|
|
3 Dec 2015, 18:36
|
#401
|
Paso Leaute
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 919
|
Re: R64 predictions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adapt
so where did Tias score go then?
|
You are misunderstanding, the person kicked for the FC has nothing to do with Tia who left 19 ticks previously. FL lost two people yesterday, but the only one that could possibly have affected the before/after score differential between FL/Ult and p3n was the one kicked for recalling, so Tia's departure was not at issue.
Since it has been said he did not count, then my theorizing was meaningless in any event.
__________________
An optimist may see a light where there is none, but why must the pessimist always run to blow it out?
|
|
|
3 Dec 2015, 18:42
|
#402
|
Leader Of The Gang
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 455
|
Re: R64 predictions
Quote:
Originally Posted by fortran
Tia score was the main factor in the score drop no doubt. And idd he was not kicked. But there were also one kicked, but that one wasn't counting much to score.
|
ah okay i was just wondering sorry i have misunderstood!
__________________
Round 60 - Ultores - Rank 67th.
Round 75 - CT - Rank 19th - Galaxy Win.
Round 80 - Ultores - Rank 16th.
Round 81 - Ultores - Rank 73rd.
Round 83 - Ultores - Rank 16th.
Round 91 - Lucky7 - Rank 50th.
Round 92 - Lucky7 - Rank 39th.
|
|
|
3 Dec 2015, 20:14
|
#403
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 846
|
Re: R64 predictions
Quote:
Originally Posted by fortran
A player who recalled in the last minute in the Agares' FC was kicked
|
No I left FL. I was not apart of the FC nor did I crash. 8m score planet left tag causing a 4.5m score drop.
__________________
R50-55 Faceless
|
|
|
3 Dec 2015, 20:17
|
#404
|
Retard0r
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,164
|
Re: R64 predictions
fortran is probably talking about offmind, not Tia...
__________________
-Chimpie
* We do not exist *
* G-II * NoS * VsN * Ascendancy * Osiris * xVx * Ultores *
|
|
|
3 Dec 2015, 21:01
|
#405
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 168
|
Re: R64 predictions
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrunkenViking
fortran is probably talking about offmind, not Tia...
|
Trusting offmind to do anything vs ult have to be the biggest mistake ever. Or trusting offmind at all would probably be stupid
|
|
|
3 Dec 2015, 21:04
|
#406
|
Retard0r
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,164
|
Re: R64 predictions
I trust him!!!
__________________
-Chimpie
* We do not exist *
* G-II * NoS * VsN * Ascendancy * Osiris * xVx * Ultores *
|
|
|
3 Dec 2015, 21:11
|
#407
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 168
|
Re: R64 predictions
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrunkenViking
I trust him!!!
|
Yea but you're ult:P He's basically an joeseph/ult drone already. Get him to play for you instead! ****ed up for two alliances in one round, got to be some kind of record
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 01:02
|
#408
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 110
|
Re: R64 predictions
Quote:
Originally Posted by fortran
Seems through news some people recalled in the last tick before the FC crashed. I know some were attackers, I won't bother to check if all were on the attackers side. But this probably made the calc better to def.
|
There were 4 hostile planets who recalled from the FC.
One was ofc offmind, his 34k locust didn't really affect the calc.
One was a pingu planet. Which I assumed, sent a lot of FR or FI and didn't want to risk his/her value. This made the calc better
The other two recalled last tick and were very small planet on of which we don't have intel, one we as CT which could very well be wrong intel... Both were small and didn't really matter tho.
LIke I said, our calc was covered even counting the full fleets of every attacker. The main thing that was different from the result and the calc was that a couple of attackers didn't send full fleets - this was of course to be expected but we couldn't count on it.
__________________
[G-II][Quha][LDK][Apprime][Ultores] - Xerxes
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 01:53
|
#409
|
Guest
|
Re: R64 predictions
I am still stunned a 3 alliance tag team failed, certainly need to go and take their heads for a good shakes.
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 07:49
|
#410
|
Blah Blah Blah
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 622
|
Re: R64 predictions
Headcalced at eta9!
__________________
If you can't amaze people with your intelligence, confuse them with your bullshit.
BANANA ALLIANCE!!
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 15:21
|
#411
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 145
|
Re: R64 predictions
A bad day for pa when BF allow a player to land on them for the round win haha, glad i'm quitting this shizzle.
__________________
The only thing neccesary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing
Ultores peon
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 15:24
|
#412
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R64 predictions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight
A bad day for pa when BF allow a player to land on them for the round win haha, glad i'm quitting this shizzle.
|
Thats only partly true.
BF has reported their own planets for the incident. If their own HCs says its cheating, they will most likely get deleted, and roids/XP deducted from jay, and the gal win will be handed over to 7:4.
Idiocy should be punished, and this time im sure it will. If i was in 6:8 i would be realy realy pissed at my gal m8s who decided to ruin their chance for gal win.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 15:28
|
#413
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 517
|
Re: R64 predictions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight
A bad day for pa when BF allow a player to land on them for the round win haha, glad i'm quitting this shizzle.
|
By your rationale I am counting 60 to 80 planets being closed for landing / escorting in 6:8. Ranking will be only final two weeks after round finishes.
