|
26 Feb 2003, 18:39
|
#1
|
NOT a yuppie....yet
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: a flat......
Posts: 308
|
the faked moon landings
http://batesmotel.8m.com
interesting no?
read it before you comment.
__________________
Ok dead end jobs goodbye, time to study! time to learn, time to expand the mind......time to get really drunk with 18 year olds from quiet middle class backrounds!
Quote:
Originally posted by an anon neg-repper
all your posts are shit. it's like a more accurate turbonegro song
|
i post on a internet forum!
|
|
|
26 Feb 2003, 18:50
|
#2
|
p a r r a c i d a
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: #titans
Posts: 511
|
Last Updated 1-26-99
old news..
+ wrong forum
__________________
Cicada || No Warning, No Mercy, No Ambiguity || [Titans] [F.E.A.R]
|
|
|
26 Feb 2003, 19:37
|
#3
|
Mr. Blobby
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Belgium
Posts: 8,271
|
Thread Tennis!
(Well, not really.)
|
|
|
26 Feb 2003, 19:46
|
#4
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
That's just stupid.
Really stupid.
|
|
|
26 Feb 2003, 19:48
|
#5
|
Angry Young Man
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Mister Cacciatore's down on Sullivan Street
Posts: 7,518
|
hi gen!
__________________
Believe in me, cause i don't believe in anything
And i wanna be someone, to believe, to believe in
|
|
|
26 Feb 2003, 19:49
|
#6
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
I was going to go through this step by step, but A is just so rediculous as 'evidence' (so many things could have caused that; a slight slope would do it) I really can't be bothered.
ps.
Communications satellites.
pps.
How do we have mirrors on the moon?
ppps.
'Whistling dixie! I want this sent to Area 51 for study!'
'But sir, that's where we're building the fake moon landing site.'
'Then we'll have to really land on the moon! Invent NASA and tell the to get off their fannies!'
|
|
|
26 Feb 2003, 19:58
|
#7
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
And the so-called 'expert' doesn't have a doctorate.
And the vietnam war ended two years after the last moon landing.
And so on, so forth.
I wonder if there's an accurate piece of information on the site.
|
|
|
26 Feb 2003, 20:03
|
#8
|
Cute and cuddly
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,891
|
"There are millions of micro-metors traveling at speeds up to 6000 MPH, which would tear the ship to pieces. "
IS that why Sky has bad reception?!?!
__________________
"You're a ****ing ugly bitch. I want to stab you to death, and then play around with your blood."
|
|
|
26 Feb 2003, 20:25
|
#9
|
IRC Lackey
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Somewhere in the dark and nasty regions...
Posts: 1,471
|
heh
yeah, have you seen the counter site?
I think it's somewhere on the NASA website, but that's pretty convincing anyways
__________________
-Mushroom.
"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it."
George Bernard Shaw
|
|
|
26 Feb 2003, 21:07
|
#10
|
Miles Teg
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dom City
Posts: 5,192
|
Re: heh
Quote:
Originally posted by Mushroom
yeah, have you seen the counter site?
I think it's somewhere on the NASA website, but that's pretty convincing anyways
|
WINNAR!
|
|
|
26 Feb 2003, 21:17
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 8,476
|
|
|
|
26 Feb 2003, 23:25
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: England
Posts: 752
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MrL_JaKiri
pps.
How do we have mirrors on the moon?
|
The same way we have those nifty little dune buggy things on Mars?
Quote:
And the so-called 'expert' doesn't have a doctorate
|
And what would you want him to have a doctorate in? Why the Moon Landings Were Faked-ology
__________________
<Bobzy> It's Jammers rockstargame kid
<Bobzy> Jammers is > the rest of GD/PA at it though.
|
|
|
26 Feb 2003, 23:34
|
#13
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Jammers
The same way we have those nifty little dune buggy things on Mars?
|
Robotics wasn't really very advanced when they were placed, so that's highly implausable at best.
