|
|
19 Jan 2010, 01:45
|
#51
|
You've Seen The Light
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,152
|
Re: round 35 politics
Shame theres not going to be a war this round, we've these awesome stats
__________________
First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin. Then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in my sight, shall snuff it.
|
|
|
19 Jan 2010, 11:32
|
#52
|
The Video Guy
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,279
|
So err...
Who's hitting who atm? Who's friendly with who?
__________________
Writing lists and taking names.
|
|
|
19 Jan 2010, 13:03
|
#53
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: So err...
certainly a good question
|
|
|
19 Jan 2010, 13:17
|
#54
|
zawze^asc
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norway.
Posts: 87
|
Re: round 35 politics
Ascendancy is dominating the top 10
Is it time for a block?
__________________
"Facts are just opinions, and opinons can be wrong, the only thing that's never wrong is confidence."
- Veronica Palmer, Better Off Ted
|
|
|
19 Jan 2010, 13:59
|
#55
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: So err...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny
Who's hitting who atm? Who's friendly with who?
|
DLR+Euphoria hitting Apprime. Apprime hitting Euphoria. It's all gal raiding heavy gals and shit though so it's not exactly intense.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
19 Jan 2010, 14:35
|
#56
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands (Crazy Dutchie)
Posts: 31
|
Re: round 35 politics
bah politics
|
|
|
19 Jan 2010, 14:47
|
#57
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: round 35 politics
Without politics this game would be less interesting than a one man game of bridge.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
19 Jan 2010, 15:17
|
#58
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: round 35 politics
"I win!"
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
20 Jan 2010, 18:14
|
#59
|
InSomniac
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Durham, England
Posts: 1,473
|
Re: round 35 politics
im disappointed in the staggeringly low level of bitching exhibited in this thread :/
does this mean people are so disenchanted with the game they are unable to hold a public slanging match anymore?
__________________
Runner up in the InSomnia 'Drunkest HC' competition - Currently on the wagon
Elysium | HR | eXilition | OuZo | ND | InSomnia | DLR
db battlegroup founder and spiritual leader
Sexytime HC of Belgians (#s3xytime)
Not so retired anymore....
|
|
|
20 Jan 2010, 19:13
|
#60
|
Drink is Good
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,122
|
Re: round 35 politics
No it means this round is over. gg.
__________________
Can we please have a moment of silence...........
|
|
|
20 Jan 2010, 19:16
|
#61
|
InSomniac
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Durham, England
Posts: 1,473
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alki
No it means this round is over. gg.
|
and who's fault is that?
__________________
Runner up in the InSomnia 'Drunkest HC' competition - Currently on the wagon
Elysium | HR | eXilition | OuZo | ND | InSomnia | DLR
db battlegroup founder and spiritual leader
Sexytime HC of Belgians (#s3xytime)
Not so retired anymore....
|
|
|
20 Jan 2010, 19:34
|
#62
|
Drink is Good
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,122
|
Re: round 35 politics
Everyone's but mine.
__________________
Can we please have a moment of silence...........
|
|
|
21 Jan 2010, 02:25
|
#63
|
InSomniac
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Durham, England
Posts: 1,473
|
Re: round 35 politics
How dare you absolve yourself of responsibility, bastard =/
__________________
Runner up in the InSomnia 'Drunkest HC' competition - Currently on the wagon
Elysium | HR | eXilition | OuZo | ND | InSomnia | DLR
db battlegroup founder and spiritual leader
Sexytime HC of Belgians (#s3xytime)
Not so retired anymore....
|
|
|
23 Jan 2010, 14:54
|
#64
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: round 35 politics
Worst. Round. Ever.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
23 Jan 2010, 15:20
|
#65
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,663
|
Re: So err...
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
DLR+Euphoria hitting Apprime. Apprime hitting Euphoria. It's all gal raiding heavy gals and shit though so it's not exactly intense.
|
So what's CT's doing ? a remake of their famous chicken dance... again ?
__________________
<smith> You're 15 and full of shit.
<Furious_George> no, im 22
|
|
|
23 Jan 2010, 16:05
|
#66
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: So err...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Makhil
So what's CT's doing ? a remake of their famous chicken dance... again ?
|
Sounds like the Chicken has been GM
|
|
|
23 Jan 2010, 16:19
|
#67
|
InSomniac
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Durham, England
Posts: 1,473
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Worst. Round. Ever.
|
it certainly has been one of the most uninteresting rounds in a while.
i wonder if CT will grow a spine for a change and use 2010 to turn over a new leaf...perhaps this will necessitate a change in command to a HC team who have some balls?
