Planetarion Forums

Banned · 29 Sep 2005, 00:23

For the wiki!

I don't have a planet, so someone please help me out with a list

The_Fish · 29 Sep 2005, 00:28

The ND in the list -

6:10:7 - Geezer
9:6:10 - McFun
10:1:3 - Gladiator
9:6:2 - Grog
3:4:1 - Lok
12:7:11 - Troll
7:7:16 - harv
3:4:3 - Nef
2:1:15 - The_Fish
6:5:10 - Impact
6:8:11 - Olle
6:2:16 - Maxerixx
10:3:13 - Gate
10:9:15 - NitinA
4:7:14 - miconof
3:4:5 - Frosty
12:3:12 - GaR

Recluse · 29 Sep 2005, 05:58

6:2:3 (#78) is kerchie

Envious · 29 Sep 2005, 07:15

guess it would be too much hassle to track all the alliance changes this round, still funny to see 1up getting all the credit again for members that were protected from 1up attacks by their original alliances till 3 weeks to the end.

Zh|l · 29 Sep 2005, 11:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Envious

guess it would be too much hassle to track all the alliance changes this round, still funny to see 1up getting all the credit again for members that were protected from 1up attacks by their original alliances till 3 weeks to the end.

Sorry I dont recall any mass recruitment wave from 1up. Most of the latter recruits for 1up came from LCH which weren't protected from 1up attacks - to dispel your little illusion. LukeyLove and Stifler are two prominent figures off top of my memory- they were some of the most hostile planets to 1up before joining us.

So really, fk off in saying we're claiming credit for anothers work and making implications without raw facts.

Kjeldoran · 29 Sep 2005, 12:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zh|l

Sorry I dont recall any mass recruitment wave from 1up. Most of the latter recruits for 1up came from LCH which weren't protected from 1up attacks - to dispel your little illusion. LukeyLove and Stifler are two prominent figures off top of my memory- they were some of the most hostile planets to 1up before joining us.

So really, fk off in saying we're claiming credit for anothers work and making implications without raw facts.

Zhil, 1up breaks like all statistics on amount of top10 and top100 planets ... you have 9/10 top10 players, asfar as I remember that hasn't happened before ... yet you get all frenzy when someone tells you that NOT for all those top100 planets of 1up, the credit should go to 1up...

As you said so yourself, stifler joined you. The credit for his ranking goes to LCH and 1up, not to 1up alone.

Just like me, you get all picky and annoyed with someone even remotely touches your alliance (Angels in my case) ... but you're introducing this to a whole new level m8

Mind you, this wan't meant as an insult or an attempt to mock you.

Banned · 29 Sep 2005, 12:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldoran

Zhil, 1up breaks like all statistics on amount of top10 and top100 planets ... you have 9/10 top10 players, asfar as I remember that hasn't happened before ... yet you get all frenzy when someone tells you that NOT for all those top100 planets of 1up, the credit should go to 1up...

Eclipse/ToT in r9 dominated more heavily, though Eclipse 'only' held 8 of the top10 spots.

Quote:

As you said so yourself, stifler joined you. The credit for his ranking goes to LCH and 1up, not to 1up alone.

So I should head over to the round 12 planet ranking page and credit mistu for all the top100 angels? Hell, while I'm at it, I'll head over to the Angels page and point out that they wouldn't have had a snowball's chance in hell of getting that top10 with a 'limited memberbase' if they hadn't leeched off Mistu until 1up had effectively won anyway.

Hyperbole aside, I agree that there should be a certain degree of credit given where credit is due, but that doesn't mean 1up's role in the ex-LCH's top finishes should be diminished. Let's face it, if they'd stayed in LCH, they're ranks would've plummeted. If they'd gone to any alliance but 1up (or perhaps Reunion) the effect would've been largely the same. Without LCH there is a 'maybe', without 1up there is a 'definitely'.

Kjeldoran · 29 Sep 2005, 13:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Banned

Eclipse/ToT in r9 dominated more heavily, though Eclipse 'only' held 8 of the top10 spots.

So I should head over to the round 12 planet ranking page and credit mistu for all the top100 angels? Hell, while I'm at it, I'll head over to the Angels page and point out that they wouldn't have had a snowball's chance in hell of getting that top10 with a 'limited memberbase' if they hadn't leeched off Mistu until 1up had effectively won anyway.

Hyperbole aside, I agree that there should be a certain degree of credit given where credit is due, but that doesn't mean 1up's role in the ex-LCH's top finishes should be diminished. Let's face it, if they'd stayed in LCH, they're ranks would've plummeted. If they'd gone to any alliance but 1up (or perhaps Reunion) the effect would've been largely the same. Without LCH there is a 'maybe', without 1up there is a 'definitely'.

