|
3 Mar 2003, 00:46
|
#1
|
Commodore
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,176
|
Cathaar Crusier Fleets: Universal Domination
We all laugh at the ETA of the Mantis pod, everyone is quick to point out that with the really high ETA defence is reletively easy to get. This is true, however if you send a fleet that will really hammer any defence, then people will think twice.
the newly improved Guardians, sent along with Tarantulas, would provide very effective cover from the FR/Co classes (though it doesnt do all that well against FI, heh) doing easily enough damage to make either the defending planet run in the first place, or make defenders think twice before launching.
If you had a fleet that was 50% Tarantula, 45% Guardian and 5% Mantis Pod, the damage you can deal (as a Cathaar) is enormous, plus you still have flak that also fires EMP - imo this combination would be very effective in R9. Especially since most anti CR units (with exception to the Corsair and Sentinel) are either CO or FR - ph00d for the Guardians.
Alliance defence can be earnt by destroying PDS for them with your Guardians, and in certain situations Tarantulas can be sent as defence against DE or even FR fleets.
I am wondering if any potential Cathaars out there had considered using said fleet - the only problem with it is that to beuild an effective fleet takes a long time, both in research and in production of numbers, and a conventional BW/Beetle fleet could suffice in the mean time.
__________________
#Strategy ; #Support - Sovereign
--- --- ---
"The Cake is a Lie."
|
|
|
3 Mar 2003, 05:18
|
#2
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
I hope to be able to use the Cr fleet, but it's really going to have to wait to see how the universe pans out again.
If Xan Fi are around in large numbers i'll be sticking with the Beetles and Widows, but otherwise i'll probably make the effort to get the Bs cons quickly.
I've also debated scorpions, but im not altogether sure they are neccessary, given that - as you said - there ain't many Fi that target Cr/Bs.
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
|
|
|
3 Mar 2003, 08:47
|
#3
|
home wrecker
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The other side of the galaxy ;)
Posts: 1,041
|
I would add scorps to that fleet, but don't expect to hit anywhere except in para with it :/
__________________
May the Farce be with you...
#pr0nstars - a pimp is for life, not just for christmas
|
|
|
3 Mar 2003, 09:27
|
#4
|
.:. Adelante .:.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 129
|
Re: Cathaar Crusier Fleets: Universal Domination
Quote:
Originally posted by Ultimate Newbie
I am wondering if any potential Cathaars out there had considered using said fleet - the only problem with it is that to beuild an effective fleet takes a long time, both in research and in production of numbers, and a conventional BW/Beetle fleet could suffice in the mean time.
|
Considered it ? Yes i have.
Tested it ? Yes i have.
Using it ? No i wont.
Why ?
a. ETA is 5
b. Helping out friends will be hard
c. Takes a long time before you reach CR and BS, before then the war may already been won or lost.
I would like to add, i really thought the cr bs fleet was very effective during the Beta when i tested it, but in r9 it will most likely not work. The eta of the fleet is high enough to get enough defence vs this fleet, as you already mentioned, Corsair and Sentinals are the ships that will target your CR, and those ships will be around allot, and with such a eta....
Maybe if your alliance / block is losing the war, and you need a way to secure your roids, and prevent losing precious ships, you could go to CR and BS, but if i was you I'd go Beetle, Roach, Blackwidow, Astropod and Spiders as Crystal Sink.
If you do go CR and BS, add Spiders to it (And allot !!) to block your Xan opponents rather then trying to kill them with your guardians, and to block FI and CO defence.
__________________
<@[NoZ]TheZeeker> WE ZHALL NEVER ZURRENDER
The World Seen From A Cathaar's View...
|
|
|
3 Mar 2003, 10:50
|
#5
|
Guest
|
Cathaar Mantis
The fantastic thing about the cathaar is you HAVE to start with the small ships. Then as you get your cruisers and battleships you can look at the universe and see if you can use the large ships or just stick with the small ones, makes cathaar quite flexible and allows alot of player choice.
Personally i think i will use them at sum point, as it shud throw some people and create new options.
