|
7 Oct 2005, 00:50
|
#1
|
USS Oklahoma
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,500
|
I Am Outraged, Sir!
I am outraged. I awoke to my moring paper and there was a headline in the banner which read TOMKAT EXPECTING.
I thought, "why were we not told?"
"Do the school authorities know?"
"Was it immaculate concepcion?"
But when I turned to the article it was about Tom Cruiese and Katie Holmes who they had the effrontery to refer to as TomKat.
I call upon Yahwe (The Birthday Boy) to immediately leap into the breach to stop these two from trying to cash in on the name and fame of the one and only true tomkat. The next thing you know there will be young New Zealand girls posting thinking they are talking to Tom and Katie.
Enough of this, I say.
GD, rise up in your mighty wrath and smite the Philistines hip and thigh!
__________________
Ignorance is curable, stupidity is not.
|
|
|
7 Oct 2005, 00:56
|
#2
|
so f*cking zen
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hitting Bottom
Posts: 8,499
|
Re: I Am Outraged, Sir!
Quote:
Originally Posted by dda
I am outraged. I awoke to my moring paper and there was a headline in the banner which read TOMKAT EXPECTING.
...
But when I turned to the article it was about Tom Cruiese and Katie Holmes who they had the effrontery to refer to as TomKat.
|
I seem to remember that the American tabloids were saying, back when Tom and Katie got together, that Katie had been "interviewed" for the part of Tom's wife along with various other "minor" actresses and part of the deal was that they'd get married and have a child (created by IVF) and get divorced 6 years later or something and for this Katie would be paid £4mil and it was all because Tom "i'm a raging queer" Cruise was gay.
Just mentioning it.
__________________
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
|
|
|
7 Oct 2005, 01:04
|
#3
|
USS Oklahoma
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,500
|
Re: I Am Outraged, Sir!
Fine but must they sully tomkat's good name?
__________________
Ignorance is curable, stupidity is not.
Last edited by dda; 7 Oct 2005 at 01:23.
Reason: k not c
|
|
|
7 Oct 2005, 01:21
|
#4
|
so f*cking zen
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hitting Bottom
Posts: 8,499
|
Re: I Am Outraged, Sir!
Quote:
Originally Posted by dda
Fine but must they sully tomcat's good name?
|
Tom kat!
And no ... i don't think that was part of the deal.
Seems like some re-negotiating is going on.
__________________
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
|
|
|
7 Oct 2005, 06:04
|
#5
|
WANNASEEMYNEWCHAINSAW
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Éire
Posts: 2,738
|
Re: I Am Outraged, Sir!
It's all so hideously stage managed isn't it?
I mean, out of nowhere they became a couple. Just as they both had movies out. They looked so fake, unfeeling, distant around each other. She then 'converts' to Scientology(I cant even type that word without bile rising in my throat) for him. Then they were engaged quite quickly....
Now the pregnancy thing?! I mean Tom is clearly a ****ing raging homo, it's been known for years.
So either it's not his, it's IVF or he turned her over, put a picture of Colin Farrel on the back of her head and pretended he was ****ing arse.
It's a load of shit.
I ****ing hate Tom Cruise. And that whiney bitch.
__________________
I came, I saw, I shouldn't mix pleasure with carpentry.
|
|
|
7 Oct 2005, 08:40
|
#6
|
Bored
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Nottm ->Shef ->Croydon ->Manc ->Durham ->Sheffield
Posts: 6,506
|
Re: I Am Outraged, Sir!
mmm katie holmes
|
|
|
7 Oct 2005, 09:05
|
#7
|
Godfather
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 5,185
|
Re: I Am Outraged, Sir!
Anyone who gets divorced from h e r is a moron anyway.
__________________
Forum Administrator
Mail : [email protected] // IRC : #forums
__________________
It's not personal, it's just business.
|
|
|
7 Oct 2005, 14:44
|
#8
|
:alpha:
Join Date: May 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 7,871
|
Re: I Am Outraged, Sir!
i'm getting on the sue-bandwagon right now lets go sue sue money money SHOW ME THE MONEY JERRY SHOW ME THE MONEY
__________________
"There is no I in team, but there are two in anal fisting"
|
|
|
7 Oct 2005, 21:24
|
#9
|
Lonely analytic
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,390
|
Re: I Am Outraged, Sir!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dace
I seem to remember that the American tabloids were saying, back when Tom and Katie got together, that Katie had been "interviewed" for the part of Tom's wife along with various other "minor" actresses and part of the deal was that they'd get married and have a child (created by IVF) and get divorced 6 years later or something and for this Katie would be paid £4mil and it was all because Tom "i'm a raging queer" Cruise was gay.
|
I was right on Micheal whatshisface from WHAM being a queer. I was right on Robbie Williams being a raving queermosexual, right from the first live stage appearance of this boyband I had the doubtful honor to see. He was the guy in black on the back left and all I could think of was 'oh my God look at that bunch of raving faggots'. Turned out I was right again.
Now this Tom Cruise is the nasty sort of faggot that has issues with the way people perceive him. He plays all these superheterosexual roles but never seems to get any real chemistry going, and it's just simply true, Tom Cruise is a homo, full stop.
If anyone wishes to bring this dyke up he was married with, well go ahead. She has put her face in more bush than Steve 'Crocodilehunter' Erwin, and it's a fact.
And as pointed out earlier by someone, anyone denying their homosexiuality is clearly gay.
__________________
For real
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:35.
| |