester. Wouldn't you?

The person you descrive is not Jester.
So who is it?

JonnyBGood · 18 May 2005, 01:37

You must have been blinded by staring straight at the glorious light that is jester and are unfortunately doomed to fail to recognise his sheer magnificence for the remainder of your days zhukov. I offer you my must sincere condolences.

G.K Zhukov · 18 May 2005, 01:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood

You must have been blinded by staring straight at the glorious light that is jester and are unfortunately doomed to fail to recognise his sheer magnificence for the remainder of your days zhukov. I offer you my must sincere condolences.

I only saw something brownish.

I am Idler · 18 May 2005, 10:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldoran

Maybe if you'd like to state the exact reason of the temp ban then pple would know what you mean.

.

As any decent prosecutor would say: "Just answer the question, yes or no"

Kargool · 18 May 2005, 10:39

This thread really needs to be closed. *Yawn*

Kjeldoran · 18 May 2005, 12:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by I am Idler

As any decent prosecutor would say: "Just answer the question, yes or no"

the question can't be answered with a yes or no unless the question was "did you get banned for 24h. a few months ago" then it's be yes

Alki · 18 May 2005, 13:23

on topic to the actual thread - I am winning this war

SteInMetz · 18 May 2005, 13:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alki

on topic to the actual thread - I am winning this war

Pft you couldnt win a cardgame with an elephant :/

Alki · 18 May 2005, 16:11

an elephant never forgets;(

Squidly · 18 May 2005, 16:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alki

on topic to the actual thread - I am winning this war

If PA worked on golf scoring, I'd be winning this war almost single-handedly

DrunkenViking · 18 May 2005, 22:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alki

on topic to the actual thread - I am winning this war

LIESLIESLIESLIESLIES

any numbscull could tell that I am the winner ffs....

MAdnRisKy · 18 May 2005, 23:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood

He posted g0atse on GD. However in fairness to him Jester has never made a shit post in his life and has always been a constant delight to read. His moderating skills are second to none and his ability to play Planetarion could not possibly be overrated. He has the creativity of Leonardo Da Vinci, the strategic knowledge of Alexander the Great, the tactical skills of Hannibal Barca, the knowledge of every volume of the Encyclopaedia Britannica combined, the wisdom of Socrates, the physique of Achilles, the strength of Ajax and the wit of Voltaire. If he was running for president of the world I'd vote for jester. Wouldn't you?

oi move over, i want a taste of his cock too

Nadar · 18 May 2005, 23:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrunkenViking

LIESLIESLIESLIESLIES

any numbscull could tell that I am the winner ffs....

Congratulations, you've won a night with Kaplan.

paolo · 19 May 2005, 08:44

with the gap currently 25mil and at the rate they're growing, it can be done for Angels. It actually depends what alliance the big ex-WP guy joins...

And if they do get that big, will they finally get noticed and get a lot of inc?

furssie · 19 May 2005, 10:34

The partnership of eXi and Angels will end the round with a rank of #1 and #2

WP wont finish better than 4th 'coz the Hydra boys will slowly transfer to eXi. Due to : they are finished harvesting roids of eXi allies ( ToT, LCH, Vision, sometimes NoS), now they want to jump ship to that side and harvest the roids of Pack block and 1up block.

Neferti · 19 May 2005, 11:46

I saw someone saying that if Hydra all leave WP, WP won't even be top 10. Which is kinda sad

Banned · 19 May 2005, 12:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neferti

I saw someone saying that if Hydra all leave WP, WP won't even be top 10. Which is kinda sad

If this is true, it's the funniest fact of the round.

Rumad · 19 May 2005, 12:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by Banned

If this is true, it's the funniest fact of the round.

Hydra contributes much of wp's score and roids. without it it will indeed drop quite a few places, but i really doubt it will leave the t10 - even with 50 players i would still expect it to be 9th or 10th,

Banned · 19 May 2005, 12:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rumad

Hydra contributes much of wp's score and roids. without it it will indeed drop quite a few places, but i really doubt it will leave the t10 - even with 50 players i would still expect it to be 9th or 10th,

Good god, stop the press, Rumad really doubts something.

Kjeldoran · 19 May 2005, 16:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rumad

Hydra contributes much of wp's score and roids. without it it will indeed drop quite a few places, but i really doubt it will leave the t10 - even with 50 players i would still expect it to be 9th or 10th,

With 50 pple they wouldn't be top 10. ToT has only a few more pple then 50 and are #3 in avg score so I very much doubt they'd remain top 10 (depends on what members that leave ofc).

Rumad · 19 May 2005, 19:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by Banned

Good god, stop the press, Rumad really doubts something.

i dunno anything much anymore - i am just a useless peon and thats the way i like it

Rumad · 19 May 2005, 19:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldoran

With 50 pple they wouldn't be top 10. ToT has only a few more pple then 50 and are #3 in avg score so I very much doubt they'd remain top 10 (depends on what members that leave ofc).

lie everything when things like that happen sme wil stil stay, but by virtue of not being roided into the ground i still think its very feasible for them to stay top ten - its not only exil and angels that can be good with 50-60 players you know :P

Kjeldoran · 19 May 2005, 19:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rumad

lie everything when things like that happen sme wil stil stay, but by virtue of not being roided into the ground i still think its very feasible for them to stay top ten - its not only exil and angels that can be good with 50-60 players you know :P

THAT IS AN OUTRAGEOUS LIE !!!