Planetarion Forums - Congratulations eXilition

Gio2k · 18 Aug 2006, 21:29

At least 1up tried to stop eX this round, i didn't see Omen target 1up at all last round. Besides, whose job is it to challenge the number 1 alliance, but #2's? Subh could have tried to take on eXi, and i am almost sure they would have failed*, but at least they could have said they tried.

* Sadly, i believe no alliance in this game can withstand more than 3 full nights of income from exilition, or 1up (when their military is running properly). So basically, it looks like the winners of next round will be either eX or 1up. And if eX doesn't play, then 1up wins.

The Real Arfy · 18 Aug 2006, 23:21

Long story short, people think ending #2 is great, and they think that people won't notice that they did **** all during the round in all reality.

Pilgrim · 19 Aug 2006, 01:16

[quote=Tomkat]He's probably 1up*. I've never heard of the guy either but his bitterness and his "I used to respect your posts and now they is full of rubbish, yo!" attitude screams 1up

(not that I'm saying all 1up posters are like that - it's almost like he's a caricature of the standard 1up poster though - of which I used to be, myself)

QUOTE]

I think everyone with the shocking flaming posts are generally ***** from 1up.

Stifler · 19 Aug 2006, 01:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pilgrim

I think everyone with the shocking flaming posts are generally ***** from 1up.

oh the irony

N.B. learn how to use the quote function

SkyHead · 19 Aug 2006, 02:32

What about 1up taking a rest next round aswell, leaving for a much more open round? And then both 1up and EXil comes back to a real fight. That'd be fun

Pilgrim · 19 Aug 2006, 02:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyHead

What about 1up taking a rest next round aswell, leaving for a much more open round? And then both 1up and EXil comes back to a real fight. That'd be fun

Havent 1up been taking a rest this round, according to their members theyve only been logging in once or twice a day to ensure their free accounts arent removed due to inactivity

SkyHead · 19 Aug 2006, 02:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by mazzelaar

I'll reiterate for the slow ones among you. 1up weren *not* good enough this round to beat eXilition 1 on 1. If eXilition were to be beaten it would have required a coalition of more than one alliance. In this instance 1up and Subh with help from xVx.

This round? ;p

And we all know you would have made sure of Subh's destruction the moment you saw the opportunity, also at this point 1up was way infront of Subh and still is, so this would basicly mean Subh would go for #2nd either way. It'd for sure require some heavy pounding to take EXil below Subh.

Stifler · 19 Aug 2006, 03:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyHead

This round? ;p

And we all know you would have made sure of Subh's destruction the moment you saw the opportunity, also at this point 1up was way infront of Subh and still is, so this would basicly mean Subh would go for #2nd either way. It'd for sure require some heavy pounding to take EXil below Subh.

umm subh were in 2nd place with ~20k more roids then 1up when they decided that they had no backbone

So they would have been in a better position to win if exi had been taken down enough

Lastly, you say 1up would have turned on Subh but again if this happened it would have happened at a time exi were out of the running for #1 and it would just have been a fight for #1 between 1up/subh (and since they would be starting in with a roid/value advantage they would have had a good chance of being there at tick stop)

SkyHead · 19 Aug 2006, 04:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stifler

umm subh were in 2nd place with ~20k more roids then 1up when they decided that they had no backbone

So they would have been in a better position to win if exi had been taken down enough

Lastly, you say 1up would have attacked Subh but again if this happened it would have happened at a time exi were out of the running for #1 and it would just have been a fight for #1 between 1up/subh (and since they would be starting in with a roid/value advantage they would have had a good chance of being there at tick stop)

If you read the post again, I never said 1up would have attacked Subh. And EXil would have turned on Subh (more like the switching off firepower like in r15, by going for higher xp gains to ensure the lead) and the roid lead would dramaticly be changed, while 1up making most probably heavy gains, Subh would surely lose alot.

mazzelaar · 19 Aug 2006, 07:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyHead

If you read the post again, I never said 1up would have attacked Subh. And EXil would have turned on Subh (more like the switching off firepower like in r15, by going for higher xp gains to ensure the lead) and the roid lead would dramaticly be changed, while 1up making most probably heavy gains, Subh would surely lose alot.

I somehow don't think eXilition would have allowed even a weakened 1up to grow unchecked.

mazzelaar · 19 Aug 2006, 07:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyHead

This round? ;p

1up were good enough in the past. We just didn't play as politically well.