Do you see me claim differently Jester (in the most polite yet serious way)? Ifso PLZ do point out where. Yes, MISTU deserves partly credits for the Angel top planets.

And I hope you realize how different the situations are that you've just compared ... infact I'm confident you realize that aswell and just used it as an example. Fair enough then.

Banned · 29 Sep 2005, 16:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldoran

Do you see me claim differently Jester (in the most polite yet serious way)? Ifso PLZ do point out where. Yes, MISTU deserves partly credits for the Angel top planets.

And I hope you realize how different the situations are that you've just compared ... infact I'm confident you realize that aswell and just used it as an example. Fair enough then.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dictionary.com

hy·per·bo·le P Pronunciation Key (h-pûrb-l)
n.
A figure of speech in which exaggeration is used for emphasis or effect, as in I could sleep for a year or This book weighs a ton.

cypher · 29 Sep 2005, 14:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldoran

Zhil, 1up breaks like all statistics on amount of top10 and top100 planets ... you have 9/10 top10 players, asfar as I remember that hasn't happened before ... yet you get all frenzy when someone tells you that NOT for all those top100 planets of 1up, the credit should go to 1up...

As you said so yourself, stifler joined you. The credit for his ranking goes to LCH and 1up, not to 1up alone.

Just like me, you get all picky and annoyed with someone even remotely touches your alliance (Angels in my case) ... but you're introducing this to a whole new level m8

Mind you, this wan't meant as an insult or an attempt to mock you.

in all honesty. when you take stifler or luke as an example in this case kjel, they ARE in there because of 1up. if it hadn't been for 1up they'd be bashed day in day out like they were when they were lch. Because of this they would have no chance whatsoever to finish high. Luke for example had like 1k roids when he joined and that is hardly enough to stay in top 10 for the weeks that were left in the round. Same story with stifler.

Kjeldoran · 29 Sep 2005, 14:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by cypher

in all honesty. when you take stifler or luke as an example in this case kjel, they ARE in there because of 1up. if it hadn't been for 1up they'd be bashed day in day out like they were when they were lch. Because of this they would have no chance whatsoever to finish high. Luke for example had like 1k roids when he joined and that is hardly enough to stay in top 10 for the weeks that were left in the round. Same story with stifler.

Would they? Colt and Icewind were LCH aswell and left LCH when Stifler and Luke did. They both joined Angels and both are in top25 ...

How comes 1up would screw over Stifler till he's dead but wouldn't do the same with colt or icewind? Weren't they LCH either? Weren't they hostile either? What exactly is the difference between Colt and Stifler, from 1up's point of view?

If you claim 1up would have kicked Stifler out the top100 ... then how come another LCH top planet survived in the top25? Just cause he joined Angels? I doubt that'd be a reason at all.

I'm just wondering, cypher. If you could provide me with a reason then fair enough. I just think when LCH fell apart (split up), they weren't considered top hostile towards 1up anymore hence would have been far less concentrated on.

cypher · 29 Sep 2005, 16:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldoran

Would they? Colt and Icewind were LCH aswell and left LCH when Stifler and Luke did. They both joined Angels and both are in top25 ...

How comes 1up would screw over Stifler till he's dead but wouldn't do the same with colt or icewind? Weren't they LCH either? Weren't they hostile either? What exactly is the difference between Colt and Stifler, from 1up's point of view?

If you claim 1up would have kicked Stifler out the top100 ... then how come another LCH top planet survived in the top25? Just cause he joined Angels? I doubt that'd be a reason at all.

I'm just wondering, cypher. If you could provide me with a reason then fair enough. I just think when LCH fell apart (split up), they weren't considered top hostile towards 1up anymore hence would have been far less concentrated on.

the answer to this is indeed planetnap.

Envious · 29 Sep 2005, 16:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zh|l

Sorry I dont recall any mass recruitment wave from 1up. Most of the latter recruits for 1up came from LCH which weren't protected from 1up attacks - to dispel your little illusion. LukeyLove and Stifler are two prominent figures off top of my memory- they were some of the most hostile planets to 1up before joining us.

So really, fk off in saying we're claiming credit for anothers work and making implications without raw facts.

Thanks for reminding me i have to write for idiots on AD. Ofc i meant "protected" in the sense of "defended", so yes, it's exactly what you say. They were hostile to 1up, they got incs from 1up, they were NOT defended by 1up at that time obviously.

You gave the raw facts yourself? Damn, that dispels my little illusion so much.

Nadar · 29 Sep 2005, 09:45

#55 Nibiru isn't NoS.

