|
31 May 2006, 01:16
|
#1
|
1up on you
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 4,007
|
Ste, Dace...
Finally a political party has been created for you
here
__________________
pig
[ 1u p]
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 01:24
|
#2
|
so f*cking zen
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hitting Bottom
Posts: 8,499
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
HOLLAND HERE I COME!
__________________
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 01:25
|
#3
|
so f*cking zen
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hitting Bottom
Posts: 8,499
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
errrr, i mean cum
__________________
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 01:28
|
#4
|
1up on you
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 4,007
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Could such a party exist in the UK do you think?
Also what they are saying "A ban just makes children curious," do you think thats correct i mean do kids at 12 really want sex are do paedos just want a reason to sleep with young boys (and girls, maybe dead people too)
__________________
pig
[ 1u p]
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 01:31
|
#5
|
so f*cking zen
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hitting Bottom
Posts: 8,499
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
I think they would end up killed (which i think is very, very wrong) because there's too many people out there who don't believe in democracy *sobs*
__________________
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 01:34
|
#6
|
Slap Machine
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Blumenau, SC - Brazil
Posts: 174
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
the bizarre political party
__________________
...
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 02:26
|
#7
|
Godfather
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 5,185
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
__________________
Forum Administrator
Mail : [email protected] // IRC : #forums
__________________
It's not personal, it's just business.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 02:34
|
#8
|
Vermin Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,280
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
to push for a cut in the legal age for sexual relations to 12 from 16
|
meh.
Quote:
"A ban just makes children curious," Ad van den Berg, one of the party's founders, told the Algemeen Dagblad (AD) newspaper.
|
"In fact, one of my biggest pickup lines is 'you wanna find out why it's illegal?'"
Quote:
"They make out as if they want more rights for children. But their position that children should be allowed sexual contact from age 12 is of course just in their own interest," anti-pedophile campaigner Ireen van Engelen told the AD daily.
|
OH SHIT! THEY'RE ONTO US!
Quote:
The party wants private possession of child pornography to be allowed although it supports the ban on the trade of such materials.
|
that seems odd.
Quote:
It also supports allowing pornography to be broadcast on daytime television, with only violent pornography limited to the late evening.
|
why can't these perverts understand that sex is a shameful act that needs to be hidden?
Quote:
Toddlers should be given sex education and youths aged 16 and up should be allowed to appear in pornographic films and prostitute themselves.
|
this is actually a pretty minor shift for holland, isn't it?
Quote:
Sex with animals should be allowed although abuse of animals should remain illegal, the NVD said.
|
it is odd that you can murder an animal, but you aren't allowed to consummate a loving relationship with one...
Quote:
The party also said everybody should be allowed to go naked in public
|
i have to say that some people shouldn't be allowed to go naked.
Quote:
and promotes legalizing all soft and hard drugs
|
yes; no.
Quote:
and free train travel for all.
|
really there is very little in there that has to do with pedophilia, outside of the incremental changes to child porn laws. really this is more just a bunch of pervs and deviants mixed up with civil libertarians.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 08:58
|
#9
|
Clerk
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,940
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by acropolis
yes; no.
|
Why the no?
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 09:21
|
#10
|
Lucky
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: -
Posts: 3,830
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 09:22
|
#11
|
Bored
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Nottm ->Shef ->Croydon ->Manc ->Durham ->Sheffield
Posts: 6,506
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
I don't want to have sex with animals
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 09:48
|
#12
|
cynic
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bishop Auckland Co. Durham
Posts: 8,809
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
yeah, but at least we all agree on the free train travel...
__________________
lazy
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 11:01
|
#13
|
Lucky
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: -
Posts: 3,830
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
for 5 years now, i already have free train/bus/tram/underground travel from mondaymorning to friday-evening. in weekends i have a 40% discount.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 11:04
|
#14
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoeN
for 5 years now, i already have free train/bus/tram/underground travel from mondaymorning to friday-evening. in weekends i have a 40% discount.
|
Only you could possibly make this thread uninteresting.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 11:09
|
#15
|
Giddy little...
