|
|
24 Aug 2004, 12:47
|
#1
|
InSomniac
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Durham, England
Posts: 1,473
|
time up for 1up??
aready they have showed in 1 round their power. i think it is cool how they seized controll of the universe so fast yet i think it may be time for them to throw in the towel, for the sake of the game
we all remember the Fury legion thing, that ruined the game for players and ultimately, with the help of p2p, made players loose faith in the game and quit. i feel if 1up dont throw in the towel this will happen again. do we really want a game where 1up stagnate everything, crushing everythign in their path and no real resistance to them??
either 1up throw in the towel or LCH, HR, ND and all the other top 10 alliances do something about it...
currently the alliances have sat back n grown gradually while 1up have smashed the smaller alliances to take the roids that have ultimately , at this time, left them with a 300 million gap over LCH... come on guys, band together and nail them ffs
Mek
__________________
Runner up in the InSomnia 'Drunkest HC' competition - Currently on the wagon
Elysium | HR | eXilition | OuZo | ND | InSomnia | DLR
db battlegroup founder and spiritual leader
Sexytime HC of Belgians (#s3xytime)
Not so retired anymore....
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 12:48
|
#2
|
InSomniac
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Durham, England
Posts: 1,473
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Alliances - Top 100
Rank Change Name Asteroids Members AVG Score Score
1 1up 341534 96 8.347.228 801.333.917
2 LCH 154036 98 4.802.554 470.650.307
i rest my case
__________________
Runner up in the InSomnia 'Drunkest HC' competition - Currently on the wagon
Elysium | HR | eXilition | OuZo | ND | InSomnia | DLR
db battlegroup founder and spiritual leader
Sexytime HC of Belgians (#s3xytime)
Not so retired anymore....
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 12:55
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Stoke-on-Trent, England
Posts: 235
|
Re: time up for 1up??
What I feel we need, are some set rules for when 'blocking' can be used. As suggested by several others, dynamic blocking is the answer IMO; if implemented well.
1up are 300 mil ahead, so mistu/lch/vsn should be allowed to block. This block would be broken if the lead was reduced to, say, 50 million, over the following alliance?
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 13:08
|
#4
|
Affectionate Nickname
Join Date: May 2002
Location: wigan
Posts: 206
|
Re: time up for 1up??
This has already been discussed. If you read Sid's proposal, he dosn't say that all blocking is bad - only blocking before the round has begun to assure victory, or blocking that does not cease once its main objective was completed.
And do you really think that next round, any of the current top 10 alliances will allow 1up to steam ahead again? They're more likely to have their wits about them. This round, there were many oppertunities for top alliances to block and bring down 1up, but these obviously ended with little sucesss. Next round, I'm sure we'll see alliances being able to handle more dynamic politics to take down whoever may be at the top then.
__________________
My posts represent me and me alone and have no connection to any of the communities I may or may not be involved in unless stated within my posts. Bints.
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 13:37
|
#5
|
InSomniac
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Durham, England
Posts: 1,473
|
Re: time up for 1up??
mabey people were happy to let 1up run away with the round... ever heard of the phrase: 'Anything for an easy life'??
__________________
Runner up in the InSomnia 'Drunkest HC' competition - Currently on the wagon
Elysium | HR | eXilition | OuZo | ND | InSomnia | DLR
db battlegroup founder and spiritual leader
Sexytime HC of Belgians (#s3xytime)
Not so retired anymore....
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 13:47
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 253
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Well, my golly, you certainly convinced me. I quit. Since I like this game and try hard to do well in it, I think I will quit because the other people were too inept this round to do what they had to do when they had to do it to win. ffs come on MeK. It is not up to 1up to throw in the towel, then you have 100 people leaving PA. It is up to everyone else to learn from their mistakes which everyone I am sure has.
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 13:51
|
#7
|
InSomniac
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Durham, England
Posts: 1,473
|
Re: time up for 1up??
imho 1up has been Sids way of saying "i can come back anytime and rule this game when i want and there aint a damn thing you can do to stop me" well its about time we did stop him...