__________________
Runner up in the InSomnia 'Drunkest HC' competition - Currently on the wagon
Elysium | HR | eXilition | OuZo | ND | InSomnia | DLR
db battlegroup founder and spiritual leader
Sexytime HC of Belgians (#s3xytime)
Not so retired anymore....
|
|
|
23 Jan 2010, 16:31
|
#68
|
Paso Leaute
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 919
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mek
i wonder if CT will grow a spine for a change and use 2010 to turn over a new leaf...perhaps this will necessitate a change in command to a HC team who have some balls?
|
Some alliances are built for war (App and Asc) and some to avoid it; CT is very clearly in the latter category. Having built up such a reputation for rounds I presume its membership expects such a policy thus a coup to install more belligerent HC's seems very unlikely. Simply put CT HC reflects its members.
Even if not, they would get trashed in fairly short order without significant help.
__________________
An optimist may see a light where there is none, but why must the pessimist always run to blow it out?
|
|
|
23 Jan 2010, 23:15
|
#69
|
break it down!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,087
|
Re: round 35 politics
did the mighty Euphoria get owned?
__________________
I put the sex in dyslexia!
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 00:02
|
#70
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallinn
Posts: 734
|
Re: round 35 politics
nopes, we`re here:d
__________________
VISION FTW
THIS IS ULTORES
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 01:46
|
#71
|
break it down!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,087
|
Re: round 35 politics
so why is this round so boring if there's an ongoing war?
__________________
I put the sex in dyslexia!
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 03:53
|
#72
|
Guest
|
Re: round 35 politics
I heard a rumour that rnd 34 was starting again tonight???
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 11:29
|
#73
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: round 35 politics
Planetarion must be the only game where you're a coward if you don't join in an attack on an outnumbered opponent. Personally I think this round's boring because it looks like a repeat of so many rounds we've seen recently. I don't know about anyone else but if the most interesting question a round can pose is "can a big enough block form in time to save their top planets?" it's not exactly looking awesome. Hopefully next round no alliance that's miles better than the rest will actually play and something vaguely novel can happen on the political scene. Or, more likely than not, everyone can gal raid all round.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 14:36
|
#74
|
InSomniac
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Durham, England
Posts: 1,473
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Planetarion must be the only game where you're a coward if you don't join in an attack on an outnumbered opponent. Personally I think this round's boring because it looks like a repeat of so many rounds we've seen recently. I don't know about anyone else but if the most interesting question a round can pose is "can a big enough block form in time to save their top planets?" it's not exactly looking awesome. Hopefully next round no alliance that's miles better than the rest will actually play and something vaguely novel can happen on the political scene. Or, more likely than not, everyone can gal raid all round.
|
The universe sat back and let you and euphoria fight it out. That did not go according to plan (probably because of the odds being stacked against euph initially with the release of their coords on pawiki) as they had significant roid loss over the length of the 'war' compared to app's losses....this led to you guys opening up an 8 million score lead on the closest alliance by tick 300
what is more boring, that the universe gangs up on you, or that we all sit back and let you crush the other alliances one by one? (lets face it, the other alliances are understrength compared to App at present)
__________________
Runner up in the InSomnia 'Drunkest HC' competition - Currently on the wagon
Elysium | HR | eXilition | OuZo | ND | InSomnia | DLR
db battlegroup founder and spiritual leader
Sexytime HC of Belgians (#s3xytime)
Not so retired anymore....
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 14:54
|
#75
|
Guest
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
(lets face it, the other alliances are understrength compared to App at present)
|
Not a Dig Mek but who's fault is this should we be blamed for this and have the alliances recreate rnd 34 or maybe there is some other direction that can be taken ?
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 14:56
|
#76
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mek
or that we all sit back and let you crush the other alliances one by one?
|
You manage that pretty well on your own by crashing for roids
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 15:01
|
#77
|
InSomniac
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Durham, England
Posts: 1,473
|
Re: round 35 politics
and what direction would you recommend is taken?
if you were HC's of the alliances in direct opposition to App at the moment what would you do differently than what is being done now??
