![Reply](STYLES/Planetarion2/buttons/reply.gif) |
|
25 May 2017, 20:26
|
#51
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 16
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
thank u
|
|
|
25 May 2017, 21:03
|
#52
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
too much spam
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
25 May 2017, 21:27
|
#53
|
The Scareh Clown
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 275
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Gl everyone
__________________
1up, Spore, Faceless, BF, Apprime and now Ultores
|
|
|
25 May 2017, 22:07
|
#54
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
ready to go, gl all!
|
|
|
25 May 2017, 22:10
|
#55
|
lackey
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 29
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Let's have some fun.
__________________
All those who wander, are not lost.
|
|
|
25 May 2017, 22:19
|
#56
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 27
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
agreed
|
|
|
26 May 2017, 09:07
|
#57
|
JNLCWSFF
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 34
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Nice to see old allys makeing combacks ![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
Good luck to all!
|
|
|
26 May 2017, 14:07
|
#58
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 26
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
gg
|
|
|
26 May 2017, 16:06
|
#59
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 26
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Gluck all
|
|
|
28 May 2017, 22:53
|
#60
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 110
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ave
venox and impressive dcing!
|
Im sure he is awesome, but you really think CTs dcing was impressive? They sure as hell lost roids at an impressive rate as soon as someone attacked them, hardly Venox' fault ofc. Or maybe you praised his efforts for trying to dc a lost cause?
__________________
[G-II][Quha][LDK][Apprime][Ultores] - Xerxes
|
|
|
30 May 2017, 07:25
|
#61
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
I dont think CT got DCs
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
30 May 2017, 11:57
|
#62
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xerxes
They sure as hell lost roids at an impressive rate as soon as someone attacked them
|
Kittenz we could cope with, it was the other 3 alliances that we couldn't. we were not built to fight fang that round so were defenseless.
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
30 May 2017, 13:35
|
#63
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 499
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xerxes
Im sure he is awesome, but you really think CTs dcing was impressive? They sure as hell lost roids at an impressive rate as soon as someone attacked them, hardly Venox' fault ofc. Or maybe you praised his efforts for trying to dc a lost cause?
|
He obviously had low expectations of CT's defence the first night they p-targetted us on their own hence returning with friends subsequent nights. I was just one guy who bothered to DC CT that first night because I happened to have incs too. I don't think responsibility for CT's defensive performance in general should be placed solely at my door, I just did what I could when I was around.
We lost a lot of roids because we didn't ground when multiple allies were hitting us, nothing complicated there. It was the last week and our only play was to continue hitting Ult, we pretty much had only ally fleets to work with and a lot of people had already given up the round.
__________________
Founder and HC of [Denial] and [Evolution]
|
|
|
30 May 2017, 16:13
|
#64
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 936
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xerxes
Im sure he is awesome, but you really think CTs dcing was impressive? They sure as hell lost roids at an impressive rate as soon as someone attacked them, hardly Venox' fault ofc. Or maybe you praised his efforts for trying to dc a lost cause?
|
They did improve later part of the round. I believe it was mainly influence by VenoX, but thats just what rumours say.
Earlier they were less prepared or more offensive minded and we landed plenty.
__________________
If the opponent resists, CaRnage there will be!
|
|
|
30 May 2017, 19:33
|
#65
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Just a wee note to demort.... I have now lost all respect for you, I have been getting messages today from various people about you and that you said "GM told BF x", I have not spoken to BF and you have no right to infer to others that I have.
DO NOT use me as a excuse for your own bullshit!
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
30 May 2017, 19:37
|
#66
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
oh and if 1-3 fleets is a lot then yes CT has hit Catz a lot!!! moron ffs!!!
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
30 May 2017, 19:47
|
#67
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 898
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
tbh that goes for BF too, do not tell others I said things I didn't!! nelito isn't running your politics this round ;p
__________________
R4-5 DDK
R6 Vanx
R7-R10 FAnG
R10 Eclipse
R10.5-R13 FAnG
R20-23 CT
R23 (CT BG) ToF
R24-R82... CT
|
|
|
30 May 2017, 20:48
|
#68
|
Kamikaze
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Berlin
Posts: 19
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
CT is great and have balls
__________________
Honour & Loyalty
|
|
|
31 May 2017, 04:20
|
#69
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 936
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
oh and if 1-3 fleets is a lot then yes CT has hit Catz a lot!!! moron ffs!!!
|
how dare you!
__________________
If the opponent resists, CaRnage there will be!
|
|
|
31 May 2017, 13:31
|
#70
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 16
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
I'm clearly using this for the roids. Anyway good luck everyone I believe ignoring the stupid changes this will be a good round. I hope app wins
|
|
|
31 May 2017, 23:59
|
#71
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 9
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
What a terrible thread. Clearly PATSA will pwn us all.
|
|
|
1 Jun 2017, 06:17
|
#72
|
Dictator
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 634
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by [DDK]gm
DO NOT use me as a excuse for your own bullshit!
|
I believe this sort of thing has been happening ever since PA began. I often get a PM saying "I've been told by X that you are blocking/working with/wanting to hit Y". People believe these statements will draw out information, whether they are true or not. It does make it hard to believe anything a few people do have to say though. I know my politics has changed over the years due to the totally false stuff I've heard round after round.
|
|
|
1 Jun 2017, 09:39
|
#73
|
GGFC
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 13
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Seemed to go off topic quite quickly this thread...
