|
9 Sep 2012, 09:15
|
#1
|
Internal Error
Join Date: May 2002
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 696
|
why?
Why did DS nap Ultores? That pretty much killed this round, blockwise.
__________________
Nitros
[]LCH[] ..lets change history
|
|
|
9 Sep 2012, 10:18
|
#2
|
The Video Guy
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,279
|
Re: why?
Hasn't everyone pretty much forced DS's hand by blocking against them?
__________________
Writing lists and taking names.
|
|
|
9 Sep 2012, 11:26
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitros
That pretty much killed this round, blockwise.
|
Blocks kill this game. It's the only thing CT seem to be competent at.
|
|
|
9 Sep 2012, 11:53
|
#4
|
Guest
|
Re: why?
Ds have sat quite pretty alone this, afaik they have only been targetted twice all round??(feel free to correct me).
So really they had no need to nap Ult other than them fortelling the same outcome to them as happened to CT last roung?
|
|
|
9 Sep 2012, 13:25
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: why?
They napped Ultores to avoid getting roided. Good politics.
|
|
|
9 Sep 2012, 13:43
|
#6
|
ToF
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England
Posts: 607
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
Blocks kill this game. It's the only thing CT seem to be competent at.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
They napped Ultores to avoid getting roided. Good politics.
|
Is this trolling or are you just that stupid?
__________________
[19:10] <coffee-> dont worry about Reincarnate he is an angry man
R1 - 9 none | R10.5 - 13 [ToF] | R14 [Reunion] | R15-17 [Subh] | R18 - 36 PA vacation | R37 [Evo] | R38 [NFI] | R39 & 40 [ToF] | R41 [Omega] | R42 - 47 [ToF][HC]
|
|
|
9 Sep 2012, 13:43
|
#7
|
Internal Error
Join Date: May 2002
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 696
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
Blocks kill this game. It's the only thing CT seem to be competent at.
|
I assume you're digging at me for being CT and blocking? Just for your information, I'm not really playing this round nor do I ever have anything to do with CT politics
__________________
Nitros
[]LCH[] ..lets change history
|
|
|
9 Sep 2012, 13:58
|
#8
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitros
Why did DS nap Ultores? That pretty much killed this round, blockwise.
|
We all know that ultores is gonna break the NAP when ever they are able to win.
This NAP means nothing but a temporaly avoidance of getting inc while they bot outgrow the alliances bellow.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
9 Sep 2012, 14:03
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: why?
the nap helps ults by removing any support ds had
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
9 Sep 2012, 15:20
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reincarnate
Is this trolling or are you just that stupid?
|
Do the maths.
|
|
|
9 Sep 2012, 18:48
|
#11
|
Honour above pr0n
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Home of 1337- Pittsburgh
Posts: 54
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by t3k
Hasn't everyone pretty much forced DS's hand by blocking against them?
|
No?
DS has probably had the least incomings of anyone this round.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouds
They napped Ultores to avoid getting roided. Good politics.
|
While also putting their only competition firmly in the lead. Good poli.....
__________________
Round 4: Dawg_14k Of Tashbaan 96:8:8 (D6 | NRK)
Round 5:The End of Tim3 9:23:9 (NRK)
Round 6: Sekigahari of Malakhi 13:15:6 (Guild)
Round 7: =- Arutha -= The Prince of Krondor 29:17:13 (NoS)
Round 8: Forget..(Adelante/Fang)
Round 9: 5:5:7 1010100101101010 of 101101010110 (NoS)
|
|
|
9 Sep 2012, 22:19
|
#12
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
the nap helps ults by removing any support ds had
|
Well that might be true, we all know CT have been aiding Ultores to the win r46, and HaveN r47, i wonder who will help em this round.
Though i think its a good move atm for dS. Though its boring for the rest.
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
9 Sep 2012, 22:21
|
#13
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: why?
I don't think CT have a leg to stand on, considering they pretty much let ult win every round by napping/allying/working with ult at tick 800 to hit fang/haven/anyone else outroiding them.
|
|
|
10 Sep 2012, 16:01
|
#14
|
king of carrot flowers
Join Date: May 2012
Location: 'Ampshire
Posts: 101
|
Re: why?
the next few nights will be interesting.
It seems to me that its either APP and ULT (which should be called AULT), APP and DS (which adequetely makes 'phone'APPS) or DS and ULT (which only makes an uninteresting DULT)..
oh and occasionally the others contribute by working with these three to prolong the eventual round winner becomming apparant.
also, from someone peering in, it does seem the blocks are changing alot this round (quicker than normal) anyhoo, wonder what people make of this lack of 'loyalty'?