If we look into the rest of the uni, I am afraid even HR will have a chance on winning tag.
__________________
mxy
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 15:37
|
#414
|
Guest
|
Re: R64 predictions
Glad to hear BF have reported it.
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 15:40
|
#415
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 517
|
Re: R64 predictions
I bet clouds reported more than one time.
__________________
mxy
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 15:45
|
#416
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 31
|
Re: R64 predictions
Hilarious - well played BF
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 16:12
|
#418
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: R64 predictions
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaUlZiToS
|
Why do you care so much if you know he didn't do anything wrong?
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 16:16
|
#419
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 67
|
Re: R64 predictions
So i need to see all this bulshit and dont anserw?
Ok. Will do that
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 16:17
|
#420
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: R64 predictions
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaUlZiToS
So i need to see all this bulshit and dont anserw?
Ok. Will do that
|
Great!
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 16:21
|
#421
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 517
|
Re: R64 predictions
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
Why do you care so much if you know he didn't do anything wrong?
|
So ppl quote him with more whine.
__________________
mxy
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 16:24
|
#422
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 67
|
Re: R64 predictions
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 16:26
|
#423
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 29
|
Re: R64 predictions
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 16:50
|
#424
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 40
|
Re: R64 predictions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight
A bad day for pa when BF allow a player to land on them for the round win haha, glad i'm quitting this shizzle.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Thats only partly true.
BF has reported their own planets for the incident. If their own HCs says its cheating, they will most likely get deleted, and roids/XP deducted from jay, and the gal win will be handed over to 7:4.
Idiocy should be punished, and this time im sure it will. If i was in 6:8 i would be realy realy pissed at my gal m8s who decided to ruin their chance for gal win.
|
Enlighten us please with more info about this incident. As far as i heard this was an escort like all the other escorts we see on a daily basis.
__________________
Good things come to those who wait
[HA]
[P3ng]
[FANG]
[Vikings]
[Faceless]
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 17:00
|
#425
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: R64 predictions
I support this cheating.
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 17:14
|
#426
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 168
|
Re: R64 predictions
Even if it was farming what can they do? The rules states:
Farming is defined as: an agreement between the attacker(s) and defender(s) where one or both benefit. This includes farming roids, ships, salvage and XP.
Punishment 1st offence: All planets involved warned. Farm closed. Close farmer if there are obvious links between farmer and farm.
This is the first offense, so what is there to do? And doubt anyone will show their WA log planning this so finding an obvious link might be hard.
Last edited by Sandvold; 4 Dec 2015 at 17:21.
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 17:17
|
#427
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 517
|
Re: R64 predictions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandvold
Even if it was farming what can they do? The rules states:
Farming is defined as: an agreement between the attacker(s) and defender(s) where one or both benefit. This includes farming roids, ships, salvage and XP.
Punishment 1st offence: All planets involved warned. Farm closed. Close farmer if there are obvious links between farmer and farm.
This is the first offense, so what is there to do?
|
There you are wrong. Ace directives while applying rules change with the wind, temperature and are dependent of his breakfast.
__________________
mxy
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 17:21
|
#428
|
a bucket
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chatham, UK
Posts: 1,073
|
Re: R64 predictions
Presumably it is quite difficult to prove that there was an agreement particularly in escort cases like this.
Anyone know what kind of evidence the multi hunters actually need to be able to say that yes this was farming rather than the usual escorting?
__________________
Proud to have been TGV!
aargh! died in Jenova! | idled in ROCK | disappointed in Audentes | been Roguish | p-p-previously a p-p-p3nguin
Ascendancy
Otterly an Otter.
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 17:22
|
#429
|
Hibernating
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Team Kesha
Posts: 1,621
|
Re: R64 predictions
#prayforagar3s
__________________
[InSomnia]
Official designated driver
[ToF] - [eXilition] - [Rock] - [Denial] - [DLR] - [eVolution] - [ODDR] - [HR] - [Ultores] - [Apprime] - [Ironborn]
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 17:26
|
#430
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 517
|
Re: R64 predictions
Quote:
Originally Posted by booji
Presumably it is quite difficult to prove that there was an agreement particularly in escort cases like this.
Anyone know what kind of evidence the multi hunters actually need to be able to say that yes this was farming rather than the usual escorting?
|
Based on history, if the player is related to Raul, he and Raul will be closed. MHs know there are only two real brazilian players. They won't need proof.
__________________
mxy
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 20:52
|
#431
|
Blah Blah Blah
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 622
|
Re: R64 predictions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
I support this cheating.
|
Gj
__________________
If you can't amaze people with your intelligence, confuse them with your bullshit.
BANANA ALLIANCE!!
|
|
|
4 Dec 2015, 21:03
|
#432
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 145
|
Re: R64 predictions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
I guarantee you that Ultores won't win.
|
__________________
The only thing neccesary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing
Ultores peon
|
|
|
5 Dec 2015, 04:05
|
#433
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The_White_House
Posts: 60
|
Re: R64 predictions
nice post knight lol clouds FAIL!
__________________
Sincerely Barrack_Obama Leader of United states and a Spokesperson for Blue Tuba-Karma
part of the FanG Gang Ooooooomph!
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:03.
| |