|
|
10 Mar 2003, 19:37
|
#1
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Wearing Speedos
Posts: 1,021
|
The Imperial vs Metric system
Arghhhhh!
At work we need to predict the strength of corrugated packaging material, which is a doddle in Metric units.
Today I had to use imperial units of measurements, and what a nightmare.
Trying to use inches, feet and pounds per square feet for an american customer, was just incomprehensible to metric boy here.
Next time you flame an american, just stop and remember that they use still use imperial units and pity them, and think how lucky you are to use the Metric system.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 19:39
|
#2
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The 1970's
Posts: 549
|
I don't really understand why anything other than Metric exists now.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 19:48
|
#3
|
Cute and cuddly
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,891
|
imperial has silly numbers and stupid things. americans
__________________
"You're a ****ing ugly bitch. I want to stab you to death, and then play around with your blood."
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 19:48
|
#4
|
Gone
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,656
|
I like Ike and his itty-bitty A-Bomb.
Last edited by Marilyn Manson; 10 Mar 2003 at 19:59.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 19:52
|
#5
|
Snake of the Sand
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 1,500
|
convincing 280million people to change over is rather difficult. They're trying but there just aren't enough practical applications in effect. We learn it in school, but only the ones who go into the military or something similar actually use it.
The first trick was to force them to sell alcoholic beverages in metric units...oh yeah, like we pay attention to how much we're actually drinking.
__________________
I poke badgers with spoons.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 19:57
|
#6
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Wearing Speedos
Posts: 1,021
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sandsnake
The first trick was to force them to sell alcoholic beverages in metric units...oh yeah, like we pay attention to how much we're actually drinking.
|
The irony, when we still buy ours in pints!
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 19:57
|
#7
|
Lord Denning
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: City of London
Posts: 2,548
|
The problem is that in many everyday situations, the Imperial system is better. For instance, it is a lot easier to say that you are 6ft tall than to say 183cm (or whatever 6ft is in cm), and its similar with weights. 100 or 1000 little units to a big unit may be useful in science or commerce, but for normal usage having 12 or 14 little units to a big unit is much easier.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 20:14
|
#8
|
I'm not a poet
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Uppsala
Posts: 603
|
I disagree. Saying that I am "one-eighty-three" is just as easy as saying "six feet". And saying that I am "one ninety" is just as easy as saying "six foot three" or whatever. I would hate to have to explain any measurement (like U-values for walls in houses) in non-SI units.
__________________
'There's no place like 127.0.0.1...there's no place like 127.0.0.1'
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 20:17
|
#9
|
J to the C to the A G E
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Scúnthorpe
Posts: 5,583
|
Well it'll be good when we buy our beers in litres.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 20:17
|
#10
|
Lord Denning
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: City of London
Posts: 2,548
|
It must be easier, otherwise people would never have started to use it.
Or was the Imperial system invented by someone with a very twisted sense of humour?
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 20:21
|
#11
|
Vermin Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,280
|
i'd rather change over from our silly base-10 number system.
you know there's a problem when you cannot divide 1 by 3 without an infinite number of digits in your answer.
PS: and for temperatures! in minnesota by centigrade the temperature would be negative for four month periods at a time. how useless is that?
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 20:24
|
#12
|
Lord Denning
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: City of London
Posts: 2,548
|
Quote:
Originally posted by acropolis
i'd rather change over from our silly base-10 number system.
you know there's a problem when you cannot divide 1 by 3 without an infinite number of digits in your answer.
|
Tada!
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 20:27
|
#13
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Proteus
Tada!
|
In which case, what about 5?
Quote:
Originally posted by acropolis
and for temperatures! in minnesota by centigrade the temperature would be negative for four month periods at a time. how useless is that?
|
Use Kelvin then!
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 20:29
|
#14
|
I'm not a poet
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Uppsala
Posts: 603
|
Quote:
Originally posted by acropolis
and for temperatures! in minnesota by centigrade the temperature would be negative for four month periods at a time. how useless is that?
|
No country actually uses the "metric" (I assume you mean the SI) temperature system. That would be the Kelvin system, and I for one would love to see that adopted around the globe too.