__________________
I finished high once, not as high as you, but then I ain't talking about rankings..
|
|
|
11 Sep 2012, 15:25
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
Posts: 145
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by baggy
also, from someone peering in, it does seem the blocks are changing alot this round (quicker than normal) anyhoo, wonder what people make of this lack of 'loyalty'?
|
Just another normal round of PA...
__________________
The only thing neccesary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing
Ultores peon
|
|
|
11 Sep 2012, 16:02
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 77
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
I don't think CT have a leg to stand on, considering they pretty much let ult win every round by napping/allying/working with ult at tick 800 to hit fang/haven/anyone else outroiding them.
|
I can actually agree with this
__________________
Who the smurf cares about a signature?
|
|
|
12 Sep 2012, 01:32
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,386
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
I don't think CT have a leg to stand on, considering they pretty much let ult win every round by napping/allying/working with ult at tick 800 to hit fang/haven/anyone else outroiding them.
|
It's not exactly difficult to out roid an ally that grounds every night.
|
|
|
12 Sep 2012, 01:58
|
#18
|
Honour above pr0n
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Home of 1337- Pittsburgh
Posts: 54
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fizz
I can actually agree with this
|
So, a bunch of ex-CT join DS (including Fizz) because they don't like how we helped Ult win last round.
So what happens?
DS helps Ult win this round by napping them and hitting CT with Apprime, V, Haven, and Ultores. I'm going to laugh when they turn on DS. Maybe then you can exile your way out of DS because 'no one likes you'...
But it's okay, you have nothing to do with it, right?
__________________
Round 4: Dawg_14k Of Tashbaan 96:8:8 (D6 | NRK)
Round 5:The End of Tim3 9:23:9 (NRK)
Round 6: Sekigahari of Malakhi 13:15:6 (Guild)
Round 7: =- Arutha -= The Prince of Krondor 29:17:13 (NoS)
Round 8: Forget..(Adelante/Fang)
Round 9: 5:5:7 1010100101101010 of 101101010110 (NoS)
|
|
|
12 Sep 2012, 03:24
|
#19
|
General (Adjective Army)
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Yorkshire, England.
Posts: 825
|
Re: why?
(Edit: I notice that Kaiba has deleted the post to which this was a reply so I've added it here for context).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
CT defence against Ultores and co was so shocking im suprised half the attacking planets didnt closed for farming... or was that the new CT masterplan?
I dont think CT have a right to criticise anyone frankly. Wjhen your own house is in order and you can defend AND attack sucessfully then you can come and have a pop at other alliances.. until then hush up please
|
I wonder if you'll be quite so cocky once you've reaped what you've sown.
Thinking about it, I don't need to wonder. The only time you've had any alliance success was when Ultores (for reasons unfathomable to the rest of us) allowed you to join them for a round - so you're used to having no foundation for your criticism of a long established alliance with two round wins under its belt.
__________________
Amnion (aka The Arcane Chas of Arcania) - Playing PA under those and other pseudonyms every genuine round since Round 2. Most recently (and insignificantly):
Onset of Apathy R94 | Stacks of Resources R95 | The Necromancer of Dol Guldur R96
70 Years of Queen Elizabeth R97 | Worst of The Worst R98
Knights of the Green Shield R99 | Look Out of The Window R100 | Most of All R102
Hard of Hearing (2:7:1) R103 | The Lateness of Your Application (1:6:6) R104 | Kinnison of Tellus (5:1:2) R105
Last edited by ArcChas; 12 Sep 2012 at 15:52.
|
|
|
12 Sep 2012, 06:40
|
#20
|
Internal Error
Join Date: May 2002
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 696
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiba
CT defence against Ultores and co was so shocking im suprised half the attacking planets didnt closed for farming... or was that the new CT masterplan?
I dont think CT have a right to criticise anyone frankly. Wjhen your own house is in order and you can defend AND attack sucessfully then you can come and have a pop at other alliances.. until then hush up please
|
This has absolutly nothing to do with this topic.
__________________
Nitros
[]LCH[] ..lets change history
|
|
|
12 Sep 2012, 10:35
|
#21
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 77
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stylez1877
So, a bunch of ex-CT join DS (including Fizz) because they don't like how we helped Ult win last round.
So what happens?
DS helps Ult win this round by napping them and hitting CT with Apprime, V, Haven, and Ultores. I'm going to laugh when they turn on DS. Maybe then you can exile your way out of DS because 'no one likes you'...
But it's okay, you have nothing to do with it, right?
|
Lol Stylez, I left CT because they suck, both politics wise and alliance wide. Only thing you got going is the tools. Well done on being accurate.
Saddest thing is, Ults are the only alliance that hasn't broken their nap to give ds its beatdown. Its taken 5 alliances to beatdown ds, well done. You're all epic. Loving the sks as well.
