|
|
4 Oct 2013, 12:50
|
#51
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Influence
Dude, GL in your game with no players then, granted you might finally get a top 10 finish then...
|
I want to say that maybe vikings can win then, but its a little early saying you cant win this round.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
4 Oct 2013, 14:08
|
#52
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Noruega
Posts: 2,999
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
So, with the war ending and instead the #2, #3, #4, #5 and #7 alliance attacking the #6 alliance today, have we seen a new low-point in PA?
__________________
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of War"
|
|
|
4 Oct 2013, 14:53
|
#53
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
No.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
4 Oct 2013, 14:57
|
#54
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Noruega
Posts: 2,999
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Most unbalanced skirmish I can recall atleast.
__________________
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of War"
|
|
|
4 Oct 2013, 15:54
|
#55
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by isildurx
So, with the war ending and instead the #2, #3, #4, #5 and #7 alliance attacking the #6 alliance today, have we seen a new low-point in PA?
|
Yes this what a part of the deal vikings made with "The block"
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
4 Oct 2013, 16:09
|
#56
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Bitch3r is right. Vikings made a deal so that we can roid Patsa.
|
|
|
4 Oct 2013, 17:41
|
#57
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Internet
Posts: 318
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by isildurx
Right now it seems like alliances are fighting to keep their prestigious top 5 spot
|
Is this coming from an apprime "we're friends with ult, sorry" legendary war hero?
In response to butcher/paisley/you, do you actually think CT's clearest route to victory lies in continuing to not land on vikings whilst fang hoover up the universe's asteroids unassailed? probably not.
|
|
|
4 Oct 2013, 17:55
|
#58
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
Alliances just don't know what to do when they don't have someone like Ult or a full force App to gang up on..
|
Farm the lower tier players for roids would be my assessment.
This Round ...
They avoid fat targets that are in a top tier ally and gal, then have a race to the top by playing farmville style PA. (as I would call it)
The problem is that the main allies just don't have the hunger to go for the win by attacking each other directly. the last decent war I could recall would be CT V apprime R40.
The top5 gals have fenced themselves nicely where gal members are either HC or at least a key member of the alliance where they can get their gal off the alliance gal raids.
Most players will follow the path of least resistance to roids (as I would call it)
as there isn't any decent grudge matches happening where there isn't any major fleet movements.
__________________
Missing Subh (r15-r18)
|
|
|
4 Oct 2013, 18:12
|
#59
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paisley
Farm the lower tier players for roids would be my assessment.
This Round ...
They avoid fat targets that are in a top tier ally and gal, then have a race to the top by playing farmville style PA. (as I would call it)
The problem is that the main allies just don't have the hunger to go for the win by attacking each other directly. the last decent war I could recall would be CT V apprime R40.
The top5 gals have fenced themselves nicely where gal members are either HC or at least a key member of the alliance where they can get their gal off the alliance gal raids.
Most players will follow the path of least resistance to roids (as I would call it)
as there isn't any decent grudge matches happening where there isn't any major fleet movements.
|
I think that PA has been like this for the last round, the fact that its as possibole to get top rankings planetwise as in a smaller allies might make you wonder whats the reason to be alliance rank focused.
I think the view certain alliances have on alliances when it comes to "farm" allies is a big reason why you get a univers split in a lower tier and a upper tier.
The lower tier alliances attack each other, and dont seem to know their own good.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
4 Oct 2013, 18:20
|
#60
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Internet
Posts: 318
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
Alliances just don't know what to do when they don't have someone like Ult or a full force App to gang up on..
|
As crushingly inspirational as you know you are i think everyone knows what to do just fine (do the best they can?), it's just that there isn't a clear case for smashing any particular alliance from the start without ult around. That's fine. Probably more interesting/fluid/whatever.
|
|
|
5 Oct 2013, 00:18
|
#61
|
Blah Blah Blah
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 622
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paisley
Farm the lower tier players for roids would be my assessment.
This Round ...
They avoid fat targets that are in a top tier ally and gal, then have a race to the top by playing farmville style PA. (as I would call it)
The problem is that the main allies just don't have the hunger to go for the win by attacking each other directly. the last decent war I could recall would be CT V apprime R40.
The top5 gals have fenced themselves nicely where gal members are either HC or at least a key member of the alliance where they can get their gal off the alliance gal raids.
Most players will follow the path of least resistance to roids (as I would call it)
as there isn't any decent grudge matches happening where there isn't any major fleet movements.
|
The war in round 40 was Apprime vs uni not Apprime vs CT
__________________
If you can't amaze people with your intelligence, confuse them with your bullshit.
BANANA ALLIANCE!!
|
|
|
5 Oct 2013, 00:23
|
#62
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunterrrr
The war in round 40 was Apprime vs uni not Apprime vs CT
|
what was your take on xvx?