The tarantula particularly as it is stil a very good ship in parellel/cluster defence against peg fleets.
|
|
|
3 Mar 2003, 10:59
|
#6
|
Ark-miner wannabe
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,005
|
Re: Cathaar Crusier Fleets: Universal Domination
Quote:
Originally posted by Ultimate Newbie
however if you send a fleet that will really hammer any defence, then people will think twice.
|
Real defenders usually dont think twice, they send if they got anything home
|
|
|
3 Mar 2003, 13:49
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 8
|
I have been thinking of using a cr fleet, yes. It depends on what the situation is like when they become available. I certainly found that in r7 (when I was cathaar) the cr/bs roiding fleet was very effective and having a second roiding fleet is never a bad thing IMO.
__________________
r3: 111:13:15 n00b
r4: 55:1:9 RB officer
r5: 9:2:24 RB officer
r6: retired
r7: 20:8:10 WP
r8: 43:4:1 WP
r9: 21:5:2 WP officer
r9.5 xx:xx:xx WP officer
JP
|
|
|
3 Mar 2003, 14:13
|
#8
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
Quote:
Originally posted by phjvp
I have been thinking of using a cr fleet, yes. It depends on what the situation is like when they become available. I certainly found that in r7 (when I was cathaar) the cr/bs roiding fleet was very effective and having a second roiding fleet is never a bad thing IMO.
|
Yeah, thats what i found too.
The extra eta really didnt make all that much difference.
Last round i started late and as a consequence didnt get to build them - mind you, with the number of Xan around i probably wouldn't have bothered anyway.
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
|
|
|
3 Mar 2003, 14:25
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bromley
Posts: 806
|
Re: Cathaar Crusier Fleets: Universal Domination
Quote:
Originally posted by Ultimate Newbie
I am wondering if any potential Cathaars out there had considered using said fleet
|
I am
__________________
Proud to be a pr0nstar and [TiT]
Proud to have been:
[_DoG_]HC
[ICE]DC
[Deus]
[Tok'ra]
[Ostraka]
www.tit.aresexy.com
|
|
|
3 Mar 2003, 14:30
|
#10
|
.:. Adelante .:.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 129
|
but dont forget, round 9, the more rounds that pass, the less players stick to planetarion, the more good players are left, few "noobs" around, i see round 9 as the most hardcore round yet, with the most active and skilled players around, it will be harder to use a eta 5 fleet then in round 7.
__________________
<@[NoZ]TheZeeker> WE ZHALL NEVER ZURRENDER
The World Seen From A Cathaar's View...
|
|
|
3 Mar 2003, 16:03
|
#11
|
Guest
|
Roaches freeze Tarantulas/mantis well and Destroyers and other anti-BS ships are free to fire at Guardians. Im Cath this round and I wont use CR fleet for roiding.
|
|
|
3 Mar 2003, 22:52
|
#12
|
Commodore
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,176
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bad Society
Roaches freeze Tarantulas/mantis well and Destroyers and other anti-BS ships are free to fire at Guardians. Im Cath this round and I wont use CR fleet for roiding.
|
The Guardians would return fire onto the Roaches, blowing them out of the stars - leaving more Tarants open to stun DE or whatever is firing on the heavily armoured Guardians.
That's also assuming that the DE got there in time
__________________
#Strategy ; #Support - Sovereign
--- --- ---
"The Cake is a Lie."
|
|
|
3 Mar 2003, 22:56
|
#13
|
Commodore
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,176
|
Re: Re: Cathaar Crusier Fleets: Universal Domination
Quote:
Originally posted by TheSeeker
If you do go CR and BS, add Spiders to it (And allot !!) to block your Xan opponents rather then trying to kill them with your guardians, and to block FI and CO defence.
|
Beetles would do better against the Sentinels/Corsairs, surely.
the Roach shouldnt prove much of a problem after tick 2 unless there are too may FR around for the guardian to hit them.
a combination of both perhaps?
__________________
#Strategy ; #Support - Sovereign
--- --- ---
"The Cake is a Lie."
|
|
|
4 Mar 2003, 00:34
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: #aus
Posts: 131
|
roach defender combo would knock the ship out of tula/guardian combo due to init..
__________________
Lethal Roar of the Gabba Pride - [Lions]
#aus
|
|
|
4 Mar 2003, 01:38
|
#15
|
.:. Adelante .:.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 129
|
Re: Re: Re: Cathaar Crusier Fleets: Universal Domination
Quote:
Originally posted by Ultimate Newbie
Beetles would do better against the Sentinels/Corsairs, surely.
the Roach shouldnt prove much of a problem after tick 2 unless there are too may FR around for the guardian to hit them.
a combination of both perhaps?
|
well, ofcourse it will be better, but the beetle makes the tarantula's T3 useless, and second, if you have an ETA 5 fleet, might aswell get Scorpions, they might be a bit less effective, but will hardly die, and beetles die quickly.......
if you go for CR and BS, dont buy beetles....