__________________
'There's no place like 127.0.0.1...there's no place like 127.0.0.1'
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 20:33
|
#15
|
Lord Denning
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: City of London
Posts: 2,548
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MrL_JaKiri
In which case, what about 5?
|
12 divided by 5 is 2.4
Which answers his complaint about infinite numbers of decimal places.
(No comedy "what about 7?" replies please )
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 20:34
|
#16
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Proteus
12 divided by 5 is 2.4
Which answers his complaint about infinite numbers of decimal places.
(No comedy "what about 7?" replies please )
|
What about 11?
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 20:42
|
#17
|
∞+♪²
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: :uo!te]o¯|
Posts: 428
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MrL_JaKiri
In which case, what about 5?
|
Simple. Just use base 6469693230.
Quote:
Originally posted by Proteus
12 divided by 5 is 2.4
Which answers his complaint about infinite numbers of decimal places.
(No comedy "what about 7?" replies please )
|
In base 12:
10 (12) divided by 5 (5) is 2.497249724972497... (2.4).
__________________
Structural Integrity for Creator - since he'll probably make PA turn 3D.
Wikipedia forum
Note to self - Don't write Chinese letters with bold and italics... 猫
<!--Last incarnation: Nov 2000-->
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 20:45
|
#18
|
I'm not a poet
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Uppsala
Posts: 603
|
Ahh.. but do we really want a base where 13 divided by 5 is three?
Well?
__________________
'There's no place like 127.0.0.1...there's no place like 127.0.0.1'
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 20:45
|
#19
|
Lord Denning
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: City of London
Posts: 2,548
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Cyp
In base 12:
10 (12) divided by 5 (5) is 2.497249724972497... (2.4).
|
I'm a Classicist! I can't be expected to know numbery stuff!
(Its not like I'm President of the Dozenal Society or anything)
What about base 60?
(You can think up all the new symbols, because I'm not going to)
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 20:50
|
#20
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Proteus
I'm a Classicist! I can't be expected to know numbery stuff!
(Its not like I'm President of the Dozenal Society or anything)
What about base 60?
(You can think up all the new symbols, because I'm not going to)
|
50?
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 20:55
|
#21
|
I'm not a poet
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Uppsala
Posts: 603
|
no... 30 if anything.
divisible by 2, 3, 5, 6, 10 evenly
and 4, 8, 12 without too many decimals
and 11 and 9 with simple recurring.
11 and 7 are a bit annoying though.
__________________
'There's no place like 127.0.0.1...there's no place like 127.0.0.1'
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 20:57
|
#22
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The 1970's
Posts: 549
|
Here's a crazy idea. How about base 10?
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 20:59
|
#23
|
∞+♪²
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: :uo!te]o¯|
Posts: 428
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MrL_JaKiri
50?
|
60= 2²* 3* 5
50= 2* 5²
As 50 has no unique prime factors to 60, 1/50 is not an infinite decimal in base 60.
__________________
Structural Integrity for Creator - since he'll probably make PA turn 3D.
Wikipedia forum
Note to self - Don't write Chinese letters with bold and italics... 猫
<!--Last incarnation: Nov 2000-->
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 21:03
|
#24
|
The Twilight of the Gods
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 23,481
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sub
Here's a crazy idea. How about base 10?
|
It'll never work, we only have 60 fingers
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 21:12
|
#25
|
Käptn Karacho
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,360
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MrL_JaKiri
It'll never work, we only have 60 fingers
|
when using fingers counting with base 2 is far easier and lets u count further then base 10
__________________
at0mic.c0w - #strategy
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 21:16
|
#26
|
Klaatu barada nikto
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 3,237
|
Quote:
Originally posted by acropolis
PS: and for temperatures! in minnesota by centigrade the temperature would be negative for four month periods at a time. how useless is that?
|
Yeah, but -40 degrees is the same temperature in both Fahrenheit and Celsius! *
* Minnesota Fun Fact #2349.