__________________
Missing Subh (r15-r18)
|
|
|
5 Oct 2013, 00:25
|
#63
|
Blah Blah Blah
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 622
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paisley
what was your take on xvx?
|
Fencing ****s?
Pal i did the politics of round40 2 allies merged to hit us and changed their name for me(9 we hart hunter). Everyone and their dog hit apprime. http://beta.planetarion.com/history/...?id=3&round=40
Anyway its round 53. We are far less active with smaller tag yet we still get 80% of uni on us
__________________
If you can't amaze people with your intelligence, confuse them with your bullshit.
BANANA ALLIANCE!!
|
|
|
5 Oct 2013, 01:07
|
#64
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunterrrr
Fencing ****s?
Pal i did the politics of round40 2 allies merged to hit us and changed their name for me(9 we hart hunter). Everyone and their dog hit apprime. http://beta.planetarion.com/history/...?id=3&round=40
Anyway its round 53. We are far less active with smaller tag yet we still get 80% of uni on us
|
Its quite ironical eh?
Apprime had around 15% of the roids in the univers, and yet FAnG/ND/CT wich is around 15% of the total planets in the univers attack you?!?! Clearly soooo uncalled for.
They should focus on all those alliances without roids, and stop hitting Apprime right away.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
5 Oct 2013, 18:27
|
#65
|
Just Awesome
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 165
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Its quite ironical eh?
Apprime had around 15% of the roids in the univers, and yet FAnG/ND/CT wich is around 15% of the total planets in the univers attack you?!?! Clearly soooo uncalled for.
They should focus on all those alliances without roids, and stop hitting Apprime right away.
|
Clearly a less active alliance with much roids should expect incommings, much like facepalm last round when ND xp landed them.
But, if any other alliance then App got coordinated p-targetting by several alliances, would you not be crying blockwars, unfair, level playing field and whatnot?
I dont know, it is just a question - the rhetorical kind.
But hey pal - we might have a high iq plan to win PA from #6 rank, seing we have almighty leader Cardi to control us in many ways
|
|
|
5 Oct 2013, 18:33
|
#66
|
Finally retired
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motti
Clearly a less active alliance with much roids should expect incommings, much like facepalm last round when ND xp landed them.
But, if any other alliance then App got coordinated p-targetting by several alliances, would you not be crying blockwars, unfair, level playing field and whatnot?
I dont know, it is just a question - the rhetorical kind.
But hey pal - we might have a high iq plan to win PA from #6 rank, seing we have almighty leader Cardi to control us in many ways
|
nah, it's ok to gangbang on vikings too
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]
In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
|
|
|
5 Oct 2013, 19:33
|
#67
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motti
Clearly a less active alliance with much roids should expect incommings, much like facepalm last round when ND xp landed them.
But, if any other alliance then App got coordinated p-targetting by several alliances, would you not be crying blockwars, unfair, level playing field and whatnot?
I dont know, it is just a question - the rhetorical kind.
But hey pal - we might have a high iq plan to win PA from #6 rank, seing we have almighty leader Cardi to control us in many ways
|
When you got this much roids, its quite normal that so many planets hit u, i dont understand what you think is wrong with it. Its not like its bottom feeding or anything
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
5 Oct 2013, 19:46
|
#68
|
Just Awesome
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 165
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
When you got this much roids, its quite normal that so many planets hit u, i dont understand what you think is wrong with it. Its not like its bottom feeding or anything
|
Is there a difference between attacking someone with much roids, and attacking in a coordinated fashion with same landing ticks and p-targetting which coveres most of the alliance, where the attackers all are alliances higher ranked then the one recieving the incommings? And also beyond a doubt cooperate to most effectivly roid down said alliance?
Would you have had the same attitude regardless which alliance recieved such coordinated incomming?
Again - just a few rhetorical questions
|
|
|
5 Oct 2013, 20:06
|
#69
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motti
Is there a difference between attacking someone with much roids, and attacking in a coordinated fashion with same landing ticks and p-targetting which coveres most of the alliance, where the attackers all are alliances higher ranked then the one recieving the incommings? And also beyond a doubt cooperate to most effectivly roid down said alliance?
Would you have had the same attitude regardless which alliance recieved such coordinated incomming?
Again - just a few rhetorical questions
|
I think it is more fair this, than when everyone jumps HR the first 200 ticks of every round.
Staying in bigger tags, you dont see many incs the first week, most of the time its under 60 incs each night, staying in smaller tags i tend to see the incs being 1,5-2 times the amount of the tag size for the first weeks.
So no, i dont think it is unfair, Apprime have gotten all this roids for a reason, either they are good, or they simply havnt had much incs early on.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
5 Oct 2013, 20:10
|
#70
|
Just Awesome
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 165
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
I think it is more fair this, than when everyone jumps HR the first 200 ticks of every round.