Filth · 29 Sep 2005, 09:46

#76 - 6:10:13 isnt Bimbo/Filth , just Filth. My fake nick failed miserably after 2 days......

Kjeldoran · 29 Sep 2005, 10:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Filth

#76 - 6:10:13 isnt Bimbo/Filth , just Filth. My fake nick failed miserably after 2 days......

Bimbo ... what happened? Were the original nicknames sold out when you bought yours?

cypher · 29 Sep 2005, 11:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldoran

Bimbo ... what happened? Were the original nicknames sold out when you bought yours?

nah filth is just too inactive to do anything and that includes picking a nick :P

Filth · 30 Sep 2005, 12:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by cypher

nah filth is just too inactive to do anything and that includes picking a nick :P

all lies

nAgAsH · 30 Sep 2005, 13:43

What about editing those lists a bit?

#35 is [MC]Hellfire
#39 is only Dav

#49 is harv (not shooter16...)
#79 is Pilatus

Also for the wiki, #13 (Carl), #31 (bigduck), #45 (wishmaster), #46 (nAgAsH^), #64 (Abe), #68 (PGlee) and #88 (Pietje) were all Hydra.

Kargool · 29 Sep 2005, 09:57

9 9 6 is not TGV.

18: Zephod TGV
96: Shikamaru_ TGV

The_Fish · 29 Sep 2005, 11:20

Zhil - 7:7:16 is not shooter, it is harv

jian_yee · 29 Sep 2005, 11:54

hmm.. i'm in there.. :P
nvr expected to reach top 100

Banned · 29 Sep 2005, 12:15

The wiki traditionally (after LCH bitched about TeK being listed as only 1up in r12) tries to track alliance changes where appropriate.

For example: LukeyLove I know was LCH -> 1up this round.

I'm a bit busy at the moment, but I'll see if I have time to reformat the list Zhil has and chuck it up on the wiki later today so everyone can edit it appropriately.

Also, I've run out of rep to give out today, but tomorrow I'll come back and posrep the rest of you

Benneh · 29 Sep 2005, 12:28

Nib (6:10:4) finished in tof.

Goodfellah · 29 Sep 2005, 13:27

Zoro Droven of Welken Ter 13:6:10 13,792,023 2,562
standalone Amaruq of Hellish Ter 6:10:9 12,448,944 6,099
Rikki The Stealer of Ships Zik 12:3:3 9,690,992 1,052
Nibiru Vindraye of Valadon Cat 6:10:4 9,547,733 3,703
ChronoX Gligs of Prodigy Zik 5:5:2 8,632,697 1,082
Alpha Space Warrior of Red Earth Ter 13:5:10 7,634,914 2,556
Olympus Emperor of An Empty Throne Xan 5:10:9 7,489,246 3,139

i count 7 ToF planets

Buddah · 29 Sep 2005, 14:02

It is I! 6:10:18

Lilleman · 29 Sep 2005, 14:08

G-II got one player in t100 to.

Spritfire · 29 Sep 2005, 14:46

Maybe because the said Angels planets hadd planet naps with 1up ?

Just a wild guess....

Kjeldoran · 29 Sep 2005, 15:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spritfire

Maybe because the said Angels planets hadd planet naps with 1up ?

Just a wild guess....

Could be, I don't know ... I assume you have actual proof (like VALID proof) of this?

P.S. I was only asking Cypher for a reason/explenation. If he or anyone gives me one (a vaiid one that I can believe) then fair enough ... no need to get sarcastic or hostile.

Spritfire · 29 Sep 2005, 15:08

I dont have any valid proof ofcourse. Since 1up wount give out that information and all your planets ofc wount give it.

I am just looking at angels average score/roids. We have one member with 1up nap. He is the only one with loads of roids.

So it should make some sence then ?

Kjeldoran · 29 Sep 2005, 15:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spritfire

snip

I take offense in your signature ... and if that's the ND logo ... then I take offense in that aswell !!!!!!

The_Fish · 29 Sep 2005, 15:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldoran

I take offense in your signature ... and if that's the ND logo ... then I take offense in that aswell !!!!!!

It was our motto long before you boys decided to use the name Angels

Kjeldoran · 29 Sep 2005, 15:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Fish

It was our motto long before you boys decided to use the name Angels

Then change it !!! We are never afraid !!!

btw, Furious Angels (of which FAnG is derived, and of which Angels is derived) was founded in round2 ... indirectly we chose for Angels in r2

Spritfire · 29 Sep 2005, 15:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldoran

Then change it !!! We are never afraid !!!

btw, Furious Angels (of which FAnG is derived, and of which Angels is derived) was founded in round2 ... indirectly we chose for Angels in r2

Clearly your members are if they have 1up naps

Kjeldoran · 29 Sep 2005, 15:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spritfire

Clearly your members are if they have 1up naps

cheap shot Sir !!

