|
|
1 May 2012, 15:23
|
#101
|
Fightin-irish for life
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: guinness brewery
Posts: 2,177
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
I wonder will the penny drop now that mz has forgotten more about the game than you will ever learn ?
__________________
Ascendancy, now with added Irish
"In the absence of orders, find something and kill it."
-Rommel
|
|
|
1 May 2012, 17:15
|
#102
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
I think we called that 'Owned'
|
|
|
1 May 2012, 20:38
|
#103
|
General (Adjective Army)
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Yorkshire, England.
Posts: 825
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
PA ......
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
....... a game in which you don't just lose to overwhelming numbers, but you lose for weeks on end to overwhelming numbers.
|
Absolutely brilliant .... I've only just stopped laughing.
(The rest of your post was pretty good too).
__________________
Amnion (aka The Arcane Chas of Arcania) - Playing PA under those and other pseudonyms every genuine round since Round 2. Most recently (and insignificantly):
Onset of Apathy R94 | Stacks of Resources R95 | The Necromancer of Dol Guldur R96
70 Years of Queen Elizabeth R97 | Worst of The Worst R98
Knights of the Green Shield R99 | Look Out of The Window R100 | Most of All R102
Hard of Hearing (2:7:1) R103 | The Lateness of Your Application (1:6:6) R104 | Kinnison of Tellus (5:1:2) R105
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 01:48
|
#104
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 26
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
Suffice it to say, I continue to think your point is a useless one. Yes, a NAPs between the #1 and #2 alliances suck, but whining on AD is not going to change anything.
|
And where did I say it would? I just decided to come here and post how much of pussies FAnG and CT are. You guys have too much time on your hands to tell me why I'm wrong.
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 02:17
|
#105
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucifer
And where did I say it would? I just decided to come here and post how much of pussies FAnG and CT are. You guys have too much time on your hands to tell me why I'm wrong.
|
Why would CT/FAnG hand Ultores the victory so early on?
xVx/Ultores did the exact same thing last round, and they stayed allied for the whole round
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 02:26
|
#106
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 26
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Why would CT/FAnG hand Ultores the victory so early on?
xVx/Ultores did the exact same thing last round, and they stayed allied for the whole round
|
What? Do you think before you post? I don't think you do, so use your brain for a second, then try again.
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 03:04
|
#107
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucifer
What? Do you think before you post? I don't think you do, so use your brain for a second, then try again.
|
shhh, u know if CT target FAnG, and FAnG target CT(about what is happening now), ultores will go roid smaller allies(like they do now), and outgrow em both
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 04:57
|
#108
|
Registered Loser
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 38
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
What do you think would happen to a 300 roid allianceless planet coming out of protection in the middle of CT-dominated space? Have you ever dropped a boulder on a raw egg?
|
I don't care where you put a noob with 300 roids, the rest of us are going to bash him and take his rocks. It's a tough uni, which contributes both to running off new players, and keeping avid gamers interested.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
Suffice it to say, I continue to think your point is a useless one. Yes, a NAPs between the #1 and #2 alliances suck, but whining on AD is not going to change anything.
|
Perhaps Lucifer is just playing devil's advocate?
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 05:58
|
#109
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Why would CT/FAnG hand Ultores the victory so early on?
xVx/Ultores did the exact same thing last round, and they stayed allied for the whole round
|
We did?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Relation Change 853 xVx has decided to end its alliance with Ultores.
Relation Change 1108 Ultores and xVx have confirmed they are allied.
|
Seems not!
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 12:33
|
#110
|
Sex, Drugs & ROCK'n'roll
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Norwegian woods
Posts: 81
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
We did?
Seems not!
|
No point even bringing up evidence eksero, B-Butcher would never ever accept reality anyway. If he did he would notice that in this round there is no such thing as "the Ult/xVx block" this round.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
xVx/Ultores did the exact same thing last round, and they stayed allied for the whole round
|
The way I see it; 2 allys just being friendly with eachother and allys who are NOT friendly with eachother plotting to outnumber a common contender, is not "the exact same thing"
__________________
Round 3-4: n00bing!
Round 5-6: Legion (Norwegian Legion)
Round 7-36: Retirement
Round 37-40: HeX DC
Round 41-42: ROCK DC/BC
Round 43: p3nguins
Round 44-49: Ultores
Round 50-56: ROCK HC
Round 57: Ultores
Round 58: p3nguins
Round 59: ROCK HC
Round 60-63: Astatores
Round 64-72: Retirement
Round 73-76: Astatores
Round 77-94: Retirement
Round 95-98: Phoenix
Round 99-101: ODDR
Round 102: Wildcards
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 17:07
|
#111
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
We did?
Seems not!
|
i were allied with xVx for 90% of the round, having em leave you so you could roid up on them when all other enemies were dead
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 17:16
|
#112
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
It must truly be wonderful, living in your world, unconstrained by facts, logic or knowledge.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 18:40
|
#113
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
It must truly be wonderful, living in your world, unconstrained by facts, logic or knowledge.
|
Hehe, the facts and the knowledge is one thing, logic is a very diffrent one.
Ive seen you around on forums of these games for what, 8 years now?
Fact is a fact, how you try to display this another thing.
I say xVx was allied for the whole round last round, and then eksero comes in shooting, oh no wait, we wernt, between pt800-1000 somesh*t we were not allied, the round was allready over then, but given that, a fact is a fact is it not?
