Planetarion Forums - Retard Circus

Petru · 29 Oct 2002, 18:34

Is there really a need to start another thread of horse****?

Does anyone, anyone with sense, and a clue of decency, really give a fk about any of this?

29 Oct 2002, 18:34

Quote:

Originally posted by Hicks
I've been running Fury defence calls most of this afternoon and haven't sent anything in FAnG's direction nor have I had any contact with any FanG military personnel . Should FanG members stop having friends in other alliances who they can get to send defence ? Should FanG BCs turn their members away if they say “I’ve got a mate in Fury who can send” for the sake of pointless AD arguments ? The answer to both is no.

All this shows is that FanG’s 300k defence > Titans/LDK/ViruS/DTA attacks. What's wrong getting a bit hot over there guys ? xxx

Hicks at times you talk so much bullsh*t, this everyone knows there is a agreement so please... stop insulting our intelligence.

Hicks · 29 Oct 2002, 18:35

Quote:

Originally posted by jornx

PM me if you want to see the full log, it will show Sid offering him defense etc..

This would be from #fang

jornx · 29 Oct 2002, 18:36

Quote:

Originally posted by Hicks
This would be from #fang

so according to you a FAnG BC is faking logs of sid offering defense to boost morals or something?

Hicks · 29 Oct 2002, 18:36

Quote:

Originally posted by ado

Hicks at times you talk so much bullsh*t, this everyone knows there is a agreement so please... stop insulting our intelligence.

Why would I need to do that you believe your own hype afterall.

Hicks · 29 Oct 2002, 18:37

Quote:

Originally posted by jornx

so according to you a FAnG BC is faking logs of sid offering defense to boost morals or something?

No I just wonder why he's:
A) Pasting them to #FAnG
B) Leaking them to Titans
C) Not doing either

Maddix · 29 Oct 2002, 18:37

Quote:

Originally posted by Petru
Is there really a need to start another thread of horse****?

Does anyone, anyone with sense, and a clue of decency, really give a fk about any of this?

Apparently jornx and Hicks do....can't say I give a ****, but nothing else to do except see what ****e oozes out of AD next \o/

lrytas · 29 Oct 2002, 18:40

Quote:

Originally posted by Hicks
No but four is.

4 ?

Akallabeth · 29 Oct 2002, 18:41

ppl this is a GAME ! Play it and don't work it, fs. Most of you people are taking this far too seriously....

I just had to say this

(btw, any bet that after15 posts maximum and this thread will be about evil alliance A acctsharing/fkin over alliance B/allying alliance C to form a 'block' or whatever....seems to happen to every thread on these boards :/)

jornx · 29 Oct 2002, 18:41

Quote:

Originally posted by Hicks
No I just wonder why he's:
A) Pasting them to #FAnG
B) Leaking them to Titans
C) Not doing either

he didn't leak it to titans

jornx · 29 Oct 2002, 18:42

my bet is that this thread won't even reach the 15 posts.

MAdnRisKy · 29 Oct 2002, 18:42

Quote:

Originally posted by Petru
For the love of god can you idiots find something more interesting to banter on about.

In Camp One we have the Psi's who claim numbers decide everything.

In Camp Two we have the Hicks's who claim alliance 'banners' decide everything.

The entire lot of you are wrong and the entire lot of you have no fking sense spending your lives still on this stupid forum.

In r2 BT had over 1k members and were smashed to bits by a group around 10% of their size. Do numbers decide everything? No, superior numbers died.

In r2 SK comprised of more than a dozen wings, half independant alliances just under the SK group. Did this large collection of names make a dominant force? No, we fking died.

Titans twats, stop justifying what you've done with the argument of Fury having numbers. Fury twats, stop replying with the banner argument. G-II twats (lo dj) just .... shutup.

The same argument with no new incentive is just getting so tiresome day in day out.

JUST GIVE IT A REST, YOU'RE ALL TALKING TOSH

leave them all alone and play me at CS incely

Hicks · 29 Oct 2002, 18:43

Quote:

Originally posted by Maddix

Apparently jornx and Hicks do....can't say I give a ****, but nothing else to do except see what ****e oozes out of AD next \o/

Given the choice between going to library to study and having pointless arguments with people so partisan and indoctrinated to believe their own alliance's hype that there can be no hope of victory I chose AD 10 times over.

