|
|
8 Dec 2004, 14:20
|
#51
|
cynic
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bishop Auckland Co. Durham
Posts: 8,809
|
Re: It used to be (The Football Hooliganism Thread.)
ah sorry, miscomprehension on my part
__________________
lazy
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 19:09
|
#52
|
Has Soup On His Head
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 10,095
|
Re: It used to be (The Football Hooliganism Thread.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrL_JaKiri
The post was intentended as a rebuttal to accusations of spam and the like, which would imply that Kura's point was that he posts at a low rate. Including the fact that he wasn't here for some of it means that when he was here he had a higher effective posting rate than the one specified; for example, if he had been away for all but one day of that period, he would still have a posting rate of 4 posts per day, but he would have made 4,000 posts on a single day.
See?
|
Even taking into account the 3-4 months i was away from the boards still brings us down to around 48 months of posting into 7000+ posts , assuming an average of 30 days in a month , giving us 1440 days into 7000 posts averaging around 4.75 posts per day, which even on a good day is pretty high for me. The fact that I was AWOL for a short period doesnt actually affect the overall statistic greatly because of the sheer volume of time ive actually been here.
__________________
And the Banker, inspired with a courage so new
It was matter for general remark,
Rushed madly ahead and was lost to their view
In his zeal to discover the Snark
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 20:05
|
#53
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Re: It used to be (The Football Hooliganism Thread.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurashima
Even taking into account the 3-4 months i was away from the boards still brings us down to around 48 months of posting into 7000+ posts , assuming an average of 30 days in a month , giving us 1440 days into 7000 posts averaging around 4.75 posts per day, which even on a good day is pretty high for me. The fact that I was AWOL for a short period doesnt actually affect the overall statistic greatly because of the sheer volume of time ive actually been here.
|
That post was only a demonstration of my point, which remains valid.
|
|
|
8 Dec 2004, 21:39
|
#54
|
Made of Twigs
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,459
|
Re: It used to be (The Football Hooliganism Thread.)
But its not 4 years though is it? When was the database of posts wiped?
__________________
If I hadn't seen such riches, I could live with being poor - James
It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I am - Muhammad Ali
So **** y'all, all of y'all; if y'all don't like me, blow me! - Dr. Dre
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 15:01
|
#55
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,442
|
Re: It used to be (The Football Hooliganism Thread.)
If you had delivered against Shakthar you'd be through, you didn't, they were definately a better side than you, last place was what you unfortuantely deserved.
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 15:22
|
#56
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Re: It used to be (The Football Hooliganism Thread.)
Shaktar are quite a rich team; much more so than Celtic. An aging midtable premier division side midfielder and a striker for a relegated team do not a champions league challenge make.
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 18:37
|
#57
|
Has Soup On His Head
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 10,095
|
Re: It used to be (The Football Hooliganism Thread.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrL_JaKiri
Shaktar are quite a rich team; much more so than Celtic. An aging midtable premier division side midfielder and a striker for a relegated team do not a champions league challenge make.
|
*cough*cough* Claudio Reyna *cough*cough* Tore Andre Flo *cough*cough*
__________________
And the Banker, inspired with a courage so new
It was matter for general remark,
Rushed madly ahead and was lost to their view
In his zeal to discover the Snark
|
|
|
9 Dec 2004, 18:44
|
#58
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Re: It used to be (The Football Hooliganism Thread.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurashima
*cough*cough* Claudio Reyna *cough*cough* Tore Andre Flo *cough*cough*
|
What the ****nuts are you on about? Where the **** did I say Sunderland had better players 2 years ago than Celtic had/have?
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:58.
| |