Planetarion Forums

Urkki · 12 Apr 2003, 13:34

You (various WEET HCs) should be relatively in the know of what's going on in your block.

So, which of WEET alliances are going to be next NAR?

If you do know the answer to that question, then how do you intend to hide it from "the answer"? And are you sure that your answer is the correct one?

If you do not know the answer to that question, do you realize that it's going to be your alliance that is "the answer"?

To sum it up in the final question, are you prepared to be as blind as NAR HCs were, or are you going to do something about it?

gzambo · 12 Apr 2003, 13:40

i reckon wp/ely will drop and roid eclipse and tot
but im not in the loop

:e_chick: :e_bunny: :e_chick: :e_bunny: :e_chick: :e_bunny:

God · 12 Apr 2003, 14:25

Quote:

Originally posted by gzambo
i reckon wp/ely will drop and roid eclipse and tot
but im not in the loop

:e_chick: :e_bunny: :e_chick: :e_bunny: :e_chick: :e_bunny:

Would be a good battle , numbers and wit against strategy and good planning

cypher · 12 Apr 2003, 14:26

ely doesn't like backstabbing... and with the current situation with gals like sakera's he won't drop eclipse... it's too easy for them atm... they can do whatever they want as it seems... god i hope eclipse will just pulvarise those lame alliances who are too stupid to think for themselves and make it a fight.

Lanceman · 12 Apr 2003, 15:01

There are quite some planets with >1k roids and a score quite low (~4-5mill), so I wonder when the lust for roids drives WEET to disband and going for each other

.

Zitos · 12 Apr 2003, 15:06

woihi.. i dont even got four milion points (-:

Lanceman · 12 Apr 2003, 15:10

Quote:

Originally posted by Zitos
woihi.. i dont even got four milion points (-:

Be careful you might get a non-authed retal on you then!!!

K-W · 12 Apr 2003, 15:44

Quote:

Originally posted by Urkki
You (various WEET HCs) should be relatively in the know of what's going on in your block.

So, which of WEET alliances are going to be next NAR?

If you do know the answer to that question, then how do you intend to hide it from "the answer"? And are you sure that your answer is the correct one?

If you do not know the answer to that question, do you realize that it's going to be your alliance that is "the answer"?

To sum it up in the final question, are you prepared to be as blind as NAR HCs were, or are you going to do something about it?

The next nar? I dont follow. Nar had a temporary nap.

Gerbie · 12 Apr 2003, 18:52

Quote:

Originally posted by K-W
The next nar? I dont follow. Nar had a temporary nap.

You're doomed then.

Zh|l · 12 Apr 2003, 18:53

Quote:

Originally posted by Gerbie
You're doomed then.

So glad there are experts like you to tell people these things.

WEET is not a WEET/NAR situation. There is no 'clean' slice.

Zh|l · 12 Apr 2003, 19:15

Quote:

Originally posted by Rumad
I completely disagree with this comment - there is never a "clean" slice unless its block versus block. Even then those that have assumed politics would go a certain direction are left with "unclean" positions (and there were a fair number of mixed nar/weet gals).

What this takes his conviction and courage. Also a understanding of what it takes to win the round.

Simpley do you have the balls zhil?

You think WEETNAR was one block?

I think you need to reword your post to save your show of intelligence. The WEET/NAR split is far easier than any split within WEET. They were two seperate blocks - and I won;t deny there were many shared galaxies, but thats nothing compared to the amount of shared galaxies within WEET.

It's not about balls Rumad, I'm sorry to say, but it seems you are only preying on the ones without the knowledge and experience desires to aquire some credibility.

Scouse · 12 Apr 2003, 19:45

There's probably more in it for WP/Ely to drop Eclipse, than there is for Eclipse to try and drop any of them.

Eclipse won't seperate WP/Ely. If anyone does any dropping it'll be them getting dropped and all the anti-Eclipse people can sing to the high heavens about it for months and months.

However, WP and Ely don't have a pair of balls between the lot of them, so I can't see that happening either.

hAl · 12 Apr 2003, 19:48

Quote:

Originally posted by Scouse
There's probably more in it for WP/Ely to drop Eclipse, than there is for Eclipse to try and drop any of them.

Eclipse won't seperate WP/Ely. If anyone does any dropping it'll be them getting dropped and all the anti-Eclipse people can sing to the high heavens about it for months and months.

However, WP and Ely don't have a pair of balls between the lot of them, so I can't see that happening either.

