![Reply](STYLES/Planetarion2/buttons/reply.gif) |
23 Jul 2017, 10:50
|
#1
|
-HotLipS-
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 55
|
Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Hola homos and lesbians,
So currently the predicament is that PA is- and has been dying for years now. For some godforsaken reason, the family doesn't seem to agree on who to pull the plug on the life support.
What I wanna debate is this disgusting trend of one tag controlling 2, 3 and whatnot. Basically why it's happening is cuz u miserable bunch of ppl in HC spots can't accept to play with someone u don't dig. It isn't the only reason, but it is a part if an explanation: By saying "I don't like u, so u can't play here" u create a small/large vacuum. On what planet are u able to choose who u work with (comparison)?
It basically builds under this theory that everyone who play PA is bitter about something. I am a bitter c**t myself for undisclosed reasons. And thank f**king God I have PA - it is the most hostile and volatile community known to man. But one thing I am able to do is accepting I am not gonna love 59 other ppl equally. I am also able to send def to the likes of ChronoX and still sleep well at night.
I want to stress that I am not pointing at anyone (ally or HC) in particular - it is basically an (pointless) attempt to asking HCs to start taking more responsibility. So it is a general statement. With a dwindling community, each potential full tag has some responsibility and that leads back to the general management.
It is a well established fact that the PA crew except maybe Appocco doesn't give a damn. So if we wanna keep the game alive I suggest we start accepting that we may not always love every member of our ally. Consider it practice for the real world that's right outside ur door, eh?
With kind and humble regards
SoulS
(prove my point plz by trolling down my post plz)
__________________
"Art of Farming"
R 6 - Olympus
R 7 - Skipped
R 8 - Adelante
R 9 - ViruS, 38:10:7
R 9.5 - RaH, 40:5:9
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 10:56
|
#2
|
Mind-boggling
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 1,468
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulS
Hola homos and lesbians,
So currently the predicament is that PA is- and has been dying for years now. For some godforsaken reason, the family doesn't seem to agree on who to pull the plug on the life support.
What I wanna debate is this disgusting trend of one tag controlling 2, 3 and whatnot. Basically why it's happening is cuz u miserable bunch of ppl in HC spots can't accept to play with someone u don't dig. It isn't the only reason, but it is a part if an explanation: By saying "I don't like u, so u can't play here" u create a small/large vacuum. On what planet are u able to choose who u work with (comparison)?
It basically builds under this theory that everyone who play PA is bitter about something. I am a bitter c**t myself for undisclosed reasons. And thank f**king God I have PA - it is the most hostile and volatile community known to man. But one thing I am able to do is accepting I am not gonna love 59 other ppl equally. I am also able to send def to the likes of ChronoX and still sleep well at night.
I want to stress that I am not pointing at anyone (ally or HC) in particular - it is basically an (pointless) attempt to asking HCs to start taking more responsibility. So it is a general statement. With a dwindling community, each potential full tag has some responsibility and that leads back to the general management.
It is a well established fact that the PA crew except maybe Appocco doesn't give a damn. So if we wanna keep the game alive I suggest we start accepting that we may not always love every member of our ally. Consider it practice for the real world that's right outside ur door, eh?
With kind and humble regards
SoulS
(prove my point plz by trolling down my post plz)
|
I honestly have no idea what you are talking about.
However, one point I can firmly make; Everyone single alliance I have ever played in, there is a high % of players that don't love me or like me. I am very confident of that.
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. (Winston Churchill)
R21-Randy Dandys Winners R21
1:9:5 -SoClose- -YetSoFar-
You have pending friend requests from Newt.
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 11:02
|
#3
|
-HotLipS-
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 55
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA
I honestly have no idea what you are talking about.
However, one point I can firmly make; Everyone single alliance I have ever played in, there is a high % of players that don't love me or like me. I am very confident of that.
|
That just means u have understood one or two things. U are very hard to like - this is true. But if u look at KittenZ/App and Ult (to a small extent - aga knows).
In ur case u are lucky to find 20 ppl who tolerate u for 49 days. I prly coulda played with ya, but it wouldn't be with great pleasure.