__________________
Runner up in the InSomnia 'Drunkest HC' competition - Currently on the wagon
Elysium | HR | eXilition | OuZo | ND | InSomnia | DLR
db battlegroup founder and spiritual leader
Sexytime HC of Belgians (#s3xytime)
Not so retired anymore....
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 13:53
|
#8
|
Pedantic hypocrite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Back and to the left
Posts: 1,488
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaithess
1up are 300 mil ahead, so mistu/lch/vsn should be allowed to block. This block would be broken if the lead was reduced to, say, 50 million, over the following alliance?
|
They tried that, they were too shit to win with a 3:1 member advantage. And that was around when LCH and 1up were the same size.
__________________
I always wanted to be a dancer, but I could never get the shit off my shoes
.......
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 14:07
|
#9
|
Playing Speedrounds
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 559
|
Re: time up for 1up??
If Alliance > Player 1UP could have been destroyed. But since most people are caring about there own little planet and don't look to far ahead, 1UP laughed the shit out of themself.
Who controls fear, controls the universe!
__________________
|R6B| Winners of last 4 Played Planetarion Speedrounds
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 14:18
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Stoke-on-Trent, England
Posts: 235
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Also, I think that this round may have done good for the game...
Next round, people realise teh powerhouse that is 1up, and will hopefully adapt to stop them steaming ahead, and the slight stagnation we're suffering now (Nowhere near as bad as with the FPM(W) superblock). Hopefully the alliances are quick enough to learn from their mistakes and we may just see a far more 'dynamic' next round.
Hopefully.
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 14:21
|
#11
|
Heh, Leeds !
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: In The Redfern
Posts: 3,790
|
Re: time up for 1up??
or they will think, 'f'k me, my alliance along with 2 others were so totally shite they couldnt wipe out an alliance between themselves'
~Vaio~
__________________
The George Harrison of BlueTuba
Yes, I know he is dead !
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 15:01
|
#12
|
th0ng gimp
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: somewhere in th0ngland
Posts: 1,798
|
Re: time up for 1up??
mommy mommy the eval 1up men are trying to get me to stay up all night mommy!!!!
(On a side note the opposition needs to get organised and whoop them earlier)
__________________
No one significant ;o)
Former FAnG HC
Former JoV daddy
Former legion th0ng master
Proud to be Independent
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 15:13
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 20
|
Re: time up for 1up??
lol, this thread is so funny.
BTW, sids was defeated in r4,6...
I don't know about the following round tho, wasn't there.
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 16:29
|
#14
|
Idle Git
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wandering
Posts: 1,550
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Somebody has got to win, why can't people accept that?
__________________
Here we go again....
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 18:01
|
#15
|
Retard0r
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,164
|
Re: time up for 1up??
they do???!?!?!?!??!?!?!??!?
FFS, i might aswell quit pa right now
__________________
-Chimpie
* We do not exist *
* G-II * NoS * VsN * Ascendancy * Osiris * xVx * Ultores *
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 18:05
|
#16
|
Down Boy - WOOF!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Somewhere About Here .
Posts: 530
|
Re: time up for 1up??
No, Jolt are the winners \o/
__________________
R2: -=42=- & [HR] ICD Squad Founding >> [HR] Alliance
R3: -=42=- & ICD Squad [HR] >> [HR] >> Sedition Wing [HR] >> G-II Wing [HR] >> [HR] Alliance
R4: [HR]
R5: [HR] - [DuH] Triad with [BD] & [UV]
R6: [HR] - [HyB] Alliance with [BD]
R7, R8, R9, R9.5: Nos Wing [HR]
R10: [HR]
R10.5: [HR] - [FYTFO] Alliance with ]LCH[
R11, R12, R13, R15, R16, R17: [HR]
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 20:01
|
#17
|
Rah's def wh0re
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Humpering Maddix for defence
Posts: 643
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord_Thunderball
If Alliance > Player 1UP could have been destroyed. But since most people are caring about there own little planet and don't look to far ahead, 1UP laughed the shit out of themself.
