|
22 May 2004, 02:16
|
#1
|
Fightin-irish for life
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: guinness brewery
Posts: 2,177
|
stats for rd 11 ?
any idea where i can find them plz
__________________
Ascendancy, now with added Irish
"In the absence of orders, find something and kill it."
-Rommel
|
|
|
22 May 2004, 02:28
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 346
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
Yes, but I'm not sure its something they want in the public domain just yet, as the stats are being tweaked in every iteration of the beta. It will probably be something PA-Team will have to post.
__________________
[1up]
|
|
|
22 May 2004, 03:02
|
#3
|
#planetarion
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 1,538
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
Stats will be made public before signups are opened (unless something goes drastically wrong)
...regardless you will have the option to change race at any point before ticks start from your preferences screen, so there is no need to worry about it this far in advance
When a version is available that is likley to be the basis of the final stats we will look at the practicality of releasing it. Of course when public beta happens the beta-stats will inevitably become public knowledge anyway whether we want them to or not...
__________________
- A2
|
|
|
22 May 2004, 04:59
|
#4
|
Klaatu barada nikto
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 3,237
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by A2
Of course when public beta happens the beta-stats will inevitably become public knowledge anyway whether we want them to or not...
|
And in the private beta the stats are only public in the private alliance channels.
__________________
The Ottawa Citizen and Southam News wish to apologize for our apology to Mark Steyn, published Oct. 22. In correcting the incorrect statements about Mr. Steyn published Oct. 15, we incorrectly published the incorrect correction. We accept and regret that our original regrets were unacceptable and we apologize to Mr. Steyn for any distress caused by our previous apology.
|
|
|
22 May 2004, 21:25
|
#5
|
Jolt's best friend
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,101
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
i don't quite understand why the beta stats arn't being made public, rather than just being given to those in the know. it wouldn't do any harm
then again, given pa's inability to tell people things it's not a huge shock
-mist
|
|
|
23 May 2004, 08:51
|
#6
|
Puppet Master
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 227
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
would it do any good?
|
|
|
23 May 2004, 15:08
|
#7
|
used to register
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 979
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
No use to officially spread BETA stats... People will start analysing them etc, but if something (radical? like R6 stats) changes, ppl will whine with "but I liked ship xyz with armour 123 better" etc.... Announcing them wouldn't do ANY good.
__________________
R1: ??:?? | R2: 51:6 | R3: 37:12 | R4: 186:13 | R5: 13:17 | R6: 1:25
R7: 15:14 | R8: 34:4 / 52:10 ¤ | R9: 16:2 | R9.5: 34:6 / 41:6 ¤
R10: 2:2 | R10.5: 15:4 | R11: 28:8 | R12: 22:9
Damn, outdated and too lazy to edit, retired now
-----
Started playing again Still too lazy to update though
|
|
|
23 May 2004, 18:54
|
#8
|
Klaatu barada nikto
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 3,237
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Martok
No use to officially spread BETA stats... People will start analysing them etc, but if something (radical? like R6 stats) changes, ppl will whine with "but I liked ship xyz with armour 123 better" etc.... Announcing them wouldn't do ANY good.
|
I'm not sure it does any harm though. I think the only difference between public beta stats and leaked private beta stats is whether or not players complain about them in public.
I've always been of the opinion that any publicity is good publicity and getting players talking about the next round--even if it's just to complain--is better than silence.
But that's just me, seemingly.
__________________
The Ottawa Citizen and Southam News wish to apologize for our apology to Mark Steyn, published Oct. 22. In correcting the incorrect statements about Mr. Steyn published Oct. 15, we incorrectly published the incorrect correction. We accept and regret that our original regrets were unacceptable and we apologize to Mr. Steyn for any distress caused by our previous apology.
|
|
|
23 May 2004, 20:49
|
#9
|
Käptn Karacho
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,360
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
i don't remember a round without this discussion...
__________________
at0mic.c0w - #strategy
|
|
|
24 May 2004, 08:29
|
#10
|
Commodore
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,176
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by at0mic.c0w
i don't remember a round without this discussion...
|
I dont remember it happening in R3 - but that's prolly because i started mid round and missed out on the pre-round entertainment
Actually, i dont remember whinging happening before R4 - i think that no-one knew what they were going to be like when they were released (not even Spinner, cos he was clearly using a dartboard to get his numbers).
__________________
#Strategy ; #Support - Sovereign
--- --- ---
"The Cake is a Lie."
|
|
|
24 May 2004, 11:32
|
#11
|
Käptn Karacho
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,360
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultimate Newbie
Actually, i dont remember whinging happening before R4 - i think that no-one knew what they were going to be like when they were released (not even Spinner, cos he was clearly using a dartboard to get his numbers).
|
wasn't r4 the one with the Nod/Spinner flame threads ?
__________________
at0mic.c0w - #strategy
|
|
|
24 May 2004, 13:55
|
#12
|
Klaatu barada nikto
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 3,237
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
They didn't start doing beta testing until the R3/R4 timeframe (that is, with actual players instead of a few insiders), so before then there wasn't the issue of some players having access to the beta stats before the general community.
