|
2 Jan 2005, 23:05
|
#1
|
Weeeeee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: leeds
Posts: 586
|
[uk]mmmmm
top gun
bbc2
now
__________________
:gollum: :gollum: :gollum: :gollum:
One load of gollums is enough for anyone.Ta
DM.
|
|
|
3 Jan 2005, 00:15
|
#2
|
:alpha:
Join Date: May 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 7,871
|
Re: [uk]mmmmm
I got it on DVD for Christmas <3
__________________
"There is no I in team, but there are two in anal fisting"
|
|
|
3 Jan 2005, 00:23
|
#3
|
Look! He's Dancing!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Gawd Bless Glasgow
Posts: 2,144
|
Re: [uk]mmmmm
whatever
__________________
[22:18] <nodrog> Cock: 8" (20cm) uncut
[22:18] <nodrog> Balls: Large hefty balls, stretched max 6" (15.5cm)
[22:18] <nodrog> Arse: Can take two fists, or one fist almost to the elbow, but slow warming up.
|
|
|
3 Jan 2005, 00:24
|
#4
|
wild one
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: River Edge, NJ
Posts: 3,313
|
Re: [uk]mmmmm
I've had it on VHS for years, DVD for about a year and I've got the audio CD too.
I've also just been watching it, but it's not the same as I just watched it yesterday. Besides, F-14's vs StarFighters isn't as attractive as an FA/18 vs an SU-27, which I'm watching footage of at the moment.
|
|
|
3 Jan 2005, 01:10
|
#5
|
I dunno...
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: manchester
Posts: 1,502
|
Re: [uk]mmmmm
But isn't Tom sleek!
__________________
He shall drink naught but brine, for I'll not show him / Where the quick freshes are.
|
|
|
3 Jan 2005, 01:40
|
#6
|
Heh, Leeds !
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: In The Redfern
Posts: 3,790
|
Re: [uk]mmmmm
Quote:
Originally Posted by skiddy
Besides, F-14's vs StarFighters isn't as attractive as an FA/18 vs an SU-27, which I'm watching footage of at the moment.
|
They are actually F5s' not starfighters.
~Vaio~
__________________
The George Harrison of BlueTuba
Yes, I know he is dead !
|
|
|
3 Jan 2005, 01:40
|
#7
|
TashTastic
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,354
|
Re: [uk]mmmmm
Its such a crap film
__________________
Its only gay if you enjoy it!
|
|
|
3 Jan 2005, 01:42
|
#8
|
wild one
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: River Edge, NJ
Posts: 3,313
|
Re: [uk]mmmmm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaio
They are actually F5s' not starfighters.
~Vaio~
|
Sorry, I was actually trying to remember but I've had a bit to drink. I should have realised, I know, as Starfighters have very short wings
|
|
|
3 Jan 2005, 02:09
|
#9
|
Unreregistered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 824
|
Re: [uk]mmmmm
People still watch this film?
__________________
I have been unbanned.
|
|
|
3 Jan 2005, 02:27
|
#10
|
:alpha:
Join Date: May 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 7,871
|
Re: [uk]mmmmm
Quote:
Originally Posted by skiddy
I've had it on VHS for years, DVD for about a year and I've got the audio CD too.
I've also just been watching it, but it's not the same as I just watched it yesterday. Besides, F-14's vs StarFighters isn't as attractive as an FA/18 vs an SU-27, which I'm watching footage of at the moment.
|
There's more to the film than DOGFIGHTING!
... like topless volleyball
__________________
"There is no I in team, but there are two in anal fisting"
|
|
|
3 Jan 2005, 02:28
|
#11
|
wild one
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: River Edge, NJ
Posts: 3,313
|
Re: [uk]mmmmm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomkat
There's more to the film than DOGFIGHTING!
... like topless volleyball
|
I went to make tea at that part
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:07.
| |