|
9 Oct 2003, 08:06
|
#1
|
Inactive peon
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,050
|
Alliance Ranking Screen
Isn't the alliance ranking screen meant to be right now...... as its not...
no one is going to convince me that:
20 Ðragons 10796 2.574.761
is right.
Any pa team people want to clear this up?
|
|
|
9 Oct 2003, 08:12
|
#2
|
Most unimportant guy...
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kvinesdal
Posts: 1,393
|
Re: Alliance Ranking Screen
Maybe they are dead :P
__________________
When we discover the centre of the universe, alot of people will be shocked and dissapointed to know that they are not it!
Retired
|
|
|
9 Oct 2003, 08:49
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 54
|
Re: Alliance Ranking Screen
hehehe..i think they forgot to install the update tbh
|
|
|
9 Oct 2003, 09:15
|
#4
|
Mr. Blobby
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Belgium
Posts: 8,271
|
Re: Alliance Ranking Screen
Looking at the changes in the Alliance Rankings, there's only two real possibilities:
- Spinner did not install the update, all alliances other than Dragons stopped using the "recruit bug" simultaneously and voluntarily.
- Spinner did install the update, Dragons had a good portion of their members quit the in-game alliance, possibly even two days ago when the update was announced, so that they can rejoin another in-game alliance shortly, thereby avoiding being noticed.
|
|
|
9 Oct 2003, 09:20
|
#5
|
peon
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 163
|
Re: Alliance Ranking Screen
or they just joined the fang ingame alliance (looking at their score / roid jump this tick, this could actually be quite possible )
__________________
Elysium / patools
|
|
|
9 Oct 2003, 09:24
|
#6
|
Sheep
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: IRC
Posts: 563
|
Re: Alliance Ranking Screen
I think spinner forgot to install the patch, and the other alliances quit using the recruit option.
__________________
WP
Ðragons
eXilition
|
|
|
9 Oct 2003, 09:27
|
#7
|
Mr. Blobby
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Belgium
Posts: 8,271
|
Re: Alliance Ranking Screen
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaos
or they just joined the fang ingame alliance (looking at their score / roid jump this tick, this could actually be quite possible )
|
Unless they were planning to do so at least 24 hours before the announcement, they can't have done so yet, due to the 72-hour period between alliances.
|
|
|
9 Oct 2003, 09:41
|
#8
|
Retired?
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 289
|
Re: Alliance Ranking Screen
Spinner hasnt uploaded the patch yet...
__________________
Played since round 3 in various alliances: G-II, Elysium, The Brotherhood, NewDawn, VisioN & more
Current status: Will never play again ever!
I was 3:2:2 in round 10 \o/
|
|
|
9 Oct 2003, 10:52
|
#9
|
Beyond The Sun
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 630
|
Re: Alliance Ranking Screen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eventh
Spinner hasnt uploaded the patch yet...
|
why oh why do we have to have an announcement on something not going to happen ON TIME!
can you PA creator ppl do something right for a change ???? maybe ??? no, ok didnt think so
__________________
Psycho, alpha, disco, beta
Somebody's gettin bucked down
|
|
|
9 Oct 2003, 10:57
|
#10
|
used to register
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 979
|
Re: Alliance Ranking Screen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leshy
Looking at the changes in the Alliance Rankings, there's only two real possibilities:
- Spinner did not install the update, all alliances other than Dragons stopped using the "recruit bug" simultaneously and voluntarily.
- Spinner did install the update, Dragons had a good portion of their members quit the in-game alliance, possibly even two days ago when the update was announced, so that they can rejoin another in-game alliance shortly, thereby avoiding being noticed.
|
Several top alliances still hide part of their members other than Ðragons, FAnG were 2M bigger yesterday than right now... And ToT were the largest allaince on the portal (including recruits that is) about 3 days ago, now they are 7th... Those were the obvious alliances, but I guess almost all alliances have SOME members at recruit status (including us, but those are real recruits ). Os Spinner didn't update the score system yet ....
__________________
R1: ??:?? | R2: 51:6 | R3: 37:12 | R4: 186:13 | R5: 13:17 | R6: 1:25
R7: 15:14 | R8: 34:4 / 52:10 ¤ | R9: 16:2 | R9.5: 34:6 / 41:6 ¤
R10: 2:2 | R10.5: 15:4 | R11: 28:8 | R12: 22:9
Damn, outdated and too lazy to edit, retired now
-----
Started playing again Still too lazy to update though
|
|
|
9 Oct 2003, 14:03
|
#11
|
I see you!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In any girl
Posts: 2,825
|
Re: Alliance Ranking Screen
It's not like it's surprising it doesn't work yet
|
|
|
9 Oct 2003, 14:15
|
#12
|
Inactive peon
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,050
|
Re: Alliance Ranking Screen
i was really looking forward to seeing NoS as #1
|
|
|
9 Oct 2003, 15:05
|
#13
|
used to register
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 979
|
Re: Alliance Ranking Screen
Maybe if you go back to sleep you will KalVirtus
__________________
R1: ??:?? | R2: 51:6 | R3: 37:12 | R4: 186:13 | R5: 13:17 | R6: 1:25
R7: 15:14 | R8: 34:4 / 52:10 ¤ | R9: 16:2 | R9.5: 34:6 / 41:6 ¤
R10: 2:2 | R10.5: 15:4 | R11: 28:8 | R12: 22:9
Damn, outdated and too lazy to edit, retired now
-----
Started playing again Still too lazy to update though
|
|
|
9 Oct 2003, 23:59
|
#14
|
Eclipse High Command
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eclipse
Posts: 1,144
|
Re: Alliance Ranking Screen
Quote:
Originally Posted by MOTD
A little bug in the Alliance Ranking code has allowed members set to "Recruits" avoid counting towards the alliance score and rank.
Unfortunatley teething problems have prevented us from updating at this time - We will update it at a later date to be announced
|
^^ The saga continues.....
__________________
We fight together,
We win together,
or we die together.
-T&P slogan
Focht
T&P HC
Fury Exec
Eclipse CEO
Stan's muppet
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:13.
| |