User Name
Password

Go Back   Planetarion Forums > Non Planetarion Discussions > General Discussions
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 17 Feb 2006, 18:01   #1
meglamaniac
Born Sinful
 
meglamaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Loughborough, UK
Posts: 4,059
meglamaniac has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.meglamaniac has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.meglamaniac has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.meglamaniac has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.meglamaniac has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.meglamaniac has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.meglamaniac has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.meglamaniac has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.meglamaniac has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.meglamaniac has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.meglamaniac has ascended to a higher existance and no longer needs rep points to prove the size of his e-penis.
Has this been tried for weather forecasting?

So in one of my random brain spasms, I wondered about bayesian learning.
Many spam filters use it - it starts off crap, but as you teach it (by clicking "this is not spam" or "this is spam" when it gets it wrong), it "learns" the characteristics of your email, and after a couple of days it can filter with a very low false positive rate.

Could this be applied to weather? Or has it already been done?
So far as I'm aware from sort of general knowledge, current weather forecasting relies on networks of sensors and satelite data, which is then plugged into mathematical models, squeezed through the Met's latest supercomputer, and prettified for our viewing pleasure. The obvious downside to that is that you only really know the conditions where the sensors have sampled; anything else is extrapolation (guesswork), and small differences scaled up can mean the forecast for 3 days down the line is totally screwed.

Would it be possible to somehow combine the models with the bayesian techniques, so that the system could "learn" to spot when the weather is likely to do something unexpected that the rigid maths won't pick up?

Just a bit of a musing really.
__________________
Worth dying for. Worth killing for. Worth going to hell for. Amen.
meglamaniac is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2018