__________________
Runner up in the InSomnia 'Drunkest HC' competition - Currently on the wagon
Elysium | HR | eXilition | OuZo | ND | InSomnia | DLR
db battlegroup founder and spiritual leader
Sexytime HC of Belgians (#s3xytime)
Not so retired anymore....
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 15:16
|
#78
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mek
The universe sat back and let you and euphoria fight it out. That did not go according to plan (probably because of the odds being stacked against euph initially with the release of their coords on pawiki) as they had significant roid loss over the length of the 'war' compared to app's losses....this led to you guys opening up an 8 million score lead on the closest alliance by tick 300
what is more boring, that the universe gangs up on you, or that we all sit back and let you crush the other alliances one by one? (lets face it, the other alliances are understrength compared to App at present)
|
Apprime are quite clearly better than Euphoria, so I don't see why you should sit back and let Apprime stroll to victory, as if they're gone, you all are. The best (and most interesting) way to approach this one was to unite and level Apprime in the first 500 to 600 ticks, see what you can do about Euphoria if you aren't either App or Euphoria and take it from there.
So I'd think about my position rather than worrying about whether alliance X or Y was doing great out of it. Instead, you exposed Euphoria to Apprime, and Apprime are just left unchecked to pick people off as they please. And you know, alliances with a political plan to win usually make it more interesting.
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 15:25
|
#79
|
Guest
|
Re: round 35 politics
Well im not sure tbh but trying to gangbang and xp whore the way to a win will not work time and time again this has been tried and failed. Ok other than the well over due noobness between tek and matas today euph and dlr will have lost more in value than they will have walked away with giving us more and more.
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 15:30
|
#80
|
InSomniac
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Durham, England
Posts: 1,473
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebird
Well im not sure tbh but trying to gangbang and xp whore the way to a win will not work time and time again this has been tried and failed. Ok other than the well over due noobness between tek and matas today euph and dlr will have lost more in value than they will have walked away with giving us more and more.
|
so you want us to do something different, but you don't know what you want us to do....come on firebird, you are better than this m8
and to lokken....
whatever we do, we cannot win with the forum community.
if we block from the start, you whine that we have blocked from the start and people should be allowed to fight one on one
if we don't block from the start, let you fight one on one...you state we should have blocked from the start...
__________________
Runner up in the InSomnia 'Drunkest HC' competition - Currently on the wagon
Elysium | HR | eXilition | OuZo | ND | InSomnia | DLR
db battlegroup founder and spiritual leader
Sexytime HC of Belgians (#s3xytime)
Not so retired anymore....
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 15:31
|
#81
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebird
Well im not sure tbh but trying to gangbang and xp whore the way to a win will not work time and time again this has been tried and failed. Ok other than the well over due noobness between tek and matas today euph and dlr will have lost more in value than they will have walked away with giving us more and more.
|
This is nothing about XP. This is very much about value and crippling Apprime's income, as that's where their main danger comes from. Meanwhile, you're gaining more value.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mek
so you want us to do something different, but you don't know what you want us to do....come on firebird, you are better than this m8
and to lokken....
whatever we do, we cannot win with the forum community.
if we block from the start, you whine that we have blocked from the start and people should be allowed to fight one on one
if we don't block from the start, let you fight one on one...you state we should have blocked from the start...
|
Stop being soft. If you've got a plan and you execute it well regardless of what people say about it at the time, why should you care about what anyone says? Get results and no one can say shit.
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 15:34
|
#82
|
Apprime Troll HC
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 857
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mek
and what direction would you recommend is taken?
if you were HC's of the alliances in direct opposition to App at the moment what would you do differently than what is being done now??
|
Improve
Blocking up means the chosen tactics(if any) was shit and failed. Perhaps try to adapt to a situation and think something out instead of scanning some planets and throw it out to the masses and say "here attack and do your best"
You are fighting an alliance that put effort into thinking strategically every step on the way, both when it comes to attacking and defending. If the socalled "HCs" you talk about is not doing this then they should scan instead and leave the responsibility to someone with more creativity then the average bear
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 15:35
|
#83
|
Guest
|
Re: round 35 politics
This must be about xp as all that is happening is mass crashings for roids there is no 2 ways about it.