__________________
"Art of Farming"
R 6 - Olympus
R 7 - Skipped
R 8 - Adelante
R 9 - ViruS, 38:10:7
R 9.5 - RaH, 40:5:9
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 11:34
|
#4
|
Anarchy Shadow
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nafferton, England
Posts: 324
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
What about Kittenz we will play with anyone and anyone is welcome well maybe not CBA lol but trust me anyone is welcome I don't close my doors to anyone who wants to play with my friends now if after a round they decide to slate my alliance and say it's shit then obviously if they reapply they will be denied but that has nothing to do with liking or disliking
__________________
EX
Legion, Fury, Xanadu, Wolfpack, NoS, TSU, LKSAB, Vgn, F-Crew, CT, Insomnia, Angels, VsN, Gross, Osiris, ROCK, XvX, Faceless, Unsullied, Haven, Carisan, RaGe, Carnage, Kittenz and EC
Currently
In ODDR Command
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 12:02
|
#5
|
Dictator
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 634
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Communities at an alliance level require teamwork. If you do not fit in with the community, why should you be added to it? Regardless to if a HC likes or dislikes you I'm sure the members of an alliance would make their position clear if you were someone that didn't fit in.
Is this not how general life works? But for some reason we believe it shouldn't apply to a game?
Note:
I doubt souls is talking about me. Since he hasn't applied. But he has been removed before..
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 12:25
|
#6
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
If your a PA criminal, or if you allready have been in said alliance, would you expect to be accepted in?
There is no way i hell i would accept a known criminal, with no regrets for their past crimes into BowS if we are to stick around with our anti cheating policy.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 12:34
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 936
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demort
What about Kittenz we will play with anyone and anyone is welcome well maybe not CBA lol but trust me anyone is welcome I don't close my doors to anyone who wants to play with my friends now if after a round they decide to slate my alliance and say it's shit then obviously if they reapply they will be denied but that has nothing to do with liking or disliking
|
Lies, he has received invitation for 2-3 rounds in a row. Not that all would fancy him or even tolerate him, but lets face it (funny faceless remark), he gets many of the required jobs done. ![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif) So anyone who lacks people to arrange stuff, here is a public recommendation. He sure is egoistic and can focus def on himself, but there are only a few valid dc's out there who wouldn't. That he offers to be farmed, when own game is over, is more of a sign of loyalty towards friends, than a mark of wanting to cheat. The one accepting such offer again should consider his fcking values, lowlifes.
I really didn't much understand anything from this post made, no offence. But somehow I got the impression the aim is for good. So here is a thump up
__________________
If the opponent resists, CaRnage there will be!
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 13:17
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 98
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
I agree with Souls. However, you reap what you sow. So many players have burned the bridges to many allies.
And I think this was aimed at the braz ![Tongue](images/smilies/tongue.gif) With the 3 "top" allies now have a 100 man+ each, its gonna be a hard round for the rest. And when some ppl arent accepted, then they rather take the crew to the top allies were numbers counts.
__________________
Really?
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 13:52
|
#9
|
Mind-boggling
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 1,468
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
You guys are misunderstanding my question
Anyone can get in any tag
It's down to pa skill level / response level
I've said it before and shouldn't need to say it again
But if you're active and play for your tag you will get accepted into any alliance hands down
Souls you must be talking about something a little more specific
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. (Winston Churchill)
R21-Randy Dandys Winners R21
1:9:5 -SoClose- -YetSoFar-
You have pending friend requests from Newt.
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 15:17
|
#10
|
Mind-boggling
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 1,468
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulS
That just means u have understood one or two things. U are very hard to like - this is true. But if u look at KittenZ/App and Ult (to a small extent - aga knows).
In ur case u are lucky to find 20 ppl who tolerate u for 49 days. I prly coulda played with ya, but it wouldn't be with great pleasure.
|
I told you quite directly that I didn't wanna play with you because you are shit. Not PA shit but mentally shit. You are too emotional - You give up too easily and I would go as far to say that you are quite unintelligent. I find your inability to grasp conversations very defunct.
