Round 38 shipsstats discussion thread

[Paisley]

I would say xan fi was too weak but bar that the stats have been fairly enjoyable.

[JonnyBGood]

Originally Posted by Paisley

I would say xan fi was too weak but bar that the stats have been fairly enjoyable.

The problem with xan fi is that once it looks properly playable everybody goes for it. Personally I think the stats were pretty balanced. What actually happened is that basically nobody went for xan and terran/etd were very heavily represented in the top two alliances, who ended up with over 50 of the t100 planets and an almost exclusive monopoly on the t30. The stats did actually suck though as they just weren't that interesting at all.

I have taken the liberty of recommending r27's stats for next round! Although god knows what they'll use.

[isildurx]

Yeah, R27 had a good set of stats that could be re-used imo.

[Paisley]

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood

The problem with xan fi is that once it looks properly playable everybody goes for it. Personally I think the stats were pretty balanced. What actually happened is that basically nobody went for xan and terran/etd were very heavily represented in the top two alliances, who ended up with over 50 of the t100 planets and an almost exclusive monopoly on the t30. The stats did actually suck though as they just weren't that interesting at all.

I have taken the liberty of recommending r27's stats for next round! Although god knows what they'll use.

I'm not having a go at you JBG ... If anything nice job on the stats

R14 are still my favourite stats though
but due to game mechanics like stealers dying they couldn't be used as they are.