Akallabeth · 29 Oct 2002, 18:45

also true :/

jornx · 29 Oct 2002, 18:45

Quote:

Originally posted by Hicks
Given the choice between going to library to study and having pointless arguments with people so partisan and indoctrinated to believe their own alliance's hype that there can be no hope of victory I chose AD 10 times over.

this doesn't even deserve a reply

Hicks · 29 Oct 2002, 18:49

Quote:

Originally posted by jornx

this doesn't even deserve a reply

It wasn't ment for you, brains.

jornx · 29 Oct 2002, 18:52

Quote:

Originally posted by Hicks
It wasn't ment for you, brains.

it was a flame aimed towards me or I'm just paranoia :-)

Maddix · 29 Oct 2002, 18:53

*gives out sweeties and sends the kiddies off to play*

General1 · 29 Oct 2002, 18:59

Akallabeth I fully AGREE with you

KillGhost · 29 Oct 2002, 19:04

here we go again

KillGhost · 29 Oct 2002, 19:07

Quote:

Originally posted by lrytas
"Solo" Fury so you can't play fair at least 1 round ? Stop that stupid blocking fs.

hahahahahahahahahahahaha

sorry this made me piss my pants.

brb have to put on a clean one.

KillGhost · 29 Oct 2002, 19:09

back

and "here we go again"

Heartless · 29 Oct 2002, 19:11

Quote:

Originally posted by The Globe
loads of FAnG's cheat. And even the high ppl there.
So it means it's a cheating alliance cause they r still there, except with planets

I don't understand why some alliances support cheaters

It looks like you told us this already.
Still better than allying with an alliance which put Planetarion out of business by credit card fraud and which was the most cheating alliance out there (lo LDK).

29 Oct 2002, 19:14

[19:30] <Rumad> no
[19:31] <Rumad> the next propaganda is i attack old wimmen for sex
[19:31] <Rumad> they seem to have nailed everything else on me

SPYSS!!!!

'heulsusen' :>

KillGhost · 29 Oct 2002, 19:16

Quote:

Originally posted by Stratovarius

It looks like you told us this already.
Still better than allying with an alliance which put Planetarion out of business by credit card fraud and which was the most cheating alliance out there (lo LDK).

yep and dont forget Globe is a known hacker. Really handy if your Titans Intel.

izverg · 29 Oct 2002, 19:27

Quote:

Originally posted by Stratovarius

It looks like you told us this already.
Still better than allying with an alliance which put Planetarion out of business by credit card fraud and which was the most cheating alliance out there (lo LDK).

yeah yeah, we are the scum

*yawn*

29 Oct 2002, 19:27

Quote:

Originally posted by MysticYoshi

+Fang who cunningly attack a top 15 planet whilst reporting him whilst him being closed a few hours later so they can roid him for 10+ ticks without defence. Wish I could claim that as farming, heh

The planet in question hit various FAnG/Adelante planets whilst being a FAnG BC himself.. Some girl from FAnG got granted a retal and Touriquet agreed to it..

When the retal had been launched he recalled one of his fleets and came up with some stupid excuse.. The BGroup of the girl in question then arranged an attack on him.

That's the way it's going, guess Touriquet thought he was invincible or something, unfortunately not even DTA members are

Btw. He came on IRC later and said he didn't care about his planet getting owned because he had given it away before the weekend. I have logs, funky funky..

So, what was your point exactly?

Heartless · 29 Oct 2002, 19:31

Quote:

Originally posted by izverg

yeah yeah, we are the scum

*yawn*

Oh, and LDK, you are not cheating anymore, right?

so, let me quote from your irc server:

*** Lrytas changes topic to 'Kam reik acc 11mil scoro 2k roidu pm donceka !!!!!! || 30:5:9 || 150k hostile minimum || Dalyvauja: Lrytas +'

'Kam reik acc 11mil scoro 2k roidu pm donceka !!!!!!' means something like "I'm offering acc 11mil score 2k roids pm donceka"

Want me to post my log with donceka, to?

K-W · 29 Oct 2002, 19:32

Quote:

Originally posted by Scouse

Ho ho.

Fury claimed to have less than 150 members, so for argument's sake lets say they had 140. You then take 40 - 50 from adelante. That's more than Titans and LDK. And you have FAnG and ToT helping you as well.

Our numbers are less than that of Fury + FAnG + ToT.

Your numbers on Fury are innacurate. Color me surprised.

Well, the fact that youve gotten into conflicts with alliances that total more members than you have would seem foolish on your part, but how is that our fault? How is it our fault that your block picked a fight with us while still fighting Fang/ToT. We never allied with them. You brought us into this. And now you blame us when i, funny.

Cryptic · 29 Oct 2002, 19:35

- some Ludicrous Twatish Dipturds made some silly mistakes and annoyed different alliances in PA

- those alliances are independantly hitting back at these Ludicrous Twatish Dipturds.