__________________
The Ottawa Citizen and Southam News wish to apologize for our apology to Mark Steyn, published Oct. 22. In correcting the incorrect statements about Mr. Steyn published Oct. 15, we incorrectly published the incorrect correction. We accept and regret that our original regrets were unacceptable and we apologize to Mr. Steyn for any distress caused by our previous apology.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 21:40
|
#27
|
Reject False Icons
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Your Hotel.... Fee:$999
Posts: 896
|
I live in The uk and friad i still think in Miles rather than Km
__________________
The Illuminati- NoS
[]LCH[]- dc
-=Destiny=-
Wolfpack - Dc
xVx - DC
Apprime -_-
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 21:43
|
#28
|
Lord Denning
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: City of London
Posts: 2,548
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rinoa
I live in The uk and friad i still think in Miles rather than Km
|
Thats hardly surprising, seeing as we still use Miles.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 22:07
|
#29
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,290
|
we measure some things in inch here
__________________
im not tolerant, i just dont care.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 22:15
|
#30
|
Clerk
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,940
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Proteus
The problem is that in many everyday situations, the Imperial system is better.
|
I sort of agree. For a lot of things a centimeter is too small, a meter too big - feet and inches just work better.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 22:37
|
#31
|
∞+♪²
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: :uo!te]o¯|
Posts: 428
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Dante Hicks
I sort of agree. For a lot of things a centimeter is too small, a meter too big - feet and inches just work better.
|
That's what decimetres are for.
__________________
Structural Integrity for Creator - since he'll probably make PA turn 3D.
Wikipedia forum
Note to self - Don't write Chinese letters with bold and italics... 猫
<!--Last incarnation: Nov 2000-->
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 22:40
|
#32
|
I'm not a poet
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Uppsala
Posts: 603
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Dante Hicks
I sort of agree. For a lot of things a centimeter is too small, a meter too big - feet and inches just work better.
|
Just use "two centimetres" or "half a metre" if you want something bigger os smaller.
__________________
'There's no place like 127.0.0.1...there's no place like 127.0.0.1'
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 22:43
|
#33
|
Prince of Amber
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 1,313
|
I use both systems. Not that I have much choice since my world is half American (or Texan to be completely honest) and half European.
In Texas back in 1979, every 13-year old had to learn metric. We were already expected to know standard (imperial) measurements.
__________________
"We sleep safe at night in our beds because rough men stand ready to visit violence upon those who wish to do us harm." -- George Orwell.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 22:47
|
#34
|
Governor General
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire
Posts: 739
|
Despite being taught in metric, I think of pretty much everything in Imperial. I don't saay I'm 183cm tall, I say I'm 6ft. I estimate distances in inches. It's just the way I've been brought up, and I see no practical disadvantage to the way I do it.
__________________
Va Va Voom
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 22:49
|
#35
|
Lord Denning
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: City of London
Posts: 2,548
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bunga
Just use "two centimetres" or "half a metre" if you want something bigger os smaller.
|
The best units for measurement in everyday situations are the ones that have the most useful base units.
A foot is useful because you can measure the height of people with a few (but not too few) feet. If a foot was half the size it is, people would be 12 feet tall, which is too high a number. If it was twice the size, they would be 3 feet tall, which is too small a number.
As it is, you can differentiate easily between different heights. 6 feet is sufficiently different to 5 feet 11 inches and 6 feet 1 inch. 183cm is not sufficiently different to 182cm, or 184cm. Thus, you can pretty accurately judge heights to the nearest unit.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 22:52
|
#36
|
Ball
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,410
|
If you want neat and exact representations of the results of integer divisions, use the rationals. So one divided by three is... a third. No infinite recursion there.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 22:54
|
#37
|
∞+♪²
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: :uo!te]o¯|
Posts: 428
|
Quote:
Originally posted by queball
If you want neat and exact representations of the results of integer divisions, use the rationals. So one divided by three is... a third. No infinite recursion there.
|
That's too easy...
__________________
Structural Integrity for Creator - since he'll probably make PA turn 3D.