Who controls fear, controls the universe!
|
Fence sitting is that called.
I HATE IT
__________________
Rd1 ---> 2 26 9 Captain Stone Chance of Dalriada [WAC/Leviathan federation]
Rd2 ---> 53 25 20 The First General of P'holt [TFD]
Rd3 ---> 22 16 20 The First General of Posterholt [TFD]
Rd4 ---> 246 24 10 Silverwolf of Limburg [TFD] [Cell] [NFU]
Rd5 ---> 34 11 19 The great Returning of me [Cell] [NFU]
Rd6----> 6 25 10 Chappa'ai of NOX Homeland (Whitebull) [Silver BC]
Rd7----> 18 18 1 Klaj Demon of Gateway from Hell [RAH]
Rd8----> 36 5 6 1 More TIME of Free Traders Inc [RAH]
Rd9----> 16 2 10 Clan McIntosh of Stardust Guardian [RAH]
Rd9.5 ---> 15 9 9 Nightshade of Sherwood forest [RAH]
Rd10 ----> [RAH]
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 21:17
|
#18
|
Lost the Fury... :(
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 516
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mek
i think it may be time for them to throw in the towel, for the sake of the game
|
because we give a shit what you think...
seriously tho, this is about the 10th thread saying the same thing... why dont you bother to read down a ways and save us all some time?
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 21:44
|
#19
|
I'm who you want me to be
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In a flat place, enjoying RL
Posts: 418
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tis
because we give a shit what you think...
|
Ofcourse you do not. You play for your own enjoyment, not ours. Anyone not remembering that, needs a few planetarion history lessons.
__________________
And in the end, it's not the years in your life that count... it's the life in those years
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 22:32
|
#20
|
NE
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 828
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Good idea! and instead of fighting back in world war 2, we should of just sed "come on hitler, youve had your fun, just quit now"
:|
__________________
PEACE.
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 22:44
|
#21
|
pe0n
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kindom of the Netherlands
Posts: 1,347
|
Re: time up for 1up??
1. LCH, VsN and Mistu were not prepared to do what was needed to make sure that 1up wouldn't win: work together closely early on in the game and bash them to bits. When they finally did it, it was too late. They let 1up win. Ofc they had to work hard for it and deserved it. But I think those HCs at least deserve some credit for their (overdone) caution.
2. 1up has ~160 members, plus a load of NAP-ed planets which are in essence fighting on the 1up side. With the average 1up player having twice the average score of the average LCH/VsN/Mistu player it's hard to stop them.
3. Other alliances seem uninterested in fighting 1up. It's better to let them win then to fight them and lose. HR didn't get #4 over Mistu by roiding 1up.
4. 1up has NAP-ed a lot of planets. They control almost the entire top100 (if we don't count planets that are in vacationmode to prevent further bashing). The top players have real trouble getting roids as they ran out of targets. The NAP-ed planets don't pose a thread to 1up. I did recal someone saying something about more fluid politics. I don't expect it to happen, just like the no-NAPs thing.
5. There's a real danger of an overreaction next round. A big block that will bash the shit out of everyone and stagnate the round. Plz. plz don't let that happen. I'd rather face a 2 round 1up victory. (Although I must admit I'd love to bash them.)
__________________
round 5 noob
round 6 noob
round 7 noob: rank 6.198 25:20:25 - VoC member
round 8 noob: rank 4.112 7:2:3 - TFD member
round 9 rank 941 23:1:9 - TFD HC
round 9.5 rank 860 22:7:3 - TFD HC
round 10: rank unknown (was #1 for a while) 5:2:5 - Vengeance pe0n
round 10.5: rank 683 19:10:2 - VGN member
round 11: rank 138 8:8:4 - VsN member
round 12: rank 515 - VGN 'special attack officer' -> jumped ship to Rock
round 13: rank 85: NoS
Last edited by Gerbie; 24 Aug 2004 at 22:53.