__________________
The Ottawa Citizen and Southam News wish to apologize for our apology to Mark Steyn, published Oct. 22. In correcting the incorrect statements about Mr. Steyn published Oct. 15, we incorrectly published the incorrect correction. We accept and regret that our original regrets were unacceptable and we apologize to Mr. Steyn for any distress caused by our previous apology.
|
|
|
26 May 2004, 02:57
|
#13
|
Commodore
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,176
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by at0mic.c0w
wasn't r4 the one with the Nod/Spinner flame threads ?
|
I have this inkling that it was R3. I (think) remember somone saying that Nodrog and Spinner disagreed on the stats, and i thought along the lines of: nodrog is a very percluliar name so perhaps a twisted outlook on life. But Spinner is a rediculous name and so is probably a nutter - i think i'll ignore the argument .
In a way, i was more right than i could have possibly have known...
And i was a newbie at the time
Still am...
__________________
#Strategy ; #Support - Sovereign
--- --- ---
"The Cake is a Lie."
|
|
|
26 May 2004, 03:16
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
Stats aren't posted yet so as to avoid embrassement if something has to be drastically changed. See it all the time in beta to live .... beta players usually end up more confused then the true newbs cause they went in thinking they already had a good strategy just to find out it was overkill and therefore removed.
|
|
|
26 May 2004, 17:50
|
#15
|
fanboy
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 492
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
I havent played since r9, so I would very much appreciate looking over the stats before I started playing beta. All discussions are healthy discussions imo.
__________________
Ascendancy, former [ 1UP] & Ministry.
FOUNDER OF THE OFFICIAL ASCENDANCY LADY GAGA FAN CLUB
ASCENDANCY DEMOLITION MAN
|
|
|
26 May 2004, 20:03
|
#16
|
used to register
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 979
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
If you signup NOW, you can see the stats ingame...
Or just look @ http://jpaweb01.planetarion.com/stats.pl
__________________
R1: ??:?? | R2: 51:6 | R3: 37:12 | R4: 186:13 | R5: 13:17 | R6: 1:25
R7: 15:14 | R8: 34:4 / 52:10 ¤ | R9: 16:2 | R9.5: 34:6 / 41:6 ¤
R10: 2:2 | R10.5: 15:4 | R11: 28:8 | R12: 22:9
Damn, outdated and too lazy to edit, retired now
-----
Started playing again Still too lazy to update though
|
|
|
26 May 2004, 21:59
|
#17
|
Most unimportant guy...
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kvinesdal
Posts: 1,393
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
Im allianceless. What race should I go?
__________________
When we discover the centre of the universe, alot of people will be shocked and dissapointed to know that they are not it!
Retired
|
|
|
27 May 2004, 00:34
|
#18
|
Jolt's best friend
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,101
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
looking at the races, cath seem to be the only one without a +0 eta pod, so they're quite smelly.
terrans seem to be best on armour/damage, xan have a nice initiative and the obvious cloaking benefit but their ships are a little brittle for my liking. xan seem to have the best target coverage in the FI/CO range so i'd probably go with them, although that would involve using subverting ships :/
still, just see what comes out of the beta
-mist
|
|
|
29 May 2004, 18:02
|
#19
|
Doh!
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit
Posts: 1,720
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonas
Im allianceless. What race should I go?
|
Lemming
__________________
Spinner: Kudos to Judge for having big cohones!
|
|
|
29 May 2004, 22:29
|
#20
|
used to register
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 979
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Judge
Lemming
|
Also known as cathaar
As allianceless player it would probably best to choose a race with solely killships. Cathaar and zikonian have some obvious weaknesses against (de /) cr / bs fleets, and without an alliance you'd be a sitting duck. Xandathrii is probably the race which is toughest to attack (leat weaknesses).
Best is if you find an alliance quickly though
__________________
R1: ??:?? | R2: 51:6 | R3: 37:12 | R4: 186:13 | R5: 13:17 | R6: 1:25
R7: 15:14 | R8: 34:4 / 52:10 ¤ | R9: 16:2 | R9.5: 34:6 / 41:6 ¤
R10: 2:2 | R10.5: 15:4 | R11: 28:8 | R12: 22:9
Damn, outdated and too lazy to edit, retired now
-----
Started playing again Still too lazy to update though
|
|
|
30 May 2004, 16:35
|
#21
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
just looked at stats to see that the cath fr pod has more damage and damage/cost than the ter de pod..is that right, surely the bigger the class, the more dmg etc it should give, seeing as its the pattern with the other pods..
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
30 May 2004, 16:42
|
#22
|
pe0n
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kindom of the Netherlands
Posts: 1,347
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
I think it's right. Terran are the only one with a De pod - making it a pod that will not be very easy to find defence against.
__________________
round 5 noob
round 6 noob
round 7 noob: rank 6.198 25:20:25 - VoC member
round 8 noob: rank 4.112 7:2:3 - TFD member
round 9 rank 941 23:1:9 - TFD HC
round 9.5 rank 860 22:7:3 - TFD HC
round 10: rank unknown (was #1 for a while) 5:2:5 - Vengeance pe0n
round 10.5: rank 683 19:10:2 - VGN member
round 11: rank 138 8:8:4 - VsN member
round 12: rank 515 - VGN 'special attack officer' -> jumped ship to Rock
round 13: rank 85: NoS
|
|
|
31 May 2004, 21:41
|
#23
|
[Vision]
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 897
|
Re: stats for rd 11 ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerbie
I think it's right. Terran are the only one with a De pod - making it a pod that will not be very easy to find defence against.
|
thats more cuz there are so many ppl playing terrans with current stats that its impossible to cover all those DE incs
__________________
[Vision] in a lost dream, contributing to The 5th Element at present
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:18.
| |