Wikipedia forum
Note to self - Don't write Chinese letters with bold and italics... 猫
<!--Last incarnation: Nov 2000-->
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 22:55
|
#38
|
Clerk
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,940
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bunga
Just use "two centimetres" or "half a metre" if you want something bigger os smaller.
|
Saying 15 centimetres or 33 centimetres is just rubbish compared to half a foot or a foot.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 23:02
|
#39
|
share the <3
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 2,709
|
speaking from the perspective of a design engineer, the uk has an advantage, the 'real' world uses a both systems, learning one is a disadvantage, because british people tend to use both systems for different things, it makes it easier for engineering students to learn to easily swap between them. The metric system has one major draw back tho, its so so easy to misplace a decimal point and totally fck everything up, this is much more difficult in imperial, as any such mistake is easily noticed as silly numbers pop up in calculations. But in metric you have to be watchful since you can more easily have a mistake in the order of magnitude whilst the 'figures' themselves remain the same. Also there are differences between some british imperial and american imperial, for example gallons. And i wouldnt worry if you make the occasional mistake in swapping between them, after all nasa made the mother of all fck ups because of it...
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 23:21
|
#40
|
Prince of Amber
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 1,313
|
At least the Mars landers landed as opposed to the moon landings.
__________________
"We sleep safe at night in our beds because rough men stand ready to visit violence upon those who wish to do us harm." -- George Orwell.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2003, 23:29
|
#41
|
Klaatu barada nikto
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 3,237
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Texan
At least the Mars landers landed as opposed to the moon landings.
|
Yeah, but the Mars Climate Orbiter wasn't so fortunate.
__________________
The Ottawa Citizen and Southam News wish to apologize for our apology to Mark Steyn, published Oct. 22. In correcting the incorrect statements about Mr. Steyn published Oct. 15, we incorrectly published the incorrect correction. We accept and regret that our original regrets were unacceptable and we apologize to Mr. Steyn for any distress caused by our previous apology.
|
|
|
11 Mar 2003, 01:40
|
#42
|
Vermin Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 3,280
|
Quote:
Originally posted by queball
If you want neat and exact representations of the results of integer divisions, use the rationals. So one divided by three is... a third. No infinite recursion there.
|
i tend to just switch bases even if i don't have a problem like that anyway. even if i'm just adding numbers together, sometimes it's neat to see what happens in base 36.
so for 1/3 i'd probably just hit base 3 for the question anyway and I wouldn't care. people checking my work tend to have aneurysms, but i figure that its good experience for em.
|
|
|
11 Mar 2003, 06:42
|
#43
|
Doh!
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit
Posts: 1,720
|
Re: The Imperial vs Metric system
Quote:
Originally posted by Woof
Arghhhhh!
At work we need to predict the strength of corrugated packaging material, which is a doddle in Metric units.
Today I had to use imperial units of measurements, and what a nightmare.
Trying to use inches, feet and pounds per square feet for an american customer, was just incomprehensible to metric boy here.
Next time you flame an american, just stop and remember that they use still use imperial units and pity them, and think how lucky you are to use the Metric system.
|
Work the problem in the units you are most comfortable with, when you have the final solution convert it into the desired units using the appropriate conversion factors.
It is not like the customer is going to ask for the "working out"?
Onliine converter
Last edited by Judge; 11 Mar 2003 at 06:58.
|
|
|
11 Mar 2003, 09:01
|
#44
|
∞+♪²
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: :uo!te]o¯|
Posts: 428
|
Re: Re: The Imperial vs Metric system
3 terrahertz = 3,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,352 fresnel
No wonder I've never heard of a fresnel before...
__________________
Structural Integrity for Creator - since he'll probably make PA turn 3D.
Wikipedia forum
Note to self - Don't write Chinese letters with bold and italics... 猫
<!--Last incarnation: Nov 2000-->
|
|
|
11 Mar 2003, 10:05
|
#45
|
mmm.. pills
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,152
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bunga
No country actually uses the "metric" (I assume you mean the SI) temperature system. That would be the Kelvin system, and I for one would love to see that adopted around the globe too.
|
Umm.. hate to burst your bubble but we've always used the metric system for temperature in Australia.
