Planetarion Forums

Treveler · 11 Oct 2003, 00:32

Where has the Propaganda Gone? Dreadnought asked.....

Well the propaganda is there, you just need to look for it!

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=59960

Wakko · 11 Oct 2003, 01:18

omg....
is started that shit with this one:
http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=59744

and then taking another pic of the same page is ****ing lame

and yes im drunken

Nadar · 11 Oct 2003, 01:23

lol @ Treveler

Treveler · 11 Oct 2003, 01:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wakko

omg....
is started that shit with this one:
http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=59744

and then taking another pic of the same page is ****ing lame

and yes im drunken

omg!!

You shouldnt drink and post! THATS lame!

11 Oct 2003, 01:26

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=60325

Wakko · 11 Oct 2003, 01:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Treveler

omg!!

You shouldnt drink and post! THATS lame!

only children and drunken ppl tell the truth

Treveler · 11 Oct 2003, 01:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dreadnought

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=60325

When “the old man” wrote that he was old and senile!

Nadar · 11 Oct 2003, 01:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dreadnought

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=60325

I never believed in Einstein, and now I deffo won't

Treveler · 11 Oct 2003, 01:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wakko

only children and drunken ppl tell the truth

Yeah I know, it was my 3 year old nephew who made that pic!

Wakko · 11 Oct 2003, 01:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Treveler

Yeah I know, it was my 3 year old nephew who made that pic!

Nadar · 11 Oct 2003, 01:50

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=60392

AllFather|away · 11 Oct 2003, 03:18

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=60439
hoho tomkat, see what I found

Tomkat · 11 Oct 2003, 03:48

It's tomK, so I feel for tomcat's sister, whoever that is.

OI TREVELER. It's true actually. Every defence I have run has been successful - no FaNG nasties have got through on any of them ^_^

I'd make one of those but it's 3:40am and I can't think of anything witty. REST ASSURED I'LL SLEEP ON IT AND WILL GIVE YOU ALL AN AMUSING PICTURE TOMORROW.

Treveler · 11 Oct 2003, 05:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomkat

REST ASSURED I'LL SLEEP ON IT AND WILL GIVE YOU ALL AN AMUSING PICTURE TOMORROW.

I`ll keep a smile ready for your contribution.

Aryn · 11 Oct 2003, 06:36

*friendly warning to keep it clean guys*

i think this thread is a nice break from the others

sure made me chuckle (or is chortle the new 'in' word? :\)

SystemShock · 11 Oct 2003, 07:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nadar

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=60392

Atleast I enjoyed Traveler's pic, that isn't even remotely funny.

ronnie · 11 Oct 2003, 10:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by SystemShock

Atleast I enjoyed Traveler's pic, that isn't even remotely funny.

it is funneh.

Morden · 11 Oct 2003, 10:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by SystemShock

Atleast I enjoyed Traveler's pic, that isn't even remotely funny.

now now outcast, he wasnt being literal we all know your Hung like a Swan. ;-)

SystemShock · 11 Oct 2003, 10:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morden

now now outcast, he wasnt being literal we all know your Hung like a Swan. ;-)

hehe. ronnie is just jealous.

I wasn't saying that the pic was sick or something, just that it was really NOT funny, mainly because it has been overused.

Tomkat · 11 Oct 2003, 13:46

After that amazing attack from FAnG last night (battlecalcs are your friend!), I thought this was rather fitting:

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=61039

Jorinn · 11 Oct 2003, 18:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dreadnought

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=60325

Proof that einstein got things wrong.

Morden · 11 Oct 2003, 19:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomkat

After that amazing attack from FAnG last night (battlecalcs are your friend!), I thought this was rather fitting:

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=61039

If we were aiming for roids we would have pulled most of the fleets,

We expected the combat code to actually allow us to kill.

If we'd know how shabby the combat code works for large fleets we'd have likely launched on Spinner for allowing such a moronic thing to be allowed to happen.

Tomkat · 11 Oct 2003, 21:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morden

If we were aiming for roids we would have pulled most of the fleets,

We expected the combat code to actually allow us to kill.