Gio2k · 29 Sep 2005, 15:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spritfire

Clearly your members are if they have 1up naps

Angels members (only a few btw) got their planet naps after they split from LCH, when all chances of beating 1up were gone. Before that Angels and LCHs were the among the most hostile planets towards 1up. I wonder if ND can claim the same. I give you a cookie for calling US afraid.

JonnyBGood · 29 Sep 2005, 15:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldoran

I take offense in your signature ... and if that's the ND logo ... then I take offense in that aswell !!!!!!

I move in Winter's cathedral
O'erwatched by mocking angels
Soothing pleasure no more
Never pleasure for me.

Kjeldoran · 29 Sep 2005, 15:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spritfire

I dont have any valid proof ofcourse. Since 1up wount give out that information and all your planets ofc wount give it.

I am just looking at angels average score/roids. We have one member with 1up nap. He is the only one with loads of roids.

So it should make some sence then ?

Fair enough then.

Benneh · 29 Sep 2005, 15:11

ice didnt finish t25..

colt and (and the other t25 angel i presume we are talkin about)recluse had planet naps afaik as the 1ups in my gal couldnt hit them.

Spritfire · 29 Sep 2005, 15:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tweaker

ice didnt finish t25..

colt and (and the other t25 angel i presume we are talkin about)recluse had planet naps afaik as the 1ups in my gal couldnt hit them.

Damn.. I was right.. big time shocker

Gio2k · 29 Sep 2005, 15:35

Colt had a planet Nap. Kerchie also. Both got planet naps shortly after Angels split from LCH. The war was lost, and Angels defence would have been leeched completetely trying to cover planets like Colts and Kerchies. Even so, we had enough incomings to make covering the remanining members a real pain in the ass.
Colt lost the planet nap last week of the round. If Recluse had a pnap, he lost it quite fast, since i was covering 1up incomings on him for the rest of the round almost since i started helping with DC tasks over the last 3 weeks or so.
There you have it.

aNgRyDuCk · 29 Sep 2005, 16:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gio2k

If Recluse had a pnap, he lost it quite fast, since i was covering 1up incomings on him for the rest of the round almost since i started helping with DC tasks over the last 3 weeks or so.
There you have it.

no, Recluse didn't have 1up incoming all round, I was in his galaxy, and 1up, and quite aware of his planet status, his planet NAP was in place and active since about the 5th week of the round

Colt · 29 Sep 2005, 15:38

Yuh, After i left LCH i got a planet nap, stupidly not until 72tick ally thing ended, and then i lost it about a week ago

for attacking Mazz

Recluse had one as well.

Spritfire · 29 Sep 2005, 15:42

We tried. Found fast out that we couldn't do it.
ND Tried on the own. I dont recall lch attack 1up alone or is my memory failing?

Gio2k · 29 Sep 2005, 15:45

Where were you when ND decided to go to war with Reunion. Which alliance was fighting 1up _alone_ at that time? Even though i didn't claim that we hit 1up alone on my former post, i just claimed Angels and LCHs were AMONG the most hostile planets towards 1up.

Stifler · 29 Sep 2005, 15:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spritfire

We tried. Found fast out that we couldn't do it.
ND Tried on the own. I dont recall lch attack 1up alone or is my memory failing?

we had to hit 1up alone when you guys refused to hit 1up, deciding to hit Reunion only, leaving LCH to take on 1up

incidently, I'm told me and lukey were near the top hostile planets before the LCH disband

Spritfire · 29 Sep 2005, 16:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stifler

we had to hit 1up alone when you guys refused to hit 1up, deciding to hit Reunion only, leaving LCH to take on 1up

incidently, I'm told me and lukey were near the top hostile planets before the LCH disband

so insomnia didn't hit 1up at all? right..

Stifler · 29 Sep 2005, 16:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spritfire

so insomnia didn't hit 1up at all? right..

not when we were working together, nor after dS left them. They canceled the nap cos they didnt have a proper arby and hence were making a lot of friendly fires,

so yes as I said while you guys refused to hit 1up with us, we were hitting them alone. Yet you still have the cheek to say "we hit 1up alone, noone else did"

Gio2k · 29 Sep 2005, 15:49

And as far as the 'ND tried on their own' quote At that point you didn't really have another chance, but to try and hit them on your own.

Gio2k · 29 Sep 2005, 15:58

Hmmm. Where is the post i was supposed to reply here?

I could swear i read Kargool post some nonsense