- these Ludicrous Twatish Dipturds are getting upset and ranting about blocks even though they are the only ones really in one.

- Because they are upset and dummy spitting , the ' were leet and you're not ' , ' you have more players so you suck and we are leet' , 'we are just sodding leet so shut up' comments are also comming out.

PA ends , you had your chances over 8 rounds ........ and you can't take our title. Boo Hoo etc

K-W · 29 Oct 2002, 19:42

Quote:

Originally posted by Psi_K

you love to mention DTA...

Didn't titans bend over backwards to tell us all that DTA was not a titans attack group?

Quote:

Originally posted by lrytas

Eeeerm 2 alliances is a powerblock ?

Apparently 2 alliances having no relations but attacking the same people is a powerblock, so yah it would seem so.

This whole propaganda fest is just about the stupidest in my rememberence. LDK, you really should keep off the forums, you could keep your mistique up and not look like the run of the mill morons your turning out to be here.

Ive gone through enough rounds of this retarted double standard. Xanadu did it so expertly, and profited, but frankly now its an overplayed record and your doing a **** job at it.

"Fury is semi cooperating with one group, they are powerblockers, they can't play fair." Meanwhile you sit back and make deals in an obvious attempt to dominate the round.

Which is fine, its always been your goal. It was always xanadus goal, it is titans goal, it is LDK's goal. It is everyones goal.

But you like to pretend that your just here playing for fun and going it nice and solo for the heck of it, and Fury is the only alliance trying to win. ITs absolutely retarted. Anyone with half a brain in their head can see that your just trying to pressure alliances to not work together so you can more easily defeat them.

As far as the solo fury thing goes. We chose to enter this round solo, and did so. We chose to stay solo for a long time. We are still solo, but when you have multiple alliances attacking us trying to hurt us, and at the same time have a block forming, and then that block accuses you of powerblocking, you wonder if its worth it.

You might as well just cut the crap and start a new thread called "Fury pls let us farm you cause we want to win"

K-W · 29 Oct 2002, 19:48

Quote:

Originally posted by Rumad
I am fed up of this already. Anyone heard any new records except the same old stuck ones?

Yah there was a nice one playing a few weeks ago. A nice piece where the parts all kinda did thier own thing.

Then someone stuck this circa round 6 scratched up one in the player.

G.K Zhukov · 29 Oct 2002, 19:52

TO ALL PEOPLE HERE:
DJCOMPLEX - PRESENT THE FACTS
Hicks & Fury PR Squad: PRESENT THE FACTS, IM TIRED OF YOUR LOUSY RETORIC.
THE REST: STAY OUT
TO THE MODS: PLZ CLOSE

Psi_K · 29 Oct 2002, 19:53

Quote:

Originally posted by K-W

Didn't titans bend over backwards to tell us all that DTA was not a titans attack group?

And Fury bends over backwards to tell everyone that DTA is titans.

K-W · 29 Oct 2002, 19:54

Quote:

Originally posted by G.K Zhukov
TO ALL PEOPLE HERE:
DJCOMPLEX - PRESENT THE FACTS
Hicks & Fury PR Squad: PRESENT THE FACTS, IM TIRED OF YOUR LOUSY RETORIC.
THE REST: STAY OUT
TO THE MODS: PLZ CLOSE

Umm, who started this thread?

Why do we have to produce the facts when it is others making the accusations. Thats a fun game, let me play.

G.K.Zhukov kills small children for fun!!!!!
.
.
.
Now you have to produce the facts that you aren't a child killer or we can assume you are, right?

K-W · 29 Oct 2002, 19:56

Quote:

Originally posted by Psi_K

And Fury bends over backwards to tell everyone that DTA is titans.

Not really, the attack group DTA left its mother alliance adalente and moved over to the Titans/LDK block. We stated that they joined titans as an attack group, but Titans ademately denied it.

Now you just told me that DTA was a titans attack group. Im just wondering whos lying.

hinch · 29 Oct 2002, 20:11

dont worry FAnG CHEAT and we ALLIED with everyone in the universe just so we can defend our selfs from the mighty titans.

I mean come on nobody is capable of beating a titans attack and with ldk pwor theyre unstoppable.

since fang are incapable of dending our selfs i believe its only right we should ally with everyone so we can be defended.

besides you forget one thing.

we`ve had more deleted no1 players than titans have had no1 players.

G.K Zhukov · 29 Oct 2002, 20:12

Quote:

Originally posted by K-W
Why do we have to produce the facts when it is others making the accusations.