KittenZ / App & Ult all fit under the banner I was describing when saying anyone could play there...
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. (Winston Churchill)
R21-Randy Dandys Winners R21
1:9:5 -SoClose- -YetSoFar-
You have pending friend requests from Newt.
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 15:21
|
#11
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by Advantix
I agree with Souls. However, you reap what you sow. So many players have burned the bridges to many allies.
And I think this was aimed at the braz
|
Well brazil is Ult core Agar3s said, and they can play there for the rest of their life regardless of what they do.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 16:32
|
#12
|
-HotLipS-
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 55
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Well brazil is Ult core Agar3s said, and they can play there for the rest of their life regardless of what they do.
|
Well as I suspected the thread would be trolled and misunderstood.
Cba atleast showing some self insight.
Basically the point was: We create this kind of power ourselves. I obviously realize the picture isn't just black and white, but why purposely misunderstand it?
@Demort: I just think its wrong for 1 tag alone to have 1/6 of uni under their control plus naps. Who the hell wants to have 120 planets on their back? It gives u direct power AND it gives u alot of unfair leverage in pols.
We might as well just sign up for a 1on1 in the future and let Appocco decide what side u are on. But by all means - carry on if u have no scrouples. Makes little diff to me as I prefer playing support.
__________________
"Art of Farming"
R 6 - Olympus
R 7 - Skipped
R 8 - Adelante
R 9 - ViruS, 38:10:7
R 9.5 - RaH, 40:5:9
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 16:55
|
#13
|
-HotLipS-
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 55
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA
I told you quite directly that I didn't wanna play with you because you are shit. Not PA shit but mentally shit. You are too emotional - You give up too easily and I would go as far to say that you are quite unintelligent. I find your inability to grasp conversations very defunct.
KittenZ / App & Ult all fit under the banner I was describing when saying anyone could play there...
|
Yea, man... Ask my compadres if what u say is real/correct. Basically - ppl cba (heh-heh) with u. Don't come here and make shit up.
Basically ur argument is that u run 3 businesses handed down by ur papa? Idgaf what u consider accomplishments in PA. We have 2 very different approaches: I play for my team, u choose the I'm-better-than-u-attitude.
Give me proof of one time when I didn't stick with it when I HC'd? I consider EMs last rd win an accomplishment. We also nearly got Conno into t3. That's obviously skills and dedication on those guys, but at the same time I worked hard to get the team selflessly behind it. It doesn't magically happen.
Kheros and Kershin this rd did alot of the same when allywin wasnt possible. They excecuted excellent.
__________________
"Art of Farming"
R 6 - Olympus
R 7 - Skipped
R 8 - Adelante
R 9 - ViruS, 38:10:7
R 9.5 - RaH, 40:5:9
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 17:42
|
#14
|
Old User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 13
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
OLA ladies
I don't generally post on here purely cos I can't be bothered with all the trololololos however as I've been mentioned I thought why not
Personally the R71 win for me was quite an accomplishment and achievement... especially with the ridiculous troll waves from the block at the time for 20 roids!
Souls was a big part of supporting that win by getting the FAnG peeps behind me and Connovar from both a defence and escorting perspective. Connovar would of most definitely been top 3 if not for the great emo of 2017, and then realising last minute he could actually do it.
Also from a Blackflag perspective Kershin and Kheros did a great job to secure the top spot as well so well done to you guys!
Planet win against the odds is always more of an achievement than being gifted it by a few players that think they run the show.
I guess we will what R73 has to bring ![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif) no doubt more blocking ... more trolling and more lolling
Good luck to all for R73!
f@$k your stupid blocks we got a horse outside!
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 18:04
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 936
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulS
@Demort: I just think its wrong for 1 tag alone to have 1/6 of uni under their control plus naps. Who the hell wants to have 120 planets on their back? It gives u direct power AND it gives u alot of unfair leverage in pols.
|
I find it all fair to play with the same rules as the rest ![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif) I am cool enforcing 1 tag, but same enforcements could be made ragarding blocking too, as allying a bunch of tags aint much different.