__________________
<@[NoZ]TheZeeker> WE ZHALL NEVER ZURRENDER
The World Seen From A Cathaar's View...
|
|
|
4 Mar 2003, 01:41
|
#16
|
.:. Adelante .:.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sn0w
roach defender combo would knock the ship out of tula/guardian combo due to init..
|
true. but thats the only ship that will be able to do anything before the CR and BS fleet.
and ofcourse the guardian will still be untouched and could fire upon the CO's with pretty heavy damage causing to it.
__________________
<@[NoZ]TheZeeker> WE ZHALL NEVER ZURRENDER
The World Seen From A Cathaar's View...
|
|
|
4 Mar 2003, 10:15
|
#17
|
home wrecker
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The other side of the galaxy ;)
Posts: 1,041
|
defender has been shooting bs since rnd 8 now.....
__________________
May the Farce be with you...
#pr0nstars - a pimp is for life, not just for christmas
|
|
|
4 Mar 2003, 13:43
|
#18
|
.:. Adelante .:.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MAdnRisKy
defender has been shooting bs since rnd 8 now.....
|
if i remember right CR is before BS, and i dont think defenders kill all those cr in 1 tick now huh
__________________
<@[NoZ]TheZeeker> WE ZHALL NEVER ZURRENDER
The World Seen From A Cathaar's View...
|
|
|
4 Mar 2003, 14:13
|
#19
|
Commodore
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,176
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TheSeeker
if i remember right CR is before BS, and i dont think defenders kill all those cr in 1 tick now huh
|
I agree
and even if they did target BA first, the very low numbers of Defenders at Cathaar planets (if there are any at all) wouldnt impact on the BA much.
A 20 mil ish planet with a fleet combo of 50% Tarants, 45% Guardians and 5% mantis pods would have 9 million score in Guardians - very scary amount of damage there, at least 3 mil per tick.
__________________
#Strategy ; #Support - Sovereign
--- --- ---
"The Cake is a Lie."
|
|
|
4 Mar 2003, 16:56
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: behind your screen
Posts: 36
|
eta9 m8 work at 5min ticks.
not in regular pa (as long as you arent <3mil and hitting noobs only).
despite this, ever considered facing pirates (which got a major improvement in firepower) ?
(tarant wouldnt shoot t3 ofc as my de would soak up all t2 fire)
__________________
no sign of intelligent life
|
|
|
4 Mar 2003, 20:52
|
#21
|
Ancient Ensign
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 44
|
Quote:
if i remember right CR is before BS, and i dont think defenders kill all those cr in 1 tick now huh
|
You remember wrong. Defenders target BA CR DE. Thus battleships first.
They also fire before all battleships, cruisers, and destroyers with the one exception of the pegasus. Their firepower is also decent and they make a mess of the most common battleship out there, the wyvern, which have pathetic armour.
__________________
We are all part of the great circle of..........STUFF!
|
|
|
4 Mar 2003, 22:27
|
#22
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 109
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Moondoggie
and they make a mess of the most common battleship out there, the wyvern, which have pathetic armour.
|
and when did cathaar start to use wyvern in their CR fleet?????
|
|
|
4 Mar 2003, 22:50
|
#23
|
Ark-miner wannabe
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,005
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sun Pin
and when did cathaar start to use wyvern in their CR fleet?????
|
uh..he is talking about the Defender killing Wyvern...
|
|
|
5 Mar 2003, 00:11
|
#24
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
Quote:
Originally posted by dabult
uh..he is talking about the Defender killing Wyvern...
|
Well thats as may be, but what the heck does it have to do with this thread in that case?
Quote:
Originally posted by spectrum
eta9 m8 work at 5min ticks.
not in regular pa (as long as you arent <3mil and hitting noobs only).
|
People continually throw this line out, yet as I and others have said, we have got through a fair few attacks with that eta before. If an entire galaxy is being covered it doesn't always make that much difference.
{Edit}Removed the pish i wrote here earlier.{/Edit}
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
Last edited by Shev; 5 Mar 2003 at 20:43.
|
|
|
5 Mar 2003, 02:27
|
#25
|
Ancient Ensign
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 44
|
Quote:
Well thats as may be, but what the heck does it have to do with this thread in that case?
|
It was the correction of someone saying that defenders targetted cruisers before battleships. Read each thread in its entirety please.