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 145
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
They'd be worth a vote if they guaranteed a sexy 15 year old for every voter.
Its hardly rocket science.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 11:16
|
#16
|
Registered Awesome Person
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,676
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Tyrant
They'd be worth a vote if they guaranteed a sexy 15 year old for every voter.
Its hardly rocket science.
|
How about a 12 year old sir? Fresh out of white cotton panties, just a touch of hair on her minge sir. Ooh, suit you sir, do you want her sir? Plenty of hymen there for you sir, ready for the taking, sir! Ooh, suits you, sir.
__________________
Finally free!
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 11:18
|
#17
|
Clerk
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,940
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoeN
for 5 years now, i already have free train/bus/tram/underground travel from mondaymorning to friday-evening. in weekends i have a 40% discount.
|
Big deal, we let our spastics have free travel too.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 11:22
|
#18
|
Giddy little...
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 145
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by furball
How about a 12 year old sir? Fresh out of white cotton panties, just a touch of hair on her minge sir. Ooh, suit you sir, do you want her sir? Plenty of hymen there for you sir, ready for the taking, sir! Ooh, suits you, sir.
|
guessing you got a sister then? yeah, i'll make a woman of her
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 11:29
|
#19
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by furball
How about a 12 year old sir? Fresh out of white cotton panties, just a touch of hair on her minge sir. Ooh, suit you sir, do you want her sir? Plenty of hymen there for you sir, ready for the taking, sir! Ooh, suits you, sir.
|
Remember furball there's nothing wrong with anything once it's decriminalised
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 12:16
|
#20
|
Clerk
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,940
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Remember furball there's nothing wrong with anything once it's decriminalised
|
I was reading in an Irish newspaper yesterday that a prisoner who had sex with a 12 year old girl is planning to appeal under the new ruling. So for justice.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 12:27
|
#21
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dante Hicks
I was reading in an Irish newspaper yesterday that a prisoner who had sex with a 12 year old girl is planning to appeal under the new ruling. So for justice.
|
He's out of jail and under double jeopardy or whatever can't be given a retrial. Also he got her drunk beforehand.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 12:31
|
#22
|
1up on you
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 4,007
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
If theres grass on the wicket...
__________________
pig
[ 1u p]
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 12:40
|
#23
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by pig
If theres grass on the wicket...
|
Isn't 12 statistically "early" though?
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 12:43
|
#24
|
Clerk
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,940
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Isn't 12 statistically "early" though?
|
Obligatory Dace link.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 12:47
|
#25
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dante Hicks
|
I meant that if we're going by the philosophy of "if there's grass on the wicket..." 12 is going to be too early even for this approach.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 12:48
|
#26
|
Bored
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Nottm ->Shef ->Croydon ->Manc ->Durham ->Sheffield
Posts: 6,506
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
a lovely text I had from Tomkat about 6 months ago:
"old enough to bleed, old enough to rape ;("
nice.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 12:51
|
#27
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Yeah but tomkat got cancer so what does that tell us about paedophiles?
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 13:11
|
#28
|
Gone
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,656
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Strangely enough, I was just reading Xenophon's symposium the other day.
Quote:
"A ban just makes children curious," Ad van den Berg, one of the party's founders, told the Algemeen Dagblad (AD) newspaper.
|
THEY'RE ALL ****ING PRICK-TEASERS!
Last edited by Marilyn Manson; 31 May 2006 at 13:47.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 14:49
|
#29
|
Evil inside
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,631
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Yeah but tomkat got cancer so what does that tell us about paedophiles?
|
Half of GD is about to develop cancer in the near future?