If we'd know how shabby the combat code works for large fleets we'd have likely launched on Spinner for allowing such a moronic thing to be allowed to happen.

We managed to calc what was going to happen.

Why else do you think we pulled all our fleets at ETA 1?

Heartless · 11 Oct 2003, 22:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomkat

We managed to calc what was going to happen.

Why else do you think we pulled all our fleets at ETA 1?

Because TEE has no balls. I know that some certain ToT HC recalled from my planet 2 times because he would have rushed into 2 300 ship banshee fleets with his vesuvius.

oh, and I found those comments:

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=62595 <-- Wakko
http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=62597 <-- Marduk

Nadval · 12 Oct 2003, 01:05

the people using einstein quotes make me laugh - the word of someone who uses black chalk on a blackboard..

Tomkat · 12 Oct 2003, 04:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heartless

Because TEE has no balls. I know that some certain ToT HC recalled from my planet 2 times because he would have rushed into 2 300 ship banshee fleets with his vesuvius.

You're trying to link two completely unrelated events here.

Eclipse were defending against your battleships. We recalled as we knew perfectly well you'd cap next to nothing.

Eclipse are not ToT. They also weren't attacking in this position.

Relating this to some event you recall from ToT has absolutely nothing to do with Eclipse. If you are going to retort with your own ideas of why we recalled (obviously I'm lying, there must be some deeper, more secret reason why we recalled, right FAnG peons?) at least keep them in the same area.

Heartless · 12 Oct 2003, 07:46

hehe, no problem Tomkat, but since I remember this one quote of Sonnenbomber where he said that "ToT/Eclipse politics are done by Focht and him. No matter if it's about ToT's or Eclipse's political relations" I thought you finally see ToT as your bg again ;-)

However, how can Eclipse keep a political tie to an alliance which obviously 'supports' cheating in the same way LDK did?

TouRiQueT · 12 Oct 2003, 10:50

how amusing
________
PRILOSEC WITHDRAW

Tomkat · 12 Oct 2003, 10:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heartless

However, how can Eclipse keep a political tie to an alliance which obviously 'supports' cheating in the same way LDK did?

Aren't you FAng?
Haven't they got a rather patchy record in terms of the HC and other command members, let alone the members, with deletion from account sharing?

Forest · 12 Oct 2003, 11:07

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=63560

Nadar · 12 Oct 2003, 11:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Forest

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=63560

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=63576

This one's better :P

Tomkat · 12 Oct 2003, 13:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nadar

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=63576

This one's better :P

Yeah, hilarious.....

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=63848

Heartless · 12 Oct 2003, 13:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomkat

Aren't you FAng?
Haven't they got a rather patchy record in terms of the HC and other command members, let alone the members, with deletion from account sharing?

Am I FAnG ?
Do I even still play PA?
Go figure.

However, I have several dozens of megabytes of IRC Logs from round 5 to pax where it is shown that your lapdogs are cheating lapdogs.
Of course, not all of them. But at least their command and quite a few of their members.

Tomkat · 12 Oct 2003, 13:41

Leaving your "I take my retorts from the School of Morden" reply ("I don't play PA, so I don't care!"), back to this original claim of yours that a significant number of ToT command cheat;
If they cheat, and you have pointed our esteemed PA Team over there, why haven't they been closed or even suspended yet?

Nadar · 12 Oct 2003, 13:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomkat

Yeah, hilarious.....

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=63848

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=63878

There u go

Tomkat · 12 Oct 2003, 13:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nadar

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=63878

There u go

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=63909

Nadar · 12 Oct 2003, 14:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomkat

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=63909

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=63947

AllFather|away · 12 Oct 2003, 14:15

Jesus Christ, what have I done
I find it hard to justify
each time I try to solve just one
my problems seem to multiply
now it’s just too late to wrap a smile around my face

(2x)
this is propaganda
you know, you know

I tried to make it go away
and I have tried the best I can
it’s been around for nights and days
they say it’s only in my head
now it’s just too late to wrap a smile around my face

(2x)
this is propaganda
you know, you know

now it’s just too late to wrap a smile around my face

(7x)
this is propaganda
you know, you know

this is propaganda

Nadar · 12 Oct 2003, 14:23

Allfather singing Briskeby?