__________________
We are all part of the great circle of..........STUFF!
|
|
|
5 Mar 2003, 03:00
|
#26
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Moondoggie
It was the correction of someone saying that defenders targetted cruisers before battleships. Read each thread in its entirety please.
|
Well given that i did, i can state that it was you who threw the thread off in the first place, with the totally out of context comment about defenders killing wyverns.
To quote:
Quote:
Originally posted by Moondoggie
and they make a mess of the most common battleship out there, the wyvern, which have pathetic armour.
|
Since the thread is about Cathaar Cr fleets, in what way do wyverns come into it?
To respond in your own metier,
Keep the thread on-topic please.
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
|
|
|
5 Mar 2003, 08:33
|
#27
|
.:. Adelante .:.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Moondoggie
You remember wrong. Defenders target BA CR DE. Thus battleships first.
They also fire before all battleships, cruisers, and destroyers with the one exception of the pegasus. Their firepower is also decent and they make a mess of the most common battleship out there, the wyvern, which have pathetic armour.
|
Still, i never seen a cathaar with allot of defenders around, not enough to scare any CR, BS fleet anyways. i dont think we should be scared of the defender.
__________________
<@[NoZ]TheZeeker> WE ZHALL NEVER ZURRENDER
The World Seen From A Cathaar's View...
|
|
|
5 Mar 2003, 13:14
|
#28
|
Arrogant Fck
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 1,031
|
I'll never use cathaar-fleets above de, as simple as that. I've calced around it alot in the past but I feel that the factors outside the bcalc are the thing that kills it.
__________________
[OLMIT] / [TreKronor]
|
|
|
5 Mar 2003, 14:19
|
#29
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TheSeeker
Still, i never seen a cathaar with allot of defenders around, not enough to scare any CR, BS fleet anyways. i dont think we should be scared of the defender.
|
I quite agree.
For resources, you are much better off just building yourself more widows and letting galmates take care of the Bs.
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
|
|
|
5 Mar 2003, 16:33
|
#30
|
home wrecker
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The other side of the galaxy ;)
Posts: 1,041
|
Defender in "better than gryphon" shocker!
don't assume the thing blows, it isn't cat's most efficient captial ship stopper (we have roaches for that) but don't anyone say it doesn't hurt....
__________________
May the Farce be with you...
#pr0nstars - a pimp is for life, not just for christmas
|
|
|
5 Mar 2003, 16:41
|
#31
|
.:. Adelante .:.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MAdnRisKy
Defender in "better than gryphon" shocker!
don't assume the thing blows, it isn't cat's most efficient captial ship stopper (we have roaches for that) but don't anyone say it doesn't hurt....
|
still doesnt say cathaar players will actually buy the friggin ship.
__________________
<@[NoZ]TheZeeker> WE ZHALL NEVER ZURRENDER
The World Seen From A Cathaar's View...
|
|
|
5 Mar 2003, 17:41
|
#32
|
Condenación
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ..her lap
Posts: 200
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Shev
People continually throw this line out, yet as I and others have said, we have got through a fair few attacks with that eta before. If an entire galaxy is being covered it doesn't always make that much difference.
{Edit}In fact, eta 9 tends to work worse in 5 minute ticks, since there is less chance of finding your target offline.{/Edit}
|
..completely disagree
__________________
R3: n00b
R4: 55:8:23 Selenia the Dark Angel of Urborg of Dominaria ( NoS)
R5: 24:12:5 MelAncholic Angel of Condemnation ( NoS)
R6: 21:5:10 Cursed Visionary of True Faith ( NoS)
R7: 9:19:9 Fragrance of Your Skin (NoS/ Bunnies)
R8: 3:5:4 Cursed Hands of Devotion (Fury/ Bunnies)
R9: 18:2:4 Infernal Memories of Humiliation ( Eclipse/Bunnies)
--------------------
MelAncholic
...criticism is the root of all progress
|
|
|
5 Mar 2003, 18:12
|
#33
|
.:. Adelante .:.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 129
|
seconded
__________________
<@[NoZ]TheZeeker> WE ZHALL NEVER ZURRENDER
The World Seen From A Cathaar's View...
|
|
|
5 Mar 2003, 18:19
|
#34
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
Ok, I gather you disagree.