Seems ult are favourites for the win as usual. No doubt they will nap half the universe and noone else will have the balls to hit them early enough to stop the round win. Or if they try the rest of the universe will smash them hard.
Don't get why any ally would say they aren't playing to win otherwise why even bother forming a tag?! Playing to do as well as you can and knowing it's highly unlikely you won't win is still playing to win. Surely noone is actually going out of there way to make sure they don't win?!
__________________
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. "
- Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."
- Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821)
|
|
|
1 Jun 2017, 10:13
|
#74
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Im pretty sure Ult said there wernt playing ftw, or atleast not as dedicated?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
1 Jun 2017, 10:23
|
#75
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veni
Don't get why any ally would say they aren't playing to win otherwise why even bother forming a tag?! Playing to do as well as you can and knowing it's highly unlikely you won't win is still playing to win. Surely noone is actually going out of there way to make sure they don't win?!
|
Isn't this what every alliance except ult does every round?
|
|
|
1 Jun 2017, 11:32
|
#76
|
Mind-boggling
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 1,468
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
It is tick 150 or whatever and Alliances have Ingame NAPs/Allies
Others have deals already
Let us just have a fkin scrap !!!!
We don't all need to NAP/ALLY up. If someone gets too big. Let's all smash them.
If it's competitive all round - fun for all!
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. (Winston Churchill)
R21-Randy Dandys Winners R21
1:9:5 -SoClose- -YetSoFar-
You have pending friend requests from Newt.
|
|
|
1 Jun 2017, 13:06
|
#77
|
GGFC
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 13
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA
If it's competitive all round - fun for all! ![Salute](images/smilies/salute.gif)
|
Exactly! Sod naptarion and politics ruining the game!
__________________
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. "
- Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."
- Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821)
|
|
|
1 Jun 2017, 13:14
|
#78
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA
It is tick 150 or whatever and Alliances have Ingame NAPs/Allies
Others have deals already
|
Wow! That's so unexpected!
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
1 Jun 2017, 14:34
|
#79
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA
It is tick 150 or whatever and Alliances have Ingame NAPs/Allies
Others have deals already
Let us just have a fkin scrap !!!!
We don't all need to NAP/ALLY up. If someone gets too big. Let's all smash them.
If it's competitive all round - fun for all! ![Salute](images/smilies/salute.gif)
|
I think they try the smashing bit most rounds, and Ult STILL wins!
|
|
|
1 Jun 2017, 15:18
|
#80
|
Retard0r
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,164
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
lol, we've lost more rounds than we've won the past few years. I wonder where this fixation comes from..?
__________________
-Chimpie
* We do not exist *
* G-II * NoS * VsN * Ascendancy * Osiris * xVx * Ultores *
|
|
|
1 Jun 2017, 15:48
|
#81
|
Mind-boggling
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 1,468
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrunkenViking
lol, we've lost more rounds than we've won the past few years. I wonder where this fixation comes from..?
|
Tbh It is like the fkin news
PAthetic propoganda morons
Everyone fight
if Ult get fat hit until they aint fat. don't do a tick 999999 deal with anyone
if App get fat, hit app, if BF get fat him them
it fkin war game
whoever wars the most should win - damage dealt & value saved ![Banana](images/smilies/banana.gif) ![Banana](images/smilies/banana.gif) ![Banana](images/smilies/banana.gif)
let's have a fight
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. (Winston Churchill)
R21-Randy Dandys Winners R21
1:9:5 -SoClose- -YetSoFar-
You have pending friend requests from Newt.
|
|
|
1 Jun 2017, 15:52
|
#82
|
BlueTuba
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,339
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
You are not going to have a war at this stage unless you're absolutely confident of blowing your opponent out the water this early. Hits to growth at this stage are still quite damaging to your long term prospects.
__________________
"Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
|
|
|
1 Jun 2017, 18:13
|
#83
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA
Tbh It is like the fkin news
PAthetic propoganda morons
Everyone fight
if Ult get fat hit until they aint fat. don't do a tick 999999 deal with anyone
if App get fat, hit app, if BF get fat him them
it fkin war game
whoever wars the most should win - damage dealt & value saved ![Banana](images/smilies/banana.gif) ![Banana](images/smilies/banana.gif) ![Banana](images/smilies/banana.gif)
let's have a fight
|
If it's a war game why is it viable to play and rank well (even win) without seeing any combat??
|
|
|
1 Jun 2017, 23:03
|
#84
|
mz.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,587
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA
let's have a fight
|
Talk is cheap.