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 22:59
|
#22
|
Its time to roll the dice
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The barn
Posts: 876
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerbie
1. LCH, VsN and Mistu were not prepared to do what was needed to make sure that 1up wouldn't win: work together closely early on in the game and bash them to bits. When they finally did it, it was too late. They let 1up win. Ofc they had to work hard for it and deserved it. But I think those HCs at least deserve some credit for their (overdone) caution.
5. There's a real danger of an overreaction next round. A big block that will bash the shit out of everyone and stagnate the round. Plz. plz don't let that happen. I'd rather face a 2 round 1up victory. (Although I must admit I'd love to bash them.)
|
The mother of contradictions I guess.
__________________
Real life peon.
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 23:37
|
#23
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: time up for 1up??
where`s the other 60odd of our members ?
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 23:45
|
#24
|
Affectionate Nickname
Join Date: May 2002
Location: wigan
Posts: 206
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treveler
The mother of contradictions I guess.
|
I think what he meant was that when 1up were taking the lead, no action to pull them down was taken until it was too late - not that we should automatically block against 1up.
__________________
My posts represent me and me alone and have no connection to any of the communities I may or may not be involved in unless stated within my posts. Bints.
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 23:46
|
#25
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 253
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
2. 1up has ~160 members, plus a load of NAP-ed planets which are in essence fighting on the 1up side. With the average 1up player having twice the average score of the average LCH/VsN/Mistu player it's hard to stop them.
|
I seem to see less than 100 members in 1up, and have never seen over 100. Our scanners are in the in game alliance, what you see is what you get, how 1up has 160 ppl is beyond me, and is a testament to your idiocy.
Quote:
4. 1up has NAP-ed a lot of planets. They control almost the entire top100 (if we don't count planets that are in vacationmode to prevent further bashing). The top players have real trouble getting roids as they ran out of targets. The NAP-ed planets don't pose a thread to 1up. I did recal someone saying something about more fluid politics. I don't expect it to happen, just like the no-NAPs thing.
|
Read the other thread pertaining to this please. 1up does not go around NAPing everyone in the universe. We do not attack inside our own galaxies, we only do so on people who have been hostile towards 1up. That policy is the same in most all other top alliances.
|
|
|
24 Aug 2004, 23:47
|
#26
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 253
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
5. There's a real danger of an overreaction next round. A big block that will bash the shit out of everyone and stagnate the round. Plz. plz don't let that happen. I'd rather face a 2 round 1up victory. (Although I must admit I'd love to bash them.)
|
A very keen observation, the way that FAnG and Elysium were taken down in 10.5 and 11 is detrimental to the game.
|
|
|
25 Aug 2004, 00:18
|
#27
|
Its time to roll the dice
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The barn
Posts: 876
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
Originally Posted by *donkie*
I think what he meant was that when 1up were taking the lead, no action to pull them down was taken until it was too late - not that we should automatically block against 1up.
|
How are 3 alliances teaming up to bash one alliance to bitses, as he put it, not creating a major block that will ruin the round?
__________________
Real life peon.
|
|
|
25 Aug 2004, 00:27
|
#28
|
Zhil's Monkeyboy
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 125
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
Originally Posted by _ryzekiel_
where`s the other 60odd of our members ?
|
Shhhhh... the secret weapon of 1up has been revealed!!!
(anyone who takes this seriously, pls look up "sarcasm" )
Nova
__________________
Chemical Brothers - Loops of [1up] - Music to MO to...
|
|
|
25 Aug 2004, 00:38
|
#29
|
Black Power MotherF*ckas!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: JAPAN
Posts: 1,812
|
Re: time up for 1up??
as long as 1up is alive, none of your mediocre alliances will win. SImply because you guys have shy'd away from activity. 100 bucks says that if there was more activity from all other alliances they wouldn't have slept while 1up was taking thier roids. They would have blocked early enough, and we wouldn't hear so much complaining. Someone said it best though, this was sids way of saying kiss my ass. But someone else also said it best. Sid has been beaten before. But sadly, with this bunch of sub par commands and sub par lazy players, he won't be beat again. Don't get mad at me.