Staying in bigger tags, you dont see many incs the first week, most of the time its under 60 incs each night, staying in smaller tags i tend to see the incs being 1,5-2 times the amount of the tag size for the first weeks.
So no, i dont think it is unfair, Apprime have gotten all this roids for a reason, either they are good, or they simply havnt had much incs early on.
|
Seing it was a rhetorical question - an answer is not required clearly.
Althou you answered, you did not answer the question.
I have seen you a few times talking about leveling they playing field - Seing I am a bit slow, can you explain to me how such coordinated actions levels a playing field?
edit:
Also, you say HR get targetted first 200 ticks etc, I do believe this is utterly wrong - as most alliances run only gal raids first ticks - both due to it being more convenient in avoiding wars, and the pure lack of intel to activly target an alliance.
But, you can probably prove me wrong - I am sure you have solid intel on this matter.
|
|
|
5 Oct 2013, 21:15
|
#71
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Noruega
Posts: 2,999
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
fang have 50% more roids than apprime, I don't see them getting hit by 6 alliances anytime soon
__________________
"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of War"
|
|
|
5 Oct 2013, 22:12
|
#72
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by isildurx
fang have 50% more roids than apprime, I don't see them getting hit by 6 alliances anytime soon
|
Well they got NAPs and deals wich is trying to get them to win
But they will be hit by App/Vikings/HR block though, so i think they will have enough to do for the time being.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
5 Oct 2013, 22:16
|
#73
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Actually, they napped HR and Apprime are grounded.
|
|
|
5 Oct 2013, 22:38
|
#74
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
Actually, they napped HR and Apprime are grounded.
|
I didnt even know Apprime ever grounded, but there you go
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
6 Oct 2013, 00:30
|
#75
|
Finally retired
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 788
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
I didnt even know Apprime ever grounded, but there you go
|
goes to show how much you follow what actually goes on in this game
__________________
don't be an arse, join [TiT]
In the absence of the good old TiT alliance, look me up in VGN
|
|
|
6 Oct 2013, 07:26
|
#76
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Actually HR Is actively p targeting Apprime. Why I don't know. Everyone should gang up on Vikings.
We need to stop this dominant alliance winning so the other dominant one can win.
|
|
|
6 Oct 2013, 07:31
|
#77
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
In response to Motti, it's wrong but you are right if this was happening to Ct or Nd there would be uproar, but block bangs against Vikings and Apprime is ok
|
|
|
6 Oct 2013, 08:12
|
#78
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
I believe incs have been evenly distrubuted this round, thats why it seems like nothing is happening.
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
|
|
|
6 Oct 2013, 14:41
|
#79
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
well atm its fang/vikings one on one, dont know how long that will last though
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
7 Oct 2013, 15:46
|
#80
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
whos been gangbanging apprime?
__________________
Missing Subh (r15-r18)
|
|
|
7 Oct 2013, 16:35
|
#81
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paisley
whos been gangbanging apprime?
|
It started out with CT/ND/Fang/HR, now its down to CT/ND/HR i believe!
Not that I can understand why..
|
|
|
7 Oct 2013, 17:15
|
#82
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
I can always understand gangbanging Apprime.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
7 Oct 2013, 17:17
|
#83
|
The brother of Spammer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paisley - Scotland
Posts: 2,352
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
I take it vikings and Fang arent going to war with each other?
__________________
Missing Subh (r15-r18)
|
|
|
7 Oct 2013, 17:19
|
#84
|
Blah Blah Blah
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 622
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
It started out with CT/ND/Fang/HR, now its down to CT/ND/HR i believe!
Not that I can understand why..
|
You forgot Innu pal
__________________
If you can't amaze people with your intelligence, confuse them with your bullshit.
BANANA ALLIANCE!!
|
|
|
7 Oct 2013, 17:26
|
#85
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 77
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
well atm its fang/vikings one on one, dont know how long that will last though
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paisley
I take it vikings and Fang arent going to war with each other?
|
At the moment fang and vikings is going at it 1vs1, but as you can see its pretty much a stallmate at the moment, neither side landing anything significant. Vikings did gain more score than fang today even with 6k less roids in total, but there might be that some fang are stocking to keep score down. They dont want to get #1 before as late as possible i guess. So people won`t say they had an easy ride (no real incs allround) but still tight in defence as we know them
__________________
Skydivenaked
Recent rounds:
Round 68 - #1 Gal Rank #6 planet
Round 67 - #1 Gal
Round 65 - Rank #3 Norsemen
Round 61 - Rank #37 Faceless
Round 60 - Rank #14 Ultores
Round 58 - Rank #35 Allieless xp play
Round 56 - Rank #14 Vikings
Round 54 - Rank #5 Vikings
|
|
|
7 Oct 2013, 17:41
|
#86
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paisley
I take it vikings and Fang arent going to war with each other?
|
Has the non existent growths from either side not given anything away?
