Planetarion Forums

Stew · 1 Feb 2004, 23:52

..Could be the announcement later this year!

They've been nominated for invading Iraq!

I think GD should try and win a Nobel Peace Prize - who shall we invade!? Doesnt seem very peace like to me.....

Nodrog · 1 Feb 2004, 23:56

I dont see why this is more ridiculous than the Pope being nominated (which he was)

Deathjam|wee · 1 Feb 2004, 23:56

france with lots and lots lots and lots lots and lots lots and lots lots and lots of lovely nuclear weapons

Stew · 1 Feb 2004, 23:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nodrog

I dont see why this is more ridiculous than the Pope being nominated (which he was)

How many missiles ahs the pope ordered to be sent to countries?

Cmdr_Cyrax · 1 Feb 2004, 23:58

I nominate Saddam for gassing those nasty Kurds a little while ago.

Embroglio · 2 Feb 2004, 00:00

Wasn't hitler once nominated?

Nodrog · 2 Feb 2004, 00:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stew

How many missiles ahs the pope ordered to be sent to countries?

Starting a war isnt necessarily anti-peace. Theres more involved in peace on a world scale than simply not being at war at the current time- neutralizing a likely future threat to world peace would surely be a peaceful gesture.

at0mic.c0w · 2 Feb 2004, 01:14

The prize for peace is to be awarded to the person who "shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding of peace congresses."

well one could say that Bush and Blair have reduced the number of Iraqi soldiers quite noticeably... which probably is not what Mr Nobel meant tho...

Snurx · 2 Feb 2004, 01:17

Jan Simonsen is a tosser anyways. He's so racist (and stupid) that he was thrown out of the "party of progress" (FRP), and, well, they are collaborating whit neo-nazis.
Heh.
He's a funny clown, thought.

wu_trax · 2 Feb 2004, 01:20

ffs, they gave one to kissinger, a real price, not just a nomination, so what did you expect?

Cynical Oracle · 2 Feb 2004, 02:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snurx

Jan Simonsen is a tosser anyways. He's so racist (and stupid) that he was thrown out of the "party of progress" (FRP), and, well, they are collaborating whit neo-nazis.
Heh.
He's a funny clown, thought.

Outstanding rubbish, Mr. Snurx.

You seem to have more detailed information regarding Norwegian politics than everyone else in our country, wich in itself is quite remarkable, considering you spend your day smoking weed and typing on these very forums.

Snurx · 2 Feb 2004, 02:15

http://www.magasinet-monitor.net/artikler/fmi299.htm
http://www.magasinet-monitor.net/art...stad130503.htm
http://www.magasinet-monitor.net/art...eppe110903.htm (Links is in norwegian)

For example. Okay, i will admitt that Kleppe and the others also are thrown out of FRP, but they have been FRP'ers...That says a lot, at least it does for me. FRP has become more "clean" the last few years, but that's only beacause they have cleaned up their launguage. Behind the words are the same meanings.
Oh, and i know that i should have more then one source, but hey, everybody knows who the nazie's are (at least everybody who pays attention, organizations like Viking and names like Jonny Olsen poops up quite often), and who goes to election where also is public aviable.

Cynical Oracle · 2 Feb 2004, 02:24

Individuals will always have an opinion and FRP has taken steps to remove those who have brought bad light on their party. What more could they have done?

Snurx · 2 Feb 2004, 02:41

Well, of course! But, that people that support/are neo-nazi's join FRP, you don't find that, hmm, slightly strange? I mean, you would never see one of those in Høyere, for instance? Why, then, are all these neo-nazi's, half-facists and racists so attracted to FRP?

http://www.magasinet-monitor.net/artikler/frp199.htm That article is kinda better, beacause it kinda defends my stance and kinda defends yours.

There are also evil rumors about a few FPU'ers being members of Nasjonal Ungdom, the new nazi group, that has close ties to national front (sweden), that's swedens most violent nazi group, or at least high up. I've also heard of Nasjonal Front posters in FPU offices, and a guy i know (that WAS fpu) met a neo-nazi at a fpu meet. He don't know if the guy was FPU or not, but he was a nazi at least.

Intruder · 2 Feb 2004, 07:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by at0mic.c0w

The prize for peace is to be awarded to the person who "shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding of peace congresses."

well one could say that Bush and Blair have reduced the number of Iraqi soldiers quite noticeably... which probably is not what Mr Nobel meant tho...

Best sarcastic comment ever

Cynical Oracle · 2 Feb 2004, 09:54

In all honesty Snurx; Do you recon that this magazine is a trustable source? It's main motive is to blackpaint whoever has an opinion wich does not follow their point of view.

The way I see it, Monitor is fairly extreme leftwing, even more so than FRP is rightwing. Bullshit will be trown between them.

What you should be concerned about is that people want FRP to run our nation.

Snurx · 2 Feb 2004, 15:14

Well, Monitor might not be the most reliabale source when it comes to certain things, but they do know who the nazies are, just like AFA does. This is easy, since nazi'es have a strong tendency to "wave" their ideology right in the face of everybody. So, when you can couple the nazi names (like you can by for example looking at the party lists and so on) whit FRP and ex-frp'ers, i don't doubt it.