__________________
The outraged poets threw sticks and rocks over the side of the bridge. They were all missing Mary and he felt a contented smug feeling wash over him. He would have given them a coy little wave if the roof hadn't collapsed just then. Mary then found himself in the middle of an understandably shocked family's kitchen table. So he gave them the coy little wave and realized it probably would have been more effective if he hadn't been lying on their turkey.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2017, 15:01
|
#85
|
Mind-boggling
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 1,468
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzyxptlk
Talk is cheap.
|
gimme ur coords and ill come at u with all i've got
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. (Winston Churchill)
R21-Randy Dandys Winners R21
1:9:5 -SoClose- -YetSoFar-
You have pending friend requests from Newt.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2017, 18:07
|
#86
|
Error
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 359
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA
gimme ur coords and ill come at u with all i've got ![Fire Devil](images/smilies/firedevil.gif)
|
well, any war is made of decisions and politics, sometimes it counts a way more then army or firepower. And sometimes, if u tell ppl "i have a nuke" no1 will mess with u, making u win without any combat!
but thats a newb point of view =)
__________________
#braSilFTW
|
|
|
3 Jun 2017, 00:04
|
#87
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBA
gimme ur coords and ill come at u with all i've got ![Fire Devil](images/smilies/firedevil.gif)
|
come at me bro
|
|
|
3 Jun 2017, 00:08
|
#88
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
So looks like FAnG is merging into the kittenz support tag.
Does this make KittenZ 120 planets? and what will the new name be? Furious KittyCatz next Generation?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
3 Jun 2017, 01:26
|
#89
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
So looks like FAnG is merging into the kittenz support tag.
Does this make KittenZ 120 planets? and what will the new name be? Furious KittyCatz next Generation?
|
How is 60 + 40 120?
|
|
|
3 Jun 2017, 01:29
|
#90
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by eksero
How is 60 + 40 120?
|
Your right, i was just assuming that those 20 planets that was kicked/left has nothing to do with the merger limit on 40 total planets.
Your quick eksero, no wonder you always winning
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
3 Jun 2017, 01:35
|
#91
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,143
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
Your right, i was just assuming that those 20 planets that was kicked/left has nothing to do with the merger limit on 40 total planets.
Your quick eksero, no wonder you always winning
|
You know what they say
|
|
|
3 Jun 2017, 05:19
|
#92
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 936
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
So looks like FAnG is merging into the kittenz support tag.
Does this make KittenZ 120 planets? and what will the new name be? Furious KittyCatz next Generation?
|
Support?
__________________
If the opponent resists, CaRnage there will be!
|
|
|
3 Jun 2017, 05:38
|
#93
|
Error
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 359
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Omg
Irvine gonna win this round!!!!
__________________
#braSilFTW
|
|
|
3 Jun 2017, 12:33
|
#94
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ave
Support?
|
What, isnt it a KittenZ support tag?
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
3 Jun 2017, 14:52
|
#95
|
Valle is my hero
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,581
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyButcher
What, isnt it a KittenZ support tag? ![Rolleyes](images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
|
It's only a measure to counter ND and it's support tag.... CT!
|
|
|
3 Jun 2017, 19:53
|
#96
|
Anarchy Shadow
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nafferton, England
Posts: 324
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
look as if Irvine would ever be a support tag get serious and Catz was never a sup tag was an extension of Kittenz just i couldnt be arsed with the extra work so they joined with Fang so both smaller tags could have a more enjoyable round enough said on the matter
__________________
EX
Legion, Fury, Xanadu, Wolfpack, NoS, TSU, LKSAB, Vgn, F-Crew, CT, Insomnia, Angels, VsN, Gross, Osiris, ROCK, XvX, Faceless, Unsullied, Haven, Carisan, RaGe, Carnage, Kittenz and EC
Currently
In ODDR Command
|
|
|
3 Jun 2017, 20:15
|
#97
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 936
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demort
look as if Irvine would ever be a support tag get serious and Catz was never a sup tag was an extension of Kittenz just i couldnt be arsed with the extra work so they joined with Fang so both smaller tags could have a more enjoyable round enough said on the matter
|
duck extension, like a nice car or a big dog!
__________________
If the opponent resists, CaRnage there will be!
|
|
|
3 Jun 2017, 21:53
|
#98
|
Don't make me declare war
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,913
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
So if an alliance decides to declare war on Fang/Catz, will it be a straight war, or will kittenz miraculously decide to get involved?
#askingforafriend
|
|
|
3 Jun 2017, 22:39
|
#99
|
Propaganda Chief
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 4,740
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forest
So if an alliance decides to declare war on Fang/Catz, will it be a straight war, or will kittenz miraculously decide to get involved?
#askingforafriend
|
Would be more interesting to hear if FAnG/CatZ would ever hit KittenZ, but i guess that aint possibole seeing they are allied ingame anyways.
But as Demort said CatZ = KittenZ
__________________
RainbowS
RB Ely MISTU Angel Fusi0n 1up ToF VisioN CT FAnG ROCK
|
|
|
4 Jun 2017, 20:35
|
#100
|
Retard0r
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,164
|
Re: R72 discussion thread
Does it matter? Combined they're still smaller than any block I've ever heard of...
__________________
-Chimpie
* We do not exist *
* G-II * NoS * VsN * Ascendancy * Osiris * xVx * Ultores *
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:05.
| |