Slap yourself. It's your own fault.
__________________
Ascendancy
When Doves Cry
|
|
|
25 Aug 2004, 01:10
|
#30
|
Raaaaaaaah!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,296
|
Re: time up for 1up??
60 Scan planets clearly ! Gerbie once again showing he's itk
__________________
Hicks
Mercury & Solace
Always [Fury]
|
|
|
25 Aug 2004, 01:12
|
#31
|
Pedantic hypocrite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Back and to the left
Posts: 1,488
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chika
It's your own fault.
|
No, it's 1up's fault. For winning. And being Fury III.
__________________
I always wanted to be a dancer, but I could never get the shit off my shoes
.......
|
|
|
25 Aug 2004, 01:17
|
#32
|
Affectionate Nickname
Join Date: May 2002
Location: wigan
Posts: 206
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treveler
How are 3 alliances teaming up to bash one alliance to bitses, as he put it, not creating a major block that will ruin the round?
|
There's a difference between creating an uber block to destroy an alliance, and teaming up for a week of heavy attacks to bring them back down to a decent level.
And also, in point 5 it seemed he was implying that a block is made and confirmed before tickstart (like in previous rounds), whereas a block created after tickstart that disbands once its purpose has been fulfilled is acceptable.
(p.s., just to be pedantic, just becaus 3 alliances block to destroy one alliance dosn't mean it will runin the round. Not if they're rank 20~ish :P*)
*Told you it was pedantic.
__________________
My posts represent me and me alone and have no connection to any of the communities I may or may not be involved in unless stated within my posts. Bints.
|
|
|
25 Aug 2004, 15:59
|
#33
|
Former [1up] Hustler
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 59
|
Re: time up for 1up??
What makes me laugh is how people seem to have the "blocking is the way" mentality
At the beginning of this round it was an even playing field - 1up proved to be superior - it's not our fault LCH and the other alliances rolled over and gave up
As Bashar previously stated - someone had to win
I can quite honestly say myself and the members of my AG worked damn hard to take down the hostile-to-1up galaxies - and it's that hard work ethic that got 1up into the position we're currently in
DB
PS Props to those that are still sending incs at my planet - shows that some ppl still have a set of balls
__________________
Dinobot
"Those of us who are truly brave, will never live in fear."
Dwayne Johnson
Loved the extra life with [1up]
Honoured to have walked the dark path with Eclipse,
Proud to have been Xanadu,
But my heart will always be with Ministry
|
|
|
25 Aug 2004, 21:10
|
#34
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 33
|
Re: time up for 1up??
The members of 1UP had a good motivation for this round. First round Sid is back first round with a new alliance so they were most active and dedicated.
The rest of the alliances werent motivated enough so it's their/our own fault simple.
1UP deserved the victory so congratz.
__________________
Round 1- Round5 - [TFD]
Round 6 Pink[BULL]
Round7 [Xylem]
Round8 [KniV]
Round9 [FAnG]
Round9.5 [Đragons]
Round10 [Đragons]
Round10.5 [MISTU]
Round 15 Comeback?
Proud to have been RedBull
Proud member of R6B Speedround Gods
Proud member of MISTU
|
|
|
26 Aug 2004, 01:19
|
#35
|
Its time to roll the dice
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The barn
Posts: 876
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
Originally Posted by *donkie*
There's a difference between creating an uber block to destroy an alliance, and teaming up for a week of heavy attacks to bring them back down to a decent level.
And also, in point 5 it seemed he was implying that a block is made and confirmed before tickstart (like in previous rounds), whereas a block created after tickstart that disbands once its purpose has been fulfilled is acceptable.