I'd rather let ults win 6/6, which is what I think I'll ensure happens. My only concern is finishing my round, also you honestly wanna know my reason foreexiling? You guys are the worst gal mates one could possibly have.
__________________
Who the smurf cares about a signature?
|
|
|
12 Sep 2012, 14:30
|
#22
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: why?
don't bother trying to come back then if that's how you feel, though i don't see DS doing very well on politics itself.
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
12 Sep 2012, 16:41
|
#23
|
Honour above pr0n
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Home of 1337- Pittsburgh
Posts: 54
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fizz
Lol Stylez, I left CT because they suck, both politics wise and alliance wide. Only thing you got going is the tools. Well done on being accurate.
Saddest thing is, Ults are the only alliance that hasn't broken their nap to give ds its beatdown. Its taken 5 alliances to beatdown ds, well done. You're all epic. Loving the sks as well.
I'd rather let ults win 6/6, which is what I think I'll ensure happens. My only concern is finishing my round, also you honestly wanna know my reason foreexiling? You guys are the worst gal mates one could possibly have.
|
Oh no? 5 alliances are attacking DS? I mean, the last 3 days, wasn't DS attacking CT (the least roidfat alliance in the top 5) with Haven, xvx, Ultores, and Apprime? What goes around comes around . Thanks for giving Ultores the win. I'm sure you wish you had a few allies about now.
And it's okay, I rather be a bad gal mate than straight up dishonest, as you've been the entire round--if not just entirely manipulative.
__________________
Round 4: Dawg_14k Of Tashbaan 96:8:8 (D6 | NRK)
Round 5:The End of Tim3 9:23:9 (NRK)
Round 6: Sekigahari of Malakhi 13:15:6 (Guild)
Round 7: =- Arutha -= The Prince of Krondor 29:17:13 (NoS)
Round 8: Forget..(Adelante/Fang)
Round 9: 5:5:7 1010100101101010 of 101101010110 (NoS)
|
|
|
12 Sep 2012, 17:07
|
#24
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 279
|
Re: why?
__________________
HA-ND-EC-DLR-APP-ODDR-Kittenz-Carisan-Tal Shiar-Carnage-ODDR
Co founder ODDR
|
|
|
12 Sep 2012, 18:15
|
#25
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fizz
Its taken 5 alliances to beatdown ds, well done. You're all epic. Loving the sks as well.
|
I think it's pretty clear to everyone that it would've taken a single pensioner in a wheelchair to beat down DS. But why ruin an opportunity to inflict record roid loss?
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
12 Sep 2012, 19:18
|
#26
|
Guest
|
Re: why?
Hmm, well DS should not be allowed to finish #1 without any real incoming that would be a crime, it is down to DS to handle the incoming better than what they have. DS have received no more incoming than any other ally.
|
|
|
12 Sep 2012, 19:42
|
#27
|
Knightly Protector
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Avalon
Posts: 590
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebird
Hmm, well DS should not be allowed to finish #1 without any real incoming that would be a crime, it is down to DS to handle the incoming better than what they have. DS have received no more incoming than any other ally.
|
Win some, lose some. Yeah its too bad we lost 25% of our roids. In the past we did better but oh well. Only way to go is up now and of course land for some good XP. Fortunately we didnt have (m)any defense crashes, quite a few of the attackers crashed though so that's good.
__________________
TGV Ex-HC
-No I am not suffering from insanity. I am enjoying every minute of it.
Est Sularus oth Mithas
My Honour is My Life, My Life is My Honour
|
|
|
12 Sep 2012, 19:48
|
#28
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 707
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RexDrax
Win some, lose some. Yeah its too bad we lost 25% of our roids. In the past we did better but oh well. Only way to go is up now and of course land for some good XP. Fortunately we didnt have (m)any defense crashes, quite a few of the attackers crashed though so that's good.
|
glad you added that (m) before any... As i've seen atleast 3 def fail breps, with unnecessairly lost value.
|
|
|
12 Sep 2012, 19:51
|
#29
|
Knightly Protector
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Avalon
Posts: 590
|
Re: why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoDD
glad you added that (m) before any... As i've seen atleast 3 def fail breps, with unnecessairly lost value.
|
Oh? I know of only 1 pretty bad crash and 2 semi def crashes. Other than at those 3 planets we really didnt lose any value except for the value lost due to roids.
__________________
TGV Ex-HC
-No I am not suffering from insanity. I am enjoying every minute of it.
Est Sularus oth Mithas
My Honour is My Life, My Life is My Honour
|
|
|
14 Sep 2012, 02:43
|
#30
|
Old Fart
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 91
|
Re: why?
Same old girly sh&te diffrent day.
__________________
MobRulz
#FAnG
#Mercenaries
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:09.
| |