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 15:38
|
#84
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaNzI
Improve
Blocking up means the chosen tactics(if any) was shit and failed. Perhaps try to adapt to a situation and think something out instead of scanning some planets and throw it out to the masses and say "here attack and do your best"
You are fighting an alliance that put effort into thinking strategically every step on the way, both when it comes to attacking and defending.
|
This is not necessary to the degree you pretend. Ultimately you can be a really good alliance but if there are numbers against you (particularly early on) it doesn't matter for shit. Quite like the idea of Apprime thinking strategically though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebird
This must be about xp as all that is happening is mass crashings for roids there is no 2 ways about it.
|
My point is that it's far too late and strategies should have focused very much on value from the outset.
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 15:42
|
#85
|
Apprime Troll HC
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 857
|
Re: round 35 politics
What i mean is that an alliance can improve themselves and make strategies to take down their enemy. If they do this then it might not be necessary to block up. In my eyes alliances who needs a block to back them up has already failed and is just trying to repair damage already done
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 16:11
|
#86
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mek
The universe sat back and let you and euphoria fight it out. That did not go according to plan (probably because of the odds being stacked against euph initially with the release of their coords on pawiki)
|
If anyone seriously thinks that had a major impact beyond "made euphoria's hilarious security precautions look utterly retarded" they're fairly deluded.
Quote:
what is more boring, that the universe gangs up on you, or that we all sit back and let you crush the other alliances one by one? (lets face it, the other alliances are understrength compared to App at present)
|
I'd end the round now personally. It makes me feel ill how shit everyone seems to be though. Seven of the eight rounds preceding this have seen the existence of a massive block against the perceived #1 alliance. In every single one of these the alliance being blocked* against has won anyways.
AND THE BEST IDEA EVERYONE HAS THIS ROUND IS TO TRY AND DO THE EXACT SAME THING AGAIN?
*If you debate this word with me I will systematically disembowel your entire family.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 16:47
|
#87
|
Nobody
Join Date: May 2004
Location: London
Posts: 178
|
Re: round 35 politics
The game is stagnant. The player base is divided into several virtually unchanging groups and nobody cares enough about the game or the winners to change anything. It's not really surprising we get the same result round after round is it?
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 17:05
|
#88
|
Miles Teg
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dom City
Posts: 5,192
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by [ND]Byrney
The game is stagnant. The player base is divided into several virtually unchanging groups and nobody cares enough about the game or the winners to change anything. It's not really surprising we get the same result round after round is it?
|
Improve and improve more. Getting tools like munin and ldk has improven other alliances, but so far it seems that they are restricting access yet again.
Make everyone a battlecommander in your respective alliances and force your allies to do so.
Don't settle for second best (like Ascendancy did last round). Trust your members, kick them when they fail. Set examples. Lead by example, not by telling. Play for your alliance, not for your planetrank, as that always fails in the end.
Get a plan, stick to it. Go for value, go for kill ships. Go for flexibility. Focus your powers. Do not go for hugships. Don't land for xp. Land killwaves sometimes where you lose 500k and they lose 1 mill after salvage. Focus your attacks, do not newbie bash. Don't make enemies you do not want to deal with (Asc cath fi this round anyone?)
Play competent, play against your enemy.
If you do all this, then we can start about how to play politics (which frankly I know little about)
__________________
Audentes Fortuna Iuvat
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 17:05
|
#89
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by [ND]Byrney
The game is stagnant. The player base is divided into several virtually unchanging groups and nobody cares enough about the game or the winners to change anything. It's not really surprising we get the same result round after round is it?
|
Horseshit. The game has pretty much always been divided into certain groups. And if you care enough to block how is it that you don't care enough to do something, anything, else? The amazing thing is it's not even that difficult to change things to the extent that the round would look a bit different from the same shit, different day affair we've had going on recently.
I must admit I do sort of hope the apprime/ascendancy thing fades away. Although I definitely think it improved pa for a while it's beginning to look in danger of becoming painfully shit.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
Last edited by JonnyBGood; 24 Jan 2010 at 17:17.
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 17:29
|
#90
|
Nobody
Join Date: May 2004
Location: London
Posts: 178
|
Re: round 35 politics
How does blocking take any considerable effort? It's a case of saying to some other ally (or 2 or 3) "hey they're getting dominant, lets hit them" and them saying "sure". It's not taxing stuff for the common member is it and lets face it that's the problem. If people don't want to wake up to send defence regularly or don't care enough to make sure they're around to JGP and calc their attacks then what can you do? Kick them I suppose but at the end of the day it's a game that we play for (limited) entertainment but these days mostly for the community in which we play.