Regarding the use of metric for measurements, I actually find the opposite case to what many of the people have said here. To me, say using height again as an example, I've always found it difficult to picture how high say 1 foot is yet alone several feet.
I find measuring height in centremetres very convenient, because 100cm = 1M. Since the height of most people on average ranges from .5 metres to 1.5 metres +/- a few centremetres it allows me to picture very quickly approximately how heigh someone is.
Where accuracy is needed then we use millimetres, which allows pinpoint accuracy for any for of lenght, width or height.
I also prefer it because it is an easily divisible system, eg:
1Km = 1000M = 100,000cm = 1,000,000mm
=[DJ Bass]=
__________________
CSS : the result of letting artists design something only an engineer should touch.
|
|
|
11 Mar 2003, 10:42
|
#46
|
Reject False Icons
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Your Hotel.... Fee:$999
Posts: 896
|
All themodern kids love metric..
Now buy one get one free too.
__________________
The Illuminati- NoS
[]LCH[]- dc
-=Destiny=-
Wolfpack - Dc
xVx - DC
Apprime -_-
|
|
|
11 Mar 2003, 12:25
|
#47
|
Forever Delayed
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: www.netgamers.org
Posts: 1,475
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Dante Hicks
Saying 15 centimetres or 33 centimetres is just rubbish compared to half a foot or a foot.
|
Saying 0.621 miles is just rubbish compared to 1km.
M.
__________________
Firefly Oper and General l4m3r - "I Do Stuff"
O2 Rip-off campaign
<vampy> plus i hate people ... i despise humanity as a whole
pablissimo "I'm still geting over the fact you just posted a pic of your own vomit"
|
|
|
11 Mar 2003, 12:31
|
#48
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 91
|
Quote:
Originally posted by djbass
Umm.. hate to burst your bubble but we've always used the metric system for temperature in Australia.
Regarding the use of metric for measurements, I actually find the opposite case to what many of the people have said here. To me, say using height again as an example, I've always found it difficult to picture how high say 1 foot is yet alone several feet.
I find measuring height in centremetres very convenient, because 100cm = 1M. Since the height of most people on average ranges from .5 metres to 1.5 metres +/- a few centremetres it allows me to picture very quickly approximately how heigh someone is.
|
The SI unit for temperature is Kelvin although this is the same size as a Celsius they have the 0 at different points.
1 foot is approximately the length of your foot (assuming you are a normal height adult male). Most imperial units are based on some reasonably common size and are thus quiet easy to visualise.
The height of most adults ranges from about 1.4M to 1.9M with 1.8M being roughly 6 foot and 1.5M being roughly 5 foot
|
|
|
11 Mar 2003, 12:34
|
#49
|
Clerk
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,940
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mong
Saying 0.621 miles is just rubbish compared to 1km.
|
Say 2/3rds of a mile then.
The point is that needing a measurement between 1cm and 1 metre is really common. Penises, monitor sizes, box sizes, cupboards, door widths, window panes, etc are all things which regularly need approximation. Feet and inches are things more convenient for these daily usage type terms. Obviously I use the metric system generally, but imperial still have their uses.
The difference between KM and miles is relatively minor, and I can't think why 2/3rds of a mile would be inherently more common than 1 and a 1/3rd kilometre (or whatever).
|
|
|
11 Mar 2003, 12:42
|
#50
|
Clerk
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,940
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Flavius
as Cyp said, decimetres
|
Decimetres aren't in common use. Although a reasonably intelligent person would know what I was on about, that's useless for most conversations I have.
For instance, I have to take details of repairs for a housing association in my job. If I asked someone how big they thought their broken window was in decimetres, they would think I was taking the piss.
And I don't use anything between feet and inches. There's only 12 sub-units, why would I need something smaller? If I meet a girl in a nightclub who says that her ex-boyfriend had an 11 inch c*ck I don't need it any more exact - I know to cry now.
I'm not advocating using the imperial system for any detailed work - but for conversational uses it's just better (atm).
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:29.
| |