Quote:
Originally posted by Jammers
And what would you want him to have a doctorate in? Why the Moon Landings Were Faked-ology
|
I'd like my 'experts' to have some form of academic qualification.
|
|
|
27 Feb 2003, 00:03
|
#14
|
Commander
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 404
|
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm
Just as meteoroids constantly bombard the Moon so do cosmic rays, and they leave their fingerprints on Moon rocks, too. "There are isotopes in Moon rocks, isotopes we don't normally find on Earth, that were created by nuclear reactions with the highest-energy cosmic rays," says McKay. Earth is spared from such radiation by our protective atmosphere and magnetosphere.
Even if scientists wanted to make something like a Moon rock by, say, bombarding an Earth rock with high energy atomic nuclei, they couldn't. Earth's most powerful particle accelerators can't energize particles to match the most potent cosmic rays, which are themselves accelerated in supernova blastwaves and in the violent cores of galaxies.
Indeed, says McKay, faking a Moon rock well enough to hoodwink an international army of scientists might be more difficult than the Manhattan Project. "It would be easier to just go to the Moon and get one," he quipped.
And therein lies an original idea: Did NASA go to the Moon to collect props for a staged Moon landing? It's an interesting twist on the conspiracy theory that TV producers might consider for their next episode of the Moon Hoax.
"I have here in my office a 10-foot high stack of scientific books full of papers about the Apollo Moon rocks," added McKay. "Researchers in thousands of labs have examined Apollo Moon samples -- not a single paper challenges their origin! And these aren't all NASA employees, either. We've loaned samples to scientists in dozens of countries [who have no reason to cooperate in any hoax]."
Even Dr. Robert Park, Director of the Washington office of the American Physical Society and a noted critic of NASA's human space flight program, agrees with the space agency on this issue. "The body of physical evidence that humans did walk on the Moon is simply overwhelming."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To believe the moon landings were faked, one would have to be dumber than the moon rocks brought back. I stand by my earlier statement, no intelligent person on earth doubts that NASA really landed astronauts on the moon and brought them home.
|
|
|
27 Feb 2003, 04:12
|
#15
|
Condemned to RP
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,654
|
A - One of the two shadows may have well been on an elevation (positive or negative) causing it to shift length but the picture was taken from such an angle that it wasnt quite clear.
B - Maybe the picture was taking with a flashything on the camera as to provide for better light? Very common here on earth when the ambient light isn't enough.
C - Camera is focused for short distance, not longdisnatace it therefore automatically becomes blurry.
D - Yes that would be the moonlandering type thingy.
E - Because this is not on earth and there IS only one lightsource that has no way of being refracted by an atmosphere the shadow WILL be more darker.
F - This one is too stupid to even answer.
K - Material may very well have been something that reflects light quite well, considering it had survive launch and re-entry you couldnt just use standard stuff.
L - maybe the chest was on top of another, or help up to make the picture, or the angle was so that it pointed upwards or it was on an elevation in the terrain or maybe the astronaut is kneeling.
M - its not a straight mirror, it has a curve.
N - Space suit most definatly, since its 'white'.
7 - anomaly, could be anything, probably prove its ON the moon more then not.
S - Have you analyzed moon dust? Didnt think so ty. Recent studies have indicated the moon contains large amounts of (frozen) water anyway.
R - Out of all the forms possible in this world, you 'think' its possible for a C shape to exist somewhere on a rock outside earth? Think of the face on mars for a far more complicated example of randomness.
P - Yes that is odd indeed, not that it prooves anything about this not being on the moon and such. However there couldve been multiple explanations, ie moving the camera, or light being reflected in a funny way etc. I'm not a camera expert - check with one before you make stupid claims.
Hey at least I get an 'A' for effort.
|
|
|
27 Feb 2003, 07:21
|
#16
|
Doh!
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit
Posts: 1,720
|
Re: the faked moon landings
Old story and been done on here at least a half dozen times over the last few years.