The Real Arfy · 19 Aug 2006, 08:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyHead

If you read the post again, I never said 1up would have attacked Subh.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyHead

And we all know you would have made sure of Subh's destruction the moment you saw the opportunity

What?

P.S. Don't get all pedantic on my ass ;p

ChipZ^ · 19 Aug 2006, 11:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pilgrim/Mighteh/max

*snip*

My god will you guys please stop posting, or better still actaully think for a few seconds before smashing random keys while drooling over the keyboard.

Mazz is *NOT* whining about subh's lack of hostility against eX, hes stating a simple fact.

Subh join 1up (and possibly xVx) -> attack eX : subh and 1up have a *chance* (even if slight) to get #1 place

Subh DONT attack eX : Subh *garantee* eX the round win and ofc thier own downfall from 1up getting pissed off.

Now you can still argue if they had attacked eX, then we would have pwned subh first, but having 3 alliances attacking you and performing FCs would be a fkn hard war. Wether subh would have crumbled after a few nights inc is neither here nore there but in not attacking eX they sealed they own fate and our win.

p.s I think this "block" should have been formed far sooner to attack us to allow a reasonably chance it would knock us from #1. I assume not all allainces wanted a war earlier tho.

Achilles · 19 Aug 2006, 13:15

Excellent summary ChipZ^. Unfortunately you are unlikely to be able to shine the light of common sense into pits of ignorance as deep as those on show here.

Mighteh · 21 Aug 2006, 15:15

i am soooo getting deja vu right now. just names changed

eXi => 1up
1up => Omen
SuBH => InS
and
hmm....
xVx => NewDawn ?

tell me I am wrong

(i know you will anyhow)

Jackal2112 · 21 Aug 2006, 15:38

I see not much has changed since I quit..

The only thing that seems to be missing in this thread are rumors about account sharing? what happened?

Alki · 22 Aug 2006, 11:38

people thought you died.

what a shame

Paisley · 22 Aug 2006, 11:56

I now see omen are #2
Well Played Keiz and the gang.

Achilles · 22 Aug 2006, 12:16

Yes, the enviable "First Losers" positions is now theirs, they will keep it with ease. Of course anyone with even a shred of insight or math ability would have realised that weeks ago

furssie · 22 Aug 2006, 12:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paisley

I now see omen are #2
Well Played Keiz and the gang.

Your precious #2 is in their hands eh.

Treveler · 22 Aug 2006, 12:49

I'm sure Omen are very proud about ending #2.

Its not like they are a shite alliance like Subh or anything...

Paisley · 22 Aug 2006, 15:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Treveler

I'm sure Omen are very proud about ending #2.

Its not like they are a shite alliance like Subh or anything...

Not as if Subh is claiming to be PA best alliance...
I think that is your maw saying your tea is out.

Alki · 24 Aug 2006, 09:24

haha you certainly toned your voice down paisley what happened dude

Xeno · 26 Aug 2006, 10:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by lokken

Because they choose to compare themselves to 1up when really, 1up give themselves a tougher job playing round after round.

If Exilition showed the same consistency, we could have some kind of accurate comparison.

Whereas you normally make sense to me, Lokken, you every so often come up with odd comments such as this one right here.

Xeno

lokken · 26 Aug 2006, 12:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xeno

Whereas you normally make sense to me, Lokken, you every so often come up with odd comments such as this one right here.

Xeno

Yet managed to prove no justification for that belief whatsoever.

LordNieminen · 3 Sep 2006, 19:09

Just a comment out of nowhere.. was just browsing old forums so I could and most likely I'm wrong.

Simple fact of life.. exil/1up.. who cares, majority of players are anyways suckeh in comparison to old times and round victories do mean absolutely nothing thou i'm getting sick pleasure to hear that exilition is beating 1up still even if I have no clue who are playing in exil these days but I bet it has more old players than 1up what I readed to be bragging a lot to be best when they where here and most of exil's players where still playing in ******** after evacuating pa to pia.

Anyways there's no returning to first 8 rounds of pa as there's the new online game generation going on wow/cov/eve etc.. what are in the end less demanding than pa ever was even if you play in the top echelons in them.

tjaa.. pla-ne-tia was censored wtf.. wierdos moderating.