Sure everyone loves to win but a lot of players just don't care enough to put the effort in that's necessary to run a top planet in a competitive alliance. Similarly I don't care enough to argue on here if you're just going to rant on vaguely about the never ending simple strategies we continue to ignore in this vastly in depth game.
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 17:35
|
#91
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
You manage that pretty well on your own by crashing for roids
|
Where's ya drakes gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebird
Well im not sure tbh but trying to gangbang and xp whore the way to a win will not work time and time again this has been tried and failed. Ok other than the well over due noobness between tek and matas today euph and dlr will have lost more in value than they will have walked away with giving us more and more.
|
Havent we landed on you with 0 losses?
Repeat performance available apon request.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaNzI
Improve
Blocking up means the chosen tactics(if any) was shit and failed. Perhaps try to adapt to a situation and think something out instead of scanning some planets and throw it out to the masses and say "here attack and do your best"
You are fighting an alliance that put effort into thinking strategically every step on the way, both when it comes to attacking and defending. If the socalled "HCs" you talk about is not doing this then they should scan instead and leave the responsibility to someone with more creativity then the average bear
|
Session Start: Wed Jan 20 16:54:55 2010
Session Ident: #Apprime
03[16:54] * Now talking in #Apprime
03[16:54] * Topic is 'apply to apprime : http://www.pastebin.org/78170 recruiting ppl who have accountsharing skills + vnc knowlegde'
03[16:54] * Set by MaxPimpinnnnnn on Wed Jan 20 16:47:06
Hmm ... Thats certainly one way to improve
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 19:01
|
#92
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Noruega
Posts: 2,999
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paisley
Where's ya drakes gone?
|
Heh, back into prod perhaps? There is such a thing as salvage you know.
__________________
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of War"
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 19:05
|
#93
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by isildurx
Heh, back into prod perhaps? There is such a thing as salvage you know.
|
Safe to say the Salvage doesn't cover it.
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 19:07
|
#94
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paisley
Where's ya drakes gone?
|
Ship Order (delivery in tick 384 at 20:00)
Drake 10000
hi
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 19:10
|
#95
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
Ship Order (delivery in tick 384 at 20:00)
Drake 10000
hi
|
still missing 2k drakes 889 cents
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 19:11
|
#96
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Noruega
Posts: 2,999
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paisley
Safe to say the Salvage doesn't cover it.
|
It's not odd that fail alliances keep crashing when you cant even calculate simple math. I mean, ****, the planetarion bcalc even shows you how much salvage the defence gets and still you cant figure it out.
Dude what is 2k drakes and 889 cents compared to the 200k+ value attackers lost?
__________________
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of War"
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 19:30
|
#97
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Originally Posted by isildurx
It's not odd that fail alliances keep crashing when you cant even calculate simple math. I mean, ****, the planetarion bcalc even shows you how much salvage the defence gets and still you cant figure it out.
Dude what is 2k drakes and 889 cents compared to the 200k+ value attackers lost?
|
You forgotten about your roid loss?
Just a question if you can get them back or have to resort to using a farm.
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 19:36
|
#98
|
Guest
|
Re: round 35 politics
Quote:
Havent we landed on you with 0 losses?
Repeat performance available apon request.
|
Think the answer ure looking for is no speak to that nice cat and thank him for me but im not here to bitch about this i just really would rather know is their really no other way the other alliances can improve there is no way app has all the best players there are plenty more of you out there so maybe put ure heads together and think of a plan of action.
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 19:37
|
#99
|
Drink is Good
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,122
|
Re: round 35 politics
Im sat here trying to type a reply to your idiocy, yet the words just cant come to mind.
__________________
Can we please have a moment of silence...........
|
|
|
24 Jan 2010, 19:43
|
#100
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 401
|
Re: round 35 politics
Hahaha, Paisley you're so deluded it's hilarious!
On topicish: other than Asc (and now App) creating fortress galaxies, when was the last time an alliance actually had a proper tactical plan going into the round, other than simply trying to be the best alliance? Usually I think politics are a great part of PA, the metagame is what makes PA so different to games like Travian etc, but when we go into a round with one alliance that is clearly better, there's not much else you can do with politics other than to form a massive block to take them out, and this repetitiveness is starting to get boring! Alliances need to get better (unlikely), or start thinking of some proper tactics. That said, there's not that much choice left in the game play because PATeam continues to limit options. Sigh.
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:08.
| |