You Believe what you wish, the rest of us will stick to the facts.
|
|
|
27 Feb 2003, 08:06
|
#17
|
etc.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Taken.
Posts: 1,602
|
Re: the faked moon landings
Quote:
Originally posted by The General8
interesting no?
|
No.
Quote:
read it before you comment.
|
Done. General8 is a retard.
__________________
10/20/04 <Dinoman> babies are like a online game... u wery soon get lack of sleep... and u try give em diffrent skills... it allso kills ur social life
|
|
|
27 Feb 2003, 13:57
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,967
|
Just to show what a dumb **** this guy is.
http://batesmotel.8m.com/nasa8.gif
He argues in that picture that if the camera was really attached to the takers chest it shouldn't be at head level. Well, if the dumb **** looked in the hemlet refelection you can clearly see that he is kneeling with the sample contianr getting the camera at head level for the poser.
|
|
|
27 Feb 2003, 19:31
|
#19
|
Governor General
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire
Posts: 739
|
It was me, I faked the moon landings.
__________________
Va Va Voom
|
|
|
27 Feb 2003, 19:34
|
#20
|
Shai Halud
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sunny Leeds \o/
Posts: 2,127
|
That website is ace.
I'm convinced.
After all, faking a moon landing is a really helpful thing to do with lots of advantages.
|
|
|
27 Feb 2003, 20:36
|
#21
|
IRC Lackey
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Somewhere in the dark and nasty regions...
Posts: 1,471
|
ahh
One of the aforementioned counter sites.
Not quite the one i was thinking of, but it explains a few points.
__________________
-Mushroom.
"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it."
George Bernard Shaw
|
|
|
27 Feb 2003, 20:40
|
#22
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Re: ahh
It's been posted in this thread already, wiggles.
|
|
|
27 Feb 2003, 23:27
|
#23
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: England
Posts: 752
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MrL_JaKiri
Robotics wasn't really very advanced when they were placed, so that's highly implausable at best.
|
Yet the Russians were able to send robots to the moon only 4years after the first moon landings (Lunakhod 2) cabable of wandering about the Moon quite happily, as well as carrying a laser detection device?
The US sent 8 missions to the Moon (counting Apollo 8, 10 and 13 which didn't actually land, but still went there and so could have dropped a robot down in the same way Lunakhod 2 was deployed).
The Russians were also able to retrieve moon rock from Luna 16, 20 and 24, so the existance of moon rock isn't proof in itself of a manned landing.
These only weighed about 4000-5600kg, compared to Apollo 11 which weighed 28801kg for the Command Module, 15065kg for the Lunar Module and 23,244 kg for the Service Module, giving a total weight of 67,110kg, enough to carry eleven 6000kg probes.
11 x 8 = 88, so thats potentially 88little robots wandering the moon reflecting lasers and picking up soil samples.
Also Apollo 1 had a fire in 1967, requiring a number of alterations, which appear to have been finished in time for Apollo 7 only 22months later.
Of course, since I don't have a degree, only a computer and access to Google, none of this actually counts as meaning anything, so please feel free to disregard this post, and I Apollo-gise(geddit?) for wasting your time.
__________________
<Bobzy> It's Jammers rockstargame kid
<Bobzy> Jammers is > the rest of GD/PA at it though.
|
|
|
28 Feb 2003, 00:12
|
#24
|
IRC Lackey
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Somewhere in the dark and nasty regions...
Posts: 1,471
|
Re: Re: ahh
Quote:
Originally posted by MrL_JaKiri
It's been posted in this thread already, wiggles.
|
Eee... so it has. Well **** me sideways
__________________
-Mushroom.
"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it."
George Bernard Shaw
|
|
|
28 Feb 2003, 12:39
|
#25
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Jammers
|
Collecting moon rock is one thing, deploying something is much much more difficult.
|
|
|
28 Feb 2003, 12:43
|
#26
|
Shai Halud
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sunny Leeds \o/
Posts: 2,127
|
How about deploying something that collects moon rock?
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:30.
| |