Hicks accused Titans of beeing in a block, compromising 4 (inc. titans themselfs) alliances. Titans/LDK/DTA is 3 (or 2 and a half). Name the 4th, or stop making em.
Exactly the same goes to the other side. Name it, or stop it.

Disclaimer: I know DTA isnt a alliance etc etc.

K-W · 29 Oct 2002, 20:15

Quote:

Originally posted by G.K Zhukov

Hicks accused Titans of beeing in a block, compromising 4 (inc. titans themselfs) alliances. Titans/LDK/DTA is 3 (or 2 and a half). Name the 4th, or stop making em.
Exactly the same goes to the other side. Name it, or stop it.

Disclaimer: I know DTA isnt a alliance etc etc.

NEws scan the top player, check the def coords with the best intel scource you have. Tell me what alliances pop up.

G.K Zhukov · 29 Oct 2002, 20:26

Quote:

Originally posted by K-W

NEws scan the top player, check the def coords with the best intel scource you have. Tell me what alliances pop up.

I cant be bothered. Im trying out a amiga emulator and some old games (moonstone, oil imperium and wings etc).
If you want to say something, spell it out. I (and I assume others) aint interested in playing the guessing game.

G.K Zhukov · 29 Oct 2002, 20:43

Quote:

Originally posted by Rumad
WINGS....
CINEMAWARE OWNS!!!

For once I agree with you Rumad, it sure does. First time I set it to play using a "68020 cpu", and it was to damn fast. No Im using "A500 speed", but its a bit slow and clumsy to fly, as I dont have a joystick. But it sure bring back good memories

CrazyConrad · 29 Oct 2002, 20:51

dum di dum

29 Oct 2002, 21:01

Quote:

Originally posted by G.K Zhukov

For once I agree with you Rumad, it sure does. First time I set it to play using a "68020 cpu", and it was to damn fast. No Im using "A500 speed", but its a bit slow and clumsy to fly, as I dont have a joystick. But it sure bring back good memories

care to pm me where you got the emulator + roms from? heh, ty

Erkenbrand · 29 Oct 2002, 21:09

FS please don't put any means for players to work together in the footy sim. No one can take anymore of this ****.

Scorpio · 29 Oct 2002, 21:11

Quote:

Originally posted by jornx

[18:37:12] -[BC]FeNiX:#fang- > 300k DEF in 15 minutes MUCH THANX TO FURY/TOT/OUZO/TEMPLAR AND OFC TO ALL OF YOU!

I guess when I get on IRC I can expect a retal request from FAnG then

Zh|l · 29 Oct 2002, 21:15

Quote:

Originally posted by Erkenbrand
FS please don't put any means for players to work together in the footy sim. No one can take anymore of this ****.

Im going to create "Team Fury" with the players named after Fury members like "Sid" (Captain), "Cryptic" (Goalkeeper) etc. I'll get a friend to create "Team Titans".

Then whenever "Team Fury" scores a goal vs "Team Titans" we can have the "OMG FURY CHEATED" and the "GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!" threads on "Team Discussions"

Duke Leto · 29 Oct 2002, 21:19

If hirr, ND, Flash and genesis II worked together, that would be 4 alliances: thus it would be a powerblock?

No.

People fail to see that you cannot predicate strength through numbers alone. All in all we are past tick 800, and strength now lies concentrated with top players... If an alliance of the top 50 planets formed in pa at this moment, nothing could stop them from severe 0wnage (lo Legion round 2).

SO why are we trying to attribute strength when you cannot dissect it from the evolution of alliance scores by how well their members are doing to this point in time?

In other words... I think its time to fight... instead of counting the numbers...

Erwin Rommel dealt with adversity and a large British 8th Army(?) and never cried over the fact that his afrika corps was always outgunned.

There's also a little something to be said about allying yourself with Italians.

lol...

Leto

hinch · 29 Oct 2002, 21:22

suppose the fury in my cluster will be requesting a bum ****ing for me too

AliasX · 29 Oct 2002, 21:25

Quote:

Originally posted by Stratovarius

Oh, and LDK, you are not cheating anymore, right?

so, let me quote from your irc server:

*** Lrytas changes topic to 'Kam reik acc 11mil scoro 2k roidu pm donceka !!!!!! || 30:5:9 || 150k hostile minimum || Dalyvauja: Lrytas +'

'Kam reik acc 11mil scoro 2k roidu pm donceka !!!!!!' means something like "I'm offering acc 11mil score 2k roids pm donceka"

Want me to post my log with donceka, to?

eww caught red handed

Post the log

dezaster · 29 Oct 2002, 21:30

Quote:

Originally posted by AliasX
i suck

ldk > * >fang > you