(p.s., just to be pedantic, just becaus 3 alliances block to destroy one alliance dosn't mean it will runin the round. Not if they're rank 20~ish :P*)
*Told you it was pedantic.
|
Well then I’m gonna be pedantic too. He clearly stated that he wanted the block to blow 1up to bitses. That is not levelling the playing field, it is something you do to an alliance you are pissed at for bashing you last round.
Besides, do pll really fancy a round where the #1 alliance gets bashed 24/7 whoever it is? I mean think about it. LCH gets on top and is bashed down to #4. Next in line is Vision who shortly after is bashed down below LCH. Then Mistu and 1up comes along and get the same treatment.
This setup pretty much removes all skills/activity and tactics. All you are left with is whoever is, by chance, #1 at the end of the round. I’m sorry but this fluid blocking idea seems to be a creation of a child’s mind imo. It seems very naive.
__________________
Real life peon.
|
|
|
26 Aug 2004, 01:32
|
#36
|
Down Boy - WOOF!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Somewhere About Here .
Posts: 530
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
3. Other alliances seem uninterested in fighting 1up. It's better to let them win then to fight them and lose. HR didn't get #4 over Mistu by roiding 1up.
|
Aye we didnt, we got there by roiding (along with other factors) WP, rock, ND and more recently mistu.
HR was never alligned alongside any of the "players", so i hope you werent implying HRs military focus is part reason for 1ups dominance? Im sure this will start the flames really fireing but from HRs pov, 1up was never our war. That ofc never stopped us from hittin 1up if they had planets in strongholds of our targets.
Im sure there will be replies of "well your selfishness allowed 1up to dominate and stagnate" ect.. but at the time of writing i wouldnt say the round was over just yet and it certainly aint stagnated. Politically it may be but there are still many targets for every1 to hit and if an ally doesnt have this, they have only themself to blame.
It will be great to finally see a victor of their own merits, regardless of who it is or how some may feel manipulated by such a finale. The #1 rank challengers had ample opportunity to do something about 1up and i feel the only dissapointment this round, has been the seemingly stagnant approach by these "players".
However, even when the dust settles, 1ups victory will be argued against, for the simple fact this was a given? That the general consensus of 1up having the 1337 of PA inside, would surely diminish their achievement? Even if such a fact should have ensured the contenders bashing them and in turn leveling the playing field.
__________________
R2: -=42=- & [HR] ICD Squad Founding >> [HR] Alliance
R3: -=42=- & ICD Squad [HR] >> [HR] >> Sedition Wing [HR] >> G-II Wing [HR] >> [HR] Alliance
R4: [HR]
R5: [HR] - [DuH] Triad with [BD] & [UV]
R6: [HR] - [HyB] Alliance with [BD]
R7, R8, R9, R9.5: Nos Wing [HR]
R10: [HR]
R10.5: [HR] - [FYTFO] Alliance with ]LCH[
R11, R12, R13, R15, R16, R17: [HR]
|
|
|
26 Aug 2004, 03:35
|
#37
|
The Caffienated One.
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 128
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Okay, I wanna know who made the alliance 2up
|
|
|
26 Aug 2004, 05:27
|
#38
|
Aaranaf's Master
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 237
|
Re: time up for 1up??
cough
secret...... o_O
__________________
R3: nub R10: 12:9:1 to 9:7:3 G Rank #14 P Rank #194
R4: 275:6:13 R10.5: 17:9:9 quitter
R5: 4:8:4 to 35:11:x R11: 15:4:9 G Rank #10 P Rank #32
R6: 22:22:11 R12: 29:8:9
R7: 8:16:9 G Rank #52 R13: Forgot
R9: 52:6:5 for a week R14: Forgot
R9.5: 12:7:17 G Rank #17 R17: 14:3:6 G Rank #6 P Rank #9
[1up] Peon
|
|
|
26 Aug 2004, 07:37
|
#39
|
Void of Sarcasm
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada, I am the only Gay Eskimo
Posts: 85
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veil05
Good idea! and instead of fighting back in world war 2, we should of just sed "come on hitler, youve had your fun, just quit now"
:|
|
WE DIDN'T??