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 15:19
|
#30
|
Vermin Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,280
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dante Hicks
Why the no?
|
it depends on what you define as hard drugs. for me:
1. Any drug that automatically makes the user a danger to (himself and) others (while under the influence).
or
2. Any drug that is addictive enough that any user will be willing to endanger (himself and) others in order to guarantee continued use.
in my utopia, drugs that fall into only the first category would be legalized for use only in controlled circumstances. the second category is tougher.
i think my definition of 'hard drugs' then makes my opposition self-explanatory.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 15:21
|
#31
|
Vermin Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,280
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Isn't 12 statistically "early" though?
|
women 'develop' earlier than men.
which clearly means the legal age for women should be younger too.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 15:23
|
#32
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by acropolis
women 'develop' earlier than men.
which clearly means the legal age for women should be younger too.
|
But what about the legal age for transsexuals!
PS You don't seem to be clear on your addiction distinction concerning hard drugs if you consider the compulsion behind certain psychological addictions.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 15:24
|
#33
|
Clerk
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,940
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by acropolis
it depends on what you define as hard drugs. for me:
1. Any drug that automatically makes the user a danger to (himself and) others (while under the influence).
or
2. Any drug that is addictive enough that any user will be willing to endanger (himself and) others in order to guarantee continued use.
|
Alcohol and cigarettes.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 15:29
|
#34
|
Vermin Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,280
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
But what about the legal age for transsexuals!
|
the legal age for hermaphrodites would be found by using the ratio of the measured weights of the relevant genitalia at hand, and applying that to a simple linear function connecting the age for men and women (i realize transsexuals aren't hermaphrodites, but i think this fills out the picture better than "depends.")
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 15:31
|
#35
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by acropolis
the legal age for hermaphrodites would be found by using the ratio of the measured weights of the relevant genitalia at hand, and applying that to a simple linear function connecting the age for men and women (i realize transsexuals aren't hermaphrodites, but i think this fills out the picture better than "depends.")
|
Shouldn't we invent some sort of arbitrary maturity test which basically rewards people for having watched stupid amounts of Byker Grove?
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 15:33
|
#36
|
Vermin Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,280
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dante Hicks
Alcohol and cigarettes.
|
'immediate physical threat' or whatever shit the lawyers come up with that prevents police from throwing everyone in the McDonalds drive through lane into a psyche ward on account o' them being 'a danger to themselves'
I'm sure I'll have a full legal department that can handle the pissy details when I'm king.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 15:35
|
#37
|
Vermin Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,280
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Shouldn't we invent some sort of arbitrary maturity test which basically rewards people for having watched stupid amounts of Byker Grove?
|
how would that give me an excuse to fondle people's naughty parts?
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 15:36
|
#38
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Further to the right
Posts: 19,441
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by acropolis
how would that give me an excuse to fondle people's naughty parts?
|
Kings are above the law dear.
__________________
Some might ask what good is life without purpose but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 15:39
|
#39
|
Vermin Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,280
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonnyBGood
Kings are above the law dear.
|
a little bit of Droit du seigneur never hurt nobody, at least that's what my pappy always used to say (then he'd **** a 12 year-old virgin serf girl* while she cried.).
*inserted to make the post topical.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 16:07
|
#40
|
Gone
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,656
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoeN
for 5 years now, i already have free train/bus/tram/underground travel from mondaymorning to friday-evening. in weekends i have a 40% discount.
|
You post like old people ****.
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 20:55
|
#41
|
Clerk
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,940
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by acropolis
'immediate physical threat' or whatever shit the lawyers come up with that prevents police from throwing everyone in the McDonalds drive through lane into a psyche ward on account o' them being 'a danger to themselves'
|
Fair enough. I presume you're against suicide then too?
|
|
|
31 May 2006, 21:57
|
#42
|
Vermin Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,280
|
Re: Ste, Dace...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dante Hicks
Fair enough. I presume you're against suicide then too?
|
i tried to make my definition effective both in societies with legal suicide and those without (just drop the parenthetical sections) because i wanted to avoid this argument.
but yeah, does it show so easily? i'm completely in favor of euthanasia, and i'm completely open on the subject, but really this has to be one of the 'Top 5 Ways To **** Up Your Kid'.
of course enforcing the criminalization of suicide is an inherently laughable concept, but i do the best i can to disrespect them as much as possible.
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:48.
| |