Last edited by Clouds; 7 Oct 2013 at 17:47.
|
|
|
7 Oct 2013, 18:00
|
#87
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
Has the non existent growths from either side not given anything away?
|
The fact that both alliance have naped everyone but each other certainly gives a little away
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
7 Oct 2013, 18:20
|
#88
|
YAAARRGH!
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 481
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
So..there is a problem with the rank 1 and 2 alliances having a fight now butcher?
|
|
|
7 Oct 2013, 19:02
|
#89
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
I am quite enjoying seeing #1 and #2 go at it. Shame App are also hitting Fang to an extent, which I would guess explains why Fang are slightly behind Vikings in score gain.
|
|
|
7 Oct 2013, 19:36
|
#90
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Connovar
So..there is a problem with the rank 1 and 2 alliances having a fight now butcher?
|
No, clearly you dont see what i was pointing at, seeing you have naped everyone else, there is no-one but each other to hit, finaly.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
7 Oct 2013, 20:43
|
#91
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
I am quite enjoying seeing #1 and #2 go at it. Shame App are also hitting Fang to an extent, which I would guess explains why Fang are slightly behind Vikings in score gain.
|
We haven't even had any attacks up for days now, if anything it's random day launches only
Last edited by eksero; 10 Oct 2013 at 09:54.
|
|
|
7 Oct 2013, 21:05
|
#92
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
We haven't even had any attacks up for days now, if anything it's random day launches only
|
Oh my mistake.
I could have sworn I saw app send a load at EM last night, and try PT'ing fang the night before.
Sorry.
|
|
|
7 Oct 2013, 21:11
|
#93
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
Oh my mistake.
I could have sworn I saw app send a load at EM last night, and try PT'ing fang the night before.
Sorry.
|
Apprime sends random 'def drains' in early evenings. The majority of the time, Apprime are grounded - gotta save 4:5!
|
|
|
7 Oct 2013, 21:37
|
#94
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
Apprime sends random 'def drains' in early evenings. The majority of the time, Apprime are grounded - gotta save 4:5!
|
Eventualy they will go full force(or full troll u might Call it) at FAnG, so i Guess Vikings/trollprime will win this one comfortably then
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
8 Oct 2013, 02:49
|
#95
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,038
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
I believe HR is hitting Apprime for the senseless SK'ing that has occured on HR planets throughout the round.
__________________
Did some stuff, played here n there done just about all there is to do
|
|
|
8 Oct 2013, 18:28
|
#96
|
#starcraft2
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 54
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
senseless? SK AHOY!
__________________
Tuba - F-Crew - ND - DLR - APP
Might have missed something:P
|
|
|
8 Oct 2013, 19:28
|
#97
|
Just Awesome
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 165
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_Esper
I believe HR is hitting Apprime for the senseless SK'ing that has occured on HR planets throughout the round.
|
I believe that the "block" are using astropods in a senseless way!
This is just horrible, althou astropods are also a part of the ships you can produce in Planetarion.
I say put a stop to use of astropods at once! Do you have any idea how long it might take to rebuild the losses after several waves of astropods landing on your planet?
All the time and effort put into getting hold of and keeping those asteroids, and then someone comes and use astropods on my planet.
Destroys the round completely - this is a war game - not a game where you hurt someone elses planet!
P.S - can exchange astropod with SK, point still stands as a stupid point!
|
|
|
8 Oct 2013, 20:59
|
#98
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motti
I believe that the "block" are using astropods in a senseless way!
This is just horrible, althou astropods are also a part of the ships you can produce in Planetarion.
I say put a stop to use of astropods at once! Do you have any idea how long it might take to rebuild the losses after several waves of astropods landing on your planet?
All the time and effort put into getting hold of and keeping those asteroids, and then someone comes and use astropods on my planet.
Destroys the round completely - this is a war game - not a game where you hurt someone elses planet!
P.S - can exchange astropod with SK, point still stands as a stupid point!
|
I love this!
Its so true, i actually think that each races SK should target a different type of structure and should be on class with a roiding fleet. They are a part of the game, deal with it people. Norton is like my secret hero for attacking with SK's at tick 24
|
|
|
8 Oct 2013, 22:59
|
#99
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Im pretty staying away from SKing would help the Trollprime inc Waves
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
8 Oct 2013, 23:01
|
#100
|
Blah Blah Blah
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 622
|
Re: Vikings declare war on CT
Your a retard BloodyButcher.
__________________
If you can't amaze people with your intelligence, confuse them with your bullshit.
BANANA ALLIANCE!!
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:07.
| |