Probably elysium might want to wait till wp is a bit smaller than now as they want a shared win, not second place behind WP or Eclipse. But they will probably bet on the wrong horse anyways as they always have.

hAl

BOB_LOST · 13 Apr 2003, 01:03

Quote:

Originally posted by cyphie
ely doesn't like backstabbing...

Why shouldnt they?. It would be an chanse to payback for the time fury used them as roidfarms. (them and WP actualy

)

:e_chick: :e_chick: :e_chick: :e_chick:

Zh|l · 13 Apr 2003, 01:04

Quote:

Originally posted by Rumad
actually i was considering teh round 7 breakdown. THere are no comparisons for this round.

I wonder why.

Zh|l · 13 Apr 2003, 01:05

Quote:

Originally posted by BOB_LOST
Why shouldnt they?. It would be an chanse to payback for the time fury used them as roidfarms. (them and WP actualy )

:e_chick: :e_chick: :e_chick: :e_chick:

Because Eclipse isn't Fury?

Oh dear. "Another one" who cant see past petty hatreds from previous rounds.

Tawg · 13 Apr 2003, 01:50

Quote:

Originally posted by Zh|l
Because Eclipse isn't Fury?

Oh dear. "Another one" who cant see past petty hatreds from previous rounds.

say what you want, but you fail to see some parts of the picture, your focusing so much on the forest that you cant see the trees.

just because you mix some sugar and chocolate into a nice turd and call it a cake, it still tastes like **** and consists of ****

just my perspective

and ive never had anything against fury.

Zh|l · 13 Apr 2003, 02:05

Quote:

Originally posted by Tawg
say what you want, but you fail to see some parts of the picture, your focusing so much on the forest that you cant see the trees.

just because you mix some sugar and chocolate into a nice turd and call it a cake, it still tastes like **** and consists of ****

just my perspective

and ive never had anything against fury.

Thank you. I will surely take your advice and bow down to the great opinion of AD.

By the same token, Hi Oly the new Titans. (although this is rather insultive to Titans :/)

If I renounce my Fury history will it make a blind bit of different to you? Probably not, you are so deeply convinced that we are a new Fury it seems.

Perhaps people will finally realize it was never Fury and Legion that were the only ones responsible to how the game has ended up.

K-W · 13 Apr 2003, 04:02

Quote:

Originally posted by Tawg
say what you want, but you fail to see some parts of the picture, your focusing so much on the forest that you cant see the trees.

just because you mix some sugar and chocolate into a nice turd and call it a cake, it still tastes like **** and consists of ****

just my perspective

and ive never had anything against fury.

You do realize that by this logic, Fury was always just a rd 1 cluster allaince. Legion never existed, it was still just conc, and Titans were always really legion, though legion didnt exist, they were still conc. Deus was just tuba, wp was actually legion, but legion didnt exist, and legion became wp, though wp was legion and legion didnt exist.

Unless an alliance formed in rd 1 it isnt really an alliance? Thats the only way the logic many of you are using makes any sense.

Also by your logic Zhil shouldnt be considered a Fury exec. That wasnt his first allaince. And accorind to your logic you can never stop being an allaince you once were. I dont know where focht started, but I know KG and Zhil werent originally Fury. So, its possible that eclipse doesnt have a single Fury person in its HC, or maybe just one.

Whew, I guess we can all breathe a sigh of relief now.

K-W · 13 Apr 2003, 05:44

Quote:

Originally posted by Rumad
Firstly the first part of your analogy is wrong. Its not about teh preceding alliance, its how closely you mimic the decisions of your fore fathers. Its very easy to denounce your history and those actions taken, but simply its not that easy when you have the majority of your former alliance at your side. Even if it is a elcetic mix of rounds, they have all been part of the fury decisions, approach and style. Anyways we discussed this fully on another thread.

Now after my experiences of round 6 and watching round 8 (full random) in action could you guys actually tell me why you are sticking to the "oh this is so messy libe please?"

You made one very important mistatement. None of the people in eclipse have been part of the decisions, approach or style of eclipse in any political sense.

I dont understand your question tbh.

XB. · 13 Apr 2003, 13:54

Quote:

Originally posted by Rumad
The question is that you believe that a block break up is messy. I am saying that precedent from round 7 and from round 8 is enough to prove that planetary naps can work and round 7 showed you cna get by with a block break up. So why are you always saying a block break up is impossible?

Cowardice ????

Tawg · 13 Apr 2003, 13:58

Quote:

Originally posted by XB.
Cowardice ????

you kinda took the word out of my mouth