Your concern how ever is more than valid. Not all has similar amount of contacts available and it makes political field quite narrow.
For total player amount its again good if all are doing their share digging members.
__________________
If the opponent resists, CaRnage there will be!
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 19:03
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
If your a PA criminal, or if you allready have been in said alliance, would you expect to be accepted in?
There is no way i hell i would accept a known criminal, with no regrets for their past crimes into BowS if we are to stick around with our anti cheating policy.
|
Known criminal
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 19:10
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 297
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
If your a PA criminal, or if you allready have been in said alliance, would you expect to be accepted in?
There is no way i hell i would accept a known criminal, with no regrets for their past crimes into BowS if we are to stick around with our anti cheating policy.
|
I fully agree, sadly thats not true for all alliances, so people who cheat keep getting accepted in different tags. And there is no reason for them to change their behaviour.
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 20:05
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shhhhhhh
I fully agree, sadly thats not true for all alliances, so people who cheat keep getting accepted in different tags. And there is no reason for them to change their behaviour.
|
Unless you're Xoca where he's banned from most alliances.
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 20:20
|
#19
|
Mind-boggling
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 1,468
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
I'm still struggling to see the points of this thread
Souls - you're saying alliances shouldn't have out of tag?
If an alliance has out of tag planets then it's up to other alliances to even the score right? Or recruit more players
Politics is the most interesting part of the game
Planet win is relatively easy to orchestrate once you've given up on attempting alliance win. For example last round Kheros pushed for Kershin planet win with around 10 days left of the round.
We do have a perpetual situation of 75% of the regular alliances playing never attempting to win ally. That in itself is strange. Maybe, for example, CT and ND merge into 1 - organise a few dcs and you would see a very formidable tag (plus support tag created. But do they want to win? Or do they play to get bashed but enjoy losing nethertheless? I honestly don't know
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. (Winston Churchill)
R21-Randy Dandys Winners R21
1:9:5 -SoClose- -YetSoFar-
You have pending friend requests from Newt.
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 21:44
|
#20
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulS
(prove my point plz by trolling down my post plz)
|
Please don't ask people to troll your post.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
23 Jul 2017, 22:13
|
#21
|
Finally retired
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
If your a PA criminal, or if you allready have been in said alliance, would you expect to be accepted in?
There is no way i hell i would accept a known criminal, with no regrets for their past crimes into BowS if we are to stick around with our anti cheating policy.
|
i wonder if i were to be accepted in Bows.
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]
In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
|
|
|
24 Jul 2017, 06:48
|
#22
|
Anarchy Shadow
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nafferton, England
Posts: 324
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Butcher so my guys make the effort of asking people to return to play but we have to tell them to play in other allies is stupid most the players we brought back would just quit pa if they didn't play with us as that's the main reason they returned but by all means if you feel you can recruit my players go ahead. As one thing you failed to see 90% of Kittenz is either returning players from retirement or brand new players from other games we play we take the effort inbetween rounds to talk to friends as to us gaming is more then playing it's about the community and being together
__________________
EX
Legion, Fury, Xanadu, Wolfpack, NoS, TSU, LKSAB, Vgn, F-Crew, CT, Insomnia, Angels, VsN, Gross, Osiris, ROCK, XvX, Faceless, Unsullied, Haven, Carisan, RaGe, Carnage, Kittenz and EC
Currently
In ODDR Command
|
|
|
24 Jul 2017, 14:16
|
#23
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demort
Butcher so my guys make the effort of asking people to return to play but we have to tell them to play in other allies is stupid most the players we brought back would just quit pa if they didn't play with us as that's the main reason they returned but by all means if you feel you can recruit my players go ahead. As one thing you failed to see 90% of Kittenz is either returning players from retirement or brand new players from other games we play we take the effort inbetween rounds to talk to friends as to us gaming is more then playing it's about the community and being together
|
I think you missunderstand.
I want BIGGER tags, i dont want smaller tags, so alliances can play as big communities.