Any particular reasoning?
Quote:
Originally posted by Shev
we have got through a fair few attacks with that eta before
|
I was saying that I have got through quite a lot of attacks at that eta, as have other peple i have attacked with.
Now unless you are saying i'm lying, then i would say it is possible to get through attacks.
If you don't agree, post something constructive.
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
|
|
|
5 Mar 2003, 18:22
|
#35
|
.:. Adelante .:.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 129
|
well this part:
In fact, eta 9 tends to work worse in 5 minute ticks, since there is less chance of finding your target offline
less chance to find your target offline in a 5 minute ticks game??? if i go to bed for even 3 hours you will have 36 ticks to raid my silly ass.... with 1 hour tick game you only have 3 ticks
__________________
<@[NoZ]TheZeeker> WE ZHALL NEVER ZURRENDER
The World Seen From A Cathaar's View...
|
|
|
5 Mar 2003, 20:36
|
#36
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TheSeeker
well this part:
In fact, eta 9 tends to work worse in 5 minute ticks, since there is less chance of finding your target offline
less chance to find your target offline in a 5 minute ticks game??? if i go to bed for even 3 hours you will have 36 ticks to raid my silly ass.... with 1 hour tick game you only have 3 ticks
|
Sorry, i was mostly referring to early on when people are still playing. Didn't make that particularly clear i guess, and also unfortunatly makes my comment fairly invalid.
It's true that by the time a significant Bs/Cr fleet could be built in a 5 minute tick game, a lot of people would be sleeping or given up, thereby making it quite easy to attack.
I stand by the opinion that eta 9 attacks aren't so bad though.
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
Last edited by Shev; 5 Mar 2003 at 20:42.
|
|
|
5 Mar 2003, 22:18
|
#37
|
Guest
|
Eta 9
I have to agree, an organised player that knows what he is doing can easily pull off eta 9 attacks.
|
|
|
6 Mar 2003, 00:00
|
#38
|
.:. Adelante .:.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 129
|
Re: Eta 9
Quote:
Originally posted by Inca
I have to agree, an organised player that knows what he is doing can easily pull off eta 9 attacks.
|
i seriously doubt that.
__________________
<@[NoZ]TheZeeker> WE ZHALL NEVER ZURRENDER
The World Seen From A Cathaar's View...
|
|
|
6 Mar 2003, 00:36
|
#39
|
Arrogant Fck
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 1,031
|
o/c you can pull it off...just as you can pull off an fr/de attack with a xanda...you just need a stupid enough target o.O
__________________
[OLMIT] / [TreKronor]
|
|
|
6 Mar 2003, 08:55
|
#40
|
Professional Spammer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in a hole with Argon
Posts: 48
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TheSeeker
still doesnt say cathaar players will actually buy the friggin ship.
|
I know a few that will ^_^ As long as terrans build battle ships that is ;o
__________________
R2 - Too n00b to care
R3 - 79:21:14 (ViruS)
R4 - 80:14:14 (ViruS)
R5 - 9:21:22 (ViruS/T&P)
R6 - 2:21:14 (ViruS/T&P)
R7 - 7:13:14 (ViruS)
R8 - Somewhere Random (ViruS)
R9 - Uncaring but PHUNKY -_-
R9.5 - 31:1:9 (ViruS)
urwins
|
|
|
6 Mar 2003, 09:37
|
#41
|
.:. Adelante .:.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sun_Tzu
o/c you can pull it off...just as you can pull off an fr/de attack with a xanda...you just need a stupid enough target o.O
|
and that is exactly what is worrying me, i doubt there will be many noobs left in round 9.
__________________
<@[NoZ]TheZeeker> WE ZHALL NEVER ZURRENDER
The World Seen From A Cathaar's View...
|
|
|
6 Mar 2003, 09:38
|
#42
|
.:. Adelante .:.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Spoticus
I know a few that will ^_^ As long as terrans build battle ships that is ;o
|
well tbh i think its a waste of resources, and you could better just buy roaches and let your galaxy m8's cover you vs BS
__________________
<@[NoZ]TheZeeker> WE ZHALL NEVER ZURRENDER
The World Seen From A Cathaar's View...
|
|
|
6 Mar 2003, 09:56
|
#43
|
Condenación
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ..her lap
Posts: 200
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Shev
Ok, I gather you disagree.
Any particular reasoning?