I am more concerned about the general racism in norway (FRP, the state's new asylum laws and so on) then the nazies, but hey, it's all part of the same "struggle". Oh, and i do hope that FRP gets to power, so that they can destroy "our" country even more! Heh.

Deffeh · 2 Feb 2004, 15:53

i nominate robbie savage for the nobel peace prize

pyirt · 2 Feb 2004, 17:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmdr_Cyrax

I nominate Saddam for gassing those nasty Kurds a little while ago.

Gassing certainly makes people go quiet and peacefull.

Dead_Meat · 2 Feb 2004, 18:13

I thought Snurx was an anarchist? What's he got against the Nazis?

Cynical Oracle · 2 Feb 2004, 23:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead_Meat

I thought Snurx was an anarchist? What's he got against the Nazis?

In a few years he will have made an opinion. At the moment he's only struggling to separate other peoples point of view with his own.

JonnyBGood · 3 Feb 2004, 11:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by Embroglio

Wasn't hitler once nominated?

Hitler was Time Magazine's Man of the Year once (if I remember correctly) which might be what you're thinking of.

Evergreen · 3 Feb 2004, 17:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by at0mic.c0w

The prize for peace is to be awarded to the person who "shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding of peace congresses."

well one could say that Bush and Blair have reduced the number of Iraqi soldiers quite noticeably... which probably is not what Mr Nobel meant tho...

They are also successfully reducing their own armies by non-issue of body armor.

On another note I think the PTO should also be nominated under those conditions as they eat into Israel and their own ranks.

Suicide bombing against military targets is the way to peace....

Tactitus · 3 Feb 2004, 18:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by JonnyBGood

Hitler was Time Magazine's Man of the Year once (if I remember correctly) which might be what you're thinking of.

No, Hitler did get a Nobel Peace Prize nomination--in 1938! No doubt the committee was impressed by Hitler's "peaceful" Anschluss of Austria and the Munich Agreement--whereby Hitler skillfully avoided war with Czechoslovakia by getting France and Britian to hand it over to him instead. However, Hitler didn't win. Ghandi was also nominated that year but he didn't win either. Both Hitler and Ghandi were edged out by the Nansen International Office for Refugees, which was doing a bang-up job helping refugees flee the expanding Third Reich.

So there you have a great trivia question; the missing link between Ghandi and Hitler: they were both nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize in the same year.

You just couldn't make this stuff up.

Qdeathstar · 4 Feb 2004, 01:03

i hope that they do give it to bush... i personallly think that everything its a part of bring peace to the middle east.

Qdeathstar · 4 Feb 2004, 01:05

on i side note..

How and why Evergreen, do you spam 27.83 posts per day?

Snurx · 4 Feb 2004, 01:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qdeathstar

i hope that they do give it to bush... i personallly think that everything its a part of bring peace to the middle east.

I hope this was ironic.

pablissimo · 4 Feb 2004, 01:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snurx

I hope this was ironic.

Surely you didn't miss the comedy genius that was the 'discussion' derailed by that chap?

Snurx · 4 Feb 2004, 01:58

I think i did?
Going to search

Snurx · 4 Feb 2004, 02:11

If it's the one in the Nodrog thread that has JBG's name in the title, then I missed it untill now

Qdeathstar · 4 Feb 2004, 05:12

i dont really think they desever the peace prize.. im sure that others have done more to deserve it...

Marilyn Manson · 5 Feb 2004, 15:53

They should have the option not to to award (If they don't already.) when the candidates are so patently pathetic in their 'achievements' as this year's.

Cynical Oracle · 5 Feb 2004, 16:13

I would say that both the prime minister of uk and presiden of us has fought a battle against future threats, and made the world's future more peaceloving and safe.

Thanks

Appocomaster · 5 Feb 2004, 16:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deathjam|wee

france with lots and lots lots and lots lots and lots lots and lots lots and lots of lovely nuclear weapons

France has done the most to stop any war it is invovled in - it either surrenders or manages to stalemate and almost all wars it is in (the whole google thing? massive french victories or something. blah.) anyway it should win the historic peace prize or something lol

Evergreen · 5 Feb 2004, 17:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qdeathstar

on i side note..

How and why Evergreen, do you spam 27.83 posts per day?

The average is going down each day. It used to be at 54 posts a day, which imo would be average on most forums.

I've been busy (successfully) flat hunting in Ottawa with the gf hence my lack of presence here lately.

Marilyn Manson · 5 Feb 2004, 19:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cynical Oracle

I would say that both the prime minister of uk and presiden of us has fought a battle against future threats, and made the world's future more peaceloving and safe.

Thanks

By disregarding official advice that invading Iraq would increase terror, dividing the western world, and attacking a state on the basis that it was a security threat because it had imaginary weapons which it had no intention of using?

Marilyn Manson · 5 Feb 2004, 19:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Appocomaster

France has done the most to stop any war it is invovled in

It formally started the Franco-Prussian war, which it then proceeded to lose, resulting in a unified Germany under militaristic and anti-democratic principles.

I'm still bitter at that one. Nappy III should have got his act together.