If you want to fill it with cheaters and other PA criminals or not, is not realy up to me to decide.
Also bigger tags would mean that 2nd tags would not be a thing as it is now, unless you have two tags now days your chances to win are far slimmer.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
Last edited by BloodyButcher; 24 Jul 2017 at 14:21.
|
|
|
24 Jul 2017, 19:00
|
#24
|
Anarchy Shadow
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nafferton, England
Posts: 324
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
how about you join kittenz butcher would be nice for you to play with me
__________________
EX
Legion, Fury, Xanadu, Wolfpack, NoS, TSU, LKSAB, Vgn, F-Crew, CT, Insomnia, Angels, VsN, Gross, Osiris, ROCK, XvX, Faceless, Unsullied, Haven, Carisan, RaGe, Carnage, Kittenz and EC
Currently
In ODDR Command
|
|
|
25 Jul 2017, 10:52
|
#25
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
I would agree Souls and CBA cant get into any tag ;p
And yes the problem is we have top alliances like ultores, p3ng, kittenz who have a full tag and then a reserve tag of players who wouldn't live up to the required standard for the main tag in that round. Those people would be active enough for lower tags but the trend now is to hoard players to weaken the rest of the universe.
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
25 Jul 2017, 11:34
|
#26
|
Dictator
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 634
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
Those people would be active enough for lower tags but the trend now is to hoard players to weaken the rest of the universe.
|
Quite simply incorrect.
Our second tag is for people who want to remain a part of the p3nguins community however do not wish to dedicate their time to be an "active" member of the alliance. We are not hoarding players for the sake of it.
|
|
|
25 Jul 2017, 12:30
|
#27
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Most alliances have a second tag.
|
|
|
25 Jul 2017, 13:08
|
#28
|
Mind-boggling
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 1,468
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
I would agree Souls and CBA cant get into any tag ;p
And yes the problem is we have top alliances like ultores, p3ng, kittenz who have a full tag and then a reserve tag of players who wouldn't live up to the required standard for the main tag in that round. Those people would be active enough for lower tags but the trend now is to hoard players to weaken the rest of the universe.
|
I disagree with all of this.
Firstly even Souls could get into any tag. Pretty sure he's played loads of T1 tags in the past.
Secondly, pretty sure the T1/T2 tags want to increase there chance of winning PA... Therefore they have more players to help them do this.... You mentioned 3 tags, Ult p3ng & kitten... All seemingly play to win. Please don't take anything away from tags trying to win this game gm...
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. (Winston Churchill)
R21-Randy Dandys Winners R21
1:9:5 -SoClose- -YetSoFar-
You have pending friend requests from Newt.
|
|
|
25 Jul 2017, 14:38
|
#29
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
im not trying to take anything away from them trying to win, what im saying is they have 20 or so players each in other tags for support etc because they wont be playing active enough.
Ultores wanted venox to play with them in R71 but wouldn't give him a spot in the proper tag and he wouldn't play in the Astatores tag so came to CT for 2 rounds. using p3ng as an example wasn't really fair since 3m0 was only about 10 planets but Astatores was in excess of 20, catz 29...
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
25 Jul 2017, 14:45
|
#30
|
Retard0r
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,164
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Wait till you see app, Cardi promise he has 150 members
__________________
-Chimpie
* We do not exist *
* G-II * NoS * VsN * Ascendancy * Osiris * xVx * Ultores *
|
|
|
25 Jul 2017, 15:03
|
#31
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
its just his cousins, big family!
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
25 Jul 2017, 17:44
|
#32
|
Trollbear
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 102
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Based on what's been seen in havoc and actually dealt with (shocker I know) one app member was running approx 7 planets.... So in that math if each app is doing that... expect maybe 200 planets
__________________
Former SiN + TGV
R59 - 62 ODDR
R63 HODORS slacker
R64 -67 Ultores
R68 tagless
|
|
|
25 Jul 2017, 20:32
|
#33
|
Blah Blah Blah
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 622
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkzidane
Based on what's been seen in havoc and actually dealt with (shocker I know) one app member was running approx 7 planets.... So in that math if each app is doing that... expect maybe 200 planets ![Tongue](images/smilies/tongue.gif)
|
I got 12
__________________
If you can't amaze people with your intelligence, confuse them with your bullshit.