If A and B were to allie at tick start, and break up 10 ticks prior to tick stop, in my magic world, inhabited by elves and fairys, they were allied the whole round even though they wernt.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
Last edited by BloodyButcher; 2 May 2012 at 18:45.
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 18:56
|
#114
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Hehe, the facts and the knowledge is one thing, logic is a very diffrent one.
Ive seen you around on forums of these games for what, 8 years now?
Fact is a fact, how you try to display this another thing.
I say xVx was allied for the whole round last round, and then eksero comes in shooting, oh no wait, we wernt, between pt800-1000 somesh*t we were not allied, the round was allready over then, but given that, a fact is a fact is it not?
If A and B were to allie at tick start, and break up 10 ticks prior to tick stop, in my magic world, inhabited by elves and fairys, they were allied the whole round even though they wernt.
|
But then again, 10 ticks and 10 days are quite different
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 19:21
|
#115
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
i were allied with xVx for 90% of the round, having em leave you so you could roid up on them when all other enemies were dead
|
There were in fact allied for slightly less than 80% of the round. And they ceased being allied approximately 70% of the way into the round, not 10 ticks before the end.
Do you think at all before you post or is this all just the remarkably coincidental result of you mashing your face into the keyboard every time you open AD?
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 19:38
|
#116
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
i were allied with xVx for 90% of the round, having em leave you so you could roid up on them when all other enemies were dead
|
Now i might be mistaken but if i remember rightly when xVx and Ultores ceased their NAP there was no 'roiding up on them' by Ultores... infact because xVx joined CT's block im pretty sure through lack of block activity and Ultores happiness to coast out the round there was a kind of roid stalemate.
This all happened whilst FaNG who had been hostile to xVX/Ultores for most the round decided to NAP Ultores and 'roid up on small/inactive alliances' in a bid to catch up Ultores, the alliance with all the value (see how that worked out for them btw).
I beleive it was 150 ticks later that FaNG switched back to the CT run block in a vain bid to beat Ultores but never really looked like doing it...
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 21:29
|
#117
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Todmorden
Posts: 1,192
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
This all happened whilst FaNG who had been hostile to xVX/Ultores for most the round decided to NAP Ultores and 'roid up on small/inactive alliances' in a bid to catch up Ultores
|
ND being the "small/inactive" alliance
__________________
FAnG
Ascendancy
Apprime
Ultores
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 21:52
|
#118
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
There were in fact allied for slightly less than 80% of the round. And they ceased being allied approximately 70% of the way into the round, not 10 ticks before the end.
Do you think at all before you post or is this all just the remarkably coincidental result of you mashing your face into the keyboard every time you open AD?
|
Well if the round allready had a winner, and all other alliances had given up, id say the round was allready over when xVx dropped the Ultores NAP.
But that is just my point of view.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 21:56
|
#119
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt
ND being the "small/inactive" alliance
|
In that round yes
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 21:57
|
#120
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Well if the round allready had a winner, and all other alliances had given up, id say the round was allready over when xVx dropped the Ultores NAP.
But that is just my point of view.
|
He didnt say it had a winner... and FaNG still push for the win, it was reasonably close at the end. You should never have napped Ultores at tick 800 odd - you might have won otherwise....
|
|
|
2 May 2012, 22:32
|
#121
|
Sex, Drugs & ROCK'n'roll
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Norwegian woods
Posts: 81
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Guys, if a round have a favorite for win then NAPs and broken NAPs do not excist! Half of the broken NAPs in PA history never happend.. but thats just "my point of view"
__________________
Round 3-4: n00bing!
Round 5-6: Legion (Norwegian Legion)
Round 7-36: Retirement
Round 37-40: HeX DC
Round 41-42: ROCK DC/BC
Round 43: p3nguins
Round 44-49: Ultores
Round 50-56: ROCK HC
Round 57: Ultores
Round 58: p3nguins
Round 59: ROCK HC
Round 60-63: Astatores
Round 64-72: Retirement
Round 73-76: Astatores
Round 77-94: Retirement
Round 95-98: Phoenix
Round 99-101: ODDR
Round 102: Wildcards
|
|
|
3 May 2012, 00:41
|
#122
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Well if the round allready had a winner, and all other alliances had given up, id say the round was allready over when xVx dropped the Ultores NAP.
But that is just my point of view.
|
Yes, I see what you mean.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
3 May 2012, 03:34
|
#123
|
Retired
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 37
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
Now i might be mistaken but if i remember rightly when xVx and Ultores ceased their NAP there was no 'roiding up on them' by Ultores... infact because xVx joined CT's block im pretty sure through lack of block activity and Ultores happiness to coast out the round there was a kind of roid stalemate.
This all happened whilst FaNG who had been hostile to xVX/Ultores for most the round decided to NAP Ultores and 'roid up on small/inactive alliances' in a bid to catch up Ultores, the alliance with all the value (see how that worked out for them btw).
|
Sense some deja vu here
|
|
|
3 May 2012, 07:30
|
#124
|
Finally retired
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howzat
Sense some deja vu here
|
that's ok, it's not like ultores is doing any different.
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]
In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
|
|
|
3 May 2012, 08:26
|
#125
|
Retired
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 37
|
Re: FAnG official Announcement
Quote:
Originally Posted by Influence
that's ok, it's not like ultores is doing any different.
|
Thats what i was implying
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:54.
| |