I was saying that I have got through quite a lot of attacks at that eta, as have other peple i have attacked with.
Now unless you are saying i'm lying, then i would say it is possible to get through attacks.
If you don't agree, post something constructive.
|
Take your point, transform your point to the total opposite & you'll get my point. ( What's the part you don't understand here?)
I don't care if you acclaim my opinion as something constructive now, still it is "my point of view"
-MelAn-
__________________
R3: n00b
R4: 55:8:23 Selenia the Dark Angel of Urborg of Dominaria ( NoS)
R5: 24:12:5 MelAncholic Angel of Condemnation ( NoS)
R6: 21:5:10 Cursed Visionary of True Faith ( NoS)
R7: 9:19:9 Fragrance of Your Skin (NoS/ Bunnies)
R8: 3:5:4 Cursed Hands of Devotion (Fury/ Bunnies)
R9: 18:2:4 Infernal Memories of Humiliation ( Eclipse/Bunnies)
--------------------
MelAncholic
...criticism is the root of all progress
|
|
|
6 Mar 2003, 14:45
|
#44
|
So what?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 606
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TheSeeker
and that is exactly what is worrying me, i doubt there will be many noobs left in round 9.
|
Aha, finally a good reason why it won't work.
I have to admit there is a distinct possibility you are right here, and that going all out for Cr and Bs - the only way to really make this fleet work - is sort of putting all your eggs in one basket.
Quote:
well tbh i think its a waste of resources, and you could better just buy roaches and let your galaxy m8's cover you vs BS
|
And this is definitely the way to go if you aren't an all-for-one gambler. Concentrate on what Cathhar do best, freezing things, and especially De.
Quote:
Originally posted by MelAn
Take your point, transform your point to the total opposite & you'll get my point. ( What's the part you don't understand here?)
I don't care if you acclaim my opinion as something constructive now, still it is "my point of view"
|
I don't understand what your point is, since you refuse to say anything with any substance whatsoever.
Im assuming you mean that you have tried to get through attacks at eta nine in past rounds and failed, and if this is the case, then thats fair enough. I disagree, but both of our opinions are based on experience.
__________________
Legion
[RaH] [Mercenaries]
|
|
|
9 Mar 2003, 12:54
|
#45
|
Professional Spammer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in a hole with Argon
Posts: 48
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TheSeeker
well tbh i think its a waste of resources, and you could better just buy roaches and let your galaxy m8's cover you vs BS
|
cathaar have the best anti bs in the game, so umm pls explain what gal mate is gunna save me.
Xans will have none, Ziks/Terrans only got high eta stuff...
__________________
R2 - Too n00b to care
R3 - 79:21:14 (ViruS)
R4 - 80:14:14 (ViruS)
R5 - 9:21:22 (ViruS/T&P)
R6 - 2:21:14 (ViruS/T&P)
R7 - 7:13:14 (ViruS)
R8 - Somewhere Random (ViruS)
R9 - Uncaring but PHUNKY -_-
R9.5 - 31:1:9 (ViruS)
urwins
|
|
|
9 Mar 2003, 13:35
|
#46
|
.:. Adelante .:.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Spoticus
cathaar have the best anti bs in the game, so umm pls explain what gal mate is gunna save me.
Xans will have none, Ziks/Terrans only got high eta stuff...
|
and i think you mean tarantula's, right ????
yes well, that might be true, but keep in mind if you get attacked as a cathaar, the attacker will ALWAYS send enough ships that will stop your tarantula to reach the BS as T3.......
maybe its smarter to have a ship that targets BS more directly then T3 * ? if it kills a good amount he will recall anyways.
__________________
<@[NoZ]TheZeeker> WE ZHALL NEVER ZURRENDER
The World Seen From A Cathaar's View...
|
|
|
9 Mar 2003, 15:38
|
#47
|
Pepsi bottle
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 234:4:3
Posts: 440
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Spoticus
cathaar have the best anti bs in the game, so umm pls explain what gal mate is gunna save me.
Xans will have none, Ziks/Terrans only got high eta stuff...
|
Clearly your zikonian galmate who follows my zikonian strat would waste yuor attacker with his 20% Buccaneers. Sure they're 'high eta' but eta 5 in gal compared to eta 7 attacking wyverns from para isn't too shabby. and if we're talking eta 9 guardians from universe he has ages to react.
__________________
There are 10 types of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:34.
| |