BANANA ALLIANCE!!
|
|
|
25 Jul 2017, 20:56
|
#34
|
Trollbear
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 102
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
That's cause your so pro Hunter pal
__________________
Former SiN + TGV
R59 - 62 ODDR
R63 HODORS slacker
R64 -67 Ultores
R68 tagless
|
|
|
26 Jul 2017, 04:33
|
#35
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 7
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
What's an app anyway? :/
|
|
|
26 Jul 2017, 08:17
|
#36
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Waiting for butcher to sentence them as PA criminals lol.
|
|
|
26 Jul 2017, 14:47
|
#37
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
Waiting for butcher to sentence them as PA criminals lol.
|
Sorry, i think they got that sentence a long loooong time ago pal
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
26 Jul 2017, 16:30
|
#38
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Off with their heads!
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
26 Jul 2017, 16:49
|
#39
|
Knightly Protector
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Avalon
Posts: 590
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
Off with their heads!
|
Between the legs or above their shoulders?
__________________
TGV Ex-HC ![Frown](images/smilies/frown.gif)
-No I am not suffering from insanity. I am enjoying every minute of it.
Est Sularus oth Mithas
My Honour is My Life, My Life is My Honour
|
|
|
2 Aug 2017, 00:39
|
#40
|
Ubi concordia, ibi victor
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 152
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
I would agree Souls and CBA cant get into any tag ;p
And yes the problem is we have top alliances like ultores, p3ng, kittenz who have a full tag and then a reserve tag of players who wouldn't live up to the required standard for the main tag in that round. Those people would be active enough for lower tags but the trend now is to hoard players to weaken the rest of the universe.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
im not trying to take anything away from them trying to win, what im saying is they have 20 or so players each in other tags for support etc because they wont be playing active enough.
Ultores wanted venox to play with them in R71 but wouldn't give him a spot in the proper tag and he wouldn't play in the Astatores tag so came to CT for 2 rounds. using p3ng as an example wasn't really fair since 3m0 was only about 10 planets but Astatores was in excess of 20, catz 29...
|
Try removing the -1 eta for Allied Alliances, and make 50 of the alliances 60 members (no one needs 20 planets in "support" mode) count towards Score, and that whole thing might just get less popular...
EDIT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrikc
Allied alliances do not get their ETA reduced, they just get the ability to defend each other.
|
Thank You for correcting that, you are of course correct! What I meant was to remove the Allied Alliances option.
__________________
"I'm not saying I don't trust you, and I'm not saying I do. But I don't."
* We do not exist *
Last edited by Villeh; 2 Aug 2017 at 20:20.
|
|
|
2 Aug 2017, 04:28
|
#41
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 957
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by Villeh
Try removing the -1 eta for Allied Alliances, and make 50 of the alliances 60 members (no one needs 20 planets in "support" mode) count towards Score, and that whole thing might just get less popular...
|
Allied alliances do not get their ETA reduced, they just get the ability to defend each other.
I do agree about more counting towards score though. You don't need 20 spots for newbies/scanners/etc, and if you choose to house more 'support' planets (or 'single purpose planets'), it should reflect in your score.
|
|
|
2 Aug 2017, 16:22
|
#42
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 168
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrikc
Allied alliances do not get their ETA reduced, they just get the ability to defend each other.
I do agree about more counting towards score though. You don't need 20 spots for newbies/scanners/etc, and if you choose to house more 'support' planets (or 'single purpose planets'), it should reflect in your score.
|
100% agree, i don't see a reason why not all should be counting, or lets say 55 so not one or two guys can leave the alliance to ruin a potential win.
There is no reason why you can't get a top 50 rank as a scanner or as a def planet if you tried
|
|
|
2 Aug 2017, 16:46
|
#43
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: Playerbase / unwanted players / HC responsibilities
I agree. Top 50 for everyone!
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:20.
| |