But seriously, 1up dominating this round is good, it keeps the game interesting with a goal (to kill 1up :P) next round, meaning people will keep playing because they want to be part of that.
-Chippeh
__________________
Three cheers to idle accounts never being deleted
|
|
|
26 Aug 2004, 10:44
|
#40
|
Lost the Fury... :(
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 516
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veil05
Good idea! and instead of fighting back in world war 2, we should of just sed "come on hitler, youve had your fun, just quit now"
:|
|
The british did :P
'peace in our time' and all that
on a side note, hitler/nazi/german examples are for four year olds, if you want to be taken seriously, try looking elsewhere for historical precidents
|
|
|
26 Aug 2004, 15:41
|
#41
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 369
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Just wait for 7up!
__________________
r1 ??:??:?? Phalanx_WLF of Kadan
r2 9:23:1 Axis_WLF of Kadan : Blluetuba/Legion
r3 6:24:1 Axis_WLF of kadan : Legion/WolfPack
r4 201:15:1 Octavian of Ostia : Wolfpack
r5 13:6:2 Sun Tzu of Art of War : Legion Command
r6 33:13:?? : Legion Command
r7 15:19:12 Unknown soldier run over by a wagon : Legion Command
R8: 28:8:9 Niccolo Machiavelli of Revera Legatus : TITAN COMMAND BC
R12 ??:??:?? 1up Military Officer
|
|
|
26 Aug 2004, 16:03
|
#42
|
Ex-Head Multihunter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: At home
Posts: 900
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mek
imho 1up has been Sids way of saying "i can come back anytime and rule this game when i want and there aint a damn thing you can do to stop me" well its about time we did stop him...
|
He doesnt rule the game, his members do :-)
__________________
R02.0-R4.0: [noob]
R05.0: [Wrath]/[Fury]
R06.0: Quit after 1 week
R7-9: Had an account, but didnt play seriously
R09.5: []LCH[] Officer
R10.0: []LCH[] HC (Rank #9, #1 Gal)
R10.5-R18.0: []LCH[] HC Scanner!
R18.0-R33 : Multihunter, Head MH
R34-.. : [CT] HC
|
|
|
26 Aug 2004, 16:40
|
#43
|
wasted
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Under the floorboards
Posts: 1,240
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerbie
1. LCH, VsN and Mistu were not prepared to do what was needed to make sure that 1up wouldn't win: work together closely early on in the game and bash them to bits. When they finally did it, it was too late. They let 1up win. Ofc they had to work hard for it and deserved it. But I think those HCs at least deserve some credit for their (overdone) caution.
|
They "let" 1up win in the same way that most formula 1 drivers "let" Michael Schumacher win - by not being good enough to beat him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerbie
2. 1up has ~160 members, plus a load of NAP-ed planets which are in essence fighting on the 1up side. With the average 1up player having twice the average score of the average LCH/VsN/Mistu player it's hard to stop them.
|
160 members? Where did you get this figure from? Needless to say, it's incorrect.
As for the planets with galaxy NAPs - that sort of thing only becomes a factor once most people believe an alliance has won already. For example, if LCH had won then there would probably be planets under LCH galaxy protection.
Also, 1up may have twice the average score of LCH/Vsn/Mistu now, but when war broke out the average scores were quite close. The combined score of LCH/Vsn/Mistu was almost 3x 1up's total score at the time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerbie
3. Other alliances seem uninterested in fighting 1up. It's better to let them win then to fight them and lose. HR didn't get #4 over Mistu by roiding 1up.
|
Curiously, HR are probably the only alliance (apart from 1up) who seem to have had a "good" round. Finishing above MISTU (who, after all, won last round along with FAnG) is a good achievement for them. Instead of whining, bitching and so on, they have actually got on with playing the game, for their own self-interest, and they seem to be doing pretty well out of it. In a round with large blocks, HR would probably be just another supporting alliance, but without blocks they can take on the other alliances around them 1 vs 1.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerbie
4. 1up has NAP-ed a lot of planets. They control almost the entire top100 (if we don't count planets that are in vacationmode to prevent further bashing). The top players have real trouble getting roids as they ran out of targets. The NAP-ed planets don't pose a thread to 1up. I did recal someone saying something about more fluid politics. I don't expect it to happen, just like the no-NAPs thing.