Heartless · 12 Oct 2003, 14:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomkat

Leaving your "I take my retorts from the School of Morden" reply ("I don't play PA, so I don't care!"), back to this original claim of yours that a significant number of ToT command cheat;
If they cheat, and you have pointed our esteemed PA Team over there, why haven't they been closed or even suspended yet?

I am filling in the reports slowly.
However, why some are still open though 100% evidence was provided is of course PA Team's secret. Even I don't know.

xtothez · 12 Oct 2003, 15:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heartless

Am I FAnG ?
Do I even still play PA?

Err, yes.

What's your point exactly?

AllFather|away · 12 Oct 2003, 15:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nadar

Allfather singing Briskeby?

Nadval · 12 Oct 2003, 17:20

http://www.goog.dk/pic/my.php?id=64546

RealJames · 12 Oct 2003, 17:37

This thread was actually quite good until Heartless started posting on it.

Oh, and for the record, Allfather is not, never has been and never will be Eclipse High Command.

Morden · 12 Oct 2003, 18:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomkat

Aren't you FAng?
Haven't they got a rather patchy record in terms of the HC and other command members, let alone the members, with deletion from account sharing?

You appear to forget that some of the ex fang hc which you speak of are now in Eclipse.

Morden · 12 Oct 2003, 18:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomkat

Leaving your "I take my retorts from the School of Morden" reply ("I don't play PA, so I don't care!"),

If your going to try and use my words, at least make them accurate.
I have never said im not playing, What I said was Im not playing the game out of choice and I couldnt really care much less about my planet, and that AD means even less to me than it did a few rounds back when even then I posted out of boredom and to see the responces of people who take things seriously.

As for why you recall it still does not explain the combat, if you were so sure we were out to roid with 3000 battleships, care to explain why most were set to target Structures or Ships, and why you even defended in the first place, Surely eclipse in there great wisdom wouldnt waste ships now would they, afterall they have some of the finest minds from primary school there.

Tomkat · 12 Oct 2003, 18:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heartless

I am filling in the reports slowly.
However, why some are still open though 100% evidence was provided is of course PA Team's secret. Even I don't know.

Very slowly indeed it seems. Isn't it about a week since you were kicked out of ToT?
The most obvious explanation for PA Team not deleting them could be that they found no evidence of it? As it didn't happen?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morden

As for why you recall it still does not explain the combat, if you were so sure we were out to roid with 3000 battleships, care to explain why most were set to target Structures or Ships, and why you even defended in the first place, Surely eclipse in there great wisdom wouldnt waste ships now would they, afterall they have some of the finest minds from primary school there.

1. If we didn't defend, you would have got through, and then recalled the escort fleets, so you COULD have capped some roids.

2. If they were set to target Structures, why did you only kill 2 structures in total? I know the battle code is a bit shoddy when it comes to structures, but I am pretty sure 3000 BS should be more efficient than that, if 40% of them are set to Structure.

3. We weren't wasting ships. Every defensive ship sent is backed up with a careful calculation, and double checked. We had spare ships, might as well tie up your fleets somewhere where plenty of your ships were heading.

Som1 · 12 Oct 2003, 19:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morden

You appear to forget that some of the ex fang hc which you speak of are now in Eclipse.

winner

Morden · 12 Oct 2003, 20:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomkat

2. If they were set to target Structures, why did you only kill 2 structures in total? I know the battle code is a bit shoddy when it comes to structures, but I am pretty sure 3000 BS should be more efficient than that, if 40% of them are set to Structure.

Now you know why im pissed at the combat code.

Simple fact is, if we wanted to roid him we would, but that would not do much good cause he could resteal them quickly.

And quite frankly you insult my intelligence if you think i'd waste 3k battleships wioh most as flak just to roid someone who would re roid them back, I wanted to kill which is a worthy use of 3k battleships.

AllFather|away · 12 Oct 2003, 20:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealJames

Oh, and for the record, Allfather is not, never has been and never will be Eclipse High Command.

slander!
I will have your ass demoted to kitchenduty cause of this outragous statement!