|
tbh, I consider these NAP'ed planets to be pretty much an abuse of 1up's galaxy protection. Galaxy protection is chiefly intended to make sure that loyal, helpful galaxy members don't get roided by 1up. Imagine you've been reporting the incomings on a 1up member in your galaxy all round, then you get 5 waves of 1up incoming. You'd feel pretty pissed off, and the 1up member in your galaxy wouldn't be too pleased either. Galaxy protection was designed to avoid that scenario, and to allow galaxies to work together with some degree of trust.
Those LCH/Vsn/Mistu planets who decided to abuse this protection (and in the process betray their alliances) are quite despicable imo, and their alliances should deal harshly with people who have done so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerbie
5. There's a real danger of an overreaction next round. A big block that will bash the shit out of everyone and stagnate the round. Plz. plz don't let that happen. I'd rather face a 2 round 1up victory. (Although I must admit I'd love to bash them.)
|
But wasn't your first point that there should have been more cooperation, and earlier?
This is pretty much the same argument that I've been having with Rumad. I don't think lack of cooperation was the problem, it was lack of guts and lack of imagination. Basically the other alliances didn't show much tactical imagination, or much commitment in their attacks. That is where I think their problem lies, not in the amount of cooperation between alliances.
__________________
“They were totally confused,” said the birdman, whose flying suit gives him a passing resemblance to Buzz Lightyear in Toy Story. “The authorities said that I was an unregistered aircraft and to fly, you need a licence. I told them, ‘No. To fly, you need wings’.”
|
|
|
26 Aug 2004, 18:38
|
#44
|
U've been Moderated
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: getting sex0red by pretty women
Posts: 1,510
|
Re: time up for 1up??
these idiots make me laugh soooooooo much
hi gerbie
__________________
Titans forever and ever.
<Forest> i fuc*ing hate password sharers, i will log into macs bros account and get scans every 2 mins
<Tempestuous> cypher just happens to be the world's cutest creature
|
|
|
26 Aug 2004, 18:56
|
#45
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: time up for 1up??
can people please stop saying this is sid`s comeback etc, he`s played every round except r7 fs.
|
|
|
26 Aug 2004, 19:43
|
#46
|
Sh33p h3rd3r
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 132
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComradeRob
Those LCH/Vsn/Mistu planets who decided to abuse this protection (and in the process betray their alliances) are quite despicable imo, and their alliances should deal harshly with people who have done so.
|
Pretty hard to do when its some of the HC's of those alliances doing the abuse.
__________________
Roiding No More
eXilitionAscendancy
*****************
Do not make me get out the paddle!!! "
|
|
|
26 Aug 2004, 22:01
|
#47
|
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,382
|
Re: time up for 1up??
amusing that, innit. Organizing attacks against some targets but not taking part themselves as they are too coward to and care much for their leet top100 place which they`ll look back in months/years and wank over.
|
|
|
26 Aug 2004, 23:27
|
#48
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Lo Naps
|
|
|
26 Aug 2004, 23:30
|
#49
|
Its time to roll the dice
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The barn
Posts: 876
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Imagine the moral blow. Your fighting your ass off for youre alliance and then you descover that one of your HC is naped to the enemy.
If I was in that alliance I would leave as fast as I could log in and press the leave button.
__________________
Real life peon.
|
|
|
27 Aug 2004, 07:47
|
#50
|
Heh, Leeds !
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: In The Redfern
Posts: 3,790
|
Re: time up for 1up??
Oh, I forgot to hit the leave button, shite
~Vaio~
__________________
The George Harrison of BlueTuba
